***SONAR 8 was.... disappointing?!!***

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 3 of 6
Author
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 02:57:32 (permalink)
Thanks for the 5 star advice John. Do you really think the problem may be with my sound chip? I have a real high quality sound blaster...?

It worked. LOL it got a chuckle out of me.

Best
John
#61
dougwayne
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13
  • Joined: 2008/02/20 11:00:50
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 02:59:17 (permalink)
The person that started a thread called ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** I thought was looking for some other opinions. I offered my opinion and was immediately attacked for it. I reacted poorly.... spelled poorly haha!... just made a made a mess of it. This is my final post. I thank you all for your widom and advice. DW
#62
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:02:16 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: dougwayne

The person that started a thread called ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** I thought was looking for some other opinions. I offered my opinion and was immediately attacked for it. I reacted poorly.... spelled poorly haha!... just made a made a mess of it. This is my final post. I thank you all for your widom and advice. DW


LOL, Poor spelling if you are writing code is called a bug...

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#63
dougwayne
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13
  • Joined: 2008/02/20 11:00:50
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:04:19 (permalink)
Hi Susan! No relation to John Holmquist although I'm sure he must be a brilliant Swede! You're right about having fun... I really belived someone would have caught on much quicker but you and John could see right through it all!!
#64
Oaf_Topik
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2105
  • Joined: 2007/12/07 17:11:26
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:07:21 (permalink)
I'm actually a professional, having fun in my bedroom.


Sorry, typo. I'm actually with a professional, having fun in my bedroom.
#65
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5817
  • Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
  • Location: Oceanside, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:22:01 (permalink)
So far OT, so, so fast...teehee and such...
#66
papa2004
Max Output Level: -10.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2005/03/23 12:40:47
  • Location: Southeastern U.S.
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:23:21 (permalink)
Sorry, typo. I'm actually with a professional, having fun in my bedroom.


*LOL* I resisted making any remarks about the "fun in the bedroom" statement...Good of you to make up for my shortcomings!

Regards,
Papa
#67
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 189
  • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/31 06:21:32 (permalink)
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:41:10

Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
#68
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 189
  • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 06:29:24 (permalink)
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:41:29

Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
#69
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5817
  • Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
  • Location: Oceanside, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 06:47:52 (permalink)
Troll here.

Yes I have rarely posted here before. Reason. Nothing to say really. I know what I am doing and don't usually have problems . What problems I do have, I sort by searching through the posts already present here on the forums. This time I had something that I wanted others to contribute too. I thank you for your contribution.
For the record I don't think Sonar 8 is useless. I think it is, so far, a disappointment. Not an irredeemable position in my experience.

Hehe....you're cool. But you come on Way strong...guess its an acquired taste thing...
#70
edentowers
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1164
  • Joined: 2007/09/20 17:12:23
  • Location: North Nibley, Gloucestershire
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 06:50:49 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: jinga8
On a lighter note...you can see my house next to the "16" sign if you go to Birdseye View HERE...


How do you keep all those church bells out of your recordings?

S8PE, Dell XPS 720 (Q6600), XP Pro SP2, Edirol UA-101
#71
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5817
  • Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
  • Location: Oceanside, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:29:42 (permalink)
How do you keep all those church bells out of your recordings?

I simply don't record between Sunday at 10:45 and 11:15...every week...whether I want to sleep in or not....Sunday...10:45am...grrr....I will record them one day and post it on the songs forum...at 10:45 one Sunday...
#72
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4604
  • Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:39:25 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: strikinglyhandsome1

I'd quite like a refund.

There's nothing wrong with Sonar 8 but the refund aspect appeals to me.



Ha thats awesome! i think I would like the same!

Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard   
i7 3770k CPU
32 gigs RAM
Presonus AudioBox iTwo
Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit
Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops
Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51
Presonus Eureka
Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
#73
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 189
  • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:41:27 (permalink)
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:41:51

Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
#74
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:44:52 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: jinga8

How do you keep all those church bells out of your recordings?

I simply don't record between Sunday at 10:45 and 11:15...every week...whether I want to sleep in or not....Sunday...10:45am...grrr....I will record them one day and post it on the songs forum...at 10:45 one Sunday...


Just 'right click' on the audio track and choose 'Mute church bells'

You have an option to choose the time span, or individual bells, or just a blanket mute - it's been available since PE6

This should be a sticky
#75
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 30423
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 01:51:41
  • Location: Miami - Fort Lauderdale - Davie
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:46:46 (permalink)
I only hear the bells form the left side of my monitors. how could that be. sonar must be broke. It must be!!!!![sm=rolleyes.gif]
Cj

www.audio-mastering-mixing.com - A Professional Worldwide Audio Mixing & Mastering Studio, Providing Online And Attended Sessions. We also do TV commercials, Radio spots & spoken word books
Audio Blog
#76
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:58:03 (permalink)
Sometimes things are not straightforward

I have to balance the fact that I genuinely like Sonar against living under a bridge and attacking billy goats
#77
maxsax
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 581
  • Joined: 2007/11/30 10:15:03
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 08:57:40 (permalink)
creynolds

ASUS P5K WS

Middleman

Make sure you have the bios memory settings at the 1066 speed or you may have problems when pushing the system under Sonar. Just a suggestion.

I've got a Q6600 and a P5K SE mobo and I've had problems with just playing a 4 bar loop with session drummer with both both 7.02 and 8.01. (8.00 seemed to dropout more) Often I get a dropout after a minute or so but not all the time. It tends to happen each time after I change the tempo however. I'm not doing any other edits - just using it as a metronome for my horn practice. I'm wondering if I have BIOS problems. I've got the latest version but the configuration options are way over my head so I've left things at the default settings. Any Asus mobo experts advice welcome. The other hardware I wonder about is my ATI Radeon HD 2400 and its Catalyst Control software. again any advice welcome.
I've run memtest and stabilitity test for over 7 hours each with no problems.

Having said all of that. Sonar S8.00 was crashing out all over the place and just looking at the fixed list for 8.01 Cake were not doing their customers any favours by releasing the original version. I haven't had a chance to do any editing to test stability with 8.01 yet.

http://www.saxatronica.co.uk/
http://www.martinsharpe.com/

Q660, Asus P5K SE, 2 Gig RAM, Windows 8 Pro 32bit RME 9632 ASIO X2A
#78
bermuda
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2271
  • Joined: 2004/04/28 12:34:40
  • Location: Bermuda
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 09:15:58 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Jonbouy


I can hardly believe how just amature so many posters are around here.


Amateur posters that spell like pro's...

What gets me is the amount of so called pro's in this industry that are reliant on a mission critical app. go out and get stung on the early adoption trip. Blimey even folk in a humble office look into the viability of upgrading even a word-processing package and evaluate in real terms any benefits of upgrading. They look into any likely costs of perhaps having to upgrade hardware in order to accommodate any new application as well as additional training costs and changes in workflow that are likely to occur.

But here we have so called pro's that state they need a working system (which involves far more than just the chosen software package) gaily abandon themselves to a 64 bit OS without even checking that what they currently use will still run on it, and expect a new to market package to deliver out of the box and immediately replace a workflow that may have been successfully employed over a number of years.

If your livelihood really depended on it wouldn't you go through a period of appraisal before burning your bridges?

While there may be issues with the new release I'm certainly looking with more alarm at some of the folk here that claim to be professionals that don't seem to have any fundamental practices in place themselves. Now that's what I'd call a shambles, and if you worked for any company that I run you'd be shown the door by the end of the week.



I agree that if it is your life blood, you use the established working product. the new version can be used for research, practice, to get up to speed with tools, but as for it replacing the money generator software out of the box, it is suicide. in theory...things should be 100% off the shelf, but sadly the Software industry fails on a constant basis across all apps. even the mightily Stable Reason has patches/bug fixes issued.

Personally I wish cakewalk would acknowledge issues more on the board and have a sticky list of issues cakewalk are working on resolving, plus requests for input on issues where they need more information. Also a sticky list of user errors... i.e. things people thought were bugs, but turned out to be user error, or system configuration issues.


 Yes.
#79
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 189
  • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 09:16:22 (permalink)
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:42:35

Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
#80
maxsax
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 581
  • Joined: 2007/11/30 10:15:03
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 09:35:16 (permalink)
Thanks I will look into this



Please let me know yout results. Thanks
post edited by maxsax - 2008/10/31 09:39:50

http://www.saxatronica.co.uk/
http://www.martinsharpe.com/

Q660, Asus P5K SE, 2 Gig RAM, Windows 8 Pro 32bit RME 9632 ASIO X2A
#81
Ham N Egz
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 15161
  • Joined: 2005/01/21 14:27:49
  • Location: Arpadhon
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:02:23 (permalink)
Ohhh I was about to say you have to some times have a thick hide to venture in here .. but then I remember GearSLutz......
Motifator and RolandClan are nice peaceful forums though.....

Green Acres is the place to be
 I dont twitter, facebook, snapchat, instagram,linkedin,tumble,pinterest,flick, blah blah,lets have an old fashioned conversation!
 
#82
Glennbo
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1840
  • Joined: 2003/11/10 22:38:37
  • Location: Planet Earth
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:21:23 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: strikinglyhandsome1

I'd quite like a refund.

There's nothing wrong with Sonar 8 but the refund aspect appeals to me.


I didn't buy Sonar 8, but I want a refund too!!! Sounds like some up and coming political policy. I find it humorous that the original poster made comments about the *core functionality* of Sonar 8, and within the first couple replies, we start hearing about how grate all the plugs are, which have nothing at all to do with the core program. Teh Beetscoop is excellent, teh Transistor Sharpener is teh baum! <g>
#83
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:40:03 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: bermuda


ORIGINAL: Jonbouy


I can hardly believe how just amature so many posters are around here.


Amateur posters that spell like pro's...

What gets me is the amount of so called pro's in this industry that are reliant on a mission critical app. go out and get stung on the early adoption trip. Blimey even folk in a humble office look into the viability of upgrading even a word-processing package and evaluate in real terms any benefits of upgrading. They look into any likely costs of perhaps having to upgrade hardware in order to accommodate any new application as well as additional training costs and changes in workflow that are likely to occur.

But here we have so called pro's that state they need a working system (which involves far more than just the chosen software package) gaily abandon themselves to a 64 bit OS without even checking that what they currently use will still run on it, and expect a new to market package to deliver out of the box and immediately replace a workflow that may have been successfully employed over a number of years.

If your livelihood really depended on it wouldn't you go through a period of appraisal before burning your bridges?

While there may be issues with the new release I'm certainly looking with more alarm at some of the folk here that claim to be professionals that don't seem to have any fundamental practices in place themselves. Now that's what I'd call a shambles, and if you worked for any company that I run you'd be shown the door by the end of the week.



I agree that if it is your life blood, you use the established working product. the new version can be used for research, practice, to get up to speed with tools, but as for it replacing the money generator software out of the box, it is suicide. in theory...things should be 100% off the shelf, but sadly the Software industry fails on a constant basis across all apps. even the mightily Stable Reason has patches/bug fixes issued.

Personally I wish cakewalk would acknowledge issues more on the board and have a sticky list of issues cakewalk are working on resolving, plus requests for input on issues where they need more information. Also a sticky list of user errors... i.e. things people thought were bugs, but turned out to be user error, or system configuration issues.





Totally agree with the software 'theory' thing that an application should be of merchantable quality on release, I'm still using 7.02 and it looks likely I will be doing that for some time to come when I chose Sonar in the first place I did appraise it against my needs and it came out winner by a long way stacked against the competition.

I'm not loyal to Cakewalk at all I'm loyal to my own quality perception and value maxims and I'm currently a happy 7 customer as the software is doing exactly as claimed for me my upgrade schedule in this area isn't due to be looked at for another 18 months and doubtlessly I shan't be looking for a refund or soliciting others advice as to whether I should get my money back as hopefully then I will have done my homework right and be happy once again with MY purchasing decision.

Whilst I agree that Software often has more issues than any other consumer products and if I purchased a washing machine that leaked I'd be unhappy to the point of returning the item, software often offers some fairly abstract capabilities that, in what I would consider good software, are not obtainable by any other means, whereas a washer has but one task, to clean yer smalls properly.

I haven't looked at S8 seriously enough to know whether it offers value or it is a rogue as my chosen app which happens to be S7PE, is functioning satisfactorily within my current requirements but to dismiss a professional company's release as being a 'Shambles' IMO is quite wrong when clearly the OP has not got the conviction of his own purchasing decision borne out by asking others to make up his mind whether or not he should be asking for a refund, unless of course the incorporated title question is a rhetorical one.

As I've already alluded too the only 'shambles' I can see here is somebody that replaces a mission critical app. without reference to even that most basic of purchasing requirements, the time honoured statement of CAVEAT EMPTOR or buyer beware.

Nobody is mugging anyone else here although it seems plain that a few like to mug themselves.


"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#84
tyacko
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1190
  • Joined: 2007/01/06 07:20:16
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:56:17 (permalink)
creynolds,

As commerical software applications (like Sonar) continue to expand and mature, it becomes more and more difficult to ensure that all areas of code continue to work/function the same way in all ways people perceive they should be used. This can be minimized by having settings or options that will branch the new functionality from existing functionality so as to not break existing code. The unfortunate thing here is that this might cause for more than one place to maintain code which is not optimal.

However, with all that said, if you are using Sonar in a commerical venture where it is imperative that the software works in front of clients, then simply installing it on the production machine without testing it first is a bit like playing the slots. If this is your means of business, you need to consider a test machine where you install the latest software (be it a new version of Sonar like 8 or simply an update patch like 8.01) and test it there before you every put it "on the front lines".

Now, everything I said is true with any DAW software you are going to use. Because bugs/issues are not specific to Sonar but to software/hardware in general. I don't work for Cakewalk and have no real passion for their software. It just surprises me when I read threads where someone uses strong words like "shambles" and go to find out that they loaded it right into production for a commercial environment.

Please live and learn.

Take care,
Tom
#85
gtgarner
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 895
  • Joined: 2005/07/21 14:36:13
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:08:48 (permalink)
Hey, Cakewalk does have a position open for anyone that want's to put their professional advice and criticism to work. (insert sound of crickets chirping)

Then you can fix your own problems. (insert sound of crickets chirping again!)

I think Cakewalk needs to open up a special forum for complainers and venters that they don't pay any attention to.

I wonder if Cakewalk is performing at the level of some peoples music. (insert sound of crickets chirping)
At WORST Sonar works 90% of the time while some people are producing music that is crap 100% of the time. If you are one of these people....then yeah you need your money back.


Everyone....I'm joking.....I thought it would be funny to post this.

Let me end my post by saying EXCELLENT JOB Cakewalk!!!!!! EXCELLENT JOB on Sonar 8.
#86
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 189
  • Joined: 2004/06/19 10:19:23
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:15:04 (permalink)
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:43:07

Rain Recording Nimbus. Sandybridge 2600k, 16gb Ram. Quadro FX 580, Roland Quad Capture. Avid Artist Mix and Transport. Loads of other cool stuff.
#87
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:19:03 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: bermuda

Personally I wish cakewalk would acknowledge issues more on the board and have a sticky list of issues cakewalk are working on resolving, plus requests for input on issues where they need more information. Also a sticky list of user errors... i.e. things people thought were bugs, but turned out to be user error, or system configuration issues.


Now there's a voice of sanity....some developers already do this, I wonder how it impacts on marketing though?

For example.....

http://www.runrev.com/support/quality-control-center/

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#88
gtgarner
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 895
  • Joined: 2005/07/21 14:36:13
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:22:39 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: creynolds

Sonar 7.02 has not and will not be replaced on my system until 8 works as well as 7 or better.


Hey!!! There is the answer. It's been here all the time. No refund necessary. Time to close this topic.
#89
Glennbo
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1840
  • Joined: 2003/11/10 22:38:37
  • Location: Planet Earth
  • Status: offline
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:25:47 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: gtgarner


ORIGINAL: creynolds

Sonar 7.02 has not and will not be replaced on my system until 8 works as well as 7 or better.


Hey!!! There is the answer. It's been here all the time. No refund necessary. Time to close this topic.


So the answer is "don't use the software you just paid for". <Mr.Burns> Excellent </Mr.Burns>
#90
Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 3 of 6
Jump to:
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1