Upgrading to X1? big mistake

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 2 of 6
Author
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/03 07:48:07 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:20:06


#31
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 07:54:18 (permalink)
mike_mccue


"My workflow speed has 'expanded' (<---- ) expotentially. "


Yes.


I was really fast already... and so, from my perspective, X1 cripples workflow... too much extra clicking for my style of getting it done.


I have imagined that you'd feel similar to how I feel if I were to announce to everyone that my new Honda 125cc has inspired me to ride faster than ever.


I guess all we can do is draw upon our personal perspectives and attempt share our thoughts on the matter.


all the best,
mike




edit to add quote to provide context


Yep, I agree with all of that. Every perspective is relative, perhaps I had been using the 'wrong' program previously and would have been better elsewhere. Guess I'll never know the answer to that.
#32
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 08:16:34 (permalink)
As a music fan, I am gravely concerned about all the potentially brilliant music that Cakewalk's new design direction has robbed us of.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#33
tommo_1
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 35
  • Joined: 2010/05/24 19:33:15
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 18:27:05 (permalink)
You would of heard all my music on the radio by now if it werent for x1.
#34
Kewl Hendagang
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 60
  • Joined: 2011/06/04 12:00:56
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 18:58:36 (permalink)
  you can't force people to change their workflow, regardless of ''yeah but try it it's easier you'll see! give it a month!'' X1 is forcing you to change the way you work, period. The right way to do things would have been to sell X1 as an entirelly new product, and keep fixing 8.5.3 - Jesus I would even pay for an 8.5.3 update
#35
Kreative
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 570
  • Joined: 2011/08/23 22:45:03
  • Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 19:43:31 (permalink)
X1 ... the best just got better! Or did it? Its a matter of opinion and personal experience, I guess.
 
Yes, people don't always like change. Remember when the "new" Coca-Cola formula came out in 1985, and then ended up to be a major marketing failure. Even a change in something as simple as carbonated sugar water makes some people highly critical.


But with X1, I paid my money for it, and I'll deal with it one way or another, for better or worse, and get the job done.


Windows 7 64 bit, Sony Vaio Laptop Q740, 8 GB, Sonar Producer X1d, Focusrite Scarlett 18i, Korg Pa500, M-audio 61 Radium Keystation. Using Omnisphere, Trilian, Komplete 8, Morphestra, Orchestral Essentials, Evolve, Orange Tree Guitars, Addictive Drums, BFD2, Melodyne Editor, Studio One 2, Ozone 5, FabFilter.
#36
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 20:45:11 (permalink)
offnote


tommo_1


My opinions on X1.

Everything is so much harder. Why change everything? I was fine without the stupid multidock, track view WAS easy to work with when i could maximise and minimise easily, into piano roll, out of piano roll, into mixing view, out of mixing view. This new layout is rat****.
And the "smart" tool? ****ing ridiculous pointless waste of time. Draw tool, GONE! now it just plots notes everywhere.

I was coping with smart tool, but now i cant drag notes to the right only to the left? WHY?!!!. Final straw. What a waste of money.
Pretty much ruining my life.


don't understand, if you were fine with previous version why in hell did you upgrade? especially that you had the option to download trial version and evaluate it... 

Well Duh, since you ask !
 
For the same reason most of us do. To get frickin bugs fixed that go on from version to version ! That's why the hell.
 
Pretty good comeback Cake gave all the fanboys what with their TRIAL VERSION crap.
 
No longtime user would in a hundred years EVER have anticipated that Cakewalk would  turn Sonar into what they did with X1. Therefore no trial was needed for generation to generation  users. Most of us just wanted and expected that the bugs would be fixed. period. That's exactly how they suckered us so easily.

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#37
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 20:48:39 (permalink)
The fact that it was radically changed was heavily trailed, and is indeed still all over the site. It's every adult's responsibility to look in the direction they're walking in. 

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#38
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 20:53:33 (permalink)
John T


The fact that it was radically changed was heavily trailed, and is indeed still all over the site. It's every adult's responsibility to look in the direction they're walking in. 


Is that what they are telling you to say now in the damage control mettings ??

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#39
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 20:56:37 (permalink)
You actually think a company like Roland gives enough of a monkeys about the griping in the backwaters of the Internet to have paid forum stooges?

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
#40
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 21:07:02 (permalink)
Yep!! I do think they have damge control helpers around here.
Feds do. All large companies do. Why wouldn't Roland. Do you really think that people are so naive that they can't see through you ?

This is a USERS forum. Who gives a rats butt what Roland thinks anyhow. Obviously they do'nt care what decades of dedicated Cakewalk users think. I spent tens of thousands on their limited llifespan junk hardware when they were king of the hill in the 80's. So I's paid my dues.

BTW, your're a smart aleck and nobody likes a smart aleck. Personally, I won't be reading anymore of your hot air.
Later.

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#41
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 21:12:59 (permalink)
John T


You actually think a company like Roland gives enough of a monkeys about the griping in the backwaters of the Internet to have paid forum stooges?

 
In which case it's actually even sadder that you do it for free
 
 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#42
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/03 21:20:43 (permalink)
John T


This forum is pretty much the last place you'd find evidence of the human capacity for adaptation.


I particularly like this post.

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#43
Mystic38
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1622
  • Joined: 2010/08/30 17:40:34
  • Location: Mystic, CT
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/04 11:15:47 (permalink)
some people need balance in their lives.

x1 cost you $99 for the upgrade... perhaps if you had spent full retail you would have read the manual and learned and adapted to the NEW program that it is.. you want the shortcuts back? program them. dont want multidock? dont use it....but if you want a program to work like 8.5.3 here is the scoop...you already had it... its SOnar 8.5.3

For my 2c, Cakewalk were strategically in a dead end street with 8.5.3.. the ONLY people it was popular with was prior owners of Sonar, those used to hundreds of dos style shortcuts and incoherent and obscure but reliable ways of doing things..to new adopters Sonar was a pig to use.
Cakewalk have massively increased the user friendliness of Sonar with X1, and with an upcoming MAC version have the ingredients to make a major push in market share.

So learn X1, go back to 8.5.3 or learn yet another program and jump ship. Cakewalk is going the right way. get on the train, get off the train or get out of the way..it aint stoppin.

HPE-580T with i7-950, 8G, 1.5T, ATI6850, Win7/64, Motu 828 III Hybrid, Motu Midi Express, Sonar Platinum, Komplete 9, Ableton Live 9 & Push 2, Melodyne Editor and other stuff, KRK VXT8 Monitors
Virus Ti2 Polar, Fantom G6, Yamaha S70XS, Novation Nova, Novation Nova II, Korg MS2000, Waldorf Micro Q, NI Maschine Studio, TC-VoiceLive Rack, 2012 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 2001 Gibson Les Paul DC, 1999 Fender Am Hardtail Strat, Fender Blues Jr, Orange TH30/PPC212, Tak EF360GF, one mic, no talent.
#44
deswind
Max Output Level: -71 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 952
  • Joined: 2003/11/23 14:07:13
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/04 16:23:02 (permalink)
Me too!!!!  That is what I want.  Maybe they can issue the 8.5.3 CLASSIC version update.  and make X1 a separate product.  Obviously from reading many posts for a long time here, there are two camps regarding X1, so charge us 8.5.3 people a nice amount for an upgrade.  I would pay $300 myself, if it was not buggy and improved 8.5.3.
 
And instead of people spending all this time on this forum being for or against X1, there would be two different products, and people could stop all this nonsense.   Those that love 8.5.3 are not any better or worse than those that love X1. 
  
 
Kewl Hendagang


 . . . I would even pay for an 8.5.3 update


#45
daryl1968
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10984
  • Joined: 2010/06/01 22:51:43
  • Location: Englishman in deepest, darkest Wales
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/04 16:32:12 (permalink)
Mystic38 - it ain't going to make you popular but you have said it and you are absolutely correct.
#46
dappa1
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2949
  • Joined: 2007/02/26 04:18:57
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/04 16:46:35 (permalink)
I am a new user to X1 (lol) It is going the right way???? But it is a long way from being there so I guess those that did use 8.whatever feel cheated... My only beef is the Audio Engine but then again thats the main thing sort that out then you're onto a winner!

Sonar X series 
https://youtu.be/9YNplnhTAZY Steal My Girl
 https://youtu.be/A0VPi_UZmLo Moon & Stars
 
KRK VXT6 Studio One 3  Main: SPLAT for Lifetime: Formerly known as...
Nothing beats the best!
#47
Splat
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 8672
  • Joined: 2010/12/29 15:28:29
  • Location: Mars.
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/04 21:01:20 (permalink)
Learn the software. There's an X1 book I seem to remember. It took me two weeks to read and learn, plus study a load of videos, and that's pretty much all I did was learn (8 hours a day as I hadn't used Cakewalk for 16 years or so).... don't have time? - ah well ain't that a pity....
 
Years ago sound engineers who went from studio to studio had to deal with a different mixing desk which they were often not familiar with.... did they throw their toys out of pram and insist that the godzillion dollar mixing desk be replaced with something they were familiar with or did they just get on with their work somehow? (Answers on a postcard on how they did this).
 
Nevermind - new toys were a thing of joy, people didn't shrug their shoulders and go "boo hoo" I've got something else to learn.
 
You are the sound engineer......so you deal with it :)
Or stick to the Tascam 4 track which many people still use today.
post edited by CakeAlexS - 2011/11/04 21:10:08

Sell by date at 9000 posts. Do not feed.
@48/24 & 128 buffers latency is 367 with offset of 38.

Sonar Platinum(64 bit),Win 8.1(64 bit),Saffire Pro 40(Firewire),Mix Control = 3.4,Firewire=VIA,Dell Studio XPS 8100(Intel Core i7 CPU 2.93 Ghz/16 Gb),4 x Seagate ST31500341AS (mirrored),GeForce GTX 460,Yamaha DGX-505 keyboard,Roland A-300PRO,Roland SPD-30 V2,FD-8,Triggera Krigg,Shure SM7B,Yamaha HS5.Maschine Studio+Komplete 9 Ultimate+Kontrol Z1.Addictive Keys,Izotope Nectar elements,Overloud Bundle,Geist.Acronis True Image 2014.
#48
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk]
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 2084
  • Joined: 2008/07/17 04:38:03
  • Location: Los Angeles, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/04 21:54:06 (permalink)
pianodano


Yep!! I do think they have damge control helpers around here.
Feds do. All large companies do. Why wouldn't Roland. Do you really think that people are so naive that they can't see through you ?

This is a USERS forum. Who gives a rats butt what Roland thinks anyhow. Obviously they do'nt care what decades of dedicated Cakewalk users think. I spent tens of thousands on their limited llifespan junk hardware when they were king of the hill in the 80's. So I's paid my dues.

BTW, your're a smart aleck and nobody likes a smart aleck. Personally, I won't be reading anymore of your hot air.
Later.


Dan,


John T is not a, "damage control helper". I can assure you of that. We do not employ anyone to come on here who is not a member of the Cakewalk staff, and all Cakewalk staffers come here using their real names and identify as Cakewalk staff.


Also, Roland has literally nothing to do with these forums. These are our forums, not Roland's. 


SP
#49
mikespitzer
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 300
  • Joined: 2009/05/30 11:58:33
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 01:01:13 (permalink)
I know we could carry on this back and forth discussion forever, but I am also one of those who reverted back to SONAR 8.X after spending time with X1 My only concern of course is how long I will be able to keep using 8.X into the future as hardware and Operating systems change. I am not adverse to learning new software and must do it all the time in business, but too many of the X1 ideas seemed illogical to me even after I learned them. I found the MIDI programming of drums and orchestra pieces in PRV more awkward with X1 Not that it is important, but I felt the appearance was a step backwards too. X1 visually looks like a cheaper product with graphics from the CGA and Windows 3.1 era. People have different tastes and ways of working in audio production, so this debate will probably always split 50/50 down the middle. The fact remains, X1 seems to signal the future direction of the product interface and flow logic. I have been lucky with Sonar Producer 8.3 and actually never experienced a crash in several years. So after spending much time the the X1 when it was released, I personally chose to go back to 8.X for as long as that remains a viable way to make music. All things considered, it simply works better for me and the work flow (at least how I use it) is more logical.
#50
mikespitzer
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 300
  • Joined: 2009/05/30 11:58:33
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 01:03:42 (permalink)
hey ....... why does text spacing and line skips get lost on this forum when using Firefox ? My post above is NOT the way I typed it. Arrghhhh
#51
Kreative
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 570
  • Joined: 2011/08/23 22:45:03
  • Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 02:20:06 (permalink)
Yeah, I'm new here, but like all things that come and go .. change is ever the process of life, and adaptation to change is the necessity: some change being for the better, and other changes presenting challenges. 

Who is right and who is wrong here is a matter of personal opinion, and in my opinion, nobody is right or wrong, because this is an individual thing about whether or not X1 is progress or regression [except for the bugs, of course].


There are a lot of good people here weighing in on this topic. But its becoming the battle of evermore, and perhaps we would all make the world a much more musical place if we were making music instead of retreading the same old worn out tires. We can never bring Sonar 8 back.

I have used older versions of Cakewalk before, myself, and I don't like the time I have to take to learn things, but nevertheless ... like Alex has said, "new toys were a thing of joy, people didn't shrug their shoulders and go "boo hoo" I've got something else to learn."

So, I'm going forward to a new frontier. With a sense of humor and a spirit of adventure, I'll get where I'm going. And so will we all, if we make up our minds to do so. Be passionate, and make some music! You'll be a better and happier person for doing so.




post edited by Kreative - 2011/11/05 02:28:06

Windows 7 64 bit, Sony Vaio Laptop Q740, 8 GB, Sonar Producer X1d, Focusrite Scarlett 18i, Korg Pa500, M-audio 61 Radium Keystation. Using Omnisphere, Trilian, Komplete 8, Morphestra, Orchestral Essentials, Evolve, Orange Tree Guitars, Addictive Drums, BFD2, Melodyne Editor, Studio One 2, Ozone 5, FabFilter.
#52
Kreative
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 570
  • Joined: 2011/08/23 22:45:03
  • Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 02:20:56 (permalink)
A duplicate

Windows 7 64 bit, Sony Vaio Laptop Q740, 8 GB, Sonar Producer X1d, Focusrite Scarlett 18i, Korg Pa500, M-audio 61 Radium Keystation. Using Omnisphere, Trilian, Komplete 8, Morphestra, Orchestral Essentials, Evolve, Orange Tree Guitars, Addictive Drums, BFD2, Melodyne Editor, Studio One 2, Ozone 5, FabFilter.
#53
mudgel
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 12010
  • Joined: 2004/08/13 00:56:05
  • Location: Linton Victoria (Near Ballarat)
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 06:14:21 (permalink)
Mystic38


some people need balance in their lives.

x1 cost you $99 for the upgrade... perhaps if you had spent full retail you would have read the manual and learned and adapted to the NEW program that it is.. you want the shortcuts back? program them. dont want multidock? dont use it....but if you want a program to work like 8.5.3 here is the scoop...you already had it... its SOnar 8.5.3

For my 2c, Cakewalk were strategically in a dead end street with 8.5.3.. the ONLY people it was popular with was prior owners of Sonar, those used to hundreds of dos style shortcuts and incoherent and obscure but reliable ways of doing things..to new adopters Sonar was a pig to use.
Cakewalk have massively increased the user friendliness of Sonar with X1, and with an upcoming MAC version have the ingredients to make a major push in market share.

So learn X1, go back to 8.5.3 or learn yet another program and jump ship. Cakewalk is going the right way. get on the train, get off the train or get out of the way..it aint stoppin.

Don't' know when Cakewalk made that announcement but I don't think it's going to happen. While they do have Mac programmers for some of their instruments we've had it mentioned on this forum a number of times quite unequivocally that SONAR will never be available as a native MAC program.

Mike V. (MUDGEL)

STUDIO: Win 10 Pro x64, SPlat & CbB x64,
PC: ASUS Z370-A, INTEL i7 8700k, 32GIG DDR4 2400, OC 4.7Ghz.
Storage: 7 TB SATA III, 750GiG SSD & Samsung 500 Gig 960 EVO NVMe M.2.
Monitors: Adam A7X, JBL 10” Sub.
Audio I/O & DSP Server: DIGIGRID IOS & IOX.
Screen: Raven MTi + 43" HD 4K TV Monitor.
Keyboard Controller: Native Instruments Komplete Kontrol S88.
#54
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 06:29:07 (permalink)
LOL... That shows how Chinese whispers and forums work. I think that probably comes from the recent post about if Sonar was ported to MAC would users swap to a MAC. Now all of a sudden it's a fact.
#55
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 07:24:49 (permalink)
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk
]

pianodano


Yep!! I do think they have damge control helpers around here.
Feds do. All large companies do. Why wouldn't Roland. Do you really think that people are so naive that they can't see through you ?

This is a USERS forum. Who gives a rats butt what Roland thinks anyhow. Obviously they do'nt care what decades of dedicated Cakewalk users think. I spent tens of thousands on their limited llifespan junk hardware when they were king of the hill in the 80's. So I's paid my dues.

BTW, your're a smart aleck and nobody likes a smart aleck. Personally, I won't be reading anymore of your hot air.
Later.


Dan,


John T is not a, "damage control helper". I can assure you of that. We do not employ anyone to come on here who is not a member of the Cakewalk staff, and all Cakewalk staffers come here using their real names and identify as Cakewalk staff.


Also, Roland has literally nothing to do with these forums. These are our forums, not Roland's. 


SP


Thank you for your post. And I believe you. With that said however, it seems that you are (Cakewalk) in desperate need of some intense moderation of some members. He (member quoted), along with at least two others, ( I can name names, routinely tell other user members that if they have a problem, take their money and go elsewhere while obnoxiously slinging insults. Nearly any reader would take such posts as having the full weight and authority of Cakewalk behind such posts. And especially for me, since in all the years I have been here, I have never seen even one such derisive post called down by Cakewalk. 
post edited by pianodano - 2011/11/05 08:08:46

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#56
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 08:07:03 (permalink)
mikespitzer


I know we could carry on this back and forth discussion forever, but I am also one of those who reverted back to SONAR 8.X after spending time with X1 My only concern of course is how long I will be able to keep using 8.X into the future as hardware and Operating systems change. I am not adverse to learning new software and must do it all the time in business, but too many of the X1 ideas seemed illogical to me even after I learned them. I found the MIDI programming of drums and orchestra pieces in PRV more awkward with X1 Not that it is important, but I felt the appearance was a step backwards too. X1 visually looks like a cheaper product with graphics from the CGA and Windows 3.1 era. People have different tastes and ways of working in audio production, so this debate will probably always split 50/50 down the middle. The fact remains, X1 seems to signal the future direction of the product interface and flow logic. I have been lucky with Sonar Producer 8.3 and actually never experienced a crash in several years. So after spending much time the the X1 when it was released, I personally chose to go back to 8.X for as long as that remains a viable way to make music. All things considered, it simply works better for me and the work flow (at least how I use it) is more logical.
As a user myself that has spent years learning the complexities and ins and outs of Sonar prior to X1, I also think that it had a certain elegance and that it allowed power users to quickly and intituitvely do nearly anything with little effort.
And for very advanced midi users, it was the bees knees, almost.
 
There was a reason for that. It was because that it was developed and worked out over and with years of user feedback. That is important to understand. It was a symbiotic relationship.
 
So now they serve up this complete redesign that was developed over a few months in some room by a few programmers that THINK they know what a DAW is supposed to look like.
 
They have made a grave mistake. I believe. The biggest car makers on earth had their clocks cleaned using the same thinking, ie; they knew what a car was supposed to look and perfom like. So the money people took their money elsewhere.
  
 I also think that what they have done has nothing to do with making a more sophisticated DAW. But rather instead, simply a dumbed down version of our great software that, as aleady stated, through the years dedicated users had provided untold thousands of hours of experience and feedback in efforts to get it where it was prior to X1.
 
So now from all reports, Cakewalk proudly states that X1 shows the biggest sales ever. As a businessman myself, I strongly believe that is spoken of as product turnover. Not gross sales.
 
In my mind, why anyone would even entertain the idea of converting somthing fabulous that was clearly worth much more than $500.00 retail, and turn it into something that offers gizmos  that most high end users would have zero use for, for a few bucks to generate revenue, is beyond belief.
The idea of selling more for less is completely foreign to me. The idea of a niche business is to sell less for more.
  
But what really takes the Cake is to allow a few obnoxious forum members using some self perceived authority and grandiose sense of importance, free reign to repeatedly insult some of the very same longtime users that may have hung in there all those years though all the iterations of bugs and half baked starts to willfully show a callous disregard for serious customers.
 
What all this really tells me is that, they may have lost their way and that they don't even care if the established power user base to goes away; and that they (Cakewalk) have staked their future on the nickel and dime crowd. Well my experience tells me that is a fickle bunch of tightwads and in many cases, have to get the money from Mom or Dad.
 
But they can count on this. I'll only go away with a fight. I will be damned if I am going to willingly throw away nearly 10 years of Sonar experience without letting them know how I  (and I'd bet thousands of others likewise) feel about it.
 
 
post edited by pianodano - 2011/11/05 08:30:26

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#57
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 08:16:59 (permalink)
Seth Perlstein [Cakewalk
]

Also, Roland has literally nothing to do with these forums. These are our forums, not Roland's. 

 
I hope they're paying you guys a good rate for the banner advertising then Seth
 
 


 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

#58
Mystic38
Max Output Level: -59 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1622
  • Joined: 2010/08/30 17:40:34
  • Location: Mystic, CT
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 08:30:01 (permalink)
This is an excellent example of the pot calling the kettle black as there is an equal if not more so number of members whose sole contribution in the X1 forum (repeat X1 forum) is to rubbish and deride X1 cakewalk and its staff.. this quoted post included..
 
The not late breaking news is that Cakewalk's new DAW is X1..  and any crash and burn in cakewalk sales from your doom and gloom scenario would come primarily as a result of taking away the huge UI improvements introduced in X1...  and note your dollars are already NOT included in said stated sales success.
 
Given that X1 is a new product, you have exercised your personal right not to buy it, however luckily your 8.5.3 will continue to work perfectly for you, and, with a dedicated computer you will have a good ten years without having to learn or adapt to anything...
 
If you wish for ongoing support for 8.5.3 then there is a forum room where you can lobby for that... this room is for the X1 version of Sonar..
 
thank you.
pianodano

As a user myself that has spent years learning the complexities and ins and outs of Sonar prior to X1, I also think that it had a certain elegance and that it allowed power users to quickly and intituitvely do nearly anything with little effort.
 
There was a reason for that. It was because that it was developed and worked out over and with years of user feedback. That is important to understand. So now they serve up this complete redesign that was developed over a few months in some room by a few programmers that THINK they know what a DAW is supposed to look like.
 
They have made a grave mistake. The biggest car makers on earth had their clocks cleaned using the same thinking, ie; they knew what a car was supposed to look and perfom like. So people took their money elsewhere.
 
 I also think that what they have done has nothing to do with making a more sophisticated DAW. But rather instead, simply a dumbed down version of our great software that, as aleady stated, through the years dedicated users had provided untold thousands of hours of experience and feedback in efforts to get it where it was prior to X1.
 
So now from all reports, Cakewalk proudly states that X1 shows the biggest sales ever. As a businessman myself, I strongly believe that is spoken of as product turnover. Not gross sales.
 
In my mind, why anyone would even entertain the idea of converting somthing fabulous that was clearly worth much more than $500.00 retail, and turn it into something that offers gizmos  that most high end users would have zero use for, for a few bucks to generate revenue, is beyond belief.
The idea of selling more for less is completely foreign to me. The idea of business is to sell less for more.
  
But what really takes the Cake is to allow a few obnoxious forum members using some self perceived authority and grandiose sense of importance, free reign to repeatedly insult some of the very same longtime users that may have hung in there all those years though all the iterations of bugs and half baked starts to willfully show a callous disregard for serious customers.
 
What all this really tells me is that, they may have lost their way and that they don't even care if the established power user base to goes away; and that they (Cakewalk) have staked their future on the nickel and dime crowd. Well my experience tells me that is a fickle bunch of tightwads and in many cases, have to get the money from Mom or Dad.
 
But they can count on this. I'll only go away with a fight. I will be damned if I am going to willingly throw away nearly 10 years of Sonar experience without letting them know how I  (and I'd bet thousands of others likewise) feel about it.
 
 

 

HPE-580T with i7-950, 8G, 1.5T, ATI6850, Win7/64, Motu 828 III Hybrid, Motu Midi Express, Sonar Platinum, Komplete 9, Ableton Live 9 & Push 2, Melodyne Editor and other stuff, KRK VXT8 Monitors
Virus Ti2 Polar, Fantom G6, Yamaha S70XS, Novation Nova, Novation Nova II, Korg MS2000, Waldorf Micro Q, NI Maschine Studio, TC-VoiceLive Rack, 2012 Gibson Les Paul Standard, 2001 Gibson Les Paul DC, 1999 Fender Am Hardtail Strat, Fender Blues Jr, Orange TH30/PPC212, Tak EF360GF, one mic, no talent.
#59
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 08:32:41 (permalink)
Mystic38


This is an excellent example of the pot calling the kettle black as there is an equal if not more so number of members whose sole contribution in the X1 forum (repeat X1 forum) is to rubbish and deride X1 cakewalk and its staff.. this quoted post included..
 
The not late breaking news is that Cakewalk's new DAW is X1..  and any crash and burn in cakewalk sales from your doom and gloom scenario would come primarily as a result of taking away the huge UI improvements introduced in X1...  and note your dollars are already NOT included in said stated sales success.
 
Given that X1 is a new product, you have exercised your personal right not to buy it, however luckily your 8.5.3 will continue to work perfectly for you, and, with a dedicated computer you will have a good ten years without having to learn or adapt to anything...
 
If you wish for ongoing support for 8.5.3 then there is a forum room where you can lobby for that... this room is for the X1 version of Sonar..
 
thank you.
pianodano

As a user myself that has spent years learning the complexities and ins and outs of Sonar prior to X1, I also think that it had a certain elegance and that it allowed power users to quickly and intituitvely do nearly anything with little effort.
 
There was a reason for that. It was because that it was developed and worked out over and with years of user feedback. That is important to understand. So now they serve up this complete redesign that was developed over a few months in some room by a few programmers that THINK they know what a DAW is supposed to look like.
 
They have made a grave mistake. The biggest car makers on earth had their clocks cleaned using the same thinking, ie; they knew what a car was supposed to look and perfom like. So people took their money elsewhere.
 
 I also think that what they have done has nothing to do with making a more sophisticated DAW. But rather instead, simply a dumbed down version of our great software that, as aleady stated, through the years dedicated users had provided untold thousands of hours of experience and feedback in efforts to get it where it was prior to X1.
 
So now from all reports, Cakewalk proudly states that X1 shows the biggest sales ever. As a businessman myself, I strongly believe that is spoken of as product turnover. Not gross sales.
 
In my mind, why anyone would even entertain the idea of converting somthing fabulous that was clearly worth much more than $500.00 retail, and turn it into something that offers gizmos  that most high end users would have zero use for, for a few bucks to generate revenue, is beyond belief.
The idea of selling more for less is completely foreign to me. The idea of business is to sell less for more.
  
But what really takes the Cake is to allow a few obnoxious forum members using some self perceived authority and grandiose sense of importance, free reign to repeatedly insult some of the very same longtime users that may have hung in there all those years though all the iterations of bugs and half baked starts to willfully show a callous disregard for serious customers.
 
What all this really tells me is that, they may have lost their way and that they don't even care if the established power user base to goes away; and that they (Cakewalk) have staked their future on the nickel and dime crowd. Well my experience tells me that is a fickle bunch of tightwads and in many cases, have to get the money from Mom or Dad.
 
But they can count on this. I'll only go away with a fight. I will be damned if I am going to willingly throw away nearly 10 years of Sonar experience without letting them know how I  (and I'd bet thousands of others likewise) feel about it.
 
 

 
Hi there Mystic.
 
Notice my siggy? I own X1.  


Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#60
Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 2 of 6
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1