saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
I just finished building the new rack mount box and loaded a 12-track song with only 3-VST plugins and Session Drummer 3 track. I cannot get the song to play without consistent (every 15 seconds but never at the same timeframe) dropouts on playback. This PC was literally built last night with only Windows 7 and Sonar. I have never used it for any other functions and it is a new build with new SSD and HDD.. baffling and it's too late at night to jump into this more. Hopefully someone might see my rig in signature and spot something... Thanks!
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 01:32:56
(permalink)
The new rig: SONAR X1 Producer Intel Core i7-3770K 3.50 GHz ASUS P8Z77-V PRO Windows 7 Pro SP1 / 64 OS and Sonar on Solid State Disk 16 GB RAM Delta 1010 PCI (latest 64-bit drivers)
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 01:48:53
(permalink)
Try upping the audio buffers a bit. Or at least until the dropouts stop.
|
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 02:03:07
(permalink)
I'm guessing its that you're using a PCI card audio interface on a motherboard that probably doesn't natively support PCI (chipset). I run X1 all day on a first-gen i7 system at 48 samples/ 1.1ms buffer and you should be able to, also. Its definitely not SONAR. First thing I would do in your case is try a new audio interface. SP
post edited by Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk] - 2012/05/13 03:54:01
|
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12010
- Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
- Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 03:41:42
(permalink)
I'd have to agree with Seth on this one. The 1010 is getting quite long in the tooth and while it would function OK on an older system with IRQ sharing etc it just is't going to cut it. sounds like its time to upgrade your soundcard.
Mike V. (MUDGEL) STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64, PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz. Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2. Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub. Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX. Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor. Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
|
musicroom
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2421
- Joined: 2004/04/26 22:31:02
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 04:20:03
(permalink)
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] I'm guessing its that you're using a PCI card audio interface on a motherboard that probably doesn't natively support PCI (chipset). I run X1 all day on a first-gen i7 system at 48 samples/ 1.1ms buffer and you should be able to, also. Its definitely not SONAR. First thing I would do in your case is try a new audio interface. SP I think you're probably right and it's a shame for the OP. The Delta 1010 has been with me for a long time and still sounds great. I'm on a Q9550 chip that is about 3 years old and still compatible with my motherboard. I've had over 50 tracks going at 64 samples without a hitch.
Dave Songs___________________________________ Desktop: Platinum / RME Multiface II / Purrfect Audio DAW I7-3770 / 16 GB RAM / Win 10 Pro / Remote Laptop i7 6500U / 12GB RAM / RME Babyface
|
soens
Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5154
- Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
- Location: Location: Location
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 06:24:31
(permalink)
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] I'm guessing its that you're using a PCI card audio interface on a motherboard that probably doesn't natively support PCI (chipset). I run X1 all day on a first-gen i7 system at 48 samples/ 1.1ms buffer and you should be able to, also. Its definitely not SONAR. First thing I would do in your case is try a new audio interface. SP What audio interface/card do you use? I have to run 9504 samples @198 ms on my 2nd gen i7 64 bit laptop with IDT HD Audio card to avoid the crackles. My 32 bit desktop with SB Audigy 2zs runs 4410 samples @100 ms. Steve
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 06:47:00
(permalink)
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] I'm guessing its that you're using a PCI card audio interface on a motherboard that probably doesn't natively support PCI (chipset). SP This! PCI is a lottery these days. I'm not even sure if anyone sells a new PCI audio interface anymore, they've all gone PCIe. It happens, I've got some old ISA boards, they don't work anymore either.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/05/13 06:54:03
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 07:24:46
(permalink)
soens Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] I'm guessing its that you're using a PCI card audio interface on a motherboard that probably doesn't natively support PCI (chipset). I run X1 all day on a first-gen i7 system at 48 samples/ 1.1ms buffer and you should be able to, also. Its definitely not SONAR. First thing I would do in your case is try a new audio interface. SP What audio interface/card do you use? I have to run 9504 samples @198 ms on my 2nd gen i7 64 bit laptop with IDT HD Audio card to avoid the crackles. My 32 bit desktop with SB Audigy 2zs runs 4410 samples @100 ms. Steve Steve, I use the Roland Octa-Capture which is an 8 mic pre USB 2.0 interface. It uses Roland's VS Streaming driver that goes down to 48 samples which is easily usable on any i7 system (probably even i5 just never tried it). The Quad-Capture also uses the VS Streaming driver as do the VS-700 and VS-100. I would look into Roland's interfaces for sure, and since they're USB 2.0 you can buy one and move it from your desktop to your laptop as needed. The sound quality is also outstanding. SP
|
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 07:28:30
(permalink)
Jonbouy Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] I'm guessing its that you're using a PCI card audio interface on a motherboard that probably doesn't natively support PCI (chipset). SP This! PCI is a lottery these days. I'm not even sure if anyone sells a new PCI audio interface anymore, they've all gone PCIe. It happens, I've got some old ISA boards, they don't work anymore either. Its true, that's just how tech is. I also spoke with a vendor of a company who's made PCI cards in the past and he mentioned that the newest Intel chipsets don't natively support PCI like they used to. I didn't get into the specifics, but he said it had something to do with emulation or the PCI chipset they use and that they're awful for audio. Point is, use USB 2.0, PCIe, Firewire (although its fraught with its own issues) or Thunderbolt (more of an emerging technology). Or, if you absolutely must use PCI then make sure you have either an older motherboard or a newer one that specifically does not have issues with PCI, but I suspect that will be harder and harder to find as time goes on. SP
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 07:59:55
(permalink)
I'm currently using a Quad capture via USB2 on a W7 2600k based box I run it on 64 buffers all day long. I'd run it at 48 buffers but occasionally I'd have to adjust it to 64 for mixing so I just leave it at 64 and I'm getting a full measured round-trip at 7.2ms which is fine by me so I just leave it at that. Obviously it depends on the project but I rarely see greater than 20% CPU utilization averaged over all cores on anything audio related on Sonar's meters, the machine in the OP should be smoking mine by a good margin.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/05/13 08:07:57
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
bvideo
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1707
- Joined: 2006/09/02 22:20:02
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 10:59:31
(permalink)
The periodic (15-sec) nature would be consistent with a DPC offender of some sort. E.g. for certain network interfaces, the MII can cause DPC spikes when the network is not plugged in.
|
keith
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3882
- Joined: 2003/12/10 09:49:35
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 11:07:57
(permalink)
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk ] Its true, that's just how tech is. I also spoke with a vendor of a company who's made PCI cards in the past and he mentioned that the newest Intel chipsets don't natively support PCI like they used to. I didn't get into the specifics, but he said it had something to do with emulation or the PCI chipset they use and that they're awful for audio. I don't think "PCI emulation" would be a chipset standard, per se. I could be totally wrong, as I'm not a gear head, but I think it's up to the manufacturer to fill in where the chipset stops providing support. So Z77 itself does not support legacy PCI, but ASUS may (or should) have their own controller integrated onto that board. E.g., I have an old Gigabyte board that has a Gigabyte branded SATA III controller, which is not part of the stock chipset. That ASUS board has 2 legacy PCI slots, so it must have been somewhat of a priority to support legacy PCI. Now, does Z77 provide "legacy PCI emulation"? I have no idea, but why would it?! No PCI support on the chipset means no PCI support on the chipset! Right? (What part of "no PCI support on the chipset don't you understand?" :) ). So the question wrt. legacy PCI support on that board is: what is ASUS using, and does it perform well for the task at hand? An audio interface is not bandwidth-intensive in the way that a PCI graphics card, disk controller, or generic USB/Firewire/whatever adapter would be. Audio requirements are in the 44100 * 4 bytes * (10 out channels + 10 in channels) = 3,528,000 bytes/sec … or roughly 4MBytes/sec, give or take. PCI bus is what 133MBytes/sec? IMO, even the crappiest PCI emulation should be able to reaonsably handle 4MB/sec throughput, esp. running on one of the fastest memory/chipset/CPU consumer combos you can buy today… That's a lot of iron under that hood. I think blaming legacy PCI is too easy. :) Let's think about this... and maybe there are some system techs out there w/ experience w/ that particular board that can help out. All motherboards are resource-limited -- the x4 slot shares bandwidth with the USB3.0 controller, the legacy PCI slot #2 shares bandwidth with the frobnitz controller, whatever… The question is: what is sharing bandwidth with your PCI slot(s), and how do you get around that bandwidth sharing? Since the apparent bandwidth sharing is obvious (e.g., 1000's ms latency required for uninterrupted audio I/O), my guess is the sharing is with something high-bandwidth… like a disk controller or the graphics chip. Some things to try before totally trashing that PCI card: 1.) Move the card to the other PCI slot (that board has 2, I believe)… any difference in performance? 2.) Try to find from the manufacturer how legacy PCI is implemented on that board, and specifically what bus sharing you need to worry about (BTW, I just scanned their manual -- it sucks). If you can move things around and/or disable stuff in the BIOS, that is going to be your only hope in getting good PCI performance. For example, perhaps legacy PCI is shared w/ the SATA III (6Gbps) controller... and you have your SATA II (3Gbps) drive plugged into the SATA III controller unnecessarily… Plug the SATA II drive into the SATA II controller, and disable the SATA III controller. This is just an example. Or maybe you're using the onboard video, and that's sharing (and consuming a lot of bandwidth, BTW). Plug a discreet graphics card into the PCIe slot and disable onboard video. LAN and Wi-Fi devices are another thing to look into. Common source of bus issues. Then again, maybe legacy PCI on that board truly sux, and you simply need to ditch your beloved 1010. Anyway… my $0.01.
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 12:56:02
(permalink)
im seeing this more and more these days with onboard pci cards. there was a thread a week agao with a guy who had almost the same exact problem,upgade cure and he was dancing for joy the next day. technology changes,you either change with it or be left behind. its sad in some cases but its a fact of life. i held on to windows xp as long as i could.but on the flip side, i had it installed in a test computer when it first came out. this way i wasnt jolted into a boat load of issues at one time and i could slowly get used to the os and the os could get used to my software.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
overkiller
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 28
- Joined: 2012/04/30 00:50:26
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 14:39:33
(permalink)
+1 for the DPC offender. Wireless NIC/Bluetooth device or maybe some Windows 7 feature like Aero (doubt it) or index service (possible) or defrag (possible) or auto-updates (probable). Could be you need updated video drivers (not likely). Could also be that you need new/updated SDD drivers (possible). Sorry you're having problems I know it can be maddening.
Sonar X2, Win 764, AMD 965BE, 8GB RAM, Asus mobo, Samsung 840 EVO, Tascam US-1800, AKG and Shure
|
lowdown
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 300
- Joined: 2004/04/14 16:07:38
- Location: Essex - UK
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 15:24:19
(permalink)
I had this problem with a Delta 10/10 and Sonar X1. On my old system and SP8.5 it ran great. New system and X1 x64, things did not go so well. Tried various drivers, and it still did not want to play. I did not really need all those ins/outs on the Delta, so i went for a Quad Capture. Now every thing is running smooth and stable. Garry
|
markno999
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1450
- Joined: 2007/08/27 18:09:30
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 15:51:14
(permalink)
|
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 15:56:24
(permalink)
If you decide of buy a new AUDIO interface I would suggest you look into following technologies. 1. PCI express Interface. Very fast and very high band wide. Extremely good for low latency. 2. Firewire 800 / 400 interfaces. Very good for low latency. 3. USB 3 interface. (not USB2) Extremely good for low latency and build for the future. So what interface and cards should you look into? The best thing is to invest in good quality cards/interface. It can cost some money but in the long run it’s worth it. With a professional card /interface you can use it for many years instead buy a cheap now and in one year time you need to buy a new one, because of bad drivers it doesn’t sound good. All great AD DA converters cost money. There are no short cuts to great sound! Specifications! Many claim that specification isn’t everything but in this case it is! It’s very easy to read out how an interface actually sounds. When you compare specifications you want to look for “Dynamic Range (1kHz, A-weighted)” and “Signal-To Noise Ratio (A-weighted)” That telling you exactly how the interface sounds and the quality of the audio interface. It should at least be 118db-120db or higher to say that it’s a Professional world class converters. As you are about to discover many low cost audio interface has typical 94db-110db. Every one db. in increment are 100% increment of the quality of the converts. So you can imagine a interface of 110db “Dynamic Range (1kHz, A-weighted) VS a professional interface of 120 “Dynamic Range (1kHz, A-weighted) how many times the sound quality has improved over the 110db interface. No Roland or Cakewalk audio interface are in quality of 120db or above...you need to look elsewhere..This interfaces would I recommend! EMU 1616M Dynamic Range 120dB digital (A-weighted) http://www.creative.com/emu/products/product.aspx?category=505&pid=19007 World class professional ADDA converts Cirrus logic. Same converters you find in Pro Tools HD System Digidesign's flagship ProTools HD 192 I/O Interface. You pay almost nothing for what you get. UAD Apollo QUAD! (coming for PC this summer 2012) Dynamic Range 118dB digital (A-weighted) [link=http://www.uaudio.com/interfaces/apollo.html%3C/a%3E%3C/font%3E]http://www.uaudio.com/int...tml%3C/a%3E%3C/font%3E[/link] A Firewire-interface with built into UAD 2 QUAD DSP-card. SSL XLogic Alpha-Link MADI AX - Dynamic Range 128dB digital (A-weighted) http://www.solidstatelogic.com/music/xlogic%20alpha-link/ Apogee Symphony (Only MAC) Dynamic Range 129dB digital (A-weighted) http://support.apogeedigital.com/help/symphony-io/
post edited by Freddie H - 2012/05/13 16:10:24
-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
|
mcdonalk
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 547
- Joined: 2004/04/05 19:04:22
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 16:15:01
(permalink)
About 6 months ago, I migrated from XP to a new 64-bit PC running W-64 (Asus P8Z68 Deluxe motherboard with PCI "bridge"). I also transferred my Lynx L22 sound card, which hosts an Aurora 8 via the Lstream interface, to the new machine. In te new environment, I would observe occasional audio dropouts (e.g. 3-4 per hour). I finally got the problem solved by REDUCING the ASIO buffer from 256 to 64 samples. It was the first time on any of my previous systems that I solved an audio problem by REDUCING the buffer.
|
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3617
- Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 16:19:57
(permalink)
mcdonalk About 6 months ago, I migrated from XP to a new 64-bit PC running W-64 (Asus P8Z68 Deluxe motherboard with PCI "bridge"). I also transferred my Lynx L22 sound card, which hosts an Aurora 8 via the Lstream interface, to the new machine. Lynx sound cards and Aurora converters are also very high quality audio interface of Dynamic Range 120dB digital (A-weighted) and above...
-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
|
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 13146
- Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 17:13:50
(permalink)
i still think an average audio card is acceptable. you dont need anything that extragent unless you need multi ins/out/ you can get a good interface with dual ins/dual outs and midi in/out that is tested windows 7 64 ready the focusrite saphire 6 usb 200.00 bucks/sometimes on sale for 180 ish problem solved/make music/headache gone/complaining on the forum will go down to about 7% complaining about audio interfaces 1% staying with that delta pci and having problems emm,92% i will say this though,you seem like a pretty cool guy. most people in your position come on here blaiming sonar x1 as the root of all evil. claiming its sonars fault. this is what i heard this week: "i got a brand new computer intel I7 16 ram and sonar x1 cant even play for 5 seconds with out dropping out" o..my sound card? a 1982 pci rca/radio shack special" seriously,not to that extent but close. and then the worse is when other people chime in saying "ya,i hear ya man" its sad. ofcourse there are real problems,with every daw there are always real problems. your post is genuine.
Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64 Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GBFocusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 18:10:10
(permalink)
I am going to try to resolve the PCI as I did want to re-use the the Delta 1010 as well as one UAD-1 card (not even gonna try that one on the mobo until I resolve this). I totally appreciate all the input and suggestions. I will move the slot and also try working with the buffer settings etc. I will post my findings later tonight.. THANKS EVERYONE!!! ;-)
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
g_randybrown
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3522
- Joined: 2003/12/24 11:30:04
- Location: Las Cruces, NM, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 18:16:25
(permalink)
The new rig: SONAR X1 Producer Intel Core i7-3770K 3.50 GHz ASUS P8Z77-V PRO Windows 7 Pro SP1 / 64 OS and Sonar on Solid State Disk 16 GB RAM Delta 1010 PCI (latest 64-bit drivers) I just built a desktop with identical specs except I got a 3770S (same but mine can't be overclocked). I just threw on about 12 audio tracks and they played fine except I can't seem to get a 24 bit project happening...even though the Delta is showing 24 bit ...that'll be another thread I need to start but are you using version 6.0.8 for the Delta?
G. Randy Brown Windows 10, 64 bit, PlatinumIntel Core i7-3770S Asus P8Z77-V LK mobo 4X8GB Corsair XMS3 memory 500 GB Crucial BX100 SSD (OS)two WD Black 1 TB HDDSAPPHIRE DUAL-X 100314-4L Radeon HD 6970 2GB 256-Bit GDDR5 Presonus AudioBox 22VSLyoutube.com/crystalclearnm
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 18:44:34
(permalink)
Yep - M-AUDIO 6.0.8 I have been working with 24-bit on this card for years with no problems... Of course a new card will be coming (thanks for the suggestions), I just wanted to wait a bit longer. I just blew through >$1,000 on the new PC parts! ;) Erik
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
g_randybrown
Max Output Level: -40 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3522
- Joined: 2003/12/24 11:30:04
- Location: Las Cruces, NM, USA
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 19:11:01
(permalink)
Hoping I don't need to get a new card as well...were you able to get 24 bit running in X1? Also what card did you decide on? Thanks, Randy
G. Randy Brown Windows 10, 64 bit, PlatinumIntel Core i7-3770S Asus P8Z77-V LK mobo 4X8GB Corsair XMS3 memory 500 GB Crucial BX100 SSD (OS)two WD Black 1 TB HDDSAPPHIRE DUAL-X 100314-4L Radeon HD 6970 2GB 256-Bit GDDR5 Presonus AudioBox 22VSLyoutube.com/crystalclearnm
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 19:15:36
(permalink)
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 19:16:35
(permalink)
Randy did you set the project to 24 bits in Preferences? You need to have it set in Audio Devices and File audio data too.
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 19:22:44
(permalink)
So you can imagine a interface of 110db “Dynamic Range (1kHz, A-weighted) VS a professional interface of 120 “Dynamic Range (1kHz, A-weighted) how many times the sound quality has improved over the 110db interface. Freddie strikes again. More comedy genius from Mr H... btw I dumped my E-Mu card and got a Quad capture out of preference. despite the E-Mu sales patter that Freddy has gobbled up that goes... World class professional ADDA converts Cirrus logic. Same converters you find in Pro Tools HD System Digidesign's flagship ProTools HD 192 I/O Interface. Love you Freddy, you're so much fun to have around.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/05/13 19:31:08
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 19:42:07
(permalink)
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Underwhelmed with Sonar X1 on New PC
2012/05/13 20:13:59
(permalink)
John Jonbouy markno999 Turn off Windows Core Parking. Instructions at this link. http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1861804 Here is another link with some useful tweaks for Windows 7. http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=1862515 NOT on that machine!!!! On a first generation i7 maybe you'd see some benefit, otherwise those tips will do more harm than good. Turn off core parking is a very good idea for a DAW. Go right ahead. It ain't on mine. Show me some evidence where it is a proven good idea on a Sandybridge board or later. I've tested it out here and gained no benefit. Other than warming up the room a little for not having the power saving working, it actually made matters worse on the whole. I'm open minded though so what ya got? Bearing in mind that I'm running totally glitch free audio on 64 buffers anyway. You think it's a good idea for me to re-introduce the few clicks and pops that happen when I turn core parking off? I prefer no clicks and pops at all personally.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/05/13 20:31:17
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|