Mick
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1358
- Joined: 2004/03/03 11:39:30
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/24 05:39:38
(permalink)
It works for me except some times it pastes the envelope into the wrong track. For instance, I just did a test with a pan envelope, and, while the paste options were set to paste into track 6, the envelope went to track 8. No idea why. Track 6 was an instrument track and track 8 is audio, but I don't think that would matter. So next time you try copying automation and it doesn't seem to work, make sure you check around. All those missing envelopes may be screwing around with other tracks! ORIGINAL: SH ORIGINAL: Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk] ORIGINAL: tags Thank you for helping, but it still doesn't seem to do anything useful. I've selected all nodes with the envelope tool Chosen edit/copy from the drop-down menu Made sure track/bus automation was checked and pressed ok Moved the cursor to a new position, chosen edit/paste Again, made sure track/bus automation was checked and pressed ok And... nothing happens. Hmmm....I don't know what could be wrong. I just tried it and it works for me here. Maybe someone else can imagine what it is that may be different in your carrying out of this operation? Otherwise a call to tech support might be able to sort you out. I've had the same problem. I seem to remember something about how the syth was inserted that made a difference. DXi worked and VST didn't or vice versa or some other variable.
I have not changed my signature.
|
Tom F
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2749
- Joined: 2007/07/08 05:56:12
- Location: Vienna (the one in Europe)
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/24 06:08:29
(permalink)
i dont know why so many people are so sceptic about those synthtracks -- its such an old feature in logic and implemented in c4 - and it seems like everyone who worked with it liked it (so did i) so i am very very happy to finally have it in s8 !!! i d even wonder if anyone who has used it for a few days would ever switch back to the sonar dual mode...and yes i know folks here have been using it for ages like this - but NOT haviong this was the biggest dissappointment for me when switching from logic to sonar... so dont worry be happy
...trying to be polite... quick temper...trying to be...
|
layer_road
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 99
- Joined: 2008/02/21 08:15:19
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/24 07:45:15
(permalink)
Personally I'm not too bothered about the instrument view. I'm on S6 PE, and having had a look at that demo, the additions from S6 make it a no-brainer to upgrade, just in relation to the instruments and new features (step sequencer, side chain support, etc etc). I'm looking forward to it and fully expect to be baffled/ confused/ on here pleading for help, but loving every minute of it.
|
dreamkeeper
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2141
- Joined: 2004/12/05 15:51:13
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/24 08:33:06
(permalink)
It works for me except some times it pastes the envelope into the wrong track. For instance, I just did a test with a pan envelope, ... The discussion was about synth automation, which was introduced in S6. Copy/paste for track parameter or FX (including synths in FX bin) envelopes has always worked. According to Brandon, this seems to be fixed now in S8. werner
"... must've been another of my dreams ..."
|
Logicology
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 146
- Joined: 2006/10/06 11:12:42
- Location: Philadelphia
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/24 10:20:01
(permalink)
In this post, Sonar 8 - The fine print, Noel says, "MIDI track and clip envelopes are not available" when using Instrument Tracks. Is that, ehh... negotiable? :) I really, really miss working with instrument tracks from my old Cubase days. But the thought of not being able to automate my trusted CC11 and other continuous controllers when using instrument tracks is a little upsetting. So then the solution is probably to split the track apart to make my MIDI edits and then join them again when I'm done. I think I can live with that. However, Noel's statement is a little vague. Are MIDI envelopes ignored? Or just not visible/editable?
|
syrath
Max Output Level: -34.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4075
- Joined: 2005/08/11 05:40:08
- Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/24 10:25:24
(permalink)
Surely some of you guys have seen Project5, the one synth one track option works reasonably well in that. True , multiple output can be a little clumsy, but the multitimbrality is easy enough organised with track layers.
|
athacker
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2008/09/12 14:36:58
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 01:29:16
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Logicology In this post, Sonar 8 - The fine print, Noel says, "MIDI track and clip envelopes are not available" when using Instrument Tracks. Is that, ehh... negotiable? :) Yes, as a Cubase user I am currently considering moving to Sonar specifically for the in-track envelopes. The instrument track is probably the last piece of the jigsaw for me in making the transition, as this is the main type of track I use .... but it is a bit disappointing to hear that instrument tracks wont display midi envelopes. I too tweak CC11 a lot for orchestral performances. Clarification on this point would be greatly appreciated.
|
SongCraft
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3902
- Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 01:50:46
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: athacker ORIGINAL: Logicology In this post, Sonar 8 - The fine print, Noel says, "MIDI track and clip envelopes are not available" when using Instrument Tracks. Is that, ehh... negotiable? :) Yes, as a Cubase user I am currently considering moving to Sonar specifically for the in-track envelopes. The instrument track is probably the last piece of the jigsaw for me in making the transition, as this is the main type of track I use .... but it is a bit disappointing to hear that instrument tracks wont display midi envelopes. I too tweak CC11 a lot for orchestral performances. Clarification on this point would be greatly appreciated. Have another look at the screenshot Click Here I can see RD + W options in the new Instr/Trk. -
post edited by SongCraft - 2008/09/25 01:52:41
|
athacker
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2008/09/12 14:36:58
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 02:55:42
(permalink)
Have another look at the screenshot Click Here I can see RD + W options in the new Instr/Trk. - Hey, thanks for the reply, but not being familiar with Cakewalk myself, I'm not sure whether that is indicative of whether the automation envelopes will be displayed and editable in the instrument track view ... it just seems, to me, to indicate that you can read and write automation data.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 03:08:22
(permalink)
You can't edit any MIDI controller data in an instrument track as an instrument track. However, one can uncombined them and edit the MIDI data as usual. Then simply recombined them. This is a feature from my point of view.
|
SongCraft
Max Output Level: -36 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3902
- Joined: 2007/09/19 17:54:46
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 03:09:40
(permalink)
You're welcome athacker :) I'm not too familiar myself with the new setup in S8, can only go off what's been posted. I guess it depends on what sort of envelope editing you want to do, I do know that S8 also has the option to switch back to the midi+track(s) setup.
|
athacker
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2008/09/12 14:36:58
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 03:18:12
(permalink)
Thanks John, Thanks Songcraft Thanks for clarifying. If thats how it works, that sounds greate. And indeed John, it does sound like a feature, rather than a shortfall ;-)
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 03:36:08
(permalink)
Athacker with that posting style you are going to be a valued member of this forum. I hope you stay and welcome to the forum. You are not required to buy Sonar either. Though it would be a good idea if only to keep your interest in the forum.
|
Saintom
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1749
- Joined: 2005/12/17 14:09:34
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 03:44:18
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: John You can't edit any MIDI controller data in an instrument track as an instrument track. I wonder if you, can by the looks of the instrument track it looks like the PRV is still there and if your MIDI controller data is in the PRV I'll bet you could edit it in the instrument track via PRV. Just a spectulation Tom
Sometimes we see the light, Sometimes we stare at the light, and wonder why it is so bright...
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 03:48:32
(permalink)
I wonder if you, can by the looks of the instrument track it looks like the PRV is still there and if your MIDI controller data is in the PRV I'll bet you could edit it in the instrument track via PRV. Just a spectulation I thought so too until Noel say it couldn't.
|
Saintom
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1749
- Joined: 2005/12/17 14:09:34
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 03:59:34
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: John I wonder if you, can by the looks of the instrument track it looks like the PRV is still there and if your MIDI controller data is in the PRV I'll bet you could edit it in the instrument track via PRV. Just a spectulation I thought so too until Noel say it couldn't. Thanks John, I missed that comment, Noel would be the guy who knows. My speculatin' was dead wrong, I guess don't judge a book by it's cover. Thats probably why they made it so they could be split and put back together (I did catch that one), I think is a good thing, I never really liked the instrument tracks in other DAW's they really felt limiting, I have always preferred the way Sonar does it. I guess I'll know soon enough if I like them or not. Tom
Sometimes we see the light, Sometimes we stare at the light, and wonder why it is so bright...
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 04:09:18
(permalink)
Thats probably why they made it so they could be split and put back together (I did catch that one), I think is a good thing, I never really liked the instrument tracks in other DAW's they really felt limiting, I have always preferred the way Sonar does it. I fully agree! I may use them but in most cases I don't see them as being that useful for me not that I am bashing them I am not . What I do like is the thoughtfulness CW put into this.
|
Saintom
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1749
- Joined: 2005/12/17 14:09:34
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 04:15:03
(permalink)
I may use them but in most cases I don't see them as being that useful for me not that I am bashing them I am not . What I do like is the thoughtfulness CW put into this. Agreed tom
Sometimes we see the light, Sometimes we stare at the light, and wonder why it is so bright...
|
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 04:36:13
(permalink)
Hey guys, After reading the last few posts here about MIDI envelopes being displayed on Instrument Tracks I decided to do a couple of small tests. In the first test I loaded TTS-1 into an Instrument Track. Then I created another MIDI track. On the MIDI track I created a MIDI Volume envelope and drew in some random shapes. Then I copied the automation data and pasted it into the Instrument Track. As expected the data was not visible on the Instrument track. Next I split the Instrument Track into separate audio and MIDI tracks and when I did the MIDI Volume envelope appeared on the newly created MIDI track. In the second test I created an instance of TTS-1 on an Instrument Track and immediately split it into separate audio and MIDI tracks. I then Write Enabled automation on the MIDI track, played back SONAR, and wiggled the MIDI track's Volume widget about to create Volume automation. As expected the resultant MIDI envelope appeared on the MIDI track. I then combined the Audio and MIDI tracks back into an Instrument track. Although the MIDI envelope was now not visible, when I played back SONAR the Volume slider on TTS-1 moved as it should have as it was being controlled by the "hidden" automation data in the Instrument Track. So, the end result is that MIDI envelopes cannot be displayed or edited on Instrument Tracks but they can live therein and they will send the written data to the appropriate controller. When split into seperate Audio and MIDI tracks they will become editable and they can then be tucked away by recombining Audio and MIDI tracks back into an Instrument track. Think of it as a way to keep things neet and tidy in the Track View
post edited by Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk] - 2008/09/25 04:41:55
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 04:51:08
(permalink)
|
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 04:54:00
(permalink)
Just wanted to confirm your suspicions
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 04:57:30
(permalink)
But you should know we are grateful for the way CW has done this. It is an important thing to many of us that we are not forced to use only instrument tracks or loose any real functionally.
|
Saintom
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1749
- Joined: 2005/12/17 14:09:34
- Location: Portland Oregon
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 04:57:40
(permalink)
Thank You Seth, That is great news. Tom
Sometimes we see the light, Sometimes we stare at the light, and wonder why it is so bright...
|
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 05:01:28
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: John But you should know we are grateful for the way CW has done this. It is an important thing to many of us that we are not forced to use only instrument tracks or loose any real functionally. I think you are totally right and thank you for recognizing the flexibility of the feature's implementation. I think the developers did a great job in thinking this through.
|
maxsax
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
- Total Posts : 581
- Joined: 2007/11/30 10:15:03
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 05:21:35
(permalink)
Doesn't appear to be any real difference to just hiding the midi or the output track of an instrument in Sonar 7 or am I missing something?
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 05:30:34
(permalink)
Yes and no. Its not the same at all because nothing is hidden as such with the new instrument track in a way. The audio meters are there and the MIDI notes are there so its different. I could say more if I knew more. But you just exhausted everything I know about instrument tracks.
|
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 05:40:38
(permalink)
Also they are only one track for a control surface to control since an instrument track shows up as only one track.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 05:59:53
(permalink)
Seth you just gave me a good reason to like instrument tracks. I hadn't thought about that aspect. I am a very dependent Mackie Control user. Thanks.
|
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 06:14:29
(permalink)
BTW you can of course merge soft synth audio and MIDI tracks from old projects into Instrument. I was going through an old project today which had about 8 soft synths, each with a separate audio and MIDI track, and each with its own track folder. Merging all of those tracks into instrument tracks and then putting them all into one single folder saves a ton of screen real estate.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
RE: Cakewalk - Screenshot of new Sonar 8 Instrument Track????
2008/09/25 06:26:24
(permalink)
OK this is getting too good. You do know that I am old school and now I find myself wanting to get my hands on Sonar 8 to use those darn instruments tracks. It is a little unfair now that we have to wait. Who'd thunk it! Me liking such new stuff.
|