Virus TI latency issues in Sonar

Page: < 123 Showing page 3 of 3
Author
erichodge
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 71
  • Joined: 2007/08/31 21:24:32
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/01 12:09:16 (permalink)
ok, so i've installed the latest, after uninstalling the previous version. definitely works without clicks and pops... but still no bones on the latency or mix-down issues.

PLEASE resolve this, whomever out there in the world resolves such things!

and, i still cannot get the SPDIF setup working correctly with the 0404, so if anyone can help with that, it would be much appreciated.
#61
erichodge
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 71
  • Joined: 2007/08/31 21:24:32
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/01 13:49:07 (permalink)
ok, getting closer!!

so, no i've got the Virus playing through the audio track... my mistake was that i needed to set my 0404 to externally sync (open the 0404 control panel and select "external" for the sync source option).

NOW, the latency issue...

has anyone worked around this? awiki01, it seems that you have this working fine... did you figure out a way around the latency?
#62
BlueSwan
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 343
  • Joined: 2003/12/24 06:25:31
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/01 14:34:27 (permalink)
Could someone answer me this question on the TI? If I sell my Virus C and buy a Virus TI, will the TI be able to "read" the MIDI dumps from Sonar that I made with the Virus C. Is it backwards compatible like that? I would hate to lose the sounds on previous projects if I sell my Virus C.

Listen to my music (electronic pop) here: http://www.bandbase.com/blueswan
#63
erichodge
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 71
  • Joined: 2007/08/31 21:24:32
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/01 14:50:29 (permalink)
painful....

but i think i'm just gonna move forward with the setup as is... i started working on this last night, stayed up most of the night... and started again in the morning, and i cannot find an acceptable "real time" solution for the latency. the best option, it appears, is, as awiki01 has suggested, recording and then using the nudge feature. it works ok... only adds a bit of additional time. thing 1 is that you have to re-record your virus tracks every time you make a change (from beginning to end, or else the nudge will be a pain to keep in sync) and then, once you are done, nudge the entire recording so it fits. i've been doing this by ear... but i'm sure i'll start making a note of how much i am nudging each time... hoping it'll be the same, and then just adjust my nudge settings so this can be a one-click operation.

if anyone has any questions, please ask... i think i've got this working acceptably at this point.

AND, keeping my eyes peeled for the "true" support of Sonar in the Virus OS/VST Control.

fingers crossed on that one.

cheers,
eric
#64
erichodge
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 71
  • Joined: 2007/08/31 21:24:32
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/03 12:39:47 (permalink)


how much i am nudging each time...


18ms
#65
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/03 13:08:44 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: BlueSwan

Could someone answer me this question on the TI? If I sell my Virus C and buy a Virus TI, will the TI be able to "read" the MIDI dumps from Sonar that I made with the Virus C. Is it backwards compatible like that? I would hate to lose the sounds on previous projects if I sell my Virus C.


Yes - the TI will play back the patches for all previous Virus models.

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

#66
BlueSwan
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 343
  • Joined: 2003/12/24 06:25:31
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/03 14:33:37 (permalink)
Thanks for the answer, Cryophonic. I'll probably get one when/if this issue gets resolved.

Listen to my music (electronic pop) here: http://www.bandbase.com/blueswan
#67
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2007/09/08 17:39:23 (permalink)
I emailed Access support regarding the bounce-to-audio issue in Sonar and here is the response I just received:

ORIGINAL: Joerg Huettner - Access Music Tech Support

Hello Dave,
Thank you for your mail. This is something which will be addressed in Sonar 7.

With best regards,



So, I guess the next question would be, when will Sonar 7 be released?

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

#68
rjay
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 123
  • Joined: 2004/08/21 14:15:54
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 07:46:22 (permalink)
I'm re-opening this thread from about a year ago, because - despite being on Sonar 7 and the latest Virus plugin (2.7.1.0 & beta 5) - I have the problem of not being able to use any other VST synths at the same time as the Virus plugin because the latter adds huge latency to any other soft synth loaded at the same time.

I've written to both Access & Cakewalk about this, but as I haven't found any reports of this since about a year ago, has everyone here who experienced the problem, fixed it ?? I only have this problem in Sonar (which is becoming a familiar tale ...).
post edited by rjay - 2008/08/27 08:36:44

Intel DP35DPM // Intel Core 2 Quad Q-6600
MSI 8600 // 4gb Corsair XMS2 PC6400
RME MADI // Sony DMX-R100
K+H O300D // Access Virus Polar

http://myspace.com/richardanthonyjay
http://myspace.com/marblehilluk
#69
paulhcp
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 250
  • Joined: 2007/10/06 14:48:59
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 15:16:20 (permalink)
There is a update to the OS as of 8-21-08 9 (beta) on the Access website for those who may not know. I have not downloaded it yet, but any update is good news for TI owners.
#70
rjay
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 123
  • Joined: 2004/08/21 14:15:54
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 15:24:06 (permalink)
That is the version I am using .... but the problem, I believe, is with Sonar rather than the Virus as I don't have this latency issue with Ableton Live.

Intel DP35DPM // Intel Core 2 Quad Q-6600
MSI 8600 // 4gb Corsair XMS2 PC6400
RME MADI // Sony DMX-R100
K+H O300D // Access Virus Polar

http://myspace.com/richardanthonyjay
http://myspace.com/marblehilluk
#71
paulhcp
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 250
  • Joined: 2007/10/06 14:48:59
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 15:35:06 (permalink)
Yep, the problem is certianly there with Sonar and the TI software. I have it working ok, but it will crash or freeze sometimes when used with other plugins and softsynths. Although there may be other reasons for that in my case, but then you have over 3000 folks viewing this post so apparently it is a issue with Sonar.
post edited by paulhcp - 2008/08/27 15:39:14
#72
rjay
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 123
  • Joined: 2004/08/21 14:15:54
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 15:58:04 (permalink)
Apart from the crashing & freezing do you have the latency issue as well ?

Intel DP35DPM // Intel Core 2 Quad Q-6600
MSI 8600 // 4gb Corsair XMS2 PC6400
RME MADI // Sony DMX-R100
K+H O300D // Access Virus Polar

http://myspace.com/richardanthonyjay
http://myspace.com/marblehilluk
#73
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2749
  • Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
  • Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 16:00:40 (permalink)
i am really happy that i just bought a hardware korg polysix, a roland juno 60 and a roland juno 106 in the last days - and many more will follow...
i just sold my brandnew tc-powercore pci-e that i just had bought for the virus plugin - which sounded great but still was lame on integration...
so i will finally learn to play my lines and melodies live and in realtime like i should have had learned already yeras ago...
only a few weeks ago i decided that i am so sick and tired of being a beta tester of almost every software....back in thne days when i used hardware i was making loads of songs...in the last yeras my main occupation was to upgrade/crossgrad/update/download/test/test and test again and eventually tweak....peronally i have enough - and so i am back to mainly analog - the good old feel - hands on - one fader per parameter....i am really happy and looking forward to my new songs - just had to post this reading this thread...becuase at least im my case and in the case of many producers i work with computers and plugs have only very superficially made our lives easier - after ten years of trying to convnce myself that "virtual" is great i came to the conclusion that for me this is totally wrong..

cheers

...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
#74
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 17:32:40 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: rjay

I'm re-opening this thread from about a year ago, because - despite being on Sonar 7 and the latest Virus plugin (2.7.1.0 & beta 5) - I have the problem of not being able to use any other VST synths at the same time as the Virus plugin because the latter adds huge latency to any other soft synth loaded at the same time.

I've written to both Access & Cakewalk about this, but as I haven't found any reports of this since about a year ago, has everyone here who experienced the problem, fixed it ?? I only have this problem in Sonar (which is becoming a familiar tale ...).


I installed the 2.7 beta OS yesterday, but only spent about a half hour with it. However, I did not experience any crashes, freezes, pops/crackles, etc. even while running other synths alongside my TI. I used the 2.5OS for a long time without any problems, so if I do experience any of the problems you've mentioned, I'll simply revert back to that OS until a stable official OS is released - you may want to consider doing the same thing.

Are you using the Virus as your soundcard? I'm not, which may explain why I'm not experiencing the issues you're getting (assuming that you are using it as a soundcard).

Also, it would help if you post a step-by-step detailed example of what you are doing that causes the problems, so others can try to replicate it. Also, tell us more about your setup.

As far as this being a Sonar-only issue, that's unlikely the case, but it's more likely because Access has a history of treating Cakewalk as an afterthought when it comes to the TI/Virus Control. The European DAWs (esp. Cubase and Live) seem to be Access' priority. And, let's face it - while I love my Virus, it's certainly not the most stable, problem-free piece of hardware on the market - just go check the Unofficial Access forums or Infekted.org and you'll see complaints from people using every DAW imaginable. Finally, and most importantly, you need to understand that this is a beta version of the TI OS developed by Access, so there are bound to be problems (and plenty more still to come). So, I wouldn't place all the blame on Cakewalk/Sonar. Hopefully, Access and Cakewalk will work together, as they did a year ago, to fix any compatibility issues (are you guys listening?).

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

#75
paulhcp
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 250
  • Joined: 2007/10/06 14:48:59
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/27 20:58:24 (permalink)
The latency for me has not been that bad. I use a delta 44 sound card with the ASIO driver and I have had good results. I really like the TI and for me I dont record tracks using the TI software because Sonar 7 takes care of that just fine. The TI and Rapture together are great.
#76
rjay
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 123
  • Joined: 2004/08/21 14:15:54
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/28 08:24:04 (permalink)
Here's what I'm doing. My main soundcard is an RME MADI, so I'm not using the Virus as soundcard. My Sonar buffers are set to 1024 and in my RME ASIO panel, it's set to 128. With any VST synth loaded, I load in the Virus plugin and instantly all VST synths EXCEPT the Virus now have latency of about .25 -.5 seconds. Very occasionally, the latency will drift around &/or improve. Once whilst trying different buffer settings the latency went but when I did exactly the same thing again it did not go.

Intel DP35DPM // Intel Core 2 Quad Q-6600
MSI 8600 // 4gb Corsair XMS2 PC6400
RME MADI // Sony DMX-R100
K+H O300D // Access Virus Polar

http://myspace.com/richardanthonyjay
http://myspace.com/marblehilluk
#77
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/28 12:36:03 (permalink)
Hmmm...I'm not experiencing that problem, but I did discover a different problem with the beta OS. When I open an existing project that has the VC already inserted, it won't play the Virus parts because it automatically changed the VC instance to the Snow TI version, rather than the Virus version. So, I remove the Snow VC instance from the synth rack, insert the Virus version, reassign the MIDI/audio inputs/outputs, and the Virus then works fine. However, some of my other soft synths' MIDI and audio input/output assignments, as well as some patch assignments, get randomly reassigned somewhere in the process. Weird! Anybody else experience this?

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

#78
soundsubs
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 496
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 13:28:52
  • Location: denver
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/28 14:07:26 (permalink)
i resolved myself looooooooooooooooooooooooooong ago to not use the TI in anything but "stand alone" mode and man, am i glad i did.
im glad because i have had 0 issues, no satan saw, no clicks, pops, glitches (except in Atomizer!), or anything of the sort. *
when i do attempt to use the VSTi version, i find it only useable in DIRECT mode (per channel) and although neat, i find it unispiring and frustrating.
when i get home i'll put the beta on it and see if there are any changes of note to us sonar users.
i too am glad they are acknowledging sonar users.

now if only access will come through with a stand alone version of the patch editor/browser, i'll be set.

*i hate that when working in SEQ mode in sonar and quitting sonar, it resorts back to "single" mode.
#79
MUSEd
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 99
  • Joined: 2007/05/04 07:37:50
  • Location: UK
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/28 15:46:52 (permalink)
This is funny. I was just about to post a thread asking why in Sonar my Ti latency seems to be better than in any other host I have tried (apart from one - Cantabile but that is just a minihost)

I also love Sonar for being the only app that has a realtime freeze option - makes working with my Ti much easier. The only thing I would like more is I do a lot of knob tweaking and while it records the automation fine the track gets crowded with lots of envelopes and it would be useful to be able to place them in their own lanes.
#80
rjay
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 123
  • Joined: 2004/08/21 14:15:54
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/29 05:55:57 (permalink)
On the advice of Cakewalk tech support I disabled "Enable Delay compensation" and as long as I have the LIVE button permanently enabled in the TI plugin, I seem to have got rid of the latency problem.

CW support also suggested configuring the TI plugin as a ".. tempo-based effect" in the Sonar Plugin manager rather than as a synth. It seems to be working OK as a synth for me: what does everyone else have it configured as ? And what practical difference does it make, in the way that Sonar handles it ?

Now all I need to do is fix the pitch drift problem when using Virus TI .....
post edited by rjay - 2008/08/29 05:56:25

Intel DP35DPM // Intel Core 2 Quad Q-6600
MSI 8600 // 4gb Corsair XMS2 PC6400
RME MADI // Sony DMX-R100
K+H O300D // Access Virus Polar

http://myspace.com/richardanthonyjay
http://myspace.com/marblehilluk
#81
cyberzip
Max Output Level: -78 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 613
  • Joined: 2003/11/12 13:09:45
  • Location: Sweden
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/29 07:20:28 (permalink)

By cryophonik
And, let's face it - while I love my Virus, it's certainly not the most stable, problem-free piece of hardware on the market - just go check the Unofficial Access forums or Infekted.org and you'll see complaints from people using every DAW imaginable.


Is this instability present when using the Virus TI in standalone mode? Because my Virus B has been rock-solid for years, and I'd be sad to hear if the TI is worse when used in the same way. (I might upgrade one day... ;) )
#82
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/29 09:51:05 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: cyberzip


By cryophonik
And, let's face it - while I love my Virus, it's certainly not the most stable, problem-free piece of hardware on the market - just go check the Unofficial Access forums or Infekted.org and you'll see complaints from people using every DAW imaginable.


Is this instability present when using the Virus TI in standalone mode? Because my Virus B has been rock-solid for years, and I'd be sad to hear if the TI is worse when used in the same way. (I might upgrade one day... ;) )


I don't think so, but I always use mine in TI mode. And, mine has also been rock solid for years (until this beta OS). The problems that I was referrring to are not ones that I have experienced myself - rather, just what I've observed by reading other peoples' experiences on those forums.

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

#83
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4724
  • Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
  • Location: Elk Grove, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2008/08/29 16:40:28 (permalink)
It looks like the official 2.7.2 OS has been released. It's available on the Access website downloads page.

cryophonik   |   soundcloud  |   Facebook

Q6600 | GA-EP45-UD3P | Windows 7 64 | 8GB
Access Virus Keyboard TI2 | Kurzweil PC3X | NI Maschine

#84
Heroics
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 175
  • Joined: 2012/02/04 14:55:38
  • Status: offline
Re:Virus TI latency issues in Sonar 2012/09/30 18:07:07 (permalink)
OMG!!!
mystp


I recently replaced my trusty Access Virus C with a Virus TI, which promises "total integration" with the host sequencer. In theory, this means that you should be able to control the Virus TI (manage patches, tweak individual sounds, get total setup recall etc) through USB with the supplied Virus Control VST-plugin. However, my experiences with this plugin in Sonar have been less than stellar, as I'm encountering some pretty grave latency issues with it.

Now, it may or may not be my specific setup that's causing the problems - though a number of other Virus TI users are reporting latecy problems as well - but the reply I got from Access support really caught me by surprise:
Apparently, they can't help out, as Sonar isn't on their list of supported sequencers - something I was totally unaware of when I purchased the synth. Instead, they recommend that I use the Virus TI as a regular synth, without the sequencer integration. That gets rid of the latency problems, but this is hardly how I intended to use it when I bought it in the first place.


This is quite sad, as the Virus TI is a great-sounding synth and the total integration element seemed extremely promising. Perhaps it works for other Sonar users and hopefully I'll get it to work in my setup as well at some point, but things don't look to good right now.

So to any Sonar users considering to purchase the Virus TI: Sonar isn't officially supported by Access yet, so for the time being, you're out of luck if you encounter any latency issues with the Virus Control plugin in Sonar.

You can read more about this on the thread: http://virusti.com/forum/index.php?s=1f773f811f91a33bebba3988b8a42bbd&act=ST&f=10&t=390&st=0&#entry3111

(Oh, and if anyone have any suggestions on how to solve the latency issue I'm describing in the Virusti.com-thread, I'd love to hear from you!)

- Asbjoern


#85
Page: < 123 Showing page 3 of 3
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1