Upgrading to X1? big mistake

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 4 of 6
Author
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/05 20:16:37 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:22:12


#91
pianodano
Max Output Level: -67 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1160
  • Joined: 2004/01/11 18:54:38
  • Location: Va Beach Virginia
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 22:18:06 (permalink)
mike_mccue


"Well we could go on all day moving goalposts to suit our agendas couldn't we?"

Ok.

I guess I didn't do a good enough job last time so I'll attempt to be more clear.

Here's my agenda for track view:
1) shows meters
2) shows level controls
3) shows state M, S, RD, W
4) shows a toolbar set up with the stuff I like to see instantaneously
5) nice bright colors



I have 26 tracks on my 7 year old display monitor that I bought for $189.00.

Does anyone want to find out and post how many tracks, and a toolbar, and the very same information I have listed can be displayed in SONAR X1?

My agenda is too be able to see valuable information in track view... and I want to see lots of it.

My agenda is to inspire the good people at Cakewalk to improve SONAR by laying out the track view components so I can have something as feature rich as what you see here.

I, personally, don't see how providing an example of maximum tracks showing minimum information suits any agenda, and there fore I think the claim that X1 can show nearly as many minimized tracks as any other version of SONAR can only serve as senseless noise which I believe obfuscates any discussion about possible improvements that we may hope to enjoy in future versions of SONAR.

I have a "goal" too. My "goal" is too avoid people who debate for recreation. My "goal" is to engage in multifaceted dialogs with people who want to enjoy mutually enhanced awareness.


I'm trying to think if I missed anything...


Yep. That's what it is supposed to look like. So much data. Thanks for the screenshot. 

Best,

Danny

Core I7, win XP pro, 3 gig ram, 3 drives- Lynx Aurora firewire- Roll around 27 inch monitor, 42 inch console monitor- Motif xs controller - Networked P4's and FX Teleport for samples- Muse Receptor VIA Uniwire for samples and plugs- UAD QUAD Neve - UAD 1- Sonar X1 but favor 8.5 GUI - Toft ATB 32 - Vintage hardware - Tascam MS-16 synched via Timeline Microlynx -Toft ATB32 console
#92
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/05 22:56:30 (permalink)
FastBikerBoy

I fully sympathise with anyone not getting on with/liking/disappointed with X1 but anyone who does like it and prefer it over previous versions (such as myself) is then called a fanbouy.


Remember, being addressed as any kind of Bouy should be considered as the very highest honour.

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
#93
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 01:39:36 (permalink)
Jonbouy


FastBikerBoy

I fully sympathise with anyone not getting on with/liking/disappointed with X1 but anyone who does like it and prefer it over previous versions (such as myself) is then called a fanbouy.


Remember, being addressed as any kind of Bouy should be considered as the very highest honour.


I do, I do.....



@Mike.........

I didn't add anything. I simply added a large amount of tracks to a project that I've literally just started on, fitted it to the screen in the three different ways that you see in the screenshots and then saved it and re-opened it in V8. Give the goalposts another shove................

I did in V8 hide as many toolbars as it would be possible in a single keystroke to fit in the control bar method, but I couldn't hide the last small tool bar easily so left that in. I thought that was the fairest way to handle the control bar issue. It can be hidden and called back very easily after all.

I think you are the one missing the point, if a user applies the 8.5 way of thinking (ie. restricts X1) then yes I couldn't agree more, X1 won't measure up in a direct comparison. Undoubtedly if this were a bike race you wouldn't want me using top gear either 'cos the modern bike has 6 and the older one 5. However if one uses their imagination for a few moments and starts to see the possibilities available in X1 it's a much different picture.

I can accept that you prefer V8.5 for your way of working, good luck to you I wish you well. Is it really so hard to accept that I and many others prefer the new way of X1. Not because we're all deluded or don't know any better as you hint at in so many of your crusade posts but genuinely prefer it.

My 'new' way of working that I have discovered since X1, is my preferred way of working now. I couldn't work that way in earlier versions simply because it wasn't possible, unless I missed something which I'm also open minded enough to accept is a possibility. In those versions I made them work for me as best I could and that's what I'm doing now. I just find X1 has fewer restrictions for me. I call it adaptation and AFAIC you call it being hoodwinked by CW.

I've already conceded your point that in V8.5 I can fit 2 more tracks on my screen in my set up using 'restricted thinking' (TM) anyway, so quite why I'd want to 'cheat' is beyond me.

Now I've humoured you will you return the favour?

My preferred method of working is to have a track view with minimised tracks in it, the inspector beside it for the current track details. That's on one monitor. On the other I have the corresponding CV.

I also like to be able to switch instantly to a very similar view but all busses instead of tracks.

When I want to edit a MIDI track I like to be able to switch instantly to a view where everything is laid out ready for me to edit. All I need do is click on the required MIDI track, oh I don't want to see any audio in that view by the way, or have to hide it everytime I open it.

BTW, I'm not really bothered how many tracks are viewable at any one time as long as it's a reasonable amount, I promise not to get upset if it's out by a few.

I won't go on with all my other preferences that'll do for starters...........

I can supply screenshots if there's anything you're unsure of but I'm not in my studio ATM.

Is that possible in versions pre-X1? I've been back briefly to have a look and can't seem to work out how to do that, perhaps it's all the brainwashing from CW I've endured. But then I haven't spent ages at it so it may be possible - I'm far too busy making my music racket.


I will suggest to you that folks that track 24 channels of inputs of musicians performing music together seem to understand.

Not something I do my interface only has 16 but if I did need to my method of working above covers that quite nicely thank you. Now I understand, I never realised you are regularly tracking 24 musicians at once. My monitor would need upgrading because even in 8.5 I can't get that many on screen at once.

I'm genuinely surprised that "folks that track 24 channels of inputs of musicians performing music together" don't use dual monitors as standard, but perhaps only they understand the answer to that.

I'll leave you now to your crusade to convince CW that they've made a terrible mistake with X1, just don't include me in the assumption that I really don't know any better and I'm just trooping along like some sheep behind a lot of other Sonar users that have been hoodwinked by CW and can't see the 'truth'.

Yes X1 can be improved of course it can, but as far as I'm concerned it's already a big improvement over previous versions.

All of the above IMHO of course, other users MMV...................

(Right boys, take the gun away from my head now I've done everything you asked, you said if I praised X1 you'd let me go back to V8.5, please don't make me use X1 any more.............please..................)
post edited by FastBikerBoy - 2011/11/06 01:55:43
#94
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 04:17:07 (permalink)
In the interests of accuracy I have re-opened the same project in V8 and unchecked the display icon option so that they can't be accused of space wasting. However I feel I now have less info viewable to me, but putting that aside I can now display 18 tracks which is er.... the same as before.

If I were to be really pedantic it's actually 17 as I can't see the meters in the 18th track but hey ho............ all the talent is on track 19 anyway - thanks for pointing that out Steve.

I guess the next suggestion will be I've photo shopped the images or something.


post edited by FastBikerBoy - 2011/11/06 04:26:47
#95
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 06:54:25 (permalink)
@FBB...You photoshopped the image!!!! There, had to get THAT out of the way, LOL!!!


OK..dumb question time...what happened to the other tracks there?

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
#96
gothic.angel
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 572
  • Joined: 2009/02/27 12:21:53
  • Location: Darkness
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 07:21:29 (permalink)
...ah guys.....

All those nice pictures are doing is reminding us how much more powerful and comfortable SONAR 8.5.3 was/is...

Look at those nice handy visible adaptable tools at the top....

Sure, some general modernization would have done.... instead X1 total (unrequested) revolution has caused all this (constantly) growing mess....

There is an evident point by now.... complaints and regrets have grown with long term time, and I believe this was predictable...

Some were taken by natural initial enthusiasm for the "new" product, some adapted to it, many instead have spent months with it getting to the point that X1 is not SONAR anymore... add to this the new "expanded" tools odd policy from Cakewalk, and the feeling all of a sudden is like having become strangers in a foreign place.... 

Cakewalk has recently been alienating many long time users....
 
And the obvious consequence is that a lot of them have jumped ship or are seriously thinking of doing... they are certainly already testing around, myself among them....

I had chosen SONAR for its established workflow... something I could never imagine they would radically change.... but now it is different.... I've been using it for almost a year and I can tell that (to me) it's become slower than almost any other DAW out there....

The worst things to me now are the Control Bar, Smart Tools, awful added menus and especially the Piano Roll.... Samplitude's and Cubase's ones, even Reaper's, are now putting Sonar's PRV  to shame..... 

I've spent some good times around here, mates, and enjoyed the company (quarrels included...) a lot..... really.... 

But after having invested some money (trough the years I literally purchased all Cakewalk's products...) I now find that Cakewalk's recent (and possibly future...) directions are making me feel like this is not my place any longer.......  

Sorry, but I never thought I could come to this end before X1 arrived... 








post edited by gothic.angel - 2011/11/06 07:40:28

GothicAngeL - EBM - Dark Electronics
______________________________
SONAR Platinum , Rapture Pro
SAMPLITUDE X3 Pro Suite, FL Studio 12, Reason 10

_________________________________________
DELL Dimension E521 - AMD 64X2 - Windows 10 Pro
_________________________________________
Proud "Apple's i-STUFF" Worst Enemy...
#97
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/06 07:42:03 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:22:37


#98
keith
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3882
  • Joined: 2003/12/10 09:49:35
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 07:59:02 (permalink)
gothic.angel

All those nice pictures are doing is reminding us how much more powerful and comfortable SONAR 8.5.3 was/is...

Look at those nice handy visible adaptable tools at the top....
I'm going in for the operation at the end of the month. I will be adding a 3rd appendage, which will be dedicated to X1 hotkeys. If you think about, I don't need more than a thumb and ring finger for ctrl combinations, so that'll cut down on cost compared to a full 5-finger job. It'll look really bizarre, but it'll be functional, so I'm pretty psyched. Think I'll finally repair that broken nose while I'm at it... maybe get a little enhancement in my man region.

#99
Wiggles
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 15
  • Joined: 2011/11/06 07:39:47
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 07:59:27 (permalink)
If you guys spent as much time working instead of complaining you'd be millionaires and have someone create your own "PERFECT DAW".
Then you could sell it to us and get your $99 update money back.

Music....the key to life and
the Life to Keys!!
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 08:45:50 (permalink)
mike_mccue


Hi Biker Boy, what size display screen are you using?

Your screen shots seem to be 1,023px × 640px...

I'd like to figure out what we need to use to compare like to like?


TBH I'm not sure, I'll check when I get back in the studio but it's not that small, or that ratio either. I'll let you know when I find out but comparing like for like only works for you on your set up in the same way mine works for me on mine so it's all a bit pointless really.

The only point I'm trying to make is your experience and opinion of X1 isn't every ones and certainly not mine. I've said countless times that I can fully accept X1 isn't for everyone I just wish that some of those that don't find it preferable would stop assuming that those of us that do are some sort of half witted easily led sheep that can't think for ourselves and being blindly led into a fools paradise by CW.

I'll also state that when/if Sonar stops working for me I'll either stay on the version that does or move to pastures new. What I won't be doing is posting on here trying to convince those that are finding it usable that they have got it all wrong and CW are conning them. I have no allegiance or loyalty to CW, I use their product at the moment because I can get it to work for me, V2 - V8.5 all worked very well for me except V7 which was a bit of a nightmare IIRC and I find X1 even better. Of course not everyone agrees but there you go - that's life.

It's already very apparent that we don't have an even work remotely similar work flow so any comparison is worthless. FWIW here's my main use screens..............

I have all the information I can possibly need here. I can see all the meters in the TV although not well I can see a when a clip has occurred which is good enough for a first glance for me.

I don't show the MSR in the MIDI edit view, I'm editing MIDI so don't need them.

All three views are available instantly with the press of a key and I have another 7 for different functions very similar to these. If this can be achieved in previous versions I missed it.

These are obviously dual monitors but it will work on single screen, the second screen being called up and hidden by pressing D, but I have dual monitors so I use them.


Track View - CV





Buss View - CV









MIDI Edit View








The one single thing that makes X1 superior IMHO to any previous versions is ...... drum roll...... screensets.

Until one gets the concept of those I'm afraid X1 will always appear limited.


The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/06 09:15:17 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:23:11


FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 09:34:50 (permalink)
I can assure you the screenshots and screens for both are sized 100% as to the rest of it I bow to your superior wisdom.

Collapsing the tracks in 8.5 was done by selecting all then shift clicking while reducing one down to the minimum I could get it before the meters disappeared. I'm sorry that my findings don't suit your purpose but I hardly need a lesson in using Sonar from you.

You seem to know very little about using X1 and I've consigned V8.5 to the shelf along with all the other previous versions, after my hardware update scheduled for next month it won't even been installed.

I will report back with my main monitor size (the second one is smaller) as promised but you carry on with your crusade I'll leave you in peace, I'll let others draw their own conclusions. I find it quite sad really...........

EDIT: Has the thought ever occurred to a superior being such as yourself that it may not be my ignorance of 8.5 but your ignorance of X1? Hmmmmm?
post edited by FastBikerBoy - 2011/11/06 09:42:26
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/06 09:41:33 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:23:23


John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 10:27:27 (permalink)
I've not looked in here since Friday. I've been busy completing a paid project in X1. Meanwhile, I see that Mike has once again proved on the internet that X1 is no use. I think one of us is getting more out of his time and money than the other.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 10:28:12 (permalink)
I can't keep up with you Mike, you're too smart for me. First I had the tracks minimised too much, then I was showing the icons, then the screen is the wrong resolution, now I don't know how to minimize tracks. Make your mind up please I'm running round like a loony here trying to keep up with the ever moving target.

I guess the only way you'll ever believe what I'm seeing is for you to make a personal visit, not very practical but you can always call round if you ever find yourself in not-so-sunny Norfolk, UK - you'll be very welcome.

Anyway monitor sizes, both are running at their maximum resolution.

Main monitor - that's the one that has the TV on it, both X1 and 8.5, both maxed out both full screen, neither photo-cropped in anyway, I haven't doctored anything in either or running 8.5 at a different resolution, I just fired them both up and loaded the same project, resized the tracks using exactly the same method although both loaded it the same anyway so I didn't actually have to move anything......  (have I missed anything?). Size 1680 x 1050

Secondary monitor - the one with the PRV/CV of X1 in it is at 1280 x 1024

Despite your sometimes condescending attitude towards me I'm still willing to help you get to grips properly with X1 if you ever need to, I've plenty of helpful tips I can share as well to get you going.

There's very little point in continuing this discussion because I am quite obviously running a completely different version of X1 to you (and many others apparently) and I also have no intention of going back to 8.5, it made me quite giddy looking at it now I'm used to X1.

So carry on with whatever point you are trying to prove for whatever reason you are trying to prove it, I won't hassle you any more.
RLD
Max Output Level: -55.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1990
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 10:11:26
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 10:38:35 (permalink)
I think X1 does indeed have a crippling effect if you spend more time complaining about it than using it.
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 10:46:17 (permalink)
Wiggles


If you guys spent as much time working instead of complaining you'd be millionaires and have someone create your own "PERFECT DAW".
Then you could sell it to us and get your $99 update money back.


Hey welcome to the forum. Obviously sensible and true posts such as yours are the exception around here.

I keep trying not to get distracted but I've an aversion to correcting BS when I see it.

However I'm very happy with my purchase so have no need to get my money back unlike some who just buy it to keep CW in business. Besides which I can't possibly create a DAW I don't even know how to minimize tracks in the ones I've got. LOL.
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 15:46:33 (permalink)
LOL

WOW.. A lot of trolling treads here lately in this FORUM about jadda jaffa....and jadda jada...Especially Whining & ****ing from members that aint use SONAR nor have bought SONAR X1 it in the first place!

A lot of B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T if you ask me!


Upgrading to X1... big mistake? NO, the biggest mistake are if you still use PRO TOOLS. Of course is not work as 8.5 did. Its a new system. SONAR X1 is not hard to understand or get going either. I manage to get going in and remember all the new key commands in 1-4 hours time. You know, read the manual how "things work" instead of trial and error is not so bad idea either.
post edited by Freddie H - 2011/11/06 16:05:10


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 16:55:59 (permalink)
And you telling me that SONAR 8.5 was better LOL

Check this VIDEO...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=viHws3lo9Q8

 
 
and this...
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=CwzY0fesOOQ
 
and this...
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WhsAu7A65DI
 
 
post edited by Freddie H - 2011/11/06 17:03:41


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
Kreative
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 570
  • Joined: 2011/08/23 22:45:03
  • Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 18:10:26 (permalink)
For me, personally, coming here is more an exercise of curiosity rather than enlightenment. But I can't help but feel that these deliberations are at times all so very unnecessary, and a distraction, instead of an asset to creativity and music making.

If some of you weren't locked into this protracted debate, you might otherwise find yourselves conversing as a group of somewhat agreeable, reasonable and quite friendly musicians here, people that have so very much more in common with one another than these posts would appear to indicate.

Hmmm, Imagine ....

Windows 7 64 bit, Sony Vaio Laptop Q740, 8 GB, Sonar Producer X1d, Focusrite Scarlett 18i, Korg Pa500, M-audio 61 Radium Keystation. Using Omnisphere, Trilian, Komplete 8, Morphestra, Orchestral Essentials, Evolve, Orange Tree Guitars, Addictive Drums, BFD2, Melodyne Editor, Studio One 2, Ozone 5, FabFilter.
Wiggles
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 15
  • Joined: 2011/11/06 07:39:47
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 22:11:47 (permalink)
I have used "Cakewalk" since it came on "floppy disks"....
In it's infancy.....it has gone through more physical changes than Joan Rivers!  I have been a part of this forum forever....posted once or twice in years.  Just joined again since I lost my name and password.  It pains me to hear people gripe who think their "workflow" is hampered by changes.  If you stay in the business long enough you'll welcome the changes that come along...
STALE is the last thing you could ever want in the music business....
One of these days you'll see that this is just another learning curve on the path to getting better.  Complain if you must, but these changes will only make you better, stronger, and more patient!  
And long after I'm gone (when they have Sonar ZX24 Platinum Extended)
You will see how many changes you endured and how much you have learned in the process.
This will be my last post for a long while.....the studio beckons!
No place I'd rather be than making music with the ones that got me where I am now!  
By the way....
I have X1 Expanded
Pro Tools 9
and an awesome studio and beautiful grand piano.....
That still doesn't mean I am any good.  My critics and those around me keep me humble!  That's why I gave up on complaining a long time ago.
Never got me anywhere but mad.  And mad never got me in the mood to do music, total waste of good time.
Cheers



Music....the key to life and
the Life to Keys!!
keith
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3882
  • Joined: 2003/12/10 09:49:35
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/06 23:46:23 (permalink)
Wiggles

If you stay in the business long enough you'll welcome the changes that come along...
STALE is the last thing you could ever want in the music business.... 
Many have a difficult time seeing curiously hidden buttons and extraneous mouse/keyboard clicking as an opportunity for personal growth and improvement. More like head-scratchers.
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/07 06:48:58 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:22:53


John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/07 07:06:08 (permalink)
I'm curious: why does it matter that the screen shots are scaled?

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/07 07:09:25 (permalink)
,

post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:23:38


John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/07 07:10:48 (permalink)
He's told you what size his monitors are. So clearly, they're scaled. Or do you think he's lying about the size of his monitors?

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/07 07:17:53 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:23:51


John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Upgrading to X1? big mistake 2011/11/07 07:41:37 (permalink)
Oh, I've read it all. Anyone with a grain of sense can see you're just filibustering, and absolutely grasping at dead grass. It is - characteristically - pathetic, sad, and a bit weird. Yet oddly compelling.

Obviously, keep it up, and at some point FBB will simply not be bothered to carry on with it, at which point you can claim an Internet Win. Everyone will be really impressed, and you'll be hoisted up on our shoulders and paraded round the room, I'm sure.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
The Maillard Reaction
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31918
  • Joined: 2004/07/09 20:02:20
  • Status: offline
, 2011/11/07 07:52:54 (permalink)
,
post edited by Bash von Gitfiddle - 2018/11/30 20:24:11


Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 4 of 6
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1