LockedSonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least!

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 3 of 8
Author
BillWatkins
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 101
  • Joined: 2009/09/18 21:31:33
  • Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 16:34:18 (permalink)
I know I shouldn't but sometimes I just feel possessed to chime in on some of this:

i wanna make music WITHOUT ISSUE


ah...have you considered a TEAC 4 track ?

Bill -
CHO

Sonar Platinum-2016.05
Custom Allegro Technology QuietDAW - Intel Core i7 2600 Quad Core CPU 3.4 GHz on an Asus P8P67 Rev 3.0 motherboard, MS Win 7 Home Premium 64 bit, 16 GB Patriot RAM, eVGA 1 GB Silent Video Card, SIIG 2 port Firewire 1394a PCIe Card, Seagate 500 GB SATA 6 Gb/s (O/S & Programs), Seagate 1 TB SATA 6 Gb/s (Audio), Seagate 1 TB SATA 6 Gb/s (Stream/Samples),Seagate 1 TB SATA 6 Gb/s (internal backup),Sony DVD-RW Lightscribe, LogisysCS4801BK 4U Rackmount case, OCZ StealthXStream 700 W PSU
#61
WDI
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2069
  • Joined: 2007/08/28 02:31:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 16:37:29 (permalink)
I use to have to take my 4-track apart every so often to fix the play button. 

Sonar 7 PE
Windows XP Pofessional (SP3)
MSI K8N Neo4-F
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
2 GB PC 3200 Ram
RME Fireface 800
Edirol FA-66
CM Labs MotorMix

Old stuff: ARJO
#62
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 16:41:56 (permalink)
While the tone of the OP's diatribe is lacking, he has some points, which could have been make in a more acceptable manner:  
1)  It is noteworthy that some DAW software seems to be more forgiving of hardware configuration.
 
2)  Mixcraft is a great value for what it is... and it is not a "toy"
 
http://www.acoustica.com/mixcraft/pdf/Keyboard_Magazine_Review_Dec_2012.pdf
 
3)  The improvements from version 4 through 6 are quite remarkable
 
4)  They used a public beta program - smart move
#63
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7196
  • Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
  • Location: Sneaking up behind you!
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 16:42:27 (permalink)
I still have my cassette based Tascam 8-Track.

I can emphatically say, without a doubt, I have never lost a moments work in the 20 years I've owned it.

It's never once automatically rewound the tape, erased it, and left it blank.

;)



"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
#64
WDI
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2069
  • Joined: 2007/08/28 02:31:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 16:48:13 (permalink)
Bub


I still have my cassette based Tascam 8-Track.

I can emphatically say, without a doubt, I have never lost a moments work in the 20 years I've owned it.

It's never once automatically rewound the tape, erased it, and left it blank.

;)

You obviously were not using the cakewalk one.


Just kidding cakewalk. 


But hardware does have its advantages. But disadvantages also. We still use a tascam msr24. Maintenance is expensive and difficult when something breaks which has happened. 

Sonar 7 PE
Windows XP Pofessional (SP3)
MSI K8N Neo4-F
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
2 GB PC 3200 Ram
RME Fireface 800
Edirol FA-66
CM Labs MotorMix

Old stuff: ARJO
#65
Brando
Max Output Level: -47.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2776
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:47:20
  • Location: Canada
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:02:31 (permalink)
CakeAlexS


I suspect less than 1% of people who use Sonar post here.
Anyway GodParticle clearly IS the self proclaimed expert of everything (God is all seeing), we clearly know nothing... Good luck to him in life, ...  and the afterlife. I'm sure his music will live on forever in peoples hearts..

I don't know why people need validation for the DAW choices they make. I couldn't care less about what DAW someone chooses to use. Really. Why someone feels the need to come on the forum of the DAW I personally choose to use to tell me all about why my choice is a poor one, and why I am a knucklehead for putting up with all of its flaws is beyond me.
The person who I have come to respect greatly in this respect is Rain - who is an unapologetic Logic user, who still frequents these forums, (not so much the SONAR one, but Techniques, Software, the Coffee Shop) but who doesn't see the need to try to earn a commission from Apple by trying to sway others to his point of view. He respects the fact that this is a SONAR community, and that there are bound to be a lot of people who are loyal to SONAR here. 
Before someone says that I am against any criticism (and obviously a fanboi), that's not it. SONAR works well here, and I like it for my needs. That doesn't mean it will be the case for everyone. 
The last thing I would do is go to a Reaper, or Presonus or Mixcraft forum to tell everyone there why they are dopes for using that particular DAW application. Just makes no sense - make your choice and move on.

Brando
Cakewalk, Studio One Pro, Reaper
Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL
ASUS Prime Z370-A LGA1151, 32GB DDR4, Intel 8700K i7, 500 GB SSD, 3 x 1TB HDD, Windows 10 Pro 64
#66
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:25:18 (permalink)
WDI


Bub


I still have my cassette based Tascam 8-Track.

I can emphatically say, without a doubt, I have never lost a moments work in the 20 years I've owned it.

It's never once automatically rewound the tape, erased it, and left it blank.

;)

You obviously were not using the cakewalk one.


Just kidding cakewalk. 


But hardware does have its advantages. But disadvantages also. We still use a tascam msr24. Maintenance is expensive and difficult when something breaks which has happened. 

@WDI,
 
You sig indicates that you are using Sonar 7 PE on XP.  That's pretty remarkable.
 
Other than the new releases of Sonar not providing anything you needed or that your setup is uber stable, why have you stayed on 7 PE, and is there anything which continues to work better for you than on newer releases?
#67
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:32:55 (permalink)
pbognar


While the tone of the OP's diatribe is lacking, he has some points, which could have been make in a more acceptable manner:  
1)  It is noteworthy that some DAW software seems to be more forgiving of hardware configuration.
 
2)  Mixcraft is a great value for what it is... and it is not a "toy"
 
http://www.acoustica.com/mixcraft/pdf/Keyboard_Magazine_Review_Dec_2012.pdf
 
3)  The improvements from version 4 through 6 are quite remarkable
 
4)  They used a public beta program - smart move

it all depends on what kind of producing your doing,myself i look at it as a toy.
how would you compare it against sonar x2 ?
 
do you feel the flow is the same ?
just curious.maybe im missing something or are we really comparing mixcraft against x2.
 
the sizes are very different,200 mb for mixcraft.
6 gb for x2 and that minus the added content,thats only the basic package of the daw and plug ins.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#68
godparticle
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 55
  • Joined: 2012/08/11 06:41:47
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:35:57 (permalink)
Truth is that you simply wouldn't be a dope for using Reaper or Studio One or Mixcraft, those DAW's don't fu_k with your mix every day and get in the way of putting out the goods. But using Sonar, well hey, enjoy the incessant bugs and anomalies that just keep popping up day after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, upgrade after upgrade, decade after decade. HULLOOOOO? Biff this sh_t until cakewalk stops taking you for a ride people, how long are you gonna let them keep yanking your chain. Clearly, going by Sonar's track-record for the last decade Cakewalk needs a new head-programmer and a proper team of coders who know what the hell they are doing. No DAW on the planet has the disgusting track-record that Sonar has, and continues to have. If i owned Cakewalk I would have sent the head-programmer out the door years ago, he's a total dud, and has amply proven that he's an amateur.  

I currently have a song running 19 individual softsynths each on their own track, plus 18 audio tracks, plus tonnes of realtime midi, and over 120 effects ALL RUNNING IN REALTIME STRAIGHT OFF THE CPU WITH NO CRACKS OR POPS AND AT ZERO LATENCY, and still my CPU IS ONLY AT 21%. NOW THAT'S WHAT I CALL A PROFESSIONAL DAW. Oh hang-on, i forgot, we are fu_kwits for not doing a 5 year diploma in Windows configuration and hardware research LOL, you guys and your 2 cent come-backs are just a sad lot. The facts show that Sonar is a lemon, plain and simple, it has been from the start, and just keeps getting worse, but Mixcraft has shown itself to be a reliable competent full-fledged Pro DAW, which only costs $149 i might add; I don't need to use a multi-fader console, i make dance music with high-end analog-emulation software plugins and a midi controller, and all's good here.

And obviously as you can see by the KeyBoard magazine review, i ain't talking sh_t. And just wait until Mixcraft 7 comes out, ho ho ho.

Looks like all the gainsayers and cockroaches have gone quiet and run for cover; where are you? Oh, you downloaded the Mixcraft demo did you. Well all i can say is...EAT THAT!

When cakewalk takes it's customers seriously and starts to cull most of the bloat, and also gets a new programming team and totally redesigns the user-interface plus strips all the legacy-code out to make a brand-new DAW that actually works without a hitch and runs beautifully on standard computer soundcards, then i'll take another look, but by then it will be too late, I'll be rewiring Mixcraft 7 into Studio One III and thus Sonar will be utterly irrelevant, along with all its sub-par bullsh_t and antics. Pro DAW my ass, you guys need to get a new sense of humour (<Yes, that's British spelling) HeHeHe

post edited by godparticle - 2013/02/04 18:04:43
#69
ed97643
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1610
  • Joined: 2005/06/27 10:21:39
  • Location: Columbus, Ohio USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:46:56 (permalink)
> "I currently have a song with 19 individual softsynths..." - awesome; good job. Wonderful. > "Looks like all the gainsayers (-?) and cockroaches have gone quiet and run for cover" I think we're actually waiting for you to post some songs, as requested multiple times above. That said I wish you well and have no beef with your Mixcraft joy. Best, Ed

Registered Cakewalk user since 1995
#70
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:47:45 (permalink)
Mr. Particle why are you here? What do you expect from us? Do you really believe you are going to recruit converts?

Most of us use X2 Producer for reasons that go far beyond your requirements. The program you are touting is not even as good as X1 LE. And that is free. 

Best
John
#71
Chregg
Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2382
  • Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
  • Location: Perth, Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:49:08 (permalink)
"HULLOOOOO? Biff this sh_t until cakewalk stops taking you for a ride people, how long are you gonna let them keep yanking your chain.",,,,,i like getting my chain yanked, feels all tingly and warm, in fact am all warm tingly thinking about it you kinky devil
#72
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:49:52 (permalink)
i aint download that,i have a proffessinal DAW in sonar x2.
where are these highly enginnered songs your producing.?
you can see in my sig,i have my songs there that i created in sonar x1/x2
id like to hear these mixcraft crations you haveth to offer ?
love to benchmark it then tell you why you only paid 150 for it...lol

no one cares about mix craft7,dont fool yourself.
your a very angry child trying to ruin any review cakewalk has on building a daw of the future.
no who's gone silient? you forget your meds man?
seriously.thats all a bunch of babble.like we care about mixcraft 7?
sorry,im not interested.

keep in mind,this forum was given to you by cakewalk to help you in solving problems not smearing your hate for cakewalk.
thats childish,you have hardware problems? deal with it and move on.
no need to fill these threads with childish babble of"i have a new girlfriend and she is sooo much better than you.

you need to grow up man.trying to help you by saying to.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
#73
SvenArne
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2719
  • Joined: 2007/01/31 12:51:29
  • Location: Trondheim, Norway
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:56:58 (permalink)
What is it with making EDM that makes people so aggressive? Why is it that the internet is filled up with forum threads with bedroom producers/composers going on page up and down about how Skrillex/Deadmau5/[insert successful EDM artist here]'s music is inferior to theirs (which always remains unheard)?


Best of luck with your endeavors Godparticle!


Sven





#74
Chregg
Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2382
  • Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
  • Location: Perth, Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 17:59:06 (permalink)
i make edm, im not aggressive
#75
SvenArne
Max Output Level: -48 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2719
  • Joined: 2007/01/31 12:51:29
  • Location: Trondheim, Norway
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:04:21 (permalink)
Chregg


i make edm, im not aggressive

Good for you (and us, I suppose). But you gotta agree that discussions rarely get heated like that within other mainstream genres? If I were to post a thread somewhere titled "Why The Killers suck", I very much doubt it would turn into a 50 page thread...





#76
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8672
  • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
  • Location: Mars.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:05:28 (permalink)
He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy!

Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
@48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
#77
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13933
  • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
  • Location: NYC
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:06:12 (permalink)
Just 19 soft synths? I regularly run 25+ without problems. Really don't know what your point is there. But anyway, we're still waiting for you to post links to some of your work. Why not do it? Because at the minute you're just another hot headed Internet kiddie who's posturing behind a computer keyboard. 

SvenArne, I also don't know what it is about EDM producers. I myself dabble in EDM and I never had the urge to parade myself like such a prick on an Internet forum. I think it's a combination of Generation-Y (notoriously diva-like, with grossly inflated unearned self esteem and a desperate need to be seen as "urban" and "edgy") and an excessive amount of testosterone. I'm betting he has an ongoing acne problem. 

James
Windows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
#78
Chregg
Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2382
  • Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
  • Location: Perth, Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:08:30 (permalink)
Sven that boy is a total nutter, if he wasnt venting here he'd be out howling with the dogs, rabid and in heat
#79
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9736
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
  • Location: Las Vegas
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:11:58 (permalink)
SvenArne


What is it with making EDM that makes people so aggressive? Why is it that the internet is filled up with forum threads with bedroom producers/composers going on page up and down about how Skrillex/Deadmau5/[insert successful EDM artist here]'s music is inferior to theirs (which always remains unheard)?


Best of luck with your endeavors Godparticle!


Sven

You've noticed that too uh? I remember reading a column featuring the complaints of a bunch of so-called professional DJs and such in regards to Logic last fall. 80% of them fell into one of two categories.


1 - Complaints and features requests related to poor knowledge of the application.
2 - So-called professional user simply unable to determine what's the right tool for the job. 

The funny thing is that those were by far the most eloquent.



TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
#80
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8672
  • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
  • Location: Mars.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:13:54 (permalink)
Ah well Cheer up, God.
 
You know what they say: some things in life are bad. They can really make you mad. Other things just make you swear and curse. When you're chewing on life's gristle, don't grumble; give a whistle, and this'll help things turn out for the best. And... always look on the bright side of life...
 
Or install a new sound card or play World or Warcraft.

Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
@48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
#81
Chregg
Max Output Level: -51.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2382
  • Joined: 2010/02/22 06:14:27
  • Location: Perth, Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:14:58 (permalink)
right c'mon now settle down on the edm talk here, we're all not like that, its just those young kids out there who dont have a fecking clue wat they are talking about
#82
Pragi
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1173
  • Joined: 2010/09/19 11:46:59
  • Location: Village of the sun
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:22:32 (permalink)
Hi godparticular,
you think to have a good sense for carnival jokes and the most of us 
are not aware, that it´s carnival season.
Many of us have really thought,you´re a ....ocksmoker,
but you are  trying hard to be funny.

Have fun !









#83
WDI
Max Output Level: -54.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2069
  • Joined: 2007/08/28 02:31:11
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:25:01 (permalink)


 In response to pbognar:

I'm due. Just haven't upgraded my computer yet and therefore Sonar. It's been a great build as far as stability. And it's just a hobby and we've been mostly using a tascam msr24.


I've recently done a couple projects in Sonar 7 and it was fine. I got a little frustrated with Cakewalk during Sonar 7, nothing too major but nothings really pulled me in since. I mean there some things about X2 I like. All the soft synth stuff and looping is cool but I've learned I never really use the stuff. Like matrix view looks cool. But I don't really need it. Automation overhaul is welcome and the lanes may be cool. 


Comping upgrade is important buy not really sold on the new implementation. I mean for comping you don't need all the features of a track in each lane like automation. Looks more like track folders. Needs to be very simple for comping and that's it. I think it's tacky to mention other software on cake forum but at the same time look at how logic does it. http://www.youtube.com/wa...e=youtube_gdata_player 


Extremy simple but yet powerful. Im always asked when comping try this, now go back to the other one. Etc. that is a good comping tool that lets you do that. Plus I've seen in other videos where mouse over plays only that take. Thet is soo much easier than using solo/mute. 




Seems like cakewalk doesn't polish off some of thier features lately and pay attention to all the details. 

Then there is things like staff view. Seems like we are asking cakewalk too much if they have a feature, especially if they are going to use it in thier advertising, that it be good. Even cakewalk forum members argue against using resources to improve it. 

http://www.youtube.com/wa...e=youtube_gdata_player
So between this only being a hobby, using the tascam msr24 and not really sure what direction I want to go when I upgrade to a new computer, just haven't found the need to do so. 


Sonar 7 PE
Windows XP Pofessional (SP3)
MSI K8N Neo4-F
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
2 GB PC 3200 Ram
RME Fireface 800
Edirol FA-66
CM Labs MotorMix

Old stuff: ARJO
#84
sharke
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13933
  • Joined: 2012/08/03 00:13:00
  • Location: NYC
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:25:13 (permalink)
Right, the esteemed Billy Arnell was a producer of fine EDM and people here had nothing but praise for his character. It's an age/generational thing. Godparticle comes across as a very childish person who is too immature to conduct himself in an amiable manner. 

James
Windows 10, Sonar SPlat (64-bit), Intel i7-4930K, 32GB RAM, RME Babyface, AKAI MPK Mini, Roland A-800 Pro, Focusrite VRM Box, Komplete 10 Ultimate, 2012 American Telecaster!
#85
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:29:22 (permalink)
RUNNING IN REALTIME STRAIGHT OFF THE CPU WITH NO CRACKS OR POPS AND AT ZERO LATENCY

 
Hehehehe...   sorry, there's nothing I could add to make it any better.   
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
#86
Rain
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9736
  • Joined: 2003/11/07 05:10:12
  • Location: Las Vegas
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:30:29 (permalink)
sharke


Just 19 soft synths? I regularly run 25+ without problems. Really don't know what your point is there. But anyway, we're still waiting for you to post links to some of your work. Why not do it? Because at the minute you're just another hot headed Internet kiddie who's posturing behind a computer keyboard. 

SvenArne, I also don't know what it is about EDM producers. I myself dabble in EDM and I never had the urge to parade myself like such a prick on an Internet forum. I think it's a combination of Generation-Y (notoriously diva-like, with grossly inflated unearned self esteem and a desperate need to be seen as "urban" and "edgy") and an excessive amount of testosterone. I'm betting he has an ongoing acne problem. 

I had my dark electro/twisted EBM period. I was using Sonar at that time. Though people would sometimes brag about how Reason was better, or Cubase or whatever, upon hearing the results, they usually shut up. The first thing an incompetent or uninspired individual will blame is his tools.


Likewise, someone who's inspired or a pro will make the tool do what he want. My brother in law's studio is still running an old 2004 Mac G4 and Pro Tools TDM 5.8 IIRC. It's actually funny to speak to someone who's so unaffected by the new this and that and, rightfully, totally confident in his own abilities and his rig. He can literally pull off anything with his set up, which at first sight, really isn't optimized for certain genres. 


And the truth is, the records I've heard coming out of his studio put 99% of what I've heard on the web to shame.


TCB - Tea, Cats, Books...
#87
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:36:41 (permalink)
chuckebaby


pbognar


While the tone of the OP's diatribe is lacking, he has some points, which could have been make in a more acceptable manner:  
1)  It is noteworthy that some DAW software seems to be more forgiving of hardware configuration.
 
2)  Mixcraft is a great value for what it is... and it is not a "toy"
 
http://www.acoustica.com/mixcraft/pdf/Keyboard_Magazine_Review_Dec_2012.pdf
 
3)  The improvements from version 4 through 6 are quite remarkable
 
4)  They used a public beta program - smart move

it all depends on what kind of producing your doing,myself i look at it as a toy.
how would you compare it against sonar x2 ?
 
do you feel the flow is the same ?
just curious.maybe im missing something or are we really comparing mixcraft against x2.
 
the sizes are very different,200 mb for mixcraft.
6 gb for x2 and that minus the added content,thats only the basic package of the daw and plug ins.

If you read Craig Anderton's review, it is apparent that you can't compare Mixcraft to X2.  X2 has far more features (some which work some or most of the time). 
 
I suppose if what you are trying to accomplish can be done in Mixcraft, X2 could be frustrating, without taking a deep dive to learn it.  On top of that, when X2a has bugs (for some people) which could interrupt the musical flow - more frustration.
 
Just saying...
 
 
#88
pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 720
  • Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 18:52:49 (permalink)
Rain


sharke


Just 19 soft synths? I regularly run 25+ without problems. Really don't know what your point is there. But anyway, we're still waiting for you to post links to some of your work. Why not do it? Because at the minute you're just another hot headed Internet kiddie who's posturing behind a computer keyboard. 

SvenArne, I also don't know what it is about EDM producers. I myself dabble in EDM and I never had the urge to parade myself like such a prick on an Internet forum. I think it's a combination of Generation-Y (notoriously diva-like, with grossly inflated unearned self esteem and a desperate need to be seen as "urban" and "edgy") and an excessive amount of testosterone. I'm betting he has an ongoing acne problem. 

I had my dark electro/twisted EBM period. I was using Sonar at that time. Though people would sometimes brag about how Reason was better, or Cubase or whatever, upon hearing the results, they usually shut up. The first thing an incompetent or uninspired individual will blame is his tools.


Likewise, someone who's inspired or a pro will make the tool do what he want. My brother in law's studio is still running an old 2004 Mac G4 and Pro Tools TDM 5.8 IIRC. It's actually funny to speak to someone who's so unaffected by the new this and that and, rightfully, totally confident in his own abilities and his rig. He can literally pull off anything with his set up, which at first sight, really isn't optimized for certain genres. 


And the truth is, the records I've heard coming out of his studio put 99% of what I've heard on the web to shame.

I admire those who don't get caught up with the "latest and greates", and just continue to crank out great music with what they have.
 
It comes down to a stable environment and knowing your tools inside and out.
#89
DigitalBoston
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 110
  • Joined: 2013/01/17 07:06:02
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X2 is highly questionable to say the least! 2013/02/04 19:04:52 (permalink)
i just say to my self when my daw crashes( thats sonar fanboys)
 i love you sonar why wont you love me back.
you worse than my 6 year old tryin to get him to act normal for 20 min
 wish i could call tec support to complain about him
but sadly i learn to live with the bad to get to somekind of good
 where ever it lay
#90
Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 3 of 8
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1