colo
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 132
- Joined: 2003/11/06 02:23:44
- Location: Vancouver, WA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/01/15 22:12:09
(permalink)
Athlon XP 3200+ (Barton) Running stock voltages @ 2.37 Ghz with 431Mhz FSB. My numbers don't vary like they do on my other computer. M-Audio Delta 66 ASIO: 1.5 90% 2.9 57% 5.8 41% 8.7 35% 11.6 32% 23.2 28% 46.4 25%
|
Boogie
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2106
- Joined: 2003/11/19 15:45:21
- Location: CALIFORNIA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/01/29 00:10:26
(permalink)
I can't download the test file anymore. Where'd it go??
|
Scott Reams
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1918
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:32:28
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/01/29 16:26:52
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Boogie I can't download the test file anymore. Where'd it go?? Try again. The link seems to work fine for me. -S
|
Vincent
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 356
- Joined: 2004/11/02 23:47:54
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/01/30 11:53:27
(permalink)
Hi Everyone, How do I import and run the SONAR 3 Test in SONAR 4 PRODUCER EDITION? I seem to be having trouble opening up this file. Can you help? When I open up the file it says..."Audio is missing would you like to create it?" I click "YES" and nothing happens, there is no audio wave files in the track view. Can anyone help please.
|
Erik Putrycz
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 138
- Joined: 2003/11/05 22:12:54
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/01/30 13:00:54
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Scott Reams ORIGINAL: Boogie I can't download the test file anymore. Where'd it go?? Try again. The link seems to work fine for me. -S Do you have any updated graph with all the results? I'm planning to build a new DAW and I'm not decided on the CPU .
|
Boogie
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2106
- Joined: 2003/11/19 15:45:21
- Location: CALIFORNIA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/01/30 15:02:15
(permalink)
I seem to be having trouble opening up this file. Can you help? When I open up the file it says..."Audio is missing would you like to create it?" I click "YES" and nothing happens, there is no audio wave files in the track view. It's asking you if you want to create an audio folder, right? Click yes. The test file contains no audio. The test measures CPU utilization of Sonar's audio engine based entirely on real-time input monitoring.
|
stillfox
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 938
- Joined: 2003/11/07 00:52:22
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/01/31 11:19:50
(permalink)
OK, here's a shootout between old computer and new: OLD COMPUTER - Carillon AC-1, P4 2.0gHz, Intel 865, 1GB RDRAM, 40/120GB IDE drives, XP SP1, MOTU 896 WDM 46.4 = 48% 23.2 = 53% 11.6 = 62% 5.8 = 80% 2.9 = dead NEW COMPUTER - AMD64 3500+ 939, ASUS A8V, 2 GB DDR, 80/250 SATA, XP SP1, 828mkII WDM 46.4 = 28% 23.2 = 30% 11.6 = 35% 5.8 = 42% 2.9 = 60% 1.5 = 71% aahhhhhhhh still not as good as some of the numbers posted here, but it's a HUGE improvement and I've yet to do any tweaks.
|
CRNA59
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 242
- Joined: 2003/11/14 17:16:00
- Location: Issaquah, WA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/02 11:33:56
(permalink)
I'd think it would be cool to have a 64bit Sonar Test. I just built a screaming machine where I've placed Sonar64/MS XP64 on a seperate drive. It's built on the new ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe board with Athlon FX-55 939 Socket and DDR-550 RAM. It's one of my Giga 3 machines. Just a thought! Regards, Bruce
Bruce Puget Sound Studios & Mastering Recording Academy-Member Issaquah, WA
|
stratcat33511
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3636
- Joined: 2004/12/27 09:48:37
- Location: Tampa FL
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/02 13:10:22
(permalink)
Is this test strictly for SONAR 3? Or can I run it on my SONAR4SE ? Thanks Good stuff here for when I build my new DAW E
|
togo59
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 218
- Joined: 2004/07/22 09:05:11
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/02 16:09:41
(permalink)
Sorry to be a johnny-come-lately but here are my figures (yawn). This was on S4 because my S3 is only studio edition with no Sonitus FX. Latency. . . Samples . . . . CPU (ms). . . . .per buffer . . . .% 46.4 . . . . . 2048. . . . . . . 27 23.2. . . . . .1024. . . . . . . 29 11.6. . . . . . 512. . . . . . . .33 5.8. . . . . . . 256. . . . . . . .38 2.9. . . . . . . 128. . . . . . . .48 1.5. . . . . . . . 64. . . . . . . .73 AMD64 3200+, 2GHz, Asus K8VSE, 1Gb RAM, Terratec 24/96 6fire. XP home (SP2), and I had Zonealarm firewall running all the time but most other systray stuff killed off.
< Message edited by togo59 -- 2/2/2005 4:18:29 PM >
...ping? Sonar has charms to soothe the savage breast.
|
stratcat33511
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3636
- Joined: 2004/12/27 09:48:37
- Location: Tampa FL
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/03 13:26:24
(permalink)
Ok I did it! here's the numbers ( don't laugh ) AOpen PIII, 866MHz, 1048M pc133 ram, ViaApolloPro133 44.1k / 24bit / 384 I/O ASIO 5.8 msec / WDM 11.8 mSec WinXP Pro SP1 tweaked ( musicXP & black viper) it floats between 64 and 65% under ASIO and 70-75% under WDM with 2 efx though it goes into the red (I normally use outboard anyway ) EDIT: for WDM numbers, added chipset numbers It works fine like this and I don't wanna change anything PS: Good to see I'm not the only one pushing a PIII to it's limits
post edited by stratcat33511 - 2005/02/26 11:53:48
|
jopatou
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 111
- Joined: 2004/11/16 16:53:40
- Location: Mtl, Qc, Ca
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/09 16:18:04
(permalink)
this is with HT, Multi-processing engine enabled. XP Media Center sp1 ATI Mobility Radeon9700 46.4ms = 10-13% 34.8ms = 11-14% 23.2ms = 14-18% 17.4ms = 16-20% 11.6ms = 18-26% 8.7 ms = 22-31% 5.8 ms = 29-51% 4.4 ms = 30-45% 2.9 ms = 36-71% 2.2 ms = 55-91% with random warning Opening windows when at 2,2 ms stops the engine. Opening windows when at higher latency = momentary peak
Sonar4PE LaptopToshibaP10-P4-3.2Gig-1GigRAM-80GigHD MOTU896HD, GuitarRig, MIDISPORT 2X2
|
Scott Reams
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1918
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:32:28
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/09 20:50:55
(permalink)
this is with HT, Multi-processing engine enabled. XP Media Center sp1 ATI Mobility Radeon9700 46.4ms = 10-13% Hmmm... something probably isn't right here. With this score, you've beat all of the systems, including the dual-CPU ones. Perhaps you are missing some plugins? -Scott
|
Jimtoonz
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 299
- Joined: 2003/11/08 13:35:21
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/10 01:14:27
(permalink)
For those of us who are pushing older hardware along, here are the results from my rusty, trusty "white box" rackmount. All numbers running S4P under W2K Professional. CPU: Intel PIII 1.4-S running at spec clocking MB: DFI CA-64TN with VIA Apollo pro 133 chipset 512 MB RAM (PC133) Echo MIA (WDM) PNY Verto GeForce FX 5200 Maxtor 6Y160 ATA 7200 RPM HD Latency(ms) CPU Utilization(%) 46.4 - 56% 23.2 - 62% 11.6 - 72% 5.8 - 91% 2.9 - Help ! BTW, numbers under S3P were all within a point or two of the S4P figures with no audio engine engage @ 2.9.
post edited by Jimtoonz - 2005/02/10 02:19:13
|
jopatou
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 111
- Joined: 2004/11/16 16:53:40
- Location: Mtl, Qc, Ca
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/12 20:10:13
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Scott Reams this is with HT, Multi-processing engine enabled. XP Media Center sp1 ATI Mobility Radeon9700 46.4ms = 10-13% Hmmm... something probably isn't right here. With this score, you've beat all of the systems, including the dual-CPU ones. Perhaps you are missing some plugins? -Scott Sorry Scott, really had it wrong!!!!! didn't see the link at first so I was trying to recreate according to the file description...Now here's my real score! 46.4 = 28-32% 34.8 = 30-33% 23.2 = 32-37% 17.4 = 33-40% 11.6 = 37-45% 8.7 = 40-52% 5.8 = 50-63% 4.4 = 58-87% 2.9 = Stops after 2 sec. 2.2 = Won't engage Now that's more like it but I don't like it a bit!!!! According to your graph I should get better results, what do you think? Kind regards Ben
Sonar4PE LaptopToshibaP10-P4-3.2Gig-1GigRAM-80GigHD MOTU896HD, GuitarRig, MIDISPORT 2X2
|
Scott Reams
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1918
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:32:28
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/12 22:27:02
(permalink)
According to your graph I should get better results, what do you think? Try ASIO. Looks like you are using WDM. -S
|
jopatou
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 111
- Joined: 2004/11/16 16:53:40
- Location: Mtl, Qc, Ca
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/13 11:52:53
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Scott Reams According to your graph I should get better results, what do you think? Try ASIO. Looks like you are using WDM. -S I am using ASIO driver, I couldn't get good results with WDM, but that was a few months ago when I was a real Sonar newbie then, so...didn't do the test with WDM then since I didn't know about it, but I couldn't get latency lower than 23.2ms or 34.8ms (WDM). I get around 11.6 - 17.4ms with ASIO. This is with my basic template, to which we paste our old MIDI songs. Maybe I'm asking for too much!? Here's what it looks like: 4 audio tracks for Mics, input monitor, send to Cake verb, main outs. 1 audio track for electric guitar, input monitor, GuitRigDXi insert, send to out 7-8, main outs. 1 audio track for BV, input monitor, send to Cake verb, send to out 5-6, main outs. 1 audio track for acc.guits, input monitor, send to Cake verb, send to out 5-6, main outs. 1 TTS-1 instance with: output 1 - instruments, send to out 5-6, main outs. output 2 - Bass wGuitRigDXi insert, send to out 1-2, main outs. 1 TTS-1 instance with: output 1 - drums, send to Lexicon verb, send to out 3-4, main outs. 1 aux Cake verb (vox, BV) 1 aux Lexicon verb (drums) 1 aux Sonitus verb (sometimes used as replacement for the above or for extra inst.) So this is about 10 audio tracks, 2 DXi inserts, 3 aux verbs, various count of MIDI tracks assigned to 2 TTS-1 using 3 outputs, nothing really big here, right???...
post edited by jopatou - 2005/02/13 12:00:35
Sonar4PE LaptopToshibaP10-P4-3.2Gig-1GigRAM-80GigHD MOTU896HD, GuitarRig, MIDISPORT 2X2
|
Andy C
Max Output Level: -65 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1272
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:09:38
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/13 14:11:57
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: CRNA59 I'd think it would be cool to have a 64bit Sonar Test Now that is a cool idea. I've not gone 64 bit yet so it would be good to see some results. Andy
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/20 20:47:43
(permalink)
My numbers seem way high for my CPU and system. I think I must be doing some things wrong, but I'll start with my test results: System: AMD Athlon 64 3400+ running @ 2412 MSI K8N Neo Platinum mobo 2x 512kb Corsair DDR RAM Win XP Pro SP2 M-Audio Delta 1010 WDM drivers 2x UAD-1 v3.7 Sonar 3.1.1 PE ATi Radeon 9600 series video card w/128 MB my results WDM 55-56 % @ 46.4ms 56-57 % @ 29ms 58-60 % @ 17.4ms 75% @ 5.8ms i cannot slide below 5.8 ms and am not sure how you can do this. It does not go any lower. my results ASIO 75% @ 5.8ms and the slider does not go lower nor does it move up higher.. the audio driver bit depth is greyed at 24bit and the file is 16bit / 44.1
post edited by saaricom - 2005/02/20 21:11:42
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
Scott Reams
Max Output Level: -56 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1918
- Joined: 2003/11/06 15:32:28
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/21 01:08:21
(permalink)
my results ASIO 75% @ 5.8ms and the slider does not go lower nor does it move up higher.. the audio driver bit depth is greyed at 24bit and the file is 16bit / 44.1 ASIO latency is changed by clicking on the "ASIO Panel" button at the bottom of the Audio Options dialog and setting a different buffer size at the sound card driver. Otherwise... yes, your results aren't anywhere near where they should be. You probably have a configuration problem. -S
post edited by Scott Reams - 2005/02/21 01:16:34
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/21 19:04:49
(permalink)
Scott - or anyone who may know: I have the ATi 9600SE model video card, which has 64-bit memory interface (not 128 as I had thought). Would this possibly be the culprit of my slow PC? I have checked all my XP tweaks and disabled a few more app's I did not require (using blackviper as my guide). I think I down to hardware as my next investigation... Thanks for the advice!
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
Al
Max Output Level: -35 dBFS
- Total Posts : 4047
- Joined: 2003/11/07 01:03:27
- Location: NYC
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/21 19:07:08
(permalink)
Would this possibly be the culprit of my slow PC? no , i really don't think so - Scott said "your results aren't anywhere near where they should be." ..something is really wrong there .
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/21 21:33:44
(permalink)
EUREKA! It was in the BIOS config! I just selected 'USE OPTIMIZED SETTINGS" and voila! I have a Sonar3Test ASIO showing the numbers as others have tested. I will (at some point) get to the bottom of what setting(s) was the culprit, but as of now I can get back to mixing... PS - and after all the digging I had done since last nights discovery, I now have a really streamlined rig! I had so much tweaking into this problem, that I ended up having to re-authorize Windows XP Pro Thanks for the replies guys!
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
travis
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5
- Joined: 2005/02/22 21:15:03
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/22 21:30:06
(permalink)
Pentium 4 540J 3.2GHz LGA775 H/T Intel 915G Southbridge Intel 82801FB (ICH6) ATI ASUS Extreme AX300SE/T 128MB PCI x16 2Gb RAM (4x512 DDR400MHz) In Dual Channel Mode E-MU 1212M 2 X SATA 250gb WinXp Pro SP2 Sonar3PE 3.1.1 Results for Sonar3 on Sonar3Test.cwb WDM Driver 44.1 Latency Use MP On.. Use MP Off 46.4ms.. 23-25%.... 29-30% 23.2ms.. 25-27%.... 30-32% 11.6ms.. 28-31%.... 33-37% 5.8ms.... 36-40%.... 43-46% 2.9ms.... 52-55%.... 58-63% 1.5ms.... 79-85%.... 92-warning (no dropout) Am considering upgrading to Sonar4 Travis
post edited by travis - 2005/02/22 23:01:41
|
trqy
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2005/02/15 22:48:51
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/25 23:28:20
(permalink)
Standard PC P4 1.8GHz Gigabyte 845G Series P4 Titan 533FSB Motherboard 256Mb DDRAM (266MHz) SBLive5.1 with kX drivers(v5.10.00.3537) Western Digital 80Gb 8Mb cache 7200rpm Onboard display adapter(Intel 82845GL 64Mb shared RAM) LG52x CD-ROM Philips DVDR1640p 16x DVD-RW Windows XP Professional with ServicePack 2 Sonar4 WDM/KS (44KHz & 16bits) 40ms 50% 30ms 55% 20ms 63% 10ms 70% below are not available ASIO (SBLive locks itself with 48KHz & 16bits if asio selected) 42,66ms 49% 21,33ms 53% 10,07ms 64% 05,30ms 84% 02,70ms dropout immediately ------------------------------ Hi ppl, Are the results above average or do i need some tweakin? I need some upgrades lookin above, right? But due to the motherboard's docs my max upgrade should be a P4 2,4GHz. Does it worth it to buy? (1.8 -> 2.4 ?) Or should i change both m.board and cpu? I need some suggestion about which one wins the war about the performance/price issue? AMD or Intel? I usually run 16audio 8midi(sf2+DXi)tracks 3effects perchannel 21,33ms (asio) at an average of 70% cpu load. Mostly no d.outs, but sometimes drives me crazy. I only record guitars all the other things are samples, DXis, VSTis, mostly sf2s. I couldn't find a surround monitoring capable 24/96 pci audiocard with an affordable price, so stuck with SBLive. I'd just ordered a 512Mb DDRAM (400MHz), i guess that will take care of most of the sf2 work. I'm open for all of your suggestions. Thanks a lot...
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/27 00:05:58
(permalink)
I think you should notice the trend in this thread is that AMD is the best value vs performance for Sonar DAW.
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
Guitarmech111
Max Output Level: -24.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5085
- Joined: 2003/11/06 10:18:53
- Location: Bayou City, TX
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/27 11:26:31
(permalink)
The test file contains no audio. I wanted to try the test, but there is no audio in the file. Can someone give a link to the full test project?
Peace, Conley Shepherd Joyful Noise Productions PC config: (Win performance base score = 7.7) ASUS Sabertooth 990 FX -amd fx-8150 - core processor am3+ - 32G Corsair 1066 DDR3 - PNY GTX670 2g gddr5 - Corsair Force SSD 120G - Samsung 750G SATA drives - WD 1tb Black (Audio files) - WD 2TB for storage - RME UFX - USB ASIO 2/2016 drivers Win8 Without a mess, there is no message
|
saaricom
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
- Total Posts : 188
- Joined: 2004/02/17 20:56:41
- Location: Chicago, IL USofA
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/27 12:52:58
(permalink)
you don't need audio in the file to perform this test.
cheers! Erik RIG: Sonar X1 Producer Expanded Build 425 (x64) Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit SP1 Intel i7-3770K CPU 16-GB RAM MB: ASUS P8 Z77-V PRO Line Six TonePort UX2 M-Audio Axiom 25
|
Guitarmech111
Max Output Level: -24.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5085
- Joined: 2003/11/06 10:18:53
- Location: Bayou City, TX
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/28 09:27:20
(permalink)
Here are mine: MSI NEO2 Platinum Athlon 3500+ 1G DDR, RME Fireface 800 ASIO 48 - dropouts 64 - 79-81% 96 - 59-61% 128 - 51% 256 - 37% 512 - 30% 768 - 28% 1024 - 28% WDM FF800 set at 64 samples in buffer 1.5 - 83% and audio stopped onit's own 2.9 - 55% 4.4 - 45% 5.8 - 40% 7.3 - 37% 8.7 - 35% 10.2 - 33-35% 11.6 - 32-33% 13.1 - 31-32% 15.4 - 30-32% 16 - 30% 17.4 29% 21.8 - 28% I am thinking I can get better than this. I am not totally convinced my system is tweaked to the hilt yet.
Peace, Conley Shepherd Joyful Noise Productions PC config: (Win performance base score = 7.7) ASUS Sabertooth 990 FX -amd fx-8150 - core processor am3+ - 32G Corsair 1066 DDR3 - PNY GTX670 2g gddr5 - Corsair Force SSD 120G - Samsung 750G SATA drives - WD 1tb Black (Audio files) - WD 2TB for storage - RME UFX - USB ASIO 2/2016 drivers Win8 Without a mess, there is no message
|
Poni
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 276
- Joined: 2003/11/06 17:55:46
- Location: Toronto
- Status: offline
RE: New, Updated SonarTest
2005/02/28 09:39:40
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Guitarmech111 I am thinking I can get better than this. I am not totally convinced my system is tweaked to the hilt yet. Your should be able to do better then that my 3000+ socket754 1gig ddr with a Delta 44 has the same stats as yuor machine.
|