***SONAR 8 was.... disappointing?!!***

Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3
Post
John
Forum Host
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 02:57:32
Thanks for the 5 star advice John. Do you really think the problem may be with my sound chip? I have a real high quality sound blaster...?

It worked. LOL it got a chuckle out of me.
dougwayne
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 02:59:17
The person that started a thread called ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** I thought was looking for some other opinions. I offered my opinion and was immediately attacked for it. I reacted poorly.... spelled poorly haha!... just made a made a mess of it. This is my final post. I thank you all for your widom and advice. DW
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:02:16

ORIGINAL: dougwayne

The person that started a thread called ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** I thought was looking for some other opinions. I offered my opinion and was immediately attacked for it. I reacted poorly.... spelled poorly haha!... just made a made a mess of it. This is my final post. I thank you all for your widom and advice. DW


LOL, Poor spelling if you are writing code is called a bug...
dougwayne
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:04:19
Hi Susan! No relation to John Holmquist although I'm sure he must be a brilliant Swede! You're right about having fun... I really belived someone would have caught on much quicker but you and John could see right through it all!!
Oaf_Topik
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:07:21
I'm actually a professional, having fun in my bedroom.


Sorry, typo. I'm actually with a professional, having fun in my bedroom.
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:22:01
So far OT, so, so fast...teehee and such...
papa2004
Max Output Level: -10.5 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 03:23:21
Sorry, typo. I'm actually with a professional, having fun in my bedroom.


*LOL* I resisted making any remarks about the "fun in the bedroom" statement...Good of you to make up for my shortcomings!
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES - I REQUEST A REFUND*** 2008/10/31 06:21:32
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:41:10
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 06:29:24
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:41:29
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 06:47:52
Troll here.

Yes I have rarely posted here before. Reason. Nothing to say really. I know what I am doing and don't usually have problems . What problems I do have, I sort by searching through the posts already present here on the forums. This time I had something that I wanted others to contribute too. I thank you for your contribution.
For the record I don't think Sonar 8 is useless. I think it is, so far, a disappointment. Not an irredeemable position in my experience.

Hehe....you're cool. But you come on Way strong...guess its an acquired taste thing...
edentowers
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 06:50:49

ORIGINAL: jinga8
On a lighter note...you can see my house next to the "16" sign if you go to Birdseye View HERE...


How do you keep all those church bells out of your recordings?
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:29:42
How do you keep all those church bells out of your recordings?

I simply don't record between Sunday at 10:45 and 11:15...every week...whether I want to sleep in or not....Sunday...10:45am...grrr....I will record them one day and post it on the songs forum...at 10:45 one Sunday...
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:39:25

ORIGINAL: strikinglyhandsome1

I'd quite like a refund.

There's nothing wrong with Sonar 8 but the refund aspect appeals to me.



Ha thats awesome! i think I would like the same!
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:41:27
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:41:51
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:44:52

ORIGINAL: jinga8

How do you keep all those church bells out of your recordings?

I simply don't record between Sunday at 10:45 and 11:15...every week...whether I want to sleep in or not....Sunday...10:45am...grrr....I will record them one day and post it on the songs forum...at 10:45 one Sunday...


Just 'right click' on the audio track and choose 'Mute church bells'

You have an option to choose the time span, or individual bells, or just a blanket mute - it's been available since PE6

This should be a sticky
CJaysMusic
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:46:46
I only hear the bells form the left side of my monitors. how could that be. sonar must be broke. It must be!!!!![sm=rolleyes.gif]
Cj
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 07:58:03
Sometimes things are not straightforward

I have to balance the fact that I genuinely like Sonar against living under a bridge and attacking billy goats
maxsax
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 08:57:40
creynolds

ASUS P5K WS

Middleman

Make sure you have the bios memory settings at the 1066 speed or you may have problems when pushing the system under Sonar. Just a suggestion.

I've got a Q6600 and a P5K SE mobo and I've had problems with just playing a 4 bar loop with session drummer with both both 7.02 and 8.01. (8.00 seemed to dropout more) Often I get a dropout after a minute or so but not all the time. It tends to happen each time after I change the tempo however. I'm not doing any other edits - just using it as a metronome for my horn practice. I'm wondering if I have BIOS problems. I've got the latest version but the configuration options are way over my head so I've left things at the default settings. Any Asus mobo experts advice welcome. The other hardware I wonder about is my ATI Radeon HD 2400 and its Catalyst Control software. again any advice welcome.
I've run memtest and stabilitity test for over 7 hours each with no problems.

Having said all of that. Sonar S8.00 was crashing out all over the place and just looking at the fixed list for 8.01 Cake were not doing their customers any favours by releasing the original version. I haven't had a chance to do any editing to test stability with 8.01 yet.
bermuda
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 09:15:58

ORIGINAL: Jonbouy


I can hardly believe how just amature so many posters are around here.


Amateur posters that spell like pro's...

What gets me is the amount of so called pro's in this industry that are reliant on a mission critical app. go out and get stung on the early adoption trip. Blimey even folk in a humble office look into the viability of upgrading even a word-processing package and evaluate in real terms any benefits of upgrading. They look into any likely costs of perhaps having to upgrade hardware in order to accommodate any new application as well as additional training costs and changes in workflow that are likely to occur.

But here we have so called pro's that state they need a working system (which involves far more than just the chosen software package) gaily abandon themselves to a 64 bit OS without even checking that what they currently use will still run on it, and expect a new to market package to deliver out of the box and immediately replace a workflow that may have been successfully employed over a number of years.

If your livelihood really depended on it wouldn't you go through a period of appraisal before burning your bridges?

While there may be issues with the new release I'm certainly looking with more alarm at some of the folk here that claim to be professionals that don't seem to have any fundamental practices in place themselves. Now that's what I'd call a shambles, and if you worked for any company that I run you'd be shown the door by the end of the week.



I agree that if it is your life blood, you use the established working product. the new version can be used for research, practice, to get up to speed with tools, but as for it replacing the money generator software out of the box, it is suicide. in theory...things should be 100% off the shelf, but sadly the Software industry fails on a constant basis across all apps. even the mightily Stable Reason has patches/bug fixes issued.

Personally I wish cakewalk would acknowledge issues more on the board and have a sticky list of issues cakewalk are working on resolving, plus requests for input on issues where they need more information. Also a sticky list of user errors... i.e. things people thought were bugs, but turned out to be user error, or system configuration issues.

creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 09:16:22
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:42:35
maxsax
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 09:35:16
Thanks I will look into this



Please let me know yout results. Thanks
post edited by maxsax - 2008/10/31 09:39:50
Ham N Egz
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:02:23
Ohhh I was about to say you have to some times have a thick hide to venture in here .. but then I remember GearSLutz......
Motifator and RolandClan are nice peaceful forums though.....
Glennbo
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:21:23

ORIGINAL: strikinglyhandsome1

I'd quite like a refund.

There's nothing wrong with Sonar 8 but the refund aspect appeals to me.


I didn't buy Sonar 8, but I want a refund too!!! Sounds like some up and coming political policy. I find it humorous that the original poster made comments about the *core functionality* of Sonar 8, and within the first couple replies, we start hearing about how grate all the plugs are, which have nothing at all to do with the core program. Teh Beetscoop is excellent, teh Transistor Sharpener is teh baum! <g>
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:40:03

ORIGINAL: bermuda


ORIGINAL: Jonbouy


I can hardly believe how just amature so many posters are around here.


Amateur posters that spell like pro's...

What gets me is the amount of so called pro's in this industry that are reliant on a mission critical app. go out and get stung on the early adoption trip. Blimey even folk in a humble office look into the viability of upgrading even a word-processing package and evaluate in real terms any benefits of upgrading. They look into any likely costs of perhaps having to upgrade hardware in order to accommodate any new application as well as additional training costs and changes in workflow that are likely to occur.

But here we have so called pro's that state they need a working system (which involves far more than just the chosen software package) gaily abandon themselves to a 64 bit OS without even checking that what they currently use will still run on it, and expect a new to market package to deliver out of the box and immediately replace a workflow that may have been successfully employed over a number of years.

If your livelihood really depended on it wouldn't you go through a period of appraisal before burning your bridges?

While there may be issues with the new release I'm certainly looking with more alarm at some of the folk here that claim to be professionals that don't seem to have any fundamental practices in place themselves. Now that's what I'd call a shambles, and if you worked for any company that I run you'd be shown the door by the end of the week.



I agree that if it is your life blood, you use the established working product. the new version can be used for research, practice, to get up to speed with tools, but as for it replacing the money generator software out of the box, it is suicide. in theory...things should be 100% off the shelf, but sadly the Software industry fails on a constant basis across all apps. even the mightily Stable Reason has patches/bug fixes issued.

Personally I wish cakewalk would acknowledge issues more on the board and have a sticky list of issues cakewalk are working on resolving, plus requests for input on issues where they need more information. Also a sticky list of user errors... i.e. things people thought were bugs, but turned out to be user error, or system configuration issues.





Totally agree with the software 'theory' thing that an application should be of merchantable quality on release, I'm still using 7.02 and it looks likely I will be doing that for some time to come when I chose Sonar in the first place I did appraise it against my needs and it came out winner by a long way stacked against the competition.

I'm not loyal to Cakewalk at all I'm loyal to my own quality perception and value maxims and I'm currently a happy 7 customer as the software is doing exactly as claimed for me my upgrade schedule in this area isn't due to be looked at for another 18 months and doubtlessly I shan't be looking for a refund or soliciting others advice as to whether I should get my money back as hopefully then I will have done my homework right and be happy once again with MY purchasing decision.

Whilst I agree that Software often has more issues than any other consumer products and if I purchased a washing machine that leaked I'd be unhappy to the point of returning the item, software often offers some fairly abstract capabilities that, in what I would consider good software, are not obtainable by any other means, whereas a washer has but one task, to clean yer smalls properly.

I haven't looked at S8 seriously enough to know whether it offers value or it is a rogue as my chosen app which happens to be S7PE, is functioning satisfactorily within my current requirements but to dismiss a professional company's release as being a 'Shambles' IMO is quite wrong when clearly the OP has not got the conviction of his own purchasing decision borne out by asking others to make up his mind whether or not he should be asking for a refund, unless of course the incorporated title question is a rhetorical one.

As I've already alluded too the only 'shambles' I can see here is somebody that replaces a mission critical app. without reference to even that most basic of purchasing requirements, the time honoured statement of CAVEAT EMPTOR or buyer beware.

Nobody is mugging anyone else here although it seems plain that a few like to mug themselves.

tyacko
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 10:56:17
creynolds,

As commerical software applications (like Sonar) continue to expand and mature, it becomes more and more difficult to ensure that all areas of code continue to work/function the same way in all ways people perceive they should be used. This can be minimized by having settings or options that will branch the new functionality from existing functionality so as to not break existing code. The unfortunate thing here is that this might cause for more than one place to maintain code which is not optimal.

However, with all that said, if you are using Sonar in a commerical venture where it is imperative that the software works in front of clients, then simply installing it on the production machine without testing it first is a bit like playing the slots. If this is your means of business, you need to consider a test machine where you install the latest software (be it a new version of Sonar like 8 or simply an update patch like 8.01) and test it there before you every put it "on the front lines".

Now, everything I said is true with any DAW software you are going to use. Because bugs/issues are not specific to Sonar but to software/hardware in general. I don't work for Cakewalk and have no real passion for their software. It just surprises me when I read threads where someone uses strong words like "shambles" and go to find out that they loaded it right into production for a commercial environment.

Please live and learn.

Take care,
Tom
gtgarner
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:08:48
Hey, Cakewalk does have a position open for anyone that want's to put their professional advice and criticism to work. (insert sound of crickets chirping)

Then you can fix your own problems. (insert sound of crickets chirping again!)

I think Cakewalk needs to open up a special forum for complainers and venters that they don't pay any attention to.

I wonder if Cakewalk is performing at the level of some peoples music. (insert sound of crickets chirping)
At WORST Sonar works 90% of the time while some people are producing music that is crap 100% of the time. If you are one of these people....then yeah you need your money back.


Everyone....I'm joking.....I thought it would be funny to post this.

Let me end my post by saying EXCELLENT JOB Cakewalk!!!!!! EXCELLENT JOB on Sonar 8.
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:15:04
Retracted
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:43:07
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:19:03

ORIGINAL: bermuda

Personally I wish cakewalk would acknowledge issues more on the board and have a sticky list of issues cakewalk are working on resolving, plus requests for input on issues where they need more information. Also a sticky list of user errors... i.e. things people thought were bugs, but turned out to be user error, or system configuration issues.


Now there's a voice of sanity....some developers already do this, I wonder how it impacts on marketing though?

For example.....

http://www.runrev.com/support/quality-control-center/
gtgarner
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:22:39

ORIGINAL: creynolds

Sonar 7.02 has not and will not be replaced on my system until 8 works as well as 7 or better.


Hey!!! There is the answer. It's been here all the time. No refund necessary. Time to close this topic.
Glennbo
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:25:47

ORIGINAL: gtgarner


ORIGINAL: creynolds

Sonar 7.02 has not and will not be replaced on my system until 8 works as well as 7 or better.


Hey!!! There is the answer. It's been here all the time. No refund necessary. Time to close this topic.


So the answer is "don't use the software you just paid for". <Mr.Burns> Excellent </Mr.Burns>
krizrox
Max Output Level: -35 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:26:11
I just got off the phone with tech support. Total wait time to get a real person? About 5 minutes.

TS is going to send me an email with further instructions on where to send the dump files and other tidbits of information related to my problems. I don't know if this will all get resolved today or not but I am hopeful that a solution will be forthcoming. In the interest of actually getting your problems resolved, I suggest you do the right thing and call TS and explain the issue to them. They're there to help. Cake is a cool company. It's worth the effort to get the problems resolved. At least I think so. Take a deep breath. Relax. It's not the end of the world. Everythign will work out. You'll see! Good luck guys! Stay positive and have a great weekend.
post edited by krizrox - 2008/11/03 13:49:35
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:30:24
Retracted
Signing off this thread
post edited by creynolds - 2008/10/31 11:44:29
Glennbo
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:35:24

ORIGINAL: creynolds

Agreed.
Obviously this has been a pointless and misguided posting. I unreservedly apologise to all contributors and to Cakewalk. May I state for the record, that I now consider Sonar 8 to be a flawless release which contains no appreciable issues or bugs.
Sorry to have wasted your time. Signing off this thread



Teh pom poms will be made available to you as your status has now been elevated to "cheerleader". <g>
bermuda
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:36:56
ORIGINAL: creynolds


ORIGINAL: Jonbouy

...to dismiss a professional company's release as being a 'Shambles' IMO is quite wrong when clearly the OP has not got the conviction of his own purchasing decision borne out by asking others to make up his mind whether or not he should be asking for a refund, unless of course the incorporated title question is a rhetorical one.

As I've already alluded too the only 'shambles' I can see here is somebody that replaces a mission critical app. without reference to even that most basic of purchasing requirements, the time honoured statement of CAVEAT EMPTOR or buyer beware.

Nobody is mugging anyone else here although it seems plain that a few like to mug themselves.



Hi Jonbouy



Under UK law if a product is not fit for the purpose for which it is sold then you are entitled to a refund or replacement.
To quote from that act:
Wherever goods are bought they must "conform to contract". This means they must be as described, fit for purpose and of satisfactory quality (i.e. not inherently faulty at the time of sale).

and also here:

If goods do not conform to contract at the time of sale, purchasers can request their money back "within a reasonable time". (This is not defined and will depend on circumstances)

I am not saying for a second that we should try and enforce any type of refund. Also, I am not a fool as you imply. Sonar 7.02 has not and will not be replaced on my system until 8 works as well as 7 or better. I beg to differ on the mugging issue though. Someone is definitley being mugged. Noli nothis permittere te terere.




Sale of Goods Act and Fitness for purpose.

Although in reality this would likely not apply to Software. All software has bugs...Some users can prove that that the product does what it is intended to do. (It may not be as easy or done in a manner that was anticipated eg..use of workarounds).

A faulty iron is a a defect item from a product group that otherwise are working. A faulty software.... ??? erm we all have the same code. where we differ is in out setups and our application of things.

Sonar 8 is still just born. Some issues were resolved in the first patch ....more will be resolved in the next patch. there is way too much at stake for Cakewalk to drop the ball en route to the goal line.


I think the world wishes that software weren't different... I personally get cheesed off with the amount of software patches and fixes I have to download and apply to the multitude of software licences owned.
post edited by bermuda - 2008/10/31 11:58:09
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:43:49

ORIGINAL: creynolds

Agreed.
Obviously this has been a pointless and misguided posting. I unreservedly apologise to all contributors and to Cakewalk. May I state for the record, that I now consider Sonar 8 to be a flawless release which contains no appreciable issues or bugs.
Sorry to have wasted your time. Signing off this thread




I was about to agree, but then I hit play on a project with two guitar tracks and a single instance of Omnisphere Trilogy's bass.

I get transport movement, meters bouncing... AND NO SOUND!

If I stop it and start it a few times I finally get sound out of my hardware.

Each guitar track has Channels tools inserted. One guitar track has a Sonitus FX compressor.

I think you're being a bit optimistic here ;-)

best,
mike



Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:50:03
ORIGINAL: creynolds

Agreed.
Obviously this has been a pointless and misguided posting. I unreservedly apologise to all contributors and to Cakewalk. May I state for the record, that I now consider Sonar 8 to be a flawless release which contains no appreciable issues or bugs.
Sorry to have wasted your time. Signing off this thread




In this now retracted and hardly sincere looking post and ( edit: now including a trite title change) it seems like you are baling out because few blindly agreed with you, which ironically is what you are arrogantly accusing most folk here of doing with Cakewalk on the Sonar 8 issue. In fact if you read back through the thread there are a number of suggestions that have been put forward in how customer and developer could work together to improve future releases not least of which involves you contacting support with your issues rather than leading with the chin with an inflammatory title on your post.

Noli nothis permittere te terere. I agree and I won't let 'em get me down but I do try and work out who the 'Ba***' (edit: Bad Guys) are first.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2008/10/31 12:04:05
gtgarner
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 11:54:46
ORIGINAL: Glennbo


ORIGINAL: gtgarner


ORIGINAL: creynolds

Sonar 7.02 has not and will not be replaced on my system until 8 works as well as 7 or better.


Hey!!! There is the answer. It's been here all the time. No refund necessary. Time to close this topic.


So the answer is "don't use the software you just paid for". <Mr.Burns> Excellent </Mr.Burns>



This thread is no different than the SONAR 7 threads were on its release. Now people swear by Sonar 7.0.2. Just wait. Patience is more valuable than success.

Will someone start a thread like this about Sonar 9.....so that we can get it out of the way early?

If 8 is not working for you....just wait.......keep working on it...... and then next time don't buy the upgrade so early. Sonar 8 works great for me and thousands of others that don't respond to posts like this.
As far as I am concerned Sonar 8 is much more stable than 7 and everything that I was doing in 7....I can do in 8.
post edited by gtgarner - 2008/10/31 12:03:04
GotMetalBoy
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 12:03:26
creynolds,

I agree with you 100%. Sonar 7 PE still has bugs from Sonar 4 PE. I honestly think that if we have a documented bug that we should get a special discount if we choose to upgrade b/c we should not have to pay for upgrades when we still NEED updates.
gtgarner
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 12:07:04
ORIGINAL: GotMetalBoy

creynolds,

I agree with you 100%. Sonar 7 PE still has bugs from Sonar 4 PE. I honestly think that if we have a documented bug that we should get a special discount if we choose to upgrade b/c we should not have to pay for upgrades when we still NEED updates.



You are willing to upgrade to something that you know hasn't been wroking for you in the past?
post edited by gtgarner - 2008/10/31 12:12:24
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 12:14:47
"Sonar 7 PE still has bugs from Sonar 4 PE. I honestly think that if we have a documented bug that we should get a special discount if we choose to upgrade b/c we should not have to pay for upgrades when we still NEED updates."

I agree with your assessment of v7... there are still a bunch of version 4 bugs in it.

It appears that we do get a discount for beta testing new versions.

Apparently taking a release at face value is a fool's errand... and common wisdom is that we should wait for the final patch before buying IF we EXPECT to be satisfied with the product.

So with that in mind I'm begining to think the wise man's upgrade costs $229- and a year of waiting while the beta tester price is $179-.

That's 50 bucks off just for taking the bath.


best regards,
mike
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 12:18:57
Jeez guys, come on. Let's get this thread back on topic: Isn't my house cool? And the bells, oh the bells...like lithe, peaceful daggers, stuck into my ears each week...Sonar 8 is great and if you hate bait just wait cuz your plate of fate's great trait of never being late to skate shall I negate.
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 12:20:07

ORIGINAL: gtgarner

ORIGINAL: GotMetalBoy

creynolds,

I agree with you 100%. Sonar 7 PE still has bugs from Sonar 4 PE. I honestly think that if we have a documented bug that we should get a special discount if we choose to upgrade b/c we should not have to pay for upgrades when we still NEED updates.



You are willing to upgrade to something that you know hasn't been wroking for you in the past?


You're logic, or lack there of is tiresome. You make blanket statements like "Now people swear by Sonar 7.0.2." and "As far as I am concerned Sonar 8 is much more stable than 7 and everything that I was doing in 7....I can do in 8." in some perverse effort to deflect the fact that each and every release is supposed to work as advertised.

In all of my posting I have yet to ASK for a feature... in every instance I have complained it has been because an ADVERTISED feature does not work as advertised.

Now your debate technique is too attempt to undermine a customer for TRUSTING a company (that you seemingly have implicit faith in) to do the right thing. You endorse the product and it's suitability in your workflow... and then imply that someone else is foolish to have trusted the company and statements of satisfaction such as yours?

That's just plain twisted.

best regards,
mike
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 12:22:34
Jinga, I'm sure your house is cool. I would expect nothing less of you. I went to the link but could not zoom in enough to see what Space_Cowboy saw. Somehow that makes me feel envious.

Thanks for trying to lighten the mood. You're a happy spirit and you have the ability to share that quality.

all the best,
mike
gtgarner
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 12:34:38
ORIGINAL: mike_mccue


ORIGINAL: gtgarner

ORIGINAL: GotMetalBoy

creynolds,

I agree with you 100%. Sonar 7 PE still has bugs from Sonar 4 PE. I honestly think that if we have a documented bug that we should get a special discount if we choose to upgrade b/c we should not have to pay for upgrades when we still NEED updates.



You are willing to upgrade to something that you know hasn't been wroking for you in the past?


You're logic, or lack there of is tiresome. You make blanket statements like "Now people swear by Sonar 7.0.2." and "As far as I am concerned Sonar 8 is much more stable than 7 and everything that I was doing in 7....I can do in 8." in some perverse effort to deflect the fact that each and every release is supposed to work as advertised.

In all of my posting I have yet to ASK for a feature... in every instance I have complained it has been because an ADVERTISED feature does not work as advertised.

Now your debate technique is too attempt to undermine a customer for TRUSTING a company (that you seemingly have implicit faith in) to do the right thing. You endorse the product and it's suitability in your workflow... and then imply that someone else is foolish to have trusted the company and statements of satisfaction such as yours?

That's just plain twisted.

best regards,
mike



Twisted people love Sonar 8 as well then.

I'm not expecting everything to work as it does not.....I just think that asking for ones money back is just as twisted.

Obviously you haven't read any of my other posts on other threads. I don't have implicit faith in Cakewalk as I experienced bugs as well.....and gues what.....they weren't all Cakewalks bugs.....especially in BFD2 using SONAR 8. It was fixed in 8.0.1.

I don't have a debate technique. I just say what I feel. Even creynolds says that his 7.0.2 works for him (even with its bugs), I say ......stick with it then - don't upgrade.

The twisted people vote for Cakewalk to give his money back....if thats what he wants. Now everyone is happy.
post edited by gtgarner - 2008/10/31 12:39:33
Ham N Egz
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 13:25:34
jinga old bean you are a poet and don't know it but your feet certainly show it because they are LONGFELLOWS


ORIGINAL: jinga8

Jeez guys, come on. Let's get this thread back on topic: Isn't my house cool? And the bells, oh the bells...like lithe, peaceful daggers, stuck into my ears each week...Sonar 8 is great and if you hate bait just wait cuz your plate of fate's great trait of never being late to skate shall I negate.

post edited by musicman100 - 2008/10/31 13:29:16
Danny Danzi
Moderator
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 13:43:01
cr: For what it's worth, I think you have every right to complain and voice your opinion no matter what that opinion may be. That said, I wouldn't have worded a few things the way you did. BUT, I HAVE in the past because frustration can get the best of us and sometimes venting about it can make us feel a bit better. I've went off on a few tangents on here when I've been frustrated. I've bashed the company, the product, some of the posters for their attitudes. It all stems from our frustrations man, seriously. At the end of the day, we need something that works for us and doesn't disrupt our work-flow. We don't care about all the time that was invested into this or what may have went on behind the scenes with a better audio engine, new plugs, new ways of handling things...we just need the program to work for us without a hitch. And, when these bugs or roadblocks come into our lives in an important situation, all this stuff really builds up and can make you boil.

I've been there man, seriously I have. I've even had a chance to talk with Noel in private many times about some of my issues. One thing he told me that I sometimes forgot was "we are people too" followed by "we are just as upset or more upset than you guys are when bugs are found". I really believe that to be true. I can't fathom the amount of stress those guys must be under to make this stuff work on so many systems. Of course I'm not taking sides either way....if something doesn't work for you, it simply doesn't work and it seems like you've wasted your money. I read your post the way you intended it to be and I sensed not only loyalty, but loads of frustration which is perfectly acceptable. But like I said, I might not have used the words you used and the reason for that is I have found in the past that the more tactful I can be, the more people (as well as the Cake TS) will be more than willing to help.

You know as well as I do that most of the problems we encounter on here have to do with individual systems and of course how savvy the user is. However, there ARE serious issues for some people on some systems that ARE related to the software itself. These need to be addressed, error reports need to be filled out, TS can be called...you know the drill. Also, I sincerely believe that each problem differs due to how that individual uses Sonar. For example, the biggest issue I have read about on these boards is pops/clicks/motorboating. If I got a penny for everytime I read a post that had that in it, I'd be in Donald Trumps league. LOL!!

That in mind, I have NEVER had an issue with motor-boating on ANY version of Sonar. In my case, that reason may be because I do not use low latency settings and I do not use direct input monitoring because I use an external mixing board to do all that in real time. I have experimented with direct input monitoring and have had good results, but motor-boating and audio drop-outs entered my world in certain situations....so this is proof that depending on your individual use, Sonar may give you some issues.

I've been pretty lucky with Sonar but I also can relate to a lot of the things you mentioned in this thread that have since been retracted. I felt S8 was a hot-rodded version of 7 and I think I slightly offended Noel in saying that originally. But for my particular use, there is nothing other than a few additional options in S8 that tells me I'm using S8. Dim Pro, enabling/disabling arm while audio is playing....stuff like that is really all I notice for my particular needs. CAL files stopped working in 8, I had issues recording Roland V Drums....crossfades were not keeping to where I set them....these same issues exist in S7 for me minus CAL file usage. They have been fixed in the S8.1 patch, but still this gives merit in my opinion that some things were damaged that worked as new things were implemented. S5 is still my weapon of choice as I have NEVER had an issue with it other than I totally hate how the mouse wheel can't be disabled for editing perameters. I still hate that to this day with the newer versions.

In my humble opinion, and I mean no offense to Cake or TS, but for MY particular use of this product, I've really not felt I've needed to buy an update since S5. S6 was worth an upgrade to me as it gave me a few new cool things to mess with. S7 and S8 should have been on the house as I really don't see them to be "new" at all. Maybe for the creators and some users....but for me and how "I" use Sonar, there are only a few things I really need. I'll list them just to further prove my personal point.

Select all audio outputs: Awesome feature that stopped me from having to change outputs one at a time. This is a necessity for me.

Dim Pro: The light version was cool, but the one with S8 is VERY cool.

Arm audio tracks while playback is running: I've always wanted this....it's perfect and I'm glad it was implemented.

V Vocal: I love it and think it's one of the best vocal plugs out there.

Keep all ports open: I hated when Sonar would stop or glitch when you would create a track or open an out-port or in port. This makes it smoother for me.

Drum map manager: I dig it and use it for things I don't have instrument definitions for. The only thing I don't like about it is when you preview an instrument too fast...it opens up the manager. This is a hinderance. Sometimes I like to audition a hit several times but it can't be done in this mode. But I still use it from time to time and it's helpful as the format is different than instrument definition view.

Would you believe this is all I can list? If you went back through all the versions on which these options were implemented, it's easy to see how a guy like me can feel I have definitely spent too much money for very limited new bells and whistles. I could live without all of those options above, so this makes my feelings a bit more credible if you're me. It really depends on how an individual uses this stuff I feel. Do I feel ripped off? Hmmm....well, yes and no. I wouldn't really say "ripped off" but I do feel some of the new releases could have just been updates IF they just added a few new features and fixed ongoing issues. I made up my mind after S7 that I wasn't going to upgrade to S8....but, all the hush hush stuff made me curious as to what we'd be in for. I thought something truly groundbreaking may have been in the works...but other than the few options I have listed and a new color scheme I made for S8, that's the only way I know I'm using S8. For others, they will give you a different side of the story...it's all in how we use the program. But I do feel your pain regardless on how some may have responded to you. I think it may have been better to just use your words a bit more carefully, but then again, like I said, I HAVE been where you are.

I can also say that given a chance, the Baker TS has been extremely fantastic with me past and present. If you can find it in yourself to fill out an in depth error report, give them a chance to assist you man. I'm serious. I know you're frustrated and I also know you may be thinking like I used to think "why should I do their work for them....I don't have the time and I don't have the desire!" I've felt that way for a long time. But one day, I decided to actually try and make a difference with an error I had. They not only gave me a great TS guy to work on my issue personally, the guy kept in contact with me on a daily basis to help me with this problem. I'm sure this is not always the case in every error report, but I cannot fault a company who has went out of their way to help me and has contacted me in private to solve my issues. I can't say a bad thing about them, seriously. Maybe Roland is the cuprit in how they run things, but I sincerely feel the TS guys that are lurking around here really care about how we are feeling and want to solve our issues. They just have to know these issues exist and though you may not want to take part in the debugging process, the more people that do, the faster we may all have a program that is close to bug free. Just try it before you completely abandon ship bro, seriously.

I went on the Stein forums for help with WaveLab last week. I can't tell you how bad it was. There were hundreds of questions that went unanswered. At least here, if a Baker doesn't help you personally, you have about 300 guys lurking that might be able to if you give your system stats and info. You'll see if you browse the Stein forum....we have quite a gift here. We just sometimes have to embrace it and do a bit extra. This is easier said than done when you are frustrated and have issues that are preventing you from using the software. Trust me, I know exactly how you feel. Anyway, I've rambled enough here but I just wanted to tell you I understand what you are feeling and I hope you can give this one more shot and see if your issues can be solved. If not, best of luck with whatever DAW you choose to use. :)
JavaMan
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 13:56:09
Went from Sonar 4 PE to Sonar 8 PE... No Regrets !!!!!!
Lay In Wait
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 14:29:04
I cant stand it when people edit/erase/retract all there comments in a thread. You obviously meant what you said. Thanx for wasting everyones time.
D K
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 15:17:35
ORIGINAL: Lay In Wait

I cant stand it when people edit/erase/retract all there comments in a thread. You obviously meant what you said. Thanx for wasting everyones time.


He's probably just frustrated by being beaten down with all the poms poms and lectures ..
post edited by D K - 2008/10/31 15:25:20
Oaf_Topik
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 16:12:44
*ATTENTION* Sonar cheer practice has been moved from Sonitus Hall, to Z3TA House. Our goal today is to get LOUD, so don't forget to bring Boost 11.
Zonno
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 16:16:04
The amateur/professional discussion in this thread got me thinking.
I'm an amateur, so who is the professional?

  • I play in a band four times a week at company parties, weddings and funerals and I have modest income out of that.
    Am I a professional?
  • I play in a band four times a week at company parties, weddings and funerals and I sell shoes during the day.
    Am I a professional?
  • I know exactly which motherboard, powersupply, processor, discs and memory you shoukd pick for optimum performance.
    Am I a professional?
  • I'll tell you that you should lower your EQ with 2.5 db with Q set at 3.2 at 1.6kHZ and your mix sounds better.
    Am I a professional?
  • My last name is either Stock, Aitkin, Waterman, Eno, Rogers or Edwars and I know how to write a song that sells.
    Am I a professional?
  • I can tell you that you need AGF330+ microphones for kick and bsd23se microphones for snare.
    Am I a professional?
  • I know that if you press M, the track manager appears.
    Am I a professional?
  • I am a conductor of a big band and I can hear immediately that the third trombone plays a D instead of a Db in bar 43.
    Am I a professional?
  • I did play in a band four times a week at company parties, weddings and funerals, but my wife convinced me to go into selling mortgages. Now I hate my wife and I spend four hours a day with SONAR 8, and I hate that too, since upgrading.
    Am I a professional?
  • I spell all my posts correctly.
    Am I a professional?
  • My postcount is huge, 10.000+ and not only in the SONAR forum.
    Am I a professional?
  • I know all the DAWS and stuff: Protools, Cubase, Reaper, Logic, Live, Reason.
    Am I a professional?
  • I know how to apply smilies correctly.
    Am I a professional?


A lot of people on the forum here, are in my opinion professionals, because of their posts.
And I like reading usefull posts from amateurs and professionals, but the most usefull thing in this thread was that I did get to see Jinga's house.
Dave Modisette
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 16:18:22
The difference between an amateur and a professional is that the professional is willing to take an annual cut in pay.
Editor
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 16:34:12
Dave - ROFL - the best post in this thread.
tcaylor
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/10/31 17:46:02
Retracted.....
Oaf_Topik
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 ROCKS!*** 2008/10/31 23:29:24
Are you ready?(clap,clap)
To Record(clap)
Say go Sonar(clap)
Go Sonar(clap)
Sonar all the way!(clap,clap
Lay In Wait
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/11/01 00:09:01

ORIGINAL: tcaylor

Retracted.....


dbmusic
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/11/01 12:49:58
Personally cyrenolds, should you mosey around this neck of the neighborhood again, I'm disappointed with your retractions. Though I don't agree with everything you said, I thought you expressed your displeasure thoughtfully and to the point. When you go anti-Sonar around here you can expect some pretty heavy-handed responses. But really, who cares? Some of the exchanges that go on here really get under my skin, but I would still defend anyone's right to express them. Speak your mind, let others respond, then move on. But to retract everything you say is like taking all your toys and going home because the kids on the block don't play nice. It's good to go against the grain once in awhile...keeps the world an interesting place.
Ham N Egz
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/11/01 14:26:19
Protracted , protractor, prorate procreate propensive , proponent, prolific, and that brings us back to do re mi fa.....


ORIGINAL: Lay In Wait


ORIGINAL: tcaylor

Retracted.....




Glennbo
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/11/01 15:48:50

ORIGINAL: dbmusic
But to retract everything you say is like taking all your toys and going home because the kids on the block don't play nice.


I saw it more as like him throwing his hands in the air in exasperation, realizing that so many people are blind sighted by their love affair with with their software, that they can't admit his observations might have some validity.
creynolds
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
RE: ***SONAR 8 IS A SHAMBLES -SHOULD WE ASK FOR A REFUND?*** 2008/11/02 19:21:58

ORIGINAL: dbmusic

Personally cyrenolds, should you mosey around this neck of the neighborhood again, I'm disappointed with your retractions. Though I don't agree with everything you said, I thought you expressed your displeasure thoughtfully and to the point. When you go anti-Sonar around here you can expect some pretty heavy-handed responses. But really, who cares? Some of the exchanges that go on here really get under my skin, but I would still defend anyone's right to express them. Speak your mind, let others respond, then move on. But to retract everything you say is like taking all your toys and going home because the kids on the block don't play nice. It's good to go against the grain once in awhile...keeps the world an interesting place.


Awright now there we go!! Bring it on evengelistas!!!! Sonar 8 was......... disapointing!!
I'm back in the fray

Thanks
Page: < 123 > Showing page 2 of 3