Beepster
 
It makes the forum look ridiculous.

Yet a 1,835 page thread full of absolutely nothing informative, entertaining, useful, or remotely sensible doesn't?
 
In fact I could probably post a lengthy list of posts and threads that "make(s) the forum look ridiculous", none of which anyone seems to be in the slightest bit bothered about. And I should know, I posted quite a fair bit of it.
 
I know two wrongs don't make a who cares, but this guy isn't that bad in comparison. I know you told me before that he's trolled a lot using many different accounts, but surely the obvious response is just to ignore him?
 
 

SuperMarioGamer

Beepster
Let's not and you go away.

If there were a poor person in some other area of the world, he/she had little food, and could not get music lessons, but still had the desire to make music, then if there were people coming up to him/her and criticizing his/her music as awful, then that is unfair and unjust.  This poor person cannot meet the rich man's standard (the professional standard) for good music.  He/she instead has to meet the poor man's standard since he/she does not have internet, technology, etc.
 
That is why I think it would be both cruel and unfair if anyone of you here put down this child/person's music.  I realize that I have the internet, am learning music lessons, etc.  But everything I just said here is to simply illustrate my point that it is demeaning of an individual's talent for you to go only by the "rich man's standard" in judging someone else's skill/talent.  You should lower your standards as a means of respecting and acknowledging the works of art and talent that an individual truly possesses.

aaaand this is where I take literal offense to your idiocy.
 
I am the guy who will (and has) dedicated his time and energy teaching music to, what society, would consider total lost causes. I believe music can get guns and hard drugs out of people's hands and replaced by guitars, basses, drumsticks, whatever. I believe it can soothe and heal the troubled and damaged minds of the world.
 
Your stupid schtick mocks everything I and others try to do to use music as a positive force in the world to ease desperation and mental illness.
 
Go suck a pile of [REDACTED] you garbage troll threadsh*tter.
 
BAN THIS IDIOT!
 

SuperMarioGamer

Beepster
Let's not and you go away.

If there were a poor person in some other area of the world, he/she had little food, and could not get music lessons, but still had the desire to make music, then if there were people coming up to him/her and criticizing his/her music as awful, then that is unfair and unjust.  This poor person cannot meet the rich man's standard (the professional standard) for good music.  He/she instead has to meet the poor man's standard since he/she does not have internet, technology, etc.
 
That is why I think it would be both cruel and unfair if anyone of you here put down this child/person's music.  I realize that I have the internet, am learning music lessons, etc.  But everything I just said here is to simply illustrate my point that it is demeaning of an individual's talent for you to go only by the "rich man's standard" in judging someone else's skill/talent.  You should lower your standards as a means of respecting and acknowledging the works of art and talent that an individual truly possesses.

You haven't made any music. 

Beepster

SuperMarioGamer
I just think that everyone has a talent to some degree regardless of how awful they are.  So if an average child who plays with toys sings an awful voice, then that is a talent.  However, it is a talent a very low level.  It is a very low level talent, but still a talent worth praising and worth acknowledging as a work of art.

 

Let me judge the authenticity of your criticisms regarding my voices.  Here is another voice I sang into the mic.  Go ahead and tell me what you think of it.  It is my absolute final voice:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQznRqoDr28
 

Also, there's no air in space for a powerful dark voice of the cosmos to pass through.
 

He's got you there. 'Timbaland'. Right up there with the great singers of this, or any other century.
 
A singer named after a brand of boot. There is no more cool to be had.

craigb

Forget all of this.  I have just exposed you all for the frauds that you are in my previous post.  

jamesg1213

SuperMarioGamer
 



Forget all of this.  I have just exposed you all for the frauds that you are in my previous post.  

 
Yep, well done.
 
What now then?

I think my work has been done here.  That is what I was trying to do all along.

SuperMarioGamer

jamesg1213

SuperMarioGamer
 



Forget all of this.  I have just exposed you all for the frauds that you are in my previous post.  

 
Yep, well done.
 
What now then?

I think my work has been done here.  That is what I was trying to do all along.

Brilliant.
 
Rest easy now.

Leadfoot

SuperMarioGamer

jamesg1213

SuperMarioGamer
 



Forget all of this.  I have just exposed you all for the frauds that you are in my previous post.  

 
Yep, well done.
 
What now then?

I think my work has been done here.  That is what I was trying to do all along.

Oh good. Does that mean you'll go away now?

No, because I suspect that others are not convinced that I have exposed them and I want to hear their reasons for thinking so.  I think they are just displaying sarcasm.

SuperMarioGamer

sharke

SuperMarioGamer

Beepster

SuperMarioGamer
I just think that everyone has a talent to some degree regardless of how awful they are.  So if an average child who plays with toys sings an awful voice, then that is a talent.  However, it is a talent a very low level.  It is a very low level talent, but still a talent worth praising and worth acknowledging as a work of art.

 

Let me judge the authenticity of your criticisms regarding my voices.  Here is another voice I sang into the mic.  Go ahead and tell me what you think of it.  It is my absolute final voice:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQznRqoDr28
 

You're talking through an effect which someone else programmed and has absolutely no reflection on your self-perceived talent. 

Wrong.  This is a professional singer's voice I altered.  It was taken from the song Give it to Me by Timbaland.  Yet, you regard this voice as awful and mediocre.  That shows how much you know.  Even though the effects applied might have not been done to a professional level, the voice used was still a professional singing voice here and you have just disregarded the greatness of that voice simply because there were some flaws in the effects applied to that voice.

It's not the voice that's awful and mediocre. It's your contribution to it. All you've done is inserted an effect that someone else programmed on a track that someone else recorded, and in the process created something that is worse than when it started. The original voice cannot be heard because of the effect, and therefore cannot be judged on its own merit. You have not displayed a single shred of talent, have not achieved anything musical and have not made a single valid point. Perhaps it's time to take this childish nonsense to another forum? Come on mods, why aren't you banning this nincompoop. People have been banned for far less. 

sharke

SuperMarioGamer

sharke

SuperMarioGamer

Beepster

SuperMarioGamer
I just think that everyone has a talent to some degree regardless of how awful they are.  So if an average child who plays with toys sings an awful voice, then that is a talent.  However, it is a talent a very low level.  It is a very low level talent, but still a talent worth praising and worth acknowledging as a work of art.

 

Let me judge the authenticity of your criticisms regarding my voices.  Here is another voice I sang into the mic.  Go ahead and tell me what you think of it.  It is my absolute final voice:
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQznRqoDr28
 

You're talking through an effect which someone else programmed and has absolutely no reflection on your self-perceived talent. 

Wrong.  This is a professional singer's voice I altered.  It was taken from the song Give it to Me by Timbaland.  Yet, you regard this voice as awful and mediocre.  That shows how much you know.  Even though the effects applied might have not been done to a professional level, the voice used was still a professional singing voice here and you have just disregarded the greatness of that voice simply because there were some flaws in the effects applied to that voice.

It's not the voice that's awful and mediocre. It's your contribution to it. All you've done is inserted an effect that someone else programmed on a track that someone else recorded, and in the process created something that is worse than when it started. The original voice cannot be heard because of the effect, and therefore cannot be judged on its own merit. You have not displayed a single shred of talent, have not achieved anything musical and have not made a single valid point. Perhaps it's time to take this childish nonsense to another forum? Come on mods, why aren't you banning this nincompoop. People have been banned for far less. 

If the voice could be judged on its own merit and the effects allowed you to do so, then if the effects were flawed and not professionally applied, then would you regard the voice as mediocre and awful like my voices?  Or would you acknowledge such a voice as professional?  This is important because if you still regard that professional voice as mediocre, bad, etc. despite the fact that it is a professional voice, then this means that you are disregarding the greatness of that voice just as how you would be disregarding the greatness of my voices.

sharke
 
People have been banned for far less. 

People
excluded
now
include
Strummy.

Yes, yes. Wing wangs are amusing.
 
Now be quiet. I'm trying to be pissy over here.