MArwood
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1816
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:04:42
- Status: offline
The 6000 post challenge (was: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine)
Edit: A few pages into this thread a challenge was issued by Cakewalk Marketing that if this thread got 6000 replies he would reveal the feature list to SONAR 7 and the 5999 poster would get a free copy of SONAR 7. There are no restrictions on what to post. You can comment on wether you like or dislike the ad, post musician jokes, or just post nonsense and idle chatter. Original post: I don't approve of this ad. I do not think it is a good practice to cut down Pro Tools or any other company to try to build up the reputation of your company (cakewalk). Sonar has improved by leaps and bounds the last few version. There is no need for an ad like this one. If you really want to cut them down, just list features with a side by side comparison. Check what each software program does then put the cost at the bottom. Sonar will most certainly beat every commercial DAW software available. I care about cakewalk and that is the only reason I posted this. Did I just take this Ad wrong? Max Arwood
post edited by Marketing [Cakewalk] - 2007/09/18 07:52:44
|
jinga8
Max Output Level: -17 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5817
- Joined: 2004/02/14 21:45:01
- Location: Oceanside, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:03:54
(permalink)
Now I am intrigued. I have not seen the ad, but whatever it says it is certainly being noticed (positively or negatively)!
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:09:20
(permalink)
Are you saying the ad is a Troll?  Best John
|
plainfaced
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1617
- Joined: 2004/08/25 08:52:16
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:09:23
(permalink)
I havent seen it.. But if was that bad.. Why did EQ magazine approve it for publishing? Do they not review or advertise Digidesign products??? Do they have a deal with Cakewalk??
Sonar Professional | Reason 8 | Propellerheads Balance | Windows 10
|
skullsession
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1765
- Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
- Location: Houston, TX, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:24:57
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: MArwood Sonar will most certainly beat every commercial DAW software available. I care about cakewalk and that is the only reason I posted this. I think you're being over-sensitive on this one. If, as you state - and I also believe, that Sonar "beats" them all, what's wrong with them pushing a button or two. I honestly believe they have a product that has finally surpassed all of the others. And Cakewalk's line of products has been somewhat stigmatized over the last years as "not professional". How many times have I got "that look" when "pros" ask me what software I use? I can't even begin to recall. They think it's a pea-shooter. Not any more. I now have all of their clients, and I'm pumping out better product at a better price. And I'm doing it with Sonar. I think they might have to shake things up a bit - push a button or two - to snap some people out of their ProTools induced coma. I think its funny. No one has had the balls to T-Bone ProTolls like that before that I can recall. Is it a bold statement? Sure! But can Sonar back it up? I sure think it can.
HOOK: Skullsessions.com / Darwins God Album "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
|
skullsession
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1765
- Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
- Location: Houston, TX, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:29:17
(permalink)
Not word-for-word....but the ad basically says..... "You have to use Pro-Tools to deliver a product that will compete, right?" then it reads.... "Get Real. Sonar 7" And the photo shows a dude sitting at a conference table at what looks like a corporate meeting. He's also got a lap-top open, all while he's grinning at the camera. Something like that anyway.
HOOK: Skullsessions.com / Darwins God Album "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
|
plainfaced
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1617
- Joined: 2004/08/25 08:52:16
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:32:22
(permalink)
Haha.. Fun Im really looking forward to it now.. **Goes to clear his cookies, and refresh the Cakewalk Homepage**
Sonar Professional | Reason 8 | Propellerheads Balance | Windows 10
|
Marketing [Cakewalk]
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 276
- Joined: 2005/07/22 13:19:58
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:34:07
(permalink)
Max, I'm sorry you did not appreciate our new SONAR 7 ad. Thanks for letting us know your thoughts abaout it. Let me explain what we were trying to do with this ad. Even though our products are superior, Pro Tools is the market leader. A common marketing practice is for the company that holds the number 2 market position to launch attacks on the company in the number one slot. The ad was meant in a tounge in cheek manner, to poke fun at one of the myths surrounding Pro Tools. This is not unlike the type of advertising you will see Apple doing against PCs for instance. When I use the word myth, I mean it literally. The alternate ad campaign direction that you suggested is a very rational one. We've taken the high road for years with exactly the type of marketing that you described. Unfortunately, a good percentage of the populace does not always respond to purely rational-based marketing. If they did, I feel confident that they would choose SONAR over Pro Tools, or they would choose Nuendo, Logic, or Digital Performer if they used a Mac. So, we decided to mix things up a bit to try and reach some new people with an ad that was very different from what you would typically find in music technology publications. We were prepared for a little controversy. The ad wasn't designed to speak to you. You already have SONAR, and we can speak to you directly through our emails, website, or right here on the forums. My appologies if you found it offensive. We really intended it to just be fun. Please let me know if you have any other concerns or questions. Best regards, Carl Jacobson Marketing Director Cakewalk
post edited by Marketing [Cakewalk] - 2007/09/17 15:50:15
|
cryophonik
Max Output Level: -28 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4724
- Joined: 2006/04/03 17:28:17
- Location: Elk Grove, CA
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:34:47
(permalink)
I don't think that this sounds like a jab at ProTools - more like a jab at all the ignoramuses who think that PT is the ONLY app that can deliver. It's all about changing (correcting?) the perception. I like it.
|
skullsession
Max Output Level: -57.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1765
- Joined: 2006/12/05 10:32:06
- Location: Houston, TX, USA
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:37:58
(permalink)
A screen shot of this thread would also make a great ad. How many times do you suppose the Marketing Director of PT would personally answer a question about an advertisement on an open forum within an hour of the original post!! Our Cakewalk team frikkin' RULES!!
post edited by skullsession - 2007/09/17 15:47:58
HOOK: Skullsessions.com / Darwins God Album "Without a doubt I would have far greater listening and aural skills than most of the forum members here. Not all but many I am sure....I have done more listening than most people." - Jeff Evans on how awesome Jeff Evans is.
|
nagal
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 185
- Joined: 2006/07/26 13:04:33
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:38:55
(permalink)
I can't wait to get a copy of EQ just to see this ad :)
Michael Sonar 7 PE, XP Pro SP2, Q6600, 4 GB Ram, EMU 1212M. MCU Pro, Axiom 61, Trigger Finger
|
plainfaced
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1617
- Joined: 2004/08/25 08:52:16
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:40:27
(permalink)
Carl if your still there. Im still refreshing the Cakewalk Homepage every 2 minutes... My eyes, hand, and mind are getting tired..!
Sonar Professional | Reason 8 | Propellerheads Balance | Windows 10
|
Marketing [Cakewalk]
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 276
- Joined: 2005/07/22 13:19:58
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:44:30
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: plainfaced Carl if your still there. Im still refreshing the Cakewalk Homepage every 2 minutes... My eyes, hand, and mind are getting tired..!  I guarantee you'll be sitting there longer than you want to. Maybe you should give your hand a break for awhile, or at least use it for something else. The ads broke earlier than was originally estimated. Sorry.
|
SteveD
Max Output Level: -47 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2831
- Joined: 2003/11/07 13:35:57
- Location: NJ
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:45:03
(permalink)
Class act... that Cakewalk. Cheap shot at PT? Maybe. Having a bit of fun at Digi's expense? Definitely. Cakewalk spotting and addressing your concerns here on a public forum? PRICELESS.
|
artsoul
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1985
- Joined: 2005/11/22 18:32:49
- Location: glasgow, scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:49:33
(permalink)
[quote Maybe you should give your hand a break for awhile, or at least use it for something else. oooer matron
|
mlockett
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2099
- Joined: 2003/11/07 17:26:14
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:50:27
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Marketing [Cakewalk] ... Maybe you should give your hand a break for awhile, or at least use it for something else. :-)
|
plainfaced
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1617
- Joined: 2004/08/25 08:52:16
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:52:05
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Marketing [Cakewalk] ORIGINAL: plainfaced Carl if your still there. Im still refreshing the Cakewalk Homepage every 2 minutes... My eyes, hand, and mind are getting tired..!  I guarantee you'll be sitting there longer than you want to. Maybe you should give your hand a break for awhile, or at least use it for something else. The ads broke earlier than was originally estimated. Sorry. haha.. Cool. Thanks. Really looking forward to it though. Ive never gone out of my way to praise a product, but I may as well do it here.. Ive been using Sonar since version 3 - I found the adverts in magazines is what sold me - It was the time that SX2 was coming out, and I didnt want to go the norm like the other commoners, so I chose Sonar.. And here I am.. The best choice Ive ever made..!
Sonar Professional | Reason 8 | Propellerheads Balance | Windows 10
|
artsoul
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1985
- Joined: 2005/11/22 18:32:49
- Location: glasgow, scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:52:21
(permalink)
beat you na na na na na
|
MArwood
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1816
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:04:42
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:54:06
(permalink)
"You have to use Pro-Tools to deliver a product that will compete, right?" I think you left out the word "DAWG" ? Or did I just dream this? Like I said before, I am a dedicated sonar user. I have my own company, a jewelry store. When I first moved to the town I live in there were 7 jewelry stores. My store has grown so much that there are only 2 store in my town now. I claim to have done this through hard work, service, positive Advertising, not talking bad about the other stores. Cakewalk has done much the same. The market just has not caught up the their efforts yet. I hope Sonar 7 is the one! I already called the sale dept to get my copy. They said not yet! Watch the web! So here I am. Max Arwood
|
bunkaroo
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 422
- Joined: 2004/01/16 14:12:28
- Location: Chicago West 'Burbs
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 15:58:07
(permalink)
Sounds like payback for every time I've heard Cakewalk referred to as "a toy" by those who think it's PT or nothing.
|
mlockett
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2099
- Joined: 2003/11/07 17:26:14
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
- Status: offline
|
artsoul
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1985
- Joined: 2005/11/22 18:32:49
- Location: glasgow, scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:05:51
(permalink)
|
musicade
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 552
- Joined: 2004/02/20 15:02:07
- Location: Leiden, Netherlands
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:07:26
(permalink)
Class act... that Cakewalk. Cheap shot at PT? Maybe. Having a bit of fun at Digi's expense? Definitely. Cakewalk spotting and addressing your concerns here on a public forum? PRICELESS. Amen..... You wouldn't get that on any other forum. Priceless indeed.
|
Boogie
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2106
- Joined: 2003/11/19 15:45:21
- Location: CALIFORNIA
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:17:08
(permalink)
I haven't read the ad, but if it's as tame as skullsession describes, I wouldn't call it a cheap shot. Will it be very effective? Not as long as professionals remain convinced that the MAC is the only platform that can be used to create anything worthy. Vista isn't helping. Microsoft would have to launch their own MAC vs. PC campaign. Or maybe CW could launch it for them.
|
Chrisma
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 585
- Joined: 2003/11/26 12:43:07
- Location: www.chrismaproductions.com
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:18:35
(permalink)
I haven't seen the ad but from what I've read from this thread to me the add is not about so much about ProTools but I see it more about confidence. Cakewalk (rightfully so) knows they've got the goods and deserves more market share and respect. Nothing BAD said about Protools... just the TRUTH about Sonar...nothing wrong with that in my book. Great job Carl! What else are they supposed say in an add they are paying for?
post edited by Chrisma - 2007/09/17 16:27:54
|
mr. moon
Max Output Level: -60 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1515
- Joined: 2003/11/10 00:23:35
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:19:10
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Marketing [Cakewalk] Max, I'm sorry you did not appreciate our new SONAR 7 ad. Thanks for letting us know your thoughts abaout it. Let me explain what we were trying to do with this ad. Even though our products are superior, Pro Tools is the market leader. A common marketing practice is for the company that holds the number 2 market position to launch attacks on the company in the number one slot. The ad was meant in a tounge in cheek manner, to poke fun at one of the myths surrounding Pro Tools. This is not unlike the type of advertising you will see Apple doing against PCs for instance. When I use the word myth, I mean it literally. The alternate ad campaign direction that you suggested is a very rational one. We've taken the high road for years with exactly the type of marketing that you described. Unfortunately, a good percentage of the populace does not always respond to purely rational-based marketing. If they did, I feel confident that they would choose SONAR over Pro Tools, or they would choose Nuendo, Logic, or Digital Performer if they used a Mac. So, we decided to mix things up a bit to try and reach some new people with an ad that was very different from what you would typically find in music technology publications. We were prepared for a little controversy. The ad wasn't designed to speak to you. You already have SONAR, and we can speak to you directly through our emails, website, or right here on the forums. My appologies if you found it offensive. We really intended it to just be fun. Please let me know if you have any other concerns or questions. Best regards, Carl Jacobson Marketing Director Cakewalk Actually, the ad kind of reminds me of my run-in with a Guitar Satan customer a year or so ago which I posted about here in the forums (search for the thread!) and you guys (Cakewalk Marketing) sent me some goodies for being such a good PR "tool" as it were. Basically, I overheard the GS customer service reps (sales team) giving a customer a line that Pro Tools was the only way to go, I took the customer aside as they went "in the back" to see if they had the 6500 buck package they were working on convincing him that he needed to produce any "real" music, and I told him that they weren't giving him the whole truth, and that he should check out SONAR. Anyways, sounds close enough that maybe Cakewalk should consider compensating me by sending me something awesome like a SONAR bookmark or something? Anyways, I personally think the ad wasn't delivered in a clever enough way, but I was not "offended" by it, as someone mentioned they were. I think that by utilizing such an marketing campaign, you're basically acknowledging to the world that your *not* number one, and that you're more concerned about putting down the other product rather than promoting your own product. -mr moon Edit: spelling
post edited by mr. moon - 2007/09/17 16:29:20
Intel Core 2 QUAD Q6600 4 GB 800MHz DDR2 RME FireFace 800 Windows 64 Pro "...Think outside the box as you mix within!" -mrmoon
|
Dizzi45Z
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1040
- Joined: 2005/10/26 17:00:20
- Location: Orem, Utah
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:19:54
(permalink)
Honestly, I didn't really get what the ad was trying to get across. Skullsessions post above makes much more sense. The actual ad reads: "Pro Tools is everything I need to make a hit record, Dawg!" across the top and then half way down it reads "Get Real" Line under that reads "Sonar 7", Then it has a bunch of bullets that lists all of the new features for Sonar 7....At least my magazine does.  But my magazine is a special print EQ magazine, so yours probably just says basic stuff that doesn't give any new features away for Sonar 7. I am very excited to see what Sonar 7 has to offer, but I would be very surprised if it surpassed Pro Tools HD when it comes to audio editing basics. Of course it surpasses Pro Tools LE and M-Powered because it doesn't have any limitations on important things like track count, smpte, latency compensation and etc. Anyways, my point is this: Sonar = Awesome! Pro Tools HD = Awesome! Both have great features the other one doesn't. Do I put them on equal ground? Not quite yet. Cost for Sonar makes it a much better value, but I do not feel the basics are covered as well in Sonar as they are in Pro Tools. I don't say this intending to turn this post into a Pro Tools Vs. Sonar thread. I just personally don't think Cakewalk is quite ready to fight the battle it is calling on, unless it is picking a fight with Pro Tools M-Powere/LE which is less than the price of Sonar. But who knows, Sonar 7 might really surprise me.
|
MArwood
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1816
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:04:42
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:24:09
(permalink)
Tired of the dongle? Spend time on music not authorizations. Simple and to the point. It could be a good ad. I'm sure there is plenty to advertize in S7! Max Arwood
|
plainfaced
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1617
- Joined: 2004/08/25 08:52:16
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:27:50
(permalink)
Ahh whatever.. Rip into them i say..! As long as its all legal (im sure Cakewalk know what is and what isnt) Go for it I say! How bout you blame the EQ publishers for allowing the advert to go throug?
Sonar Professional | Reason 8 | Propellerheads Balance | Windows 10
|
soundrage
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 144
- Joined: 2004/08/25 15:35:31
- Status: offline
RE: Disappointed in Sonar 7 ad in "EQ" magazine
2007/09/17 16:28:29
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Dizzi45Z Honestly, I didn't really get what the ad was trying to get across. Skullsessions post above makes much more sense. The actual ad reads: "Pro Tools is everything I need to make a hit record, Dawg!" across the top and then half way down it reads "Get Real" Line under that reads "Sonar 7", Then it has a bunch of bullets that lists all of the new features for Sonar 7....At least my magazine does. But my magazine is a special print EQ magazine, so yours probably just says basic stuff that doesn't give any new features away for Sonar 7. So those features are at least somewhat in the public domain. What are those features?
|