Hi Cake. will 8.3 include ASIO Direct Monitoring support

Page: < 1234 Showing page 4 of 4
Author
Post
Essentials Only Full Version
jackn2mpu
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2765
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 17:38:43
  • Location: Soprano State
  • Status: offline
RE: Hi Cake. will 8.3 include ASIO Direct Monitoring support 2009/04/23 08:44:54 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: VigilantSound

but it is mainly Lynx users that are complaining, right?


Actually its not just lynx users, I have a Motu interface and i would really like ADM, as you can probably tell by my posts!


Allow me to add my vote in here for adm as well - I use an Edirol UA1000 that with the latest drivers supports adm. Other Edirol products probably support adm as well. And seeing as how Edirol is a part of Roland which owns Sonar Wouldn't one reasonably expect to see some impetus here to add such support?
post edited by jackn2mpu - 2009/04/23 08:45:25

Jack
Qapla!
#91
kp
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1496
  • Joined: 2004/01/21 15:22:09
  • Location: London, UK
  • Status: offline
RE: Hi Cake. will 8.3 include ASIO Direct Monitoring support 2009/04/23 10:30:29 (permalink)
I put in a Feature Request for ADM some time ago as I thought it would be really useful for my Dakota, which supports it and has a decent input/output mapping function accessible through its control panel. I tried it in another host and discovered (and it is documented in the Dakota readme's etc, I just hadn't read them for ages :-)) that the functionality exposed by ADM is so limited compared to what is offered via the control panel that it was useless.

So ADM is definitely not a panacea, even if the card supports it!

Xoo - www.alien8.co.uk
#92
Page: < 1234 Showing page 4 of 4
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1