Troels
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 199
- Joined: 2003/11/11 12:32:55
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 15:42:37
(permalink)
Athlon64 3400+ Newcastle L2 512kb @2.41GHZ MSI K8N Neo Platinum 2GB DDR PC3200 unbuff. crucial Riva TNT2 64 Video Enermax 431w PSU 2 IDE drives Frontier Design Dakota ASIO: 1.5ms 78-85% 2.9ms 49% 5.8ms 34% 11.6ms 26% This is a bit disappointing to me, I had expected scores down there with FX51 and the older 3400 Clawhammer with an L2 of 1mb... I can still return the Newcastle for the Clawhammer, should I????
|
tazman
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2435
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 16:28:20
(permalink)
I would have thought you'd get a bit better than what I am getting on the 3200+. Mine is a CLawhammer, but I would doubt that would make a difference. Infact the Newcastle runs faster and the cache should not make any difference as far as audio apps. Have you tried loading the Optimized defaults in the BIOS?
< Message edited by tazman -- 8/23/2004 3:29:38 PM >
|
Troels
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 199
- Joined: 2003/11/11 12:32:55
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 17:21:59
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: tazman I would have thought you'd get a bit better than what I am getting on the 3200+. Mine is a CLawhammer, but I would doubt that would make a difference. Infact the Newcastle runs faster and the cache should not make any difference as far as audio apps. Have you tried loading the Optimized defaults in the BIOS? Thanks Rob, the optimized defaults brought the score down to 76-80% @ 1.5ms. Still far from Scott's FX51 below 60% score @ 1.5...... Any other suggestions as to what will help, anyone?
< Message edited by Troels -- 8/23/2004 4:23:47 PM >
|
feadhel
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 351
- Joined: 2004/04/07 12:28:47
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 17:57:21
(permalink)
I thought you couldn't get yer board working.. On the MSI site people say "switch it to 1T immediately, the default 2T suxxors", but it hasn't made a big difference in mine. I have yet to enable "optimized" however.. chortle chortle
|
Troels
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 199
- Joined: 2003/11/11 12:32:55
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 18:33:41
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: feadhel I thought you couldn't get yer board working.. I couldn't until this morning..... On the MSI site people say "switch it to 1T immediately, the default 2T suxxors", but it hasn't made a big difference in mine. Thanks, I'll try that imediately. I have yet to enable "optimized" however.. chortle chortle
|
Troels
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 199
- Joined: 2003/11/11 12:32:55
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 18:47:03
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Troels ORIGINAL: feadhel I thought you couldn't get yer board working.. I couldn't until this morning..... On the MSI site people say "switch it to 1T immediately, the default 2T suxxors", but it hasn't made a big difference in mine. Thanks, I'll try that imediately. I have yet to enable "optimized" however.. chortle chortle Allright, that brought it down to 69-78% @ 1.5ms, cool! Can we get it any lower??
|
feadhel
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 351
- Joined: 2004/04/07 12:28:47
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 19:01:50
(permalink)
With optimized settings in BIOS.. (and 1T timing) AMD Athlon 64 2800+ MSI K8N NEO PLATINUM 1GB Kingston Value Ram PC3200 DDR400 (2x512MB) Apollo Radeon 9200 64MB AGP Video Western Digital 80GB 7200rpm ATA100 System Drive Maxtor 80GB 7200rpm ATA133 Audio Drive LG DVDR Antec 380w standard Sonata "quiet power" M-Audio Firewire Audiophile ASIO 46.4ms........30-31% 23.2ms........33% 11.6ms........37% 5.8ms..........46-47% 2.9ms..........62-64% 1.5ms..........93% Dropout The only big deal there is that the 1.5ms setting *almost* works.. with a gentle OC I could probably pull it off!
|
favance
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 37
- Joined: 2004/08/14 15:37:34
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 19:06:04
(permalink)
Echo Audio ASIO Driver Multiprocessor 46.4 25% 23.2 28% 11.6 32% 5.8 40% 2.9 56% 1.5 N/A w/Layla ASIO Drivers w/o Multiprocessor 46.4 28% 23.2 30% 11.6 35% 5.8 43% 2.9 60% 1.5 N/A w/Layla ASIO Drivers Asus P4C800-E Deluxe 2GB Kingston KVR400X64C3AK2/2G 2GB Kit DDR400 PC3200 Memory Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor Prescott 3.2GHz 2 Raid-0 Western Digital Raptor WD740GD 74GB Serial ATA 10,000RPM Drives Echo Audio Mona
|
tazman
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2435
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 21:58:04
(permalink)
We need to verify that some of those guys getting very low CPU usage are not Over Clocking their machines...
|
tazman
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2435
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 22:04:33
(permalink)
What is this 1T, 2T? Where in the BIOS? Thanks,
|
Troels
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 199
- Joined: 2003/11/11 12:32:55
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 22:16:00
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: sarcazm here's results of Centrino (755) HP nw8000 2ghz with 2 mg cache on AC power 1 gig ram 60 gig 7200 hd Win XP Pro Indigo i/o 46.4 - ~27 23.3 - ~27 11.6 - ~30 5.8 - ~35 2.9 - ~44 1.5 - ~64 ASIO4ALL (Soundmax) unable to test as Sonar don't like the inbuilt card might test with my 410 to see if there's any difference later. Rather disappointing actually, I was hoping for better. Hey, thats a very good score for an intel machine. Only 2 other intels are able to do 1.5ms and @ 64 % you are down there with the Athlon 64 3400+, and way below the P43.2. I'm speculating it has to do with the 2MB cache.
|
feadhel
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 351
- Joined: 2004/04/07 12:28:47
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/23 22:26:22
(permalink)
My motherboard is an MSI K8N Neo Platinum.. if you have that, go into the Cell thingy in BIOS, first selection has to do with your RAM, in that list will be the timing, set as default at 2T, but if your chip(s) can handle it, do 1T. If you don't have the same board, I don't know how to begin to help you!
|
tazman
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2435
- Joined: 2003/11/13 13:01:40
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/24 07:18:30
(permalink)
Actually since I have a Clawhammer, that option is not available in the BIOS on the MSI board... Thanks
|
aj
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1084
- Joined: 2003/12/08 08:21:36
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/24 07:40:25
(permalink)
Wow! I think I can speak for everyone hear in saying, thanks very much for going to all this trouble. This is excellent stuff. Interestingly, this confirms my current thinking that (a) If you want a laptop for music production, the Pentium M (Banias or Dothan) is clearly the superior choice, given that its performance is so good and power consumption so modest. (b) The Athlon 2800XP makes a damn good cheap and cheerful workstation, when you look at how much cheaper a machine based around this CPU will be compared to the high-end Pentiums.
|
Scott Reams
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1918
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:32:28
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/24 13:16:39
(permalink)
Hey, thats a very good score for an intel machine. Only 2 other intels are able to do 1.5ms and @ 64 % you are down there with the Athlon 64 3400+, and way below the P43.2. I'm speculating it has to do with the 2MB cache. At actually has a lot more to do with the fact that its a Centrino, and not a P4. Centrino is a great chip. -S
|
MichaelV
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2004/08/16 12:48:33
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/24 15:10:07
(permalink)
Wow. Almost 39,000 hits and around 365 Replies For Your post Scott. It's a big community here ! Okay, Hi and thanks to everyone's help here especially Scott Who makes me understand why my system keep producing POPs and Clicks while Recording, just 1 midi track (from out board gear) to audio trak. And also why the Audio is drop out ! Your contributions help me to build a better performance system in future to cope it with Sonar 3. Here is my system 2x512 Mb DDR400 Memory (Pc 2700) 1x512 mb Corsair Memory mode Dual Channel NVIDIA GeForce2 MX/MX 400 (2 CHIPSET BASE) 32MB Ram Samsung Syncmaster 21 GL (Monitor) MSI K7N2 Delta L Mother Board. System disk: 1- 112 GB 7200 Western Digital IDE 1 - 120 Gb 7200 Western Digital IDE (2 partitions) Adaptec Firewire IEEE 1394 (PCI card) mLan 1.51 driver Yamaha 01X (Digital mixer) Windows XP Pro SP1 Sonar 3.1.1.1 Project5 ASIO Testing at 256 K I/O Buffer. Catches, Dither on, ( trigger and free wheel produce indentical scores ) 2.2 Dead meat 3.5 ms 70~73% 5.00 ms 58~62% 6.00 ms 54~56% 7.00 ms 50~51% 10.00 ms 45% 15.00 ms 39~47% 20.00 ms 37% 30.00 ms 34% 40.00 ms 32% It's a little out of context here but I take this opportunity to ask any one if you see Sonar does (While recording a 1 midi track from out board gear) Suddenly just from 5 to 6 % CPU compsumtion, it spike up to Warning zone 80~85% CPU Then the audio drop out! - And this audio track got POPS and Clicks. (256 k I/O buffer, latency set at 15 ms. (Achived all other trak while recording) Do You have the same problem like me ? Cheers Michael V.
|
MichaelV
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2004/08/16 12:48:33
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/24 15:14:15
(permalink)
Sorry ! Forgot the main thing! Athlon AMD 2800+ Michael V.
|
v42x
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 150
- Joined: 2004/07/09 11:49:59
- Location: mk:
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/25 06:03:51
(permalink)
S3PE AMD Athlon 1.33GHz Gigabyte GA7DR Motherboard 768MB PC2100 DDR 32MB AGP Video Maxtor 40GB 7200rpm ATA133 HD WindowsXP Professional SP1 Audiophile 2496 46.4ms........no go 23.2ms........nowt 11.6ms........nada 5.8ms..........zip 2.9ms..........gar nichts 1.5ms..........you gotta be joking right there must be something wrong with my pc - cheap RAM perhaps? still, it does what i want, and a vast improvement on a Porta-One
|
phyl
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10
- Joined: 2004/08/23 09:49:58
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/08/25 14:49:28
(permalink)
Scott, I'm having a system built using the ECS 755-A2 motherboard and AMD64 3000+ chip. I'll run your tests once I get it and post the results. How significant is the fact that my MB has only a 400MHz FSB? How will this affect performance? I'm also curious about the 3000+ having half the cache of a 3200+. In any event, I'm sure it will be an improvemoent over my Dell P4 1.8 Ghz (845 chipset). SONAR 2.0 ran fine on it, SONAR 3.0 brought it to it's knees.
< Message edited by phyl -- 8/25/2004 12:50:53 PM >
|
Troels
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 199
- Joined: 2003/11/11 12:32:55
- Status: offline
Athlon 64 Clawhammer beats Newcastle for low latency audio performance.
2004/08/29 16:47:58
(permalink)
Athlon 64 3400+ Clawhammer speed 2.2ghz, L2 cache 1024 KB. SONAR Test 3 score @ 1.5 ms: 57-63%. Athlon 64 3400+ Newcastle speed 2.4ghz, L2 512KB SONAR Test 3 score @ 1.5ms: 69-78%. At 11.6ms the performance is identical. The Newcastle might have an advantage at higher latencies. The processor is the only difference in hardware and settings. The Clawhammer runs a couple of degrees Celsius hotter than the Newcastle. Troels
|
drophit
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2
- Joined: 2004/09/02 23:55:26
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/02 23:58:03
(permalink)
I can not move the slider past 10 ms using WDM drivers why is this?
|
ReedMyLips
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 17
- Joined: 2004/08/17 00:51:22
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/03 15:22:46
(permalink)
HP/Compaq nw8000 with 1.8GHz Pentium M 1GB RAM Dual 60GB mobile drives (slow) M-Audio MobilePre w/ASIO drivers (WDM don't work well) 17.4 = 30% 5.8 = 37% 2.9 = 50% 1.8 = 66% Pretty decent for a portable, I guess. Need a good audio interface and a firewire drive, what do you think? After posting I noticed I have a similar system to sarcazm with similar results. Can't beat a portable studio like this. Haven't used it to do "real work" yet after upgrading from a lowly Pentium III portable and CWPA 8.x.
< Message edited by ReedMyLips -- 9/3/2004 3:26:57 PM >
|
ReedMyLips
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 17
- Joined: 2004/08/17 00:51:22
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/03 15:29:35
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: sarcazm here's results of Centrino (755) HP nw8000 1.5 - ~64 Rather disappointing actually, I was hoping for better. Really!? I'm pleased as punch with the results of the nw8000. Is it possible to get significantly better results with a portable?
|
Patrice Brousseau
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 391
- Joined: 2003/11/05 20:12:10
- Location: Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/03 21:34:21
(permalink)
46.4ms........no go 23.2ms........nowt 11.6ms........nada 5.8ms..........zip 2.9ms..........gar nichts 1.5ms..........you gotta be joking right there must be something wrong with my pc - cheap RAM perhaps? still, it does what i want, and a vast improvement on a Porta-One I agree with you, there's something wrong with your system. My specs are similar to yours, except maybe the RAM, and I can go go as low as 5.8 ms... See by yourself: -WinXP Home sp1 (dual-boot: one uncluttered and optimixed for DAW and the other for internet and Office) -MSI K7T Turbo LE -Athlon XP 1600+ (1.39 gHz) -768 Mb of PC133 SDRAM -Echo Mia with latest drivers (6.08) -Maxtor 40 gigs 7200 rpm for system drive -Maxtor 80 gigs for samples (on his own IDE) -Matrox G450 This is on the Internet boot with WDM: 46.4ms.....56% 23.2ms.....58-60% 11.6ms.....69-73% 5.8ms.......91-92% 2.9ms.......Audio engine refuse to engage Added: Same values on the DAW only boot...
< Message edited by Patrice Brousseau -- 9/3/2004 9:37:20 PM >
|
Scott Reams
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1918
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:32:28
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/04 00:01:37
(permalink)
Wow... I missed this post before. How can you possibly be disappointed with those numbers? The 2GHz Centrino with 2MB of L2 is performing exactly like a 2GHz Athlon64. Pretty amazing. -S ORIGINAL: sarcazm here's results of Centrino (755) HP nw8000 2ghz with 2 mg cache on AC power 1 gig ram 60 gig 7200 hd Win XP Pro Indigo i/o 46.4 - ~27 23.3 - ~27 11.6 - ~30 5.8 - ~35 2.9 - ~44 1.5 - ~64 ASIO4ALL (Soundmax) unable to test as Sonar don't like the inbuilt card might test with my 410 to see if there's any difference later. Rather disappointing actually, I was hoping for better.
|
jlgrimes
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1639
- Joined: 2003/12/15 12:37:09
- Location: Atlanta, Ga, USA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/09 10:39:28
(permalink)
Testing is simple... Open Sonar... Set default sample rate to 44.1KHz (important to do this). Set latency to, say, 46.4ms (For consistency's sake, try to use ASIO drivers if you have them available... otherwise, WDM is okay)... and then open the test file. Make sure the audio engine is active, and note the CPU meter reading. Do the same at 23.2ms, 11.6ms, 5.8ms, 2.9ms, and 1.5ms. Keep in mind that on many systems, the audio engine may refuse to engage at the lower latencies. Make a note of that as well. If you have a Dual-CPU system... or one with Hyperthreading... or both... post results with Sonar's Multiprocessor Engine both on and off. Along with your results, post detailed system specs, and I'll try to put together some detailed charts mapping out the performance of various CPUs at various latencies. Thanks ahead for all of your help with this! Now... this is a nice bonus to having a web-based forum. I can update this top post at will in order to keep updated results readily available to all. Here's what we have so far (this will be updated as new data comes in): CPU Chart CPUs are listed in order of low-latency performance. Blue Lines represent Intel systems. Green Lines represent older-generation single-CPU AMD systems. Red/Pink Lines represent new-generation single-CPU AMD systems. Yellow Lines represent multi-CPU systems. Dotted lines represent multi-CPU systems with Sonar's MP capabilities disabled. -Scott < Message edited by Scott Reams -- 1/20/2004 2:39:37 AM > Report Does the operton 248 perform as stated with one processor or was two identical processors used in that test?
|
Scott Reams
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1918
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:32:28
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/09 13:53:00
(permalink)
Does the operton 248 perform as stated with one processor or was two identical processors used in that test? All multi-CPU systems are labeled "DP" on the chart, and have solid yellow lines as described. That would mean two processors. -S
|
TonyOConnor
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 438
- Joined: 2004/09/05 15:28:45
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/09 21:23:56
(permalink)
3.06GhZ without HT turned on. 46.4 = 26% 23.2 = 28% 11.6 = 33% 5.8 = 42 - 43% 2.9 = 63% Racked: Gigabyte 8INXP (E7205 -- Granitebay) motherboard P3.06Ghz HT 1 Gig DDR (2 dimms pc3200) 2x36Gig 10Krpm Western Digital (SATA) Raptors in 0Raid configuration 1x80Gig Maxtor 7200rpm UDMA 133Mhz HDD Storage Gigabyte MAYA II R9700 Pro (128MB DDR SDRAM, 256-bit DDR 8xAGP) Thermaltake Valcano7 CPU fan, 1x5" front rack fan / 2x2" rear rack fans SONY DVD_RW (DRU510A), External Que USB CD RW Generic CD – ROM. XP SP2 MOTU
|
davidchristopher
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1360
- Joined: 2004/06/18 15:51:14
- Location: Burlington, Ontario, Canada
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/13 23:16:48
(permalink)
Latecomer, I know: @ 44.1/24bit: 5.8msec=77% (ouch!) 11.6msec=43% Time for an upgrade. Seems that dual opterons are mopping up the Pentiums? Any thoughts for Sonar hardware? Asus P4C800-E 3.0GHZ 2GB DDR (4x 512) 2 120GB 7200RPM Seagate Baracuda SATAs 1 80GB 7200RPM Seagate IDE (System Drive) HP DVD 300e and 100i DVD Burners XP SP2 Motu PCI 424 2x HD192
|
rgfors
Max Output Level: -69 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1068
- Joined: 2003/12/19 15:48:07
- Location: Dublin, CA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2004/09/16 03:52:20
(permalink)
Okay, I've now posted three different results with three different computers. My first post was with a 3.2ghz P4, the next was with a 3.2ghz P4 Extreme Edition and my new computer is as follows: 2) Opteron 250s (2) Zalman 7000A coolers Tyan S2885 dual-Opteron motherboard 4GB OCZ CAS2 PC3200 registered DDR (8x512MB) ATI Radeon 64MB DH AGP Video HighPoint 8-way SATA RAID controller Plextor 712 series DVDRW 120GB 7200rpm 8MB system drive (2) 160GB 7200rpm 8MB SATA samples/loops drives (3) 160GB 7200rpm 8MB SATA audio drives in RAID5 array (3) SATA drive sleds for audio drives Antec 550W quiet power supply 4-space rack case (26†deep) WinXP Pro Here are the results: 46.4: 15% 23.2: 16-17% 11.6: 18-19% 5.8: 21-24% 2.9: 27-32% 1.5: 44-49% 0.7: CPU Warning, but will engage! Scott Reams (Liquiddaw) built this system for me and as you can see, the performance is stellar!!
|