HammerHead
Max Output Level: -62 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1403
- Joined: 2004/01/07 15:59:53
- Location: Northern Virginia
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/06/23 15:48:52
(permalink)
OK, this may be just my problem - and I am using this not for a SATA problem but with a clicking problem I have been looking that - but I loaded powerstrip on my box and I can't for the life of me see where in powerstrip you can see these values. Sorry if I am just dense - but I would appreciate a tip on this one. thanks much its not you ...its powerstrip. once installed open powerstrip. under options-->adapter information tip...this got me for a while...at the top where the adapter name is shown there's actually a small set of scroll arrows that cycle through the adapters. very hard to see. the latency shows up in a drop down box. unclick read-only checkbox to modify any settings.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/06/23 17:43:02
(permalink)
EDIT: Thanks for helping out, HammerHead! You 'da man! Yeah, don't worry woodamand, you're not alone on this one. Go back to page 3 of this thread and look for a post by simulacreant asking the same question. My answer is in the next post, along with a link to a picture that paints 1000 words and makes it easy to figure out. HTH
< Message edited by losguy -- 6/23/2004 4:45:54 PM >
|
woodamand
Max Output Level: -77 dBFS
- Total Posts : 673
- Joined: 2003/11/10 15:56:37
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/06/24 12:54:54
(permalink)
Thanks both to hammerhead and losguy for helping me on this! As always, this is a great forum. cheers D
|
GREGi
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 214
- Joined: 2003/11/11 16:13:02
- Location: Australia
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/16 23:08:39
(permalink)
All hail losguy for starting this thread. You are the PCI Latency SuperHero of our time! I just installed and ran a little utility called LtcyCfg.exe which enabled me to tweak my PCI latency settings. I'm using a fairly old ( and modest) setup : ECS K75A mobo Athlon 1800+ 256MB 20 Gb Hdd Audiotrak Maya PCI Audio Yamaha DS-XG PCI Audio TNT Riva 64 Video The Maya is my "Pro" audio card, used for Music Programs ( Sonar, FL Studio Reason Sound Forge ) The Yamaha is used for MP3 playback and occassionally for it's onboard midi synth. I have been experiencing pops clicks and other wierd audio glitches whenever I move the cursor while payback is happening. This has actually been more of a problem in Fl Studio than the other programs, but it also appears in Sonar if I'm using too many Softsynths or Rewiring. The PCI latency for the TNT Riva was set at 280! The Maya was set to 64. I changed to the settings below and VOILA! NO MORE AUDIO GLITCHES! =================================================== [002] Isa Bridge Bus = 000 Device = 02 Function = 0 Latency = 000 VenID = 1039 DevID = 0008 [004] Maya EWDM Controller Bus = 000 Device = 11 Function = 0 Latency = 240 VenID = 3388 DevID = 1014 [005]Maya EWDM Wave-1 Bus = 000 Device = 11 Function = 1 Latency = 240 VenID = 3388 DevID = 1015 [006]Yamaha DS-XG PCI Audio Bus = 000 Device = 13 Function = 0 Latency = 064 VenID = 1073 DevID = 0010 [007]Ethernet Controller Bus = 000 Device = 15 Function = 0 Latency = 088 VenID = 10EC DevID = 8139 [008]TNT Riva 64 Video Bus = 001 Device = 00 Function = 0 Latency = 128 VenID = 10DE DevID = 002D ==============================================
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/17 01:09:28
(permalink)
That's excellent news! Congrats to you! I'll check into that utility when I get a chance.
|
pharohoknaughty
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1226
- Joined: 2004/07/08 17:29:16
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/17 13:45:48
(permalink)
This is a great article. Thanks. Unfortunatley for me, I have not been able to make this work. If I got a SCSI RAID card for my PCI, do you think that the PCI timing would be a similar issue? It seems like it would. I don't mind paying if I can get this machine (dual Xeon 3.2) to handle lots of tracks. Right now I get dropouts with just 15 tracks.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/17 15:10:04
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: pharohoknaughty This is a great article. Thanks. You're welcom, pharaoh. Hey... Let My People Go, Already! Unfortunatley for me, I have not been able to make this work. If I got a SCSI RAID card for my PCI, do you think that the PCI timing would be a similar issue? It seems like it would.
Could be, if the issue really is PCI bus timing. What does the rest of your machine look like? (MOBO make/model, chipset, drives and connections) I don't mind paying if I can get this machine (dual Xeon 3.2) to handle lots of tracks. Right now I get dropouts with just 15 tracks. Could be a lot of things going on to cause this. Also, remember that the primary symptom of PCI/drive bottlenecks is audio glitches (clicks) and not dropouts (though I wouldn't rule those out completely, either). What's your CPU doing usage-wise at the dropout? And... plase fill me in... how does the whole CPU usage thing work with dual processors?
|
pharohoknaughty
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1226
- Joined: 2004/07/08 17:29:16
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/17 18:15:19
(permalink)
I have the Tyan Tiger dual 3.2 Xeon MOBO with 2 gigs memory. The sound cars are Dakota and Montana, with latest drivers. It has a UAD card in it, but the jury is out on the UAD. My midi is a midi express MOTU on USB, but I usually leave it off. The built in SATA controller shares with the PCI buss like on your machine. I bought the dual Xeon because the Cakewalk tech guys said it was the fastest way to go. I record 44.1 at 24 bit depth. I set the latency to 192. At first, I had a 200 meg Western Digital EIDE for drive C, one DVD/CD drive, and two Western Digital 200 meg SATA drives in Raid 0 using the built in Promise controller. I put the audio to the RAID. Dropouts were terrible, and Sonar would give an error message that the Hard drive could not be written to, and was possibly full. This would happen while trying to record 9 tracks while monitoring 3 tracks. Of course the 400 gig RAID drive was less than 1 percent used. This would happen within a couple of measures. I tried using Powerstrip, and reducing the PCI latency on the video card (ATI 9000 pro), but saw no change. In desperation, I tried using drive C for audio, and the results improved, with only occasional ( every other take). As a result, I installed one more EIDE drive to record audio to, and I un-raided the SATA drives. I figure I will use the SATA drives for storage or backup. I am currently getting dropouts while adding 9 tracks while monitoring 3 tracks about every third take on a four minute song. Adding 9 tracks while monitoring 12 tracks is likeley to get a dropout on any four minut long take. Curriously, the reliability decreases dramatically if you have even one plug in going. Of course I look like a fool to the musicians I am trying to record. My processor varies from 0 to 5 percent use, and the hard drive meter fluxuates from 0 to 15 percent use. I have used Cakewalk since DOS 3, and I don't want to change, but sooner or later desperation sets in. Macs are looking better than I ever thought. I would gladly pay for a SCSI raid if I could get the performance it would imply. I figure I should get lots more tracks with lots more reliablility.
< Message edited by pharohoknaughty -- 7/17/2004 6:28:41 PM >
|
wynnsong
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 504
- Joined: 2003/11/05 17:57:42
- Location: Los Angeles
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/17 18:52:26
(permalink)
I don't know if this is the issue but try dumping the motu midi device and just use the Dakota's. I recently had a problem with a dakota card and motu midi (older serial though). Once I got rid of the motu and used a sierra instead things ran great.... On another box I have Ultra scsi 160 drives not in raid running great. I can slam them with a ton of tracks. I almost considered replacing them with a Serial ATA Raptor drive but have thought better of it since of all the reported problems.... Hope this helps..
|
pharohoknaughty
Max Output Level: -66 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1226
- Joined: 2004/07/08 17:29:16
- Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/17 20:00:32
(permalink)
I am replying to myself. Sanity seems to be slowly slipping away. I just turned off hardware acceleration on the video, and things seem to have improved quite a bit. I admit I forgot to do this. As far as the MOTU USB MIDI, I have been leaving it off, but turning it on does not affect things.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/07/17 20:24:14
(permalink)
You should be getting way more tracks than that; I know I do, and with a machine that is a mere fraction of yours. Something is definitely rotten in Denmark (or wherever). Let's start with the basics... what's your IRQ landscape? Got everything important isolated? Also, in Powerstrip, revert everything back to the default PCI latency. Use the little clockwise arrow on the lower right of the display for each device. You'll need to reboot after you do this. Then report back what all your devices have for default PCI latency. You really only need to tell me about devices hanging on the PCI bus, and the graphics adapter. Let's see where we can go from there.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/08/19 01:48:40
(permalink)
Just a quick friendly "bump" to keep the thread from falling into the bit bucket. It's been handy to keep around, if nothing else, for reference's sake.
|
harmonium
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2
- Joined: 2004/08/19 18:56:59
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/08/19 19:11:04
(permalink)
Thanks for the great post losguy.... I've been having similar problems with a recently purchased Asus P4R800-V Deluxe but have not been able to solve them. What do you think of that motherboard? The place I bought it from has agreed to swap it out for free...I'm thinking of swapping it for an Intel D865PERL. Do you have any thoughts? Thanks! Derek
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/08/19 20:12:30
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: harmonium Thanks for the great post losguy.... I've been having similar problems with a recently purchased Asus P4R800-V Deluxe but have not been able to solve them. What do you think of that motherboard? Hey harmonium (Derek), welcome to the SONAR Forum! That board has an ATI chipset, which is not really one of the mainstream ones, even for ATI. Pieces of it look like SiS, but it may be a sort of cross between the two. The board, with the integrated RADEON VGA, is mainly aimed at Home Theater PC applications. The place I bought it from has agreed to swap it out for free...I'm thinking of swapping it for an Intel D865PERL. Do you have any thoughts? I have heard nothing but great news about this MOBO. The chipset is excellent and very stable. This sounds like a great deal, and I would jump on it if I had the chance. Blessings, Carlos.
|
vicsant
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1378
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:44:33
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/08/19 20:53:13
(permalink)
Hi, This is a great thread with over 7 pages and 15,000 hits!!! Is there a way you can summarize all the data into one document and post it...something like the Steve's Sonar FAQ? God bless, Vic
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/08/19 22:46:17
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: vicsant Hi, This is a great thread with over 7 pages and 15,000 hits!!! Is there a way you can summarize all the data into one document and post it...something like the Steve's Sonar FAQ? God bless, Vic Thanks for the kind words and sentiments, Vic. That would be like writing an article. Hey... that's an idea! (Too late to copyright the material, though... it's Cakewalk's property now!). Actually, the real "meat" is all on the first page. All my posts there (and some clarifications by Scott Reams and Marquis42) on that page summarize the needed technical information. Everything after that are like specific case studies for PCI latency timer optimization and PCI-slot IRQ configuration. OK, there was one good piece (fourth-from-last post on page 6) where I decoded Intel PCI tables for the world. That was fun. Here's a thought: a thread with direct links to those three posts. It would save a lot of retyping, and it would continue to drive up the hit count on the original thread. ;) (I'm hoping to pass up the big gripe threads on good principle alone.)
|
vicsant
Max Output Level: -63 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1378
- Joined: 2003/11/06 20:44:33
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/08/20 04:55:06
(permalink)
Thanks for the kind words and sentiments, Vic. That would be like writing an article. Hey... that's an idea! (Too late to copyright the material, though... it's Cakewalk's property now!). Actually, the real "meat" is all on the first page. All my posts there (and some clarifications by Scott Reams and Marquis42) on that page summarize the needed technical information. Everything after that are like specific case studies for PCI latency timer optimization and PCI-slot IRQ configuration. OK, there was one good piece (fourth-from-last post on page 6) where I decoded Intel PCI tables for the world. That was fun. Here's a thought: a thread with direct links to those three posts. It would save a lot of retyping, and it would continue to drive up the hit count on the original thread. ;) (I'm hoping to pass up the big gripe threads on good principle alone.) Great! looking forward to that article. Vic
|
harmonium
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2
- Joined: 2004/08/19 18:56:59
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/08/20 12:45:50
(permalink)
I have heard nothing but great news about this MOBO. The chipset is excellent and very stable. This sounds like a great deal, and I would jump on it if I had the chance. Blessings, Carlos. Carlos, Thanks so much for the info. I'll definitely jump on this opportunity to swap out the board! Cheers, Derek
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/19 16:30:04
(permalink)
Just a friendly "bump" to keep this thread from falling off the map. Thanks!
|
Zlartibartfast
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 820
- Joined: 2004/08/21 17:54:17
- Location: Magrathea
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/19 16:44:10
(permalink)
and very well worth it, losguy! I knew about the principles of PCI latency timing, but I did not know that the user could do anything about it. It is because I read that Matrox G series vid cards choose low prioritys values that I chose them for my DAW. I believe I wil follow your instructions and check my system out - I have the same SATA controller as you wrote about, integrated on an Intel D845PEBT2, and I'm not sure I have it set for maximum performance in the real world. I've been recording on a stand alone disk recorder then editing in Sonar, but I'd like to be able to slave the 2 together and I think I might need to tweak it some more... Also I would hazard a guess that the same factors would apply to SATA or SCSI add-in PCI controllers, not just integrated ones - I run SCSI for Gigasampler so I might be getting a double whammy
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/19 20:25:49
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: Zlartibartfast Also I would hazard a guess that the same factors would apply to SATA or SCSI add-in PCI controllers, not just integrated ones - I run SCSI for Gigasampler so I might be getting a double whammy Hi Zlart, yes, that would be correct. The main difference, if any, would be somewhat in the controller hardware, but mostly in the drivers, through the extra exposure to the PCI tweaking parameters that the controller card manufacturers may provide (though it appears that you tend to find greater level of control on the more expensive controller cards). Check out the guts of the driver GUI for your controller card; you may be able to do some tweaking right there.
|
Zlartibartfast
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 820
- Joined: 2004/08/21 17:54:17
- Location: Magrathea
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/19 22:44:01
(permalink)
losguy, I don't know if this is of any interest to you, being that the thread is months old now, but I was corectly informed about the Matrox G series defaulting to low PCI latency settings - outputs A and B are defaulting to 64 on my 550. I think I'll leave that alone for now. My SATA and SCSI controllers are at 32 (side not - I don't have any uesr-definable SCSI options in the driver other than the usual Wiindows offerings. My 2 deltas are also at 32., as well as my add-in NIC, Now since it is a server adapter, which aupports teaming, I'm thinking that is probably the best setting. I am surprised to find, however, that every other device in the system is set to ZERO - including the IDE controller! I am considering raising the level of the Delta's priority just a bit, but it kinda looks like I got lucky and ended up with a well balanced system after all comments welcomed...
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/19 23:17:45
(permalink)
Yeah, the Matrox cards have been pretty reliably low right off the bat. If you get crackling with your SATA or SCSI, you could try raising your Deltas as you said. Zero... yes, that surprised me too, but I've also noticed that it's almost always on stuff that's "tight" inside the chipset, i.e. relatively close to the CPU. I figure that PCI latency must not matter so much at that level, perhaps because CPU access is easier to get down there.
|
Zlartibartfast
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 820
- Joined: 2004/08/21 17:54:17
- Location: Magrathea
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/19 23:32:11
(permalink)
Hey I was just looking at the Recover Memory option - seems to put Mem Turbo to shame! I should mention that I'm looking at this in 98SE right now - I use W2K for DAW work, but I decided against putting PS on that until I had a chance to see what i was about first. It looks very good! Again, thanks for a really well written post. This one is going into hard copy....
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/20 09:49:53
(permalink)
Hey, thanks. It's always nice to hear from folks that are being helped. Yeah, Win98 was a big memory leak. It's like a painful memory now. That's cool about PowerStrip... it's really a fairly deep utility. Gamers must really love it. :) I still have an old (98 vintage) laptop with WinMe on it. It has "only" 128MB of RAM... not really enough to run XP. It's starting to collect dust. It's a shame, too, because that old thing could run older softsynths just fine (Seer Reality). Maybe I'll dust it off again and see what I can get out of it, one of these days that I run out of things to do on SONAR (yeah, RSN...)
|
mb
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 372
- Joined: 2003/11/16 15:26:17
- Location: in my studio
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/20 10:06:14
(permalink)
Thanks for the kind words and sentiments, Vic. That would be like writing an article. Hey... that's an idea! (Too late to copyright the material, though... it's Cakewalk's property now!). Actually, the real "meat" is all on the first page. it's your intellectual property !!!.....if your employed by them it would be regarded as "work for hire" personally i think you should send it to SOS a.s.a.p. mb
|
deafinity
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 85
- Joined: 2004/04/03 07:10:08
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/20 11:56:11
(permalink)
Great post! I have SATA drives and issues similar to your post. You didn't mention seek time as being a factor. I used Ultra SCSI II drives on my PentIII box and the seek time is 3.6ms compared to 4.6 on SATA. Is this a consideration for latency, glitches etc? Deafinity
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/20 13:09:47
(permalink)
Thanks. Seek time has everything to do with the transient behavior of the drive, i.e. how long it takes to find the sector/cluster that you asked it to find. It could make a difference with lots of tracks fragmented all over the drive, and I suppose that it could cause glitches, though I'd expect it to more likely cause stutters and dropouts. Remember, too, that I had glitches even with two tracks, and with a screaming RAID 0 system that barely even felt that it was being accessed at all.
|
losguy
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5506
- Joined: 2003/12/18 13:40:44
- Location: The Great White North (MN, USA)
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/20 13:13:11
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: mb it's your intellectual property !!!.....if your employed by them it would be regarded as "work for hire" Actually, I'm an "Unofficial Spokesperson" for Cakewalk. Oh, BTW, did you know that SONAR tastes great!? ;-)
< Message edited by losguy -- 9/20/2004 12:20:39 PM >
|
Zlartibartfast
Max Output Level: -74 dBFS
- Total Posts : 820
- Joined: 2004/08/21 17:54:17
- Location: Magrathea
- Status: offline
RE: Reclaiming SATA for audio
2004/09/20 17:44:53
(permalink)
ORIGINAL: losguy Actually, I'm an "Unofficial Spokesperson" for Cakewalk. Oh, BTW, did you know that SONAR tastes great!? ;-) even so it can be VERY full-filling! (and it's open all night, at least at my house)
|