Low wattage, tube based *power* amp?

Page: < 12345 > Showing page 3 of 5
Author
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10037
  • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
  • Location: SL,UT
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/05 14:59:32 (permalink)
yeah, you wear out an older speaker, and it's gonna get smooth around the edges.

but my v30 is harsh.
both in the demeter, and in a closed back 1x12 cab.


my point stands:
a brand new v30, sounds harsh.

a better choice, if you're liking celestions, would be a heritage g12.

Bats Brew music Streaming
Bats Brew albums:
"Trouble"
"Stay"
"The Time is Magic"
--
Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
 
#61
Cheeto
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 118
  • Joined: 2008/09/30 03:57:39
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/07 04:20:05 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: mike_mccue

Don't worry... we're talking about tone.... there is no tone worse than the sound of an under stimulated speaker. :-)


Sure there is! How about the tone of stepping on the cord and pulling it from the input jack -bzzzzz! That's gotta be the worst tone ever!

But in all seriousness, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with the point you made due to factors I believe are more important.

What could be worse is:

1.) A weak sounding instrument and or player
2.) A bad sounding amplifier
3.) nowhere near pushing the power tubes.

While I also believe speaker breakup is important contributor tonally, in my opinion it would be last on that list, and I certainly wouldn't describe it as being "no tone worse than" if not particularly not present.

#62
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/07 07:37:36 (permalink)
OK, I agree with 1 & 2, but I think 3 falls after having access to a great loudspeaker.

You don't have to have power tubes screaming and output transformers in saturation to have a great sounding tube amp.

In fact, I don't think many people with a modern 50 - 100 watt tube amp are anywhere near getting either the tubes or the trannys near their edge, and plenty of people get a good tone from them... they just do it all in the preamp.

On the other hand, I have several Champs, a Deluxe Reverb, and a Vibrolux Reverb sitting here so I have the experience of simply swapping them and playing at similar SPL to listen to the sound of tubes pushed to different extremes as well as the sound of a saturated transformer.

For example; Switching from the Deluxe to the Vibrolux is essentially an experience of finding great tone with or without the sound of pushed power tubes.

The Vibrolux is much cleaner... but still absolutely "musical".

Most people do not realize how loud a Champ can go... throw a compressor and a tube screamer in front of it and it will scream with the sound of pushed tubes and a FULLY saturated transformer. It's a very distinct, hard to emulate tone, but that sound is not for everyone.

In any case I'd value a well matched speaker for the amps before arbitrarily considering that the tubes HAVE to be pushed to get great tone.

Does that make sense?

best regards,
mike


#63
Cheeto
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 118
  • Joined: 2008/09/30 03:57:39
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/09 07:46:03 (permalink)
Hey Batsbrew,

It's easy to tell from the good advice you've given to others here you have been through the ahh...experimentation stage. Nice gear too btw!

Man, I could get into a good discussion about a few various things with you that I'm sure we'd both enjoy, but that'd really be going way OT for a thread like this.

But on a short note, I don't prefer the V30 either. I don't find them particularly harsh, rather for me I find them somewhat lacking something in the upper mids.

Also nice tip about using the palmer between the attenuator. Now that's something I wasn't aware of. Although still a bit skeptical, you got me curious about that one. But then again I've got more than a few possibilities for recording options just as you do so I really wonder if I need another -lol!. But it does sound interesting nonetheless.
#64
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/09 15:39:25 (permalink)
Well, with the complications of finding a power amp that I feel comfy with and for a reasonable price, I'm no wkind of leaning towards the Emery Microbaby:

http://www.emerysound.com/Microbaby.html

It's a 1/2 watter, very simple and direct, and they also sell a 'mad scientist' tube kit with a whole bunch of tubes that are known to work well with it, so you can play around with all kinds of sounds. The cab is a Weber blue pup. I've heard some clips and it sounds awefully nice (the ones on the Emery site aren't done very well.)

Here's a Youtube video (yeh, audio quality is an issue with them) where he just takes it through a number of variations of guitars with different types of pickups, gutar volume levels, and tone and volume levels on the amp.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3mq3dCSedQ

From what everyone says it's very reasonable volume easily crankable in the apartment. It seems to have plenty of gain with higher output pickups, but a simple boost pedal would probably get it into serious overdrive levels I'd imagine.

So about $1400 for the amp (no enclosure) and cab, and a couple hundred for an SM57 and e609. That wouldn't be a bad deal at all, and I'm sure Mike will approve much more :-)

post edited by droddey - 2008/11/09 15:42:09

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#65
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/09 22:03:13 (permalink)
I'm not only approving... I'm drooling.

BTW, today I came across a used blackface Bandmaster rig that is fairly priced. It appears to have 2 JBL K120s in the cabinet... I'm soul searching trying to decide just how much I want to take those two speaker out of that rig :-). I'm thinking I could buy it... get the speakers and move the package to someone with less specific interests in speakers.

Also I stopped by an old firends house to take him an Ampeg VT22 carcus that he is going to rebuild as as mini SVT and got to drive his new/used Mesa Boogie bass amp... that was fun... we played thru a McCauley. Yikes.

decisions, decisions.

best regards,
mike


#66
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/09 22:56:24 (permalink)
I'm off refreshing my memory of the JBL line.

Here's a fun link that explains one small aspect of why choosing a "great" speaker is an imporatnt part of the tone equation:

http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/courses/phys199pom/Student_Reports/Fall04/Brian_Lunardini/Brian_Lunardini_P199POM_Fall04_Final_Report.pdf


#67
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/09 23:00:41 (permalink)
So, it looks like the Emery head, without enclosure which I don't need, plus then going to Weber for the raw speaker cabinet and the same Blue Dog speaker, will be $695 plus shipping, and $405'ish plus shipping, respectively. So altogether probably about $1200 with taxes and shipping, so that saves a good bit over getting the fancy wooden enclosure from Emery. Throw in an SM57 and e609, for probably a total of around $1450'ish with taxes and shipping. So basically the plainer cabinet covers the cost of the mics.

The Blue Dog Alnico (which is what Emery sells in their cabinets) only comes in a 15 watt minimum version, with 30, 50, 75, and 100wt versions. I'm not sure which one Emery sells, ro which would be optimal. Weber says the lower the wattage capacity the more aggressive and bright it is. Though some folks say that the Emery is a bit on the dark side, so maybe a 30 would be a good compromise? I dunno. I'll have to ask the Emery guy if I move forward on this.
post edited by droddey - 2008/11/09 23:03:39

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#68
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/09 23:09:57 (permalink)
The Blue dog gets great reviews by folks I'd be eager to learn from... I've never heard one first hand.

Have fun with your new rig! :-)

best regards,
mike


#69
batsbrew
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10037
  • Joined: 2007/06/07 16:02:32
  • Location: SL,UT
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 12:34:14 (permalink)
glad you checked out the emery-
i tell everyone i know, to at least look at them, because they're well made, and are a bit unique, in that they can take all those tube sets.

pretty much tho, all you can do with that amp, is let the individual character of each guitar shine thru, with little to no influence on the sound from the amp..
other than gain characteristic.

some people like to be able to go to an amp, and really tweak EVERYTHING.

the superbaby goes the opposite direction.....
it tries to give back, only what is put in.

which is a 'purist' way of doing it.



i've used the blue dog, it's an excellent speaker,

i happen to like the celestion heritage G12H better.
YMMV

Bats Brew music Streaming
Bats Brew albums:
"Trouble"
"Stay"
"The Time is Magic"
--
Sonar 6 PE>Bandlab Cakewalk>Studio One 3.5>RME BFP>i7-7700 3.6GHz>MSI B250M>G.Skill Ripjaws 4 series 16GB>Samsung 960 EVO m.2ssd>W 10 Pro
 
#70
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 18:55:32 (permalink)
do you think he'd sell me a 6G6 for my baby?:

I call this the "half bake"






Dean, I wonder if you are aware that you can put all those tubes in a silverface Fender Champ?

I love the Emery and think that's a great choice... just want to make sure you don't think the Champ is somehow a lesser amp.

The main thing with all these amps is that you are free to shape the tone with pedals. I think in terms of the 5 major overdrive/distortion circuit categories and mix and match my pedals to get a wide variety of tones.

I can't wait to find out how much fun you are having with the Emery!

best regards,
mike


#71
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 19:13:16 (permalink)
If I was confident I could find a Silverface Champ in good shape from a reputable person, I'd certainly entertain the notion. But I'm limited in the time I can put into the search, and I can't afford to buy one on e-bay and have it be a fake or dud. It would certainly save a lot of money if I could find one.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#72
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 19:33:57 (permalink)
I agree 100%. I can not stomach the idea of being lied too on ebay.

I think you'll really love the Emery! Plus you'll be doing first hand service towards supporting a domestic economy. It's a win, win, win situation.

best regards,
mike


#73
ew
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1837
  • Joined: 2004/01/27 21:24:49
  • Location: Eagan, MN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 21:39:16 (permalink)
#74
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 22:21:19 (permalink)
I want all of them :-)


#75
ew
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1837
  • Joined: 2004/01/27 21:24:49
  • Location: Eagan, MN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 22:53:58 (permalink)
You too, Mike?

I tend to stay away from Willie's; it's hard for me to go in there without dropping lots of cash.

ew

#76
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/10 23:42:03 (permalink)
Which would you like? From my favorite local store:


I guess I could do some searching to see if any local places have any to look at.
post edited by droddey - 2008/11/10 23:54:09

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#77
lazarous
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1461
  • Joined: 2005/09/15 11:55:42
  • Location: Minneapolis, MN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/11 09:30:05 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: ew
You too, Mike?

I tend to stay away from Willie's; it's hard for me to go in there without dropping lots of cash.

ew

A friend of mine just sent me an email with the following headline:

DO NOT GO TO WILLIE'S TO BUY STRINGS FOR YOUR BASS!

Followed by the story of buying another Ibanez Artisan bass. Wait... did I say ANOTHER? Why, yes, I did. He'd just gotten one on eBay, but it wasn't in nearly as good shape as he'd hoped. Went to Willie's to get new strings for it, and guess what's hangin' on the wall?

Now he has two. Go figure.

I only go in Willie's with my wife. If SHE thinks something's a good deal, I can bring it home. Doesn't happen too often! LOL

Mike: Did you build that Half-Baked amp yourself?

Corey

Ath 64 3500+
MSI K8N N2 Plat ATX 939 Mobo
2Gb DDR2 400
RME Hammerfall HDSP 9652
UAD1 4.2
WinXP Pro SP2
Sonar 8.3PE
New Henry and Buster episodes available!
#78
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/11 09:48:54 (permalink)
Hi Corey,

I feel so lucky... when I take my wife to the nice music stores she always encourages me to feed the beast. I usually let her fend off the sales clerks with questions like... "Is that really a '72 Les Paul? It looks like a 73 to me." I'm then left to browse at my leisure. :-) :-)

yes that's a home built I DIY'd... I made it before it became easy to find a suitable chassis... so I used an old radio hobby idea... the Cake pan.

Here's an example of how I use it... note that the ampeg cab is just a holder... this setup has nothing to do with a cool ampeg. The amp from that unit is now a custom made mini SVT my friend Buster and I made:



The speakers are late 50's Rolas I found in an old organ... they are the creamy ones I described in an earlier post in this thread. I would venture to say that you have to hear it first hand in real life to realize how unique those speakers sound when driven by this amp. It's like swimming in butter fat.

That's one thing I think a lot of modern life people don't have the luxury of... some of the most fantastic and visceral guitar tones can not be printed to a recording... getting to experience them first hand is a true luxury that I savor and appreciate. That's why I live out in the country.


best regards,
mike
post edited by mike_mccue - 2008/11/11 10:01:03


#79
lazarous
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1461
  • Joined: 2005/09/15 11:55:42
  • Location: Minneapolis, MN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/11 10:46:59 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: mike_mccue
Hi Corey,

I feel so lucky... when I take my wife to the nice music stores she always encourages me to feed the beast. I usually let her fend off the sales clerks with questions like... "Is that really a '72 Les Paul? It looks like a 73 to me." I'm then left to browse at my leisure. :-) :-)

Well, my wife bought me a 5-string bass for my 40th birthday a couple of months ago, so it's pretty rare she actively STOPS me from buying anything... she just makes sure it's a good deal. At Willie's, EVERYTHING'S a good deal to me - she adds the dose of reality so I don't just pull up a U-Haul to the front door!

yes that's a home built I DIY'd... I made it before it became easy to find a suitable chassis... so I used an old radio hobby idea... the Cake pan.

So, would you be at all interested in making another one, or selling the schematics? I picked up one of the Epiphones, and it sounds great when I plug it into my Polytone 12" extension cab, but I'd kind of like to have something truly point-to-point wired.

Corey

Ath 64 3500+
MSI K8N N2 Plat ATX 939 Mobo
2Gb DDR2 400
RME Hammerfall HDSP 9652
UAD1 4.2
WinXP Pro SP2
Sonar 8.3PE
New Henry and Buster episodes available!
#80
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/11 13:44:46 (permalink)
Hi Corey,
I am sorta interested in building some more... I've had the parts laying around for a few years... but honestly I've been too busy to get back to it... so I don't think you should wait on me. :-)

I'd be happy to send you info but that amp is just a clone of a late fifties Fender Champ. The schematic and layout is a Champ. I'd reccomend you look at the many Champ kits that are available these days and then decide if you want to buy a kit or just get the parts and do it all yourself.

I think everyone should try to assemble a small tube amp. I can't begin to describe the thrill I felt the first time I played one of mine. The sound came out and I wet my pants. Everyone should have that thrill.

Go for it!

best regards,
mike


#81
ew
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1837
  • Joined: 2004/01/27 21:24:49
  • Location: Eagan, MN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/11 14:10:06 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: lazarous

At Willie's, EVERYTHING'S a good deal to me - she adds the dose of reality so I don't just pull up a U-Haul to the front door!

I resemble that remark...

ew
#82
lazarous
Max Output Level: -61 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1461
  • Joined: 2005/09/15 11:55:42
  • Location: Minneapolis, MN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/11 14:34:36 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: mike_mccue
I think everyone should try to assemble a small tube amp. I can't begin to describe the thrill I felt the first time I played one of mine. The sound came out and I wet my pants. Everyone should have that thrill.

It's on the list of things to do! Course, it's a very long list, and is prioritized somewhere after the "Gee, I should probably get a Strat in here too" - which is exceedingly low priority since I'm a BASS player! LOL

Thanks, Mike!

Corey

Ath 64 3500+
MSI K8N N2 Plat ATX 939 Mobo
2Gb DDR2 400
RME Hammerfall HDSP 9652
UAD1 4.2
WinXP Pro SP2
Sonar 8.3PE
New Henry and Buster episodes available!
#83
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/11 21:10:35 (permalink)
Well, I'm now down to the last obstacle in this course... I just checked and I'm flat broke, like in I have money at all in the bank once I pay a couple bills. Once I get that straightned out, then I'll get the Emery.
post edited by droddey - 2008/11/11 21:11:38

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#84
Cheeto
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 118
  • Joined: 2008/09/30 03:57:39
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/12 04:26:05 (permalink)
Not to mention the satisfaction of making it yourself, and the cool conversational piece that it is, I think that "half bake" is pretty sweet! Two thumbs up.

Someday (and hopefully soon) I'd like to build some kind of small amp like that.





#85
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/15 22:21:02 (permalink)
So I was looking more at the Weber site. They also sell amp kits. Their 5F1 is effectively a 50s Fender Champ. It's a very simple and pure circuit, and even I could put that one together. I assume it's almost exactly the same circuit as the Half-bake above. It's only $415 with cabinet and speaker and all the parts needed. And they even have a 10% off sale in November, so that would knock it down to more like $380 before shipping. Or you could use the difference to move up from the basic speaker that kit has to the next step up, which would put it back about at the original price and probably worth it.

So you could do a high quality, really classic, low wattage (5 in this case), combo amp with 10" speaker, for a really reasonable price if you are willing to do the work to put it together yourself.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#86
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/15 23:47:12 (permalink)
Hmmm... Even better I think:

Ceriatone Pre-built 5F1 Amp chassis without tubes - $250
Tubes -
12AX7 Sovtek $14
6V6 Sovtek $15
5Y3 Sovtek $15
Weber 1x12 Cabinet - $215
10A100 Weber speaker (designed for this amp type) - $90

So a separate head and cabinet Tweed Champ clone, with good components, and a speaker specially designed for Tweed Champ type amps, all for $600. I'd just not put the amp chassis in anthing and just use it raw to save bucks. That's a pretty dang good deal, and I bet it would sound quite nice. That's less than just the Emery head by itself. The Emery obviously does have a few extra amenities, but a couple inexpensive pedals would make this configuration plenty flexible. A simple booster for more overdrive to start would be cheap.
post edited by droddey - 2008/11/15 23:51:12

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#87
ew
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1837
  • Joined: 2004/01/27 21:24:49
  • Location: Eagan, MN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/16 00:16:25 (permalink)
I've heard really good things about the Ceriatones myself- that'd be a great option for you, Dean.

ew
#88
pistolpete
Max Output Level: -59.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1584
  • Joined: 2007/02/08 18:03:18
  • Location: Brentwood, TN
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/16 05:09:28 (permalink)
Instead of ruining a potentially classic amp like a champ with some Frankenstein-like modifications. You'd be much better off using a high quality amp-sim equipment (line-6, Korg, etc.) It's more flexible, cheaper, more portable, more reliable, and less chance of electrocuting yourself. Also you won't look like some half-assed dork with a rig that looks like it came out of a flea market.
#89
droddey
Max Output Level: -24 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5147
  • Joined: 2007/02/09 03:44:49
  • Location: Mountain View, CA
  • Status: offline
RE: Low wattage, tube based *power* amp? 2008/11/16 14:00:14 (permalink)
Well, because there are no modifications to a classic amp being done, it's just a new amp based on the same circuit at the Tweed Champ, and because the whole point is to get a real amp based system. And it'll sound enormously better than a Line6. I owned a POD Pro, so I know what it sounds like. I can do that well or better with my current Amplitube2 based setup, with a lot more flexibility. And I don't really give a crap what it looks like. It's for my studio only. I'll be the only one who ever sees it. All that matters is the music that gets made, since that's all that anyone but me will ever know about.

Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO, Charmed Quark Systems
www.charmedquark.com
#90
Page: < 12345 > Showing page 3 of 5
Jump to:
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1