chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 15:39:11
(permalink)
+1001 
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
godparticle 
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 55
- Joined: 2012/08/11 06:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 17:31:50
(permalink)
Hey, i've got an idea.
To undo the ability of people like john who come in here and post a one word post just to rack up their post-count to appear like a big-time senior member, Cakewalk should automatically delete 25% of his non-legit post-count at the end of each year just to account for the amount of junk cheap responses that he utilizes just to a appear like he is a big-shot big-timer in this forum, actually cakewalk should do this to everyones thread-count, and then we all will know for sure that anyone's post-count is indeed what it is with associated effort and genuine relevant participation.
|
Paul P
Max Output Level: -48.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2685
- Joined: 2012/12/08 17:15:47
- Location: Montreal
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 17:38:53
(permalink)
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 17:46:49
(permalink)
godparticle
Hey, i've got an idea.
To undo the ability of people like john who come in here and post a one word post just to rack up their post-count to appear like a big-time senior member, Cakewalk should automatically delete 25% of his non-legit post-count at the end of each year just to account for the amount of junk cheap responses that he utilizes just to a appear like he is a big-shot big-timer in this forum, actually cakewalk should do this to everyones thread-count, and then we all will know for sure that anyone's post-count is indeed what it is with associated effort and genuine relevant participation.
I wouldn't mind that at all. As long as it also includes all CH posts. 
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 18:00:38
(permalink)
To undo the ability of people like john who come in here and post a one word post just to rack up their post-count to appear like a big-time senior member, Cakewalk should automatically delete 25% of his non-legit post-count at the end of each year just to account for the amount of junk cheap responses that he utilizes just to a appear like he is a big-shot big-timer in this forum, actually cakewalk should do this to everyones thread-count, and then we all will know for sure that anyone's post-count is indeed what it is with associated effort and genuine relevant participation. That's a really long sentence... So, what's your take on Cubase vs. Studio One as compared to SONAR at this point? There actually have been a few posts interspersed within this five page thread that have answered your question, but you really haven't acknowledged them AFAIK.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13933
- Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 18:05:52
(permalink)
Imagine if Cakewalk deleted all of you posts, Godparticle, in which you've whined, insulted, ****ed and generally made a gigantic arse of yourself. Every trace of you would be erased from this forum. Don't get me wrong, I don't think anyone's posts should be deleted and I don't mind you being here at all (entertainment purposes) but I just have a feeling you're not going to be happy in the Sonar community. So why punish yourself?
JamesWindows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 18:58:26
(permalink)
i cant believe that this thread has not had any moderation for all the TOS violations
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:11:33
(permalink)
mudgel
i cant believe that this thread has not had any moderation for all the TOS violations
I had one in Software asking about how Studio 1 was and it got locked up that very morning. Mind, this was on a weekday, but still...
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:14:53
(permalink)
I used to be bothered by his threads, they don't bother me anymore.
if he wants to vent,he's going to vent.
sooner or later he will make a choice, Cubase, sonar, studio 1
I wish him the best.
seriously.
I wish I could give hime more advise on those daw's, but ive said all I can.
peace.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:20:13
(permalink)
Mr particle,
groove 3 has this thing going on right now for a 30 day trial(I think)
this might be a good route to go.
you can watch the groove 3 vids and get a really good inside look at all 3 daw's in action.
this might help a lot.
I know ive seen some cool vids there on studio 1. V2 and it helps to see the features too being used on projects,tutorials.
just a thought.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6907
- Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
- Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:26:26
(permalink)
John
godparticle
Hey, i've got an idea.
To undo the ability of people like john who come in here and post a one word post just to rack up their post-count to appear like a big-time senior member, Cakewalk should automatically delete 25% of his non-legit post-count at the end of each year just to account for the amount of junk cheap responses that he utilizes just to a appear like he is a big-shot big-timer in this forum, actually cakewalk should do this to everyones thread-count, and then we all will know for sure that anyone's post-count is indeed what it is with associated effort and genuine relevant participation.
I wouldn't mind that at all. As long as it also includes all CH posts.
Hey now....Leave the CH out of this  . Oh and Monday when the mods see this thread, please do me a favor and just delete it. We don't need this trash in the CH. We're busy discussing important topics down there.  Thanks. Mike
Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW
GA-Z77X-UD5H
Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8)
2x Samsung 250GB SSD
1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB
Corsair H80i Liquid cooler
Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm
Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU
Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:29:10
(permalink)
LOL You have a point Mike. At least on this disaster thread we can still have some fun. 
|
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6907
- Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
- Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:37:42
(permalink)
Yeah God is a funny guy.
Who'd thunk?
Mike
Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW
GA-Z77X-UD5H
Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8)
2x Samsung 250GB SSD
1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB
Corsair H80i Liquid cooler
Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm
Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU
Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
|
Chregg
Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2382
- Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
- Location: Perth, Scotland
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:49:40
(permalink)
|
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6907
- Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
- Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:50:51
(permalink)
Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW
GA-Z77X-UD5H
Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8)
2x Samsung 250GB SSD
1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB
Corsair H80i Liquid cooler
Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm
Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU
Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 19:53:48
(permalink)
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
bz2838
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 366
- Joined: 2010/10/16 14:44:50
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 20:02:28
(permalink)
godparticle
Hey, i've got an idea.
To undo the ability of people like john who come in here and post a one word post just to rack up their post-count to appear like a big-time senior member, Cakewalk should automatically delete 25% of his non-legit post-count at the end of each year just to account for the amount of junk cheap responses that he utilizes just to a appear like he is a big-shot big-timer in this forum, actually cakewalk should do this to everyones thread-count, and then we all will know for sure that anyone's post-count is indeed what it is with associated effort and genuine relevant participation.
You mean like your post above?
Purrrfect Audio: Intel i7 7700k (Kabylake), 32Gig DDR4/2133, Windows 10x64 Pro, USB RME Babyface, Sonar Platinum Current
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 20:03:23
(permalink)
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
DW_Mike
Max Output Level: -6 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6907
- Joined: 2006/11/29 18:06:40
- Location: The arm-pit of the good 'ol US...New Jersey
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/10 22:11:07
(permalink)
Yes........Yes it was.
Mike
Sonar X3 ~ Scarlett 18i6 ~ Home Build DAW
GA-Z77X-UD5H
Intel i7 3770k 4.2GHz
32GB RAM Crucial Ballistix Elite (4x8)
2x Samsung 250GB SSD
1TB WD Black HDD @ 7200RPM 6Gb/s 64MB
Corsair H80i Liquid cooler
Noctua Silent Fans ~ 3x120mm ~ 1x140mm
Seasonic Platinum 760w PSU
Windows 7 Pro 64Bit.
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 01:25:08
(permalink)
To godparticle:
I wasn't aware that Post count inferred anything other than the number of posts.
Joining date doesn't even infer much other than it shows how long someone's been a member of the forum.
Even that doesn't mean much, as many folks have been members for ages and haven't posted much while others have been members for a short while and have huge post counts.
Then there's those who've used cakewalk software for years but just joined the forum recently and those who use Cakewalk software and aren't members of the forum at all.
None of it means anything: It is what it is and that's all.
What does mean something is those who come in here and disrespect Cakewalk and what others say by behaving in a rude manner with no consideration for the forum Terms Of Service.
Thankfully there's not too many of those types and they eventually go away. Even the plague dies off without a host.
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 02:07:00
(permalink)
particle, here's that link to the groove 3 free membership: http://www.groove3.com/str/gbox-free.html im not really sure on the deets but check it out, like I said, theres nothing better than getting up close in the vids. you can see every little thing. peace.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
godparticle
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 55
- Joined: 2012/08/11 06:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 03:23:13
(permalink)
OK chuckebaby, i acknowledge your help, thanks mate.
post edited by Seth Kellogg [Cakewalk] - 2013/03/12 12:48:02
|
Zonno
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 999
- Joined: 2007/04/11 16:37:33
- Location: The Netherlands
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 03:35:16
(permalink)
godparticle
The rest of you need to wipe all that semen off your hands, especially john and sharke...pathetic.
Quick reply for post count purposes only.
Cakewalk, Reason 10, KOMPLETE 11, BIAB 2018, Roland OctaCapture, Finale 26, PCR-300, HP ZBook, Guitars __________________ Any text above is a random collection of characters which bear no meaning whatsoever. The reader will be held liable for any damage due to interpretation of these characters.
|
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 31112
- Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
- Location: Worcester, England.
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 04:30:20
(permalink)
I can smell coffee... MMMMMmmmmmm mmmmmm................. percolation 
|
bigboi
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 260
- Joined: 2004/03/12 00:30:41
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 04:37:35
(permalink)
I have all 3.
Studio One is the best, work flow wise. Sonar is great for mixing. I just started using Cubase7....it will now be my main DAW. Overall, it just seems more cohesive to me. More fluid. And this is coming from a long time Sonar user (check my joined date).
If anyone is interested in a vs700c controller, pm me.
And if anyone wants a more detailed explanation of why I switched, pm me as well. I dont care to get pulled into this war.
I7 920, 8 gigs ram, Newest gigabyte motherboard, 100 gig ssd for operating system and program files, 1 TB 7400 rpm for storage, Full V-Studio system, 2x Motu 2408 MKIII, 2x Motu 24 I/O, Maschine, Kore 2, Virus TI2, Korg m3, Novation Supernova, Novation D-station, Mo Phatt, Elektron Machine Drum, MicroKorg XL, Arturia Origin, Korg Triton, Roland jv2080-completely expanded, Avalon 737SP, 3 Sony premiere monitors, 2 event 20/20 studio monitors, Autotune AVP1, TC Helicon Voiceworks, 1 TC Electronics Powercore 6000, 1 Powercore Firewire
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 05:03:28
(permalink)
SteveStrummerUK
I can smell coffee...
MMMMMmmmmmmmmmmmm................. percolation
I can smell it from here................
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Pragi
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1173
- Joined: 2010/09/19 11:46:59
- Location: Village of the sun
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 06:28:54
(permalink)
I simply want to rack up my post-count .
Have a nice coffee and day!
Pragi
|
godparticle
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 55
- Joined: 2012/08/11 06:41:47
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 09:34:51
(permalink)
Me and my big mouth, so now they come in here and openly admit it, frick me. s**** s**** 56 posts now... hehe
bigboi, you're the one i've been waiting for, forget the PM matey, just lay it out, point blank, freedom of speech, we need to hear it, i need to hear it, everyone needs to hear it, the aliens need to hear it, even the President needs to hear it, this is my chance, tell me why Cubase is better than Sonar, in detail, and why.
It took 147 posts to wait for this info, now's the time, like you said, you're a long time Sonar user, you have a right to be here, and a right to have an opinion on another DAW, so lets hear it; if Cakewalk are confident about their DAW then they have nothing to worry about, the truth reigns supreme. What do you mean Sonar is better for mixing, what? Does S1 need ten mouse-clicks to insert an effect, what do you mean?
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 09:46:21
(permalink)
10 mouse clicks to insert an effect?
I don't know what DAW you're talking about, but you'd better steer well clear of it
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
thunderkyss
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1207
- Joined: 2003/11/12 12:10:59
- Status: offline
Re:SONAR X2 versus Cubase 7
2013/03/11 10:42:05
(permalink)
Wonderful thread. I remember back in the day when I used to frequent this forum & participate in these threads....... ah, the good ole days. Anywho, a little background. I pretty much stopped all the DAW wars about the time SonarX1 came out. I was on Sonar5 & though cakewalk made it financially attractive to upgrade through all that, I had to take a break. I was tired of building new computers to accommodate features of software I'd never use. I'm a simple man, my needs are few. So anyway, I'm just wasting time, kicking the tires on a couple of the new products out there. Saw this thread & thought I'd ask the experts. Cubase 7 includes this new funtionality, I was wondering if Sonar had an equivalent. Cubase detects the harmony structure of your song and feeds back all chord and scale information to both MIDI and audio tracks processed with VariAudio. All tracks engaged to follow will automatically reflect any harmonic adjustments made with the Chord Track! Advanced voicing options are used to transform existing parts in a harmonically correct and ear-pleasing way. Chords can be either entered manually with the mouse, by playing them on a MIDI keyboard, or generated automatically from existing MIDI parts in the project. You may even want to enter single notes and harmonize these later on with VariAudio — Chord Track lets you do all this. and this (which is similar) Intelligent composing assistance You don't have to be a musical genius to lay down beautiful harmonies — not when you're using Cubase 7. The powerful new Chord Assistant helps you to generate everything from simple pop to complex jazz chord sequences that just sound fabulous. Want to specify both the first and final chords but have no clue how to get there? This, also, is possible in Cubase 7. The Chord Assistant lists chord suggestions from which you can choose — it's all just a click away.
|