bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Tell me about Samplitude
I've not been tempted by any of the current DAW deals because I don't feel a need to switch DAWs ATM, and if I do in a year's time, those deals will likely come around again next Black Friday. But nobody's giving more apparent value for the money right now than MAGIX Samplitude. Soundforge alone is worth the $149. Plus it's got ARA, the PRV looks similar to SONAR's, and I like the inline tempo automation feature. SpectraLayers looks to be an improvement over the spectral editor I currently use in Adobe Audition. Lots of goodies in there, and the sale price is an amazing 90% off (for another week). I'd like to hear from Samplitude users. Let me know if MAGIX's sketchy reputation is deserved. Does Independence still suck as badly as it did when it was Yellowtools? Does Samplitude require a dongle? How's the peer support/forum? I don't really care much about bundled instruments - unless, of course, some of them stand out as especially noteworthy.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
DaveClark
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
- Total Posts : 956
- Joined: 2006/10/21 17:02:58
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 17:11:50
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Hill62 2017/12/15 07:00:07
Hi Dave, I've been using Samplitude for years now. I finally got so fed up with SONAR and the direction it went around the time of X that I simply stopped using it. After using Samplitude for some years, I tried to use SONAR X2 and X3 for a project, then gave up and had to recreate it in Samplitude. That's a way of saying that I found Samplitude much easier to use for my work than SONAR. Frankly, I think most people would. Sketchy reputation: Somewhat, but it seems to be better than it used to be. This has not interfered with using Samplitude. In fact, Samplitude, as you probably know by now, is (or was) handled by a different group than the more consumer-related stuff. I don't think that Independence is any different now than it was before, but I used it only on a couple of projects years ago and did not like the results. They have taken the samples and developed some instruments using them using different players. I've never used the peer support/forum for Samplitude. Never needed it. Bundled instruments: There aren't many of these. You can pay a lot more and get many of them, but not many sound very good if you like real-sounding stuff. I like Saxophonia and World Flutes, for example. For EDM, I would say that there is probably a lot of stuff one could use. They do seem quite EDM-oriented because some of the techniques they use in their examples tend to create sounds that are quite distorted, but yes they are loud! The only serious problem I had with Samplitude was that there is a buggy version of vorbis.acm out there that causes crashes when working with projects that use different sample rates. This buggy version is newer than the one that actually works correctly. I'll send you an email in a moment. Best regards, Dave On edit: Forgot to say that SpectraLayers had some unbelievable bugs in it when I got it maybe a year ago. But the developer was very responsive to me personally and he fixed all the major, glaring problems. Another important issue: Updates. Magix has the smoothest updates of anyone I deal with. Too many software people change things all around all the time, then have major conflicts with past versions, introduce new bugs where there weren't any before, and so on. These guys have an amazing ability for and understanding of software development processes.
|
clintmartin
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3893
- Joined: 2009/10/11 12:16:43
- Location: Fort Smith, AR
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 17:15:41
(permalink)
I agree with Dave...that this is the only deal that has me even thinking about it. My needs are so simple that I believe Waveform and Mixbus will more than deliver for me, but still this looks like a great deal. Then again...If I don't need any of it...it's not.
|
mikedocy
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1157
- Joined: 2007/05/09 23:00:37
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 17:34:40
(permalink)
No dongle required. The console is not dockable and changes sizes as you add tracks. Audio engine seems to be good and stable. I'm still learning so can't add much else. It seems to be like the "Swiss Army knife" of daws. There are settings for changing almost anything.
|
Sidroe
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1954
- Joined: 2010/11/10 18:59:43
- Location: Macon,Georgia
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 17:38:09
(permalink)
No dongle!!!!! Choose the option to receive discs when you place in the cart. The Independence library took 10 hours. I will still use Sonar while learning Samplitude's workflow but I'm very impressed so far.
Sonar Platinum, Sonar X3e, Sonar X2a , Sonar X1 Expanded and 8.5.3 (32 and 64 bit), Windows 10 on a Toshiba P75-A7200 Laptop with i7 @ 2.4 quad and 8 gigs of RAM and secondary WD 1 Tb drive, Windows 10 desktop, Asus i5 @ 3.2 quad, 12 gigs RAM, 1 Tb drive, 1 500 gig drive, MOTU 24io, 2 Roland Studio Captures, Saffire 6 USB for laptop, Soundtracs Topaz Project 8 mixer, Alesis Monitor 2s, Event BAS 20/20s, Roland Micro-Monitor BA-8s, and 45 years worth of collecting FX, Mics, Amps, Guitars, and Keyboards!
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 17:39:09
(permalink)
bitflipper Does Independence still suck as badly as it did when it was Yellowtools? Does Samplitude require a dongle? How's the peer support/forum? I don't really care much about bundled instruments - unless, of course, some of them stand out as especially noteworthy.
I do not believe Independence has changed at all since Yellowtools. No dongle required. The forum looks pretty helpful and as has been pointed out Samplitude and Sequoia (and SpectraLayers) have separate support and forums from the rest of the Magix. In order to register the Pro X3 Suite takes two separate accounts, one for SoundForge and one for Samplitude/SpectraLayers. Giving support a test right now on a plug-in layout issue. Had an issue with missing Melodyne serial number (they ran out like Cakewalk did when running sales). Got my reply from support in two days.
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 17:47:15
(permalink)
I didn't know MAGIX has/had a sketchy reputation. I think their bread and butter is on the consumer side, and yes, there are restrictions/fees for using their consumer products and content commercially. My nickel review is: Interface isn't very modern looking by comparison, instruments are average/effects are good with lots of both. plug-in management and organization is lacking, but compatibility is excellent. I'm happy to try to answer any specific questions, but I am new to Pro X3 Suite/SpectraLayers (not new to Samplitude).
|
Ruben
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 472
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:12:42
- Location: Where they play the West Coast sound
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 18:16:02
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Hill62 2017/12/15 07:00:51
bitflipper I've not been tempted by any of the current DAW deals because I don't feel a need to switch DAWs ATM, and if I do in a year's time, those deals will likely come around again next Black Friday. But nobody's giving more apparent value for the money right now than MAGIX Samplitude. Soundforge alone is worth the $149. Plus it's got ARA, the PRV looks similar to SONAR's, and I like the inline tempo automation feature. SpectraLayers looks to be an improvement over the spectral editor I currently use in Adobe Audition. Lots of goodies in there, and the sale price is an amazing 90% off (for another week). I'd like to hear from Samplitude users. Let me know if MAGIX's sketchy reputation is deserved. Does Independence still suck as badly as it did when it was Yellowtools? Does Samplitude require a dongle? How's the peer support/forum? I don't really care much about bundled instruments - unless, of course, some of them stand out as especially noteworthy. I was a long-time Sonar user up to X2, when I tried Samplitude Pro X. It has a reputation for been complicated but I didn't find it hard to figure out, there are a lot of videos about using Samp, and there is an aspect to the workflow that is similar to Sonar. Lots of configuration options. I haven't used Independence very much (and I never used it when it was Yellowtools) but it works well, feels quite solid actually, and I like some of the sounds. And its sound files are huge, of course. No dongle on Samp versions since at least Pro X. The official Magix user forum is adequate - nowhere near as active as the Cakewalk forum but there are long-time experienced users there and you can get answers you need. Also, they have ramped up a bit recently due to a bunch of new forum members - former Sonar users. And you've probably heard of Kraznet, who's a wealth of Samp knowledge and has created dozens of video tutorials for Samp. He's very active on the Samp forum (he's a mod there) as well as Gearslutz and KVR. Unfortunately, official email support is hit and miss - their offices are in Germany so there is the time zone delay, plus they seem to be understaffed for U.S. support. On the plus side I haven't needed official support very often... between the forums and video tutorials I've gotten the answers I needed. Their reputation - they do make a lot of non-pro, consumer market software but I think that many people aren't aware of their professional software like Samp and the mastering suite Sequoia (which is used by professional mastering engineers), so I think that being sketchy is more of an urban legend rather than actual practice. As a Samp user for a few years I've seen that they put a lot of work into their pro side and the non-pro side seems to give them the resources to back Samp (so Samp hopefully won't end up like Sonar). I also think most of Samp's plugins are quite good - I like EQ116 and use it a lot, and their compressors - especially AM Munituion - are great. It's a very full-featured program, like Sonar or Cubase, but if you already have a selection of plugins and VSTis Samp's feature set may not be that important.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 18:18:37
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby Hill62 2017/12/15 07:01:02
Thanks for the feedback! I've been watching several of Kraznet's very clear tutorials. He's a one-man Samplitude University. While watching, I was struck by how similar it is to SONAR. You're not stuck with Instrument tracks, but can freely route VIs any way you like. Plus the MIDI editor is quite similar to what I'm used to - and it does multiple tracks in one window very nicely. Many keyboard shortcuts are even the same (I assume they can also be customized). Automation is almost the same as SONAR. Actually, it's a little better because it looks more like SONAR 8.5, with all automation overlaid over the waveform and (optionally) all selectable without having to use a dropdown list. That's how I liked automation to work, and the main reason it took me so long to warm to SPlat. There are also some nice features that SONAR doesn't have, such as a complete Red Book CD-burning solution and a mastering mode.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 18:39:00
(permalink)
I think another thing that contributes to MAGIX reputation is how they acquire other software companies, then recycle the software without developing it. It's not completely true, as evidenced by Sound Forge Audio Studio 12, but that is a complaint I've seen from Yellowtools and Sony Creative software users.
|
Ruben
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 472
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:12:42
- Location: Where they play the West Coast sound
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 18:59:09
(permalink)
bitflipper Many keyboard shortcuts are even the same (I assume they can also be customized). Yes, a lot of customization for keyboard shortcuts. The first thing I did was change Rewind to "W".
|
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 9871
- Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
- Location: Ohio
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 19:55:15
(permalink)
The Object based editing in Samplitude is extremely flexible/powerful. It takes a while to get familar with the GUI... but the basics are easy. If you spend most of your MIDI editing time in the PRV, you'll likely be comfortable with Samplitude. If you're looking for more esoteric MIDI features (advanced notation, "note expression", etc), Samplitude might not be the right fit. Samplitude's CPU performance is pretty good... and has been for a long while. Years back, they implemented a Read-ahead cache... (which I'm guessing influenced Reaper - as it has a similar feature) that significantly increased performance. Samplitude is a great "mastering" solution... and you have the option to export DDP. Independence has potential... but it still sucks. It's so far behind Kontakt and HALion 6... I just don't see it being a viable competitor. No custom scripting...
|
Kuusniemi
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 490
- Joined: 2008/11/09 01:31:47
- Location: Finland
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 19:57:55
(permalink)
DaveClark That's a way of saying that I found Samplitude much easier to use for my work than SONAR. Frankly, I think most people would.
Nitpicking, but this is statement that one can't simply make. Simply too many ways of doing things and if even most people would find the same things good then we would not have such a variety of DAWs to choose from. :) Carry on then, don't mind me griping.
Composer & Sound Designer at Really Slow Motion, Man Makes Noise, Epic North, YleX and Yle Puhe.
|
telecharge
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1180
- Joined: 2014/03/31 18:01:17
- Location: Enfuego, Monterey
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:05:10
(permalink)
Jim Roseberry Independence has potential... but it still sucks. It's so far behind Kontakt and HALion 6... I just don't see it being a viable competitor. No custom scripting...
Probably not a concern for pros like you and Dave, but considering the difference in cost during this sale, Independence is still a good choice for those who haven't yet been assimilated by the Steinborgs and Natives.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:14:26
(permalink)
I have Samplitude Pro X2 and think its a great DAW. I got it a while ago on sale. I however am switching to Cubase Pro 9.5. I already have it and am refamiliarizing myself with it. Samplitude is an object oriented DAW and so is Sonar. If one likes this Samplitude is a better choice. If you have as I do a lot of MIDI hardware Cubase is more suitable. Both are deep DAWs and should allow the user to do just about anything they may conceive. Cubase has the edge in notation from the DAW. However both run rings around Sonar in notation. I have been surprised by the high quality of Steinberg's own VSTs. They have done much to improve the sound. Also the looks. There is nothing wrong with Samplitude's plugins. They are as good as Cakewalks in quality of sound but are not as good looking. So far I have been porting Sonar projects over to Cubase. I use both OMF or an export of all the tracks. I import those into Cubase. I have not run into too many problems so far. The import of the tracks seems the most reliable. I really like the Cubase Mixer. Or in Cubase speak Mixconsole. It is easy to use once you figure it out. It is not as easy to use as Sonar's or as configurable. Mackie Control support is just fair in Cubase. It is better in Samlitude. More later as I think of more things to note.
|
yummay
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
- Total Posts : 396
- Joined: 2003/11/06 09:01:58
- Location: Canada, Quebec
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:40:24
(permalink)
Hum... Might be going down their path, as Magix also bought Vegas Pro (I upgraded my Vegas pro 9 to their first release, v14...)
Yummay, Amuses-gueules sonores Bite-sized sounds and harmonic entrées Dell Studio 1747 (I7), Tascam US20x20, Yamaha 01v96V2 / Behringer ADA 8000, Godin LGXT+ Roland GR-09, Behringer Motor 49. Windows 10 (64), Sonar Platinum, Komplete 10, Sound Forge 10, Vegas pro 9, Waves Gold.
|
dappa1
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2949
- Joined: 2007/02/26 04:18:57
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:41:19
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby John 2017/12/13 23:14:37
You seem to be enjoying Cubase 9.5 John. Likewise I am enjoying Studio One 3 We moving from Cakewalk seems to be a good thing as its always good to inject creativity into your art. I would probably have gone Cubase as I had it before and was quite comfy in it. But their offspring Studio One 3 is nice enough has a similar feel but lighter.
|
35mm
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1105
- Joined: 2008/12/09 08:21:44
- Location: Devon, UK
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:42:23
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby John 2017/12/13 23:14:41
Bitflipper, I begrudgingly bought Studio One after Cubase fell through for me. Then the Samplitude deal came along and I snapped it up. I'm very glad I did. I've been learning on the job as it were while I'm working on a couple of projects in it. It is a powerhouse of a DAW for sure and has been very robust and stable for me so far. In many ways, it blows Sonar out of the water although there are many things I prefer about Sonar, but that's probably just through familiarity. Something I love about Samplitude, that I loved about Sonar and hate about Studio One, is that it adapts to your workflow. It doesn't dictate that to you. Everything can be configured the way you like. Everything can be turned into a savable preset and there are many different ways to crack the same nut. Another thing that is great is its ability to play back a big project with lots of soft synths and effects plugins at a higher buffer setting while simultaneously recording at low latency. Its audio engine is amazing! Another thing that sold it to me is its built-in programmer for external controllers. I was able to completely remap my ProjectMix (makie protocol) to control the DAW in any way I want. I have seen some people saying that Samplitude lacks midi features, but that's not true. It's very strong in audio and midi. If you used the full feature set of Splat and need the advanced stuff then I can't recommend Samplitude enough. If you had Splat but only used the features of Home Studio then you'd be better off with Studio One. P.S. They released a new update today.
Splat, Win 10 64bit and all sorts of musical odds and sods collected over the years, but still missing a lot of my old analogue stuff I sold off years ago.
|
dappa1
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2949
- Joined: 2007/02/26 04:18:57
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:50:59
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby John 2017/12/13 23:14:20
Studio One 3 is still a baby but what a baby the things it can do to inspire creativity and the ideas that buzz around in your head merely because of its potential is awesome. So many people are realising its potential. The way its sounds also it's an excellent tool for mixing and mastering. I got to give Studio One its props. I have used Logic Pro which is really good but not as intuitive as Studio One. I have used SPLAT for a long time it is nice and full and it fits like a glove. But Studio One is a boxing glove an MMA glove it's designed to do the job and that it does without timing issues. Its not an old professional like most of these DAWs its definitely a new Champ that in many peoples eyes from different platforms have come to realise it is a GOAT!
|
Ruben
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
- Total Posts : 472
- Joined: 2003/11/06 08:12:42
- Location: Where they play the West Coast sound
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:53:17
(permalink)
35mm P.S. They released a new update today. Thanks for the heads up... updating now.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 20:59:51
(permalink)
I learned something with the update..save your workspace. But I needed to get more familiar with workspaces anyway. Since working on the plug-in layout the first thing I noticed with the update was the VST3 Delay/Reverb menu moved from VST FX to the VST3 area. I would have expected it to be appended to the Delay/Reverb menu above the VST3 FX area. edit: restart and the menu moved where it should be.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 21:09:10
(permalink)
John ...If you have as I do a lot of MIDI hardware Cubase is more suitable...
Could you expand on that thought? Are we talking control surfaces, hardware sequencers, outboard modules? All I need is MIDI IN and MIDI OUT. That, and of course, a good multi-track MIDI editor. Samplitude's PRV seems as good as any I've seen so far, including SONAR's. Although I'm told Cubase has that nailed, too.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 21:15:22
(permalink)
Q: Does the Samplitude license allow installation on two computers?
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 21:31:46
(permalink)
From p28 of the manual
Note: Please make sure to keep your serial number in a safe place. If you lose it, you will not be able to activate the product again. Substantial changes to the hardware configuration of your system may require reactivation. You can activate the product a total of three times. If you wish to active the product more than three times, you need to contact our support team.
There is a confirming thread on the forum where Kraznet indicates this could be 3 different PCs.
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 21:50:39
(permalink)
Thanks. I'd want to install it on my laptop, since I'd hate for my business trips to be wasted on, well, business.
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 22:01:40
(permalink)
Track folders? I've not seen any in the videos... {EDIT} Never mind. They call them "folder tracks", not "track folders".
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 22:16:58
(permalink)
Anything like VocalSync in Samplitude?
All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 22:49:07
(permalink)
dappa1 You seem to be enjoying Cubase 9.5 John. Likewise I am enjoying Studio One 3 We moving from Cakewalk seems to be a good thing as its always good to inject creativity into your art. I would probably have gone Cubase as I had it before and was quite comfy in it. But their offspring Studio One 3 is nice enough has a similar feel but lighter.
Totally true. I have had Studio One for some time.
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 23:12:13
(permalink)
bitflipper
John ...If you have as I do a lot of MIDI hardware Cubase is more suitable...
Could you expand on that thought? Are we talking control surfaces, hardware sequencers, outboard modules? All I need is MIDI IN and MIDI OUT. That, and of course, a good multi-track MIDI editor. Samplitude's PRV seems as good as any I've seen so far, including SONAR's. Although I'm told Cubase has that nailed, too.
Dave I'm talking about hardware MIDI synths. Like an XV 5080. I also have an SC 8850 and a DR 770. Cubase has scripts for patch names as Sonar has instrument def. files. I think over all Cubase supports hardware better then any other DAW. If this is not a consideration other DAWs are darn good too. Heck even Reaper is good at this too. I just can't stand it. That is on me only. No one else should have that view just because I do. My old Cubase SX 3 was very powerful yet Sonar had a better or easier way to route audio. Sonar still has a better audio routing then Cubase 9.5. However, it can emulate many Sonar abilities. None the less I miss the busing in Sonar. Recording MIDI in Cubase is simple and easy. Recording audio is fair but nowhere as easy as in Sonar. Though in Cubase inputs are able to print FX on incoming audio. At lease I think it can. Personally I think there is no true replacement for Sonar. However as Dappa pointed out we can look at this as an opportunity to find new and perhaps better ways of working with MIDI and audio. One point is Sonar was able to work well with any Windows audio driver. You will find that is not the case with many other DAWs. Cubase wants ASIO plain and simple. I should add Cubase 9.5 has some good user control over the look and workspace. It a lot more customizable than it used to be. There are ways to have a much greater number of colors for tracks too. Still, I am hoping that someone somewhere decides to keep Cakewalk going. I know that will not happen yet I still hope.
|
soens
Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5154
- Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
- Location: Location: Location
- Status: offline
Re: Tell me about Samplitude
2017/12/13 23:41:26
(permalink)
I think it has the cleanest looking GUI out of all DAWs I've tried. Mixer console has stacked/collapsible modules as opposed to Sonar's click the menu to show/hide each module. It has customizable themes like Sonar. Unlike Sonar all the graphic files are in a folder easy to get to with editable INI files to boot. One theme maker even has his own theme editor for about $30.
post edited by soens - 2017/12/15 09:28:40
|