Sound Quality of Sonar X1

Page: << < ..2627282930.. > >> Showing page 26 of 31
Author
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 16:46:40 (permalink)
If we get Danny back on board then it'll 49 pages in about 3 hours. Just need to lure him in with a topic he can get to grips with.

What type of plectrum do you use Danny and could you give us an insight into the different ones available? Result.
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 16:46:42 (permalink)
ProjectM


SteveStrummerUK


bapu



Wow, so you can play it with your clothes on too...
 
 

Only for illustration purposes....
 
 
But what I came here to say: Ya'll know this thread is going to suck unless it reach 50 pages?

 
Noooooooooooooo

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 944
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
  • Location: Adelaide Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 17:20:00 (permalink)
strikinglyhandsome1


Have you tried the Cassowary 2020x? Latency is -2ms. You hear it before you've even pressed play. It anticipates what you're about to record with forward thinking technology. That's the future here today.

I'd love to but,no Aussie dealers have it in stock,+ it's only available from Guitar Centre and they don't ship to Australia,F$%^ unbelievable!




https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs
"You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix    
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 17:45:29 (permalink)
ROFLMAO!!!  This is a perfectly derailed thread!!!

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 17:47:10 (permalink)
trimph1


ROFLMAO!!!  This is a perfectly derailed thread!!!


I'm not sure it was ever railed in the first place was it?
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 17:51:36 (permalink)
FastBikerBoy


trimph1


ROFLMAO!!!  This is a perfectly derailed thread!!!


I'm not sure it was ever railed in the first place was it?

I can't remember....

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 944
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
  • Location: Adelaide Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 17:53:36 (permalink)
FastBikerBoy


trimph1


ROFLMAO!!!  This is a perfectly derailed thread!!!


I'm not sure it was ever railed in the first place was it?

Oh I dunno,some of the posts,seem to be from people,whov'e had a couple "rails"

https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs
"You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix    
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 17:59:52 (permalink)
I think you'll find that's "lines"
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 18:01:42 (permalink)
Which daw has the best highs?

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 18:11:12 (permalink)
John T


Which daw has the best highs?

No No No...we got it all worgn!!!  


Now we see this!!!


http://www.prosoundweb.com/article/purple_sounds_best_a_matter_of_mass_psychology/P1/

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 944
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
  • Location: Adelaide Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 18:26:05 (permalink)
FastBikerBoy


I think you'll find that's "lines"

That depends on what country/nightclub cubicle your in at the time!


THE END YAY!
post edited by bobguitkillerleft - 2012/03/14 19:11:13

https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs
"You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix    
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 944
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
  • Location: Adelaide Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 19:36:35 (permalink)
trimph1


John T


Which daw has the best highs?

No No No...we got it all worgn!!!  


Now we see this!!!


http://www.prosoundweb.com/article/purple_sounds_best_a_matter_of_mass_psychology/P1/

Brilliant article,I love it when overestimated value is de-bunked.


It's due to me being left handed,and EVERY LH electric/acoustic in Australia is insanely more expensive,than the exact model in Right H.


For example after 26 years of playing my humbuckered stratlike Ibanez[before they ever offered Gibson type pickups in their strat type models] I bought a genuine Gibson Les Paul........studio[sigh], Nowhere near the meaty wheight of a standard/custom lp.


So it cost $1700 bucks,ok for a "real gibson" I thought....................the right hand version sells for as little as $600 in the US,arrrgh,and it's wired for Right Hand![my Epiphone is wired correctly] and NO if you just swap the wires around you get VERY little taper....virtually on or off.


So I send to the US to get proper LH pots from CTS[YES they exist.....rightys don't know]and the pots are as stiff as hell,it never ends so I'll end the whining now,and go to my room!

https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs
"You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix    
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/14 21:24:38 (permalink)
strikinglyhandsome1


If we get Danny back on board then it'll 49 pages in about 3 hours. Just need to lure him in with a topic he can get to grips with.

What type of plectrum do you use Danny and could you give us an insight into the different ones available? Result.

LOL!!! I'm not biting on this! Oh wait, I do have a "plectrum" story for you. That was a word I had never heard before until I played my first show in the UK. The same with Faggs...never heard that before either and got a bit defensive when someone asked "if I had an extra". LOL!!!!!
 
So I'm in England...Mannchester Ritz I believe. After the show, someone comes up to me and says "have you got an extra plectrum?" Of course I give them the nod a dog does when he's cornfused...and said "a what?" They said "a plecturm, you know....plectrum, hello is there any bloody body home under that hair?"
 
I said, "honest I have no idea what you're talking about...a what...what are you saying?" So they point to my necklace which is a golden guitar pick with my name in diamonds. I said "hahaha, no I can't give you that...sorry" they said "no, silly, that's a plectrum!!" Then I got it....sheesh...between faggs, taking the piss, what are you on about, nice bird, driving on the wrong side of the road and now plectrums, I sure had an education my first time in the UK! :) Darn it...I tried to stay out of this thread strikingly, but you made it difficult! :-Þ
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 03:01:49 (permalink)
There's nothing wrong with our fags, but they are expensive. I don't do them any more either....
Scott Lee
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1120
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:13:38
  • Location: Hollywood, California
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 03:26:53 (permalink)
Very interesting thread. 

Once you filter out or block the basement spin team looking just to argue, we have established two results. One group states Sonar sounds superior to protools for example, then the other camp will call anyone crazy for thinking daws sound different.  Can we have it both ways? So if I'm a guitar player and x1 colors my mix better then protools, then indeed the engines have something going on under the hood. Or does that only work when it favors my beliefs?

Here we go again? It was established early in this thread that a null test on a single track would most likely be comparable in results. In fact, it was also mentioned user errors can be a culprit. When we compose with Sonar, we all use different means to produce music. Some are heavily dependent on midi, some elastic audio. Do we all share the paths getting from point a to b? How many times have you asked yourself "oh I didn't know you could do that this way!"


Now, knowing the endless possiblies we approach our music, we can also link the possibly that bugs will be found according to how the end users produce, what methods are used. I still suspect that how the audio is piped, routed, or mixed can influence that null perfect signal we all want. This can by why some see it some don't.


The forums I believe should be for intelligent debates. We might not all agree on the topic at hand, but strive to improve what we are all passioniate about - X1. I'd like to see Sonar used more in the industry, but we also need to address problems that folks have not insult or downplay the customers. We are all keeping Cakewalk afloat by being long term users of the software.


Best regards,







post edited by Scott Lee - 2012/03/15 03:46:48

Scott Lee (ASCAP)
SFX Media 
Song Composer / Engineer / Audio Director

http://www.youtube.com/user/Dezacrator?feature=mhee

John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 04:22:09 (permalink)
Danny: I live literally two or three minutes walk from Manchester Ritz. Small world. 

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 06:33:20 (permalink)
Scott Lee


Very interesting thread. 

Once you filter out or block the basement spin team looking just to argue, we have established two results. One group states Sonar sounds superior to protools for example, then the other camp will call anyone crazy for thinking daws sound different.  Can we have it both ways? So if I'm a guitar player and x1 colors my mix better then protools, then indeed the engines have something going on under the hood. Or does that only work when it favors my beliefs?

Here we go again? It was established early in this thread that a null test on a single track would most likely be comparable in results. In fact, it was also mentioned user errors can be a culprit. When we compose with Sonar, we all use different means to produce music. Some are heavily dependent on midi, some elastic audio. Do we all share the paths getting from point a to b? How many times have you asked yourself "oh I didn't know you could do that this way!"


Now, knowing the endless possiblies we approach our music, we can also link the possibly that bugs will be found according to how the end users produce, what methods are used. I still suspect that how the audio is piped, routed, or mixed can influence that null perfect signal we all want. This can by why some see it some don't.


The forums I believe should be for intelligent debates. We might not all agree on the topic at hand, but strive to improve what we are all passioniate about - X1. I'd like to see Sonar used more in the industry, but we also need to address problems that folks have not insult or downplay the customers. We are all keeping Cakewalk afloat by being long term users of the software.


Best regards,

Well Scott, I admit to being in the camp where I do not believe they color the sound. That said, I am NOT in the camp that would call you or anyone else experiencing this, "crazy". I can only speak for myself and produced a pretty credible test that complied with what the OP mentioned. I don't know if you heard my test samples, but in my opinion and that of others, there were no blatantly obvious differences other than human performance issues because I literally played the same piece individually into each DAW I tested as well as exported from each one.
 
I would think if there was a problem, it would be pretty obvious. It's not like a DAW would just color one instrument and not another, right? I didn't even use a good soundcard to further prove things. I have done this same test with various soundcards of great quality and converters such as Lynx, Apogee, RME, and Echo. I get the same results no matter what DAW I use as long as the same interface is used as well.
 
My front end is always the same. Either a direct box or mic's going through a console. One other thing I wanted to bring to your attention that others here as well as myself are sort of bugged about is, you made a few serious claims here which we questioned. We questioned them because you didn't provide any proof other than your text. I'm not calling you out or attempting to make you have to justify anything, but when you make the claims you have made in this thread without showing any audio examples at all, how can you expect people to really buy into it?
 
As soon as I read this thread and what people were saying, I took 10 minutes to record a little piece in each DAW using a clean sound with Guitar Rig 4 and a basic preset we all have. I ran out of a guitar pre-amp that I use that was on bypass. When in bypass mode, it sounds and works exactly like a direct box. Two low Z in's to my Mackie 32x8 console on two channels, no pre-amp from the console used, channel faders at unity/center, board eq disabled, out of the board into 1/8 inch line in to a Realtek card recording at 16/44 with an input of -3dB peak vias master fader on my console. I did this test purposely from my house using my crap system in order to show what a regular, ordinary customer may get.
 
Studio One 2, Sonar X1 Expanded and Reaper were used. I have the latest updates on all three. I recorded each part inside of a different DAW giving me 3 different performances exported out of each DAW it was created in. The results? They sounded identical. Forget nulls and all that stuff for a second...do a test like I did and let your ears be the judge. If we have to do a null test to show us something that we can't hear on our own, how much of a difference could there be? Even if the null test shows a difference, the way you described your problem on here...it should be blatantly obvious there is a color change. We should also be able to hear this colorization if it truly exists. Is there any way you can give us some steps to recreate so we can try to hear what you hear?
 
Make it basic like I did. If you are using an analog front end that we can't duplicate, what if you got rid of it and tried the same tests just to see if we can get what you get? It should be easy enough to do. You should be able to take a DI right into your DAWs of choice and get these anomalies you hear. If you can get them, so can we unless something in your set-up is different somewhere. But I'm willing to try whatever you say to attempt to duplicate your findings. But you gotta work with me/us. :)
 
I'm really interested in getting to what may be causing the stuff you hear. I never once thought you or anyone else was crazy....I just wish I could duplicate what you hear so I could jump on the train and help to fix what you think may be broken if indeed it IS broken. But if I can't hear it and I don't see any proof with some merit behind it, it makes it tougher to swallow man, know what I mean?
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 06:45:51 (permalink)
John T


Danny: I live literally two or three minutes walk from Manchester Ritz. Small world. 

Hahaha are you serious? Man, I wish I would have known you back then! I bet you're a blast to hang out with in person. I usually get out that way at least once a year. I land in Manchester and then I end up in Skelmersdale/Lancashire. We get so drunk we end up in Wigan lol...which is always a fun time. Thank God they like lil yank rocker dudes like me....or it's probably because I'm a good sport and don't mind being busted on. Other times I'll end up in Sheffield, New Castle or Birmingham...it's always a great trip for me. One of these times, I'm definitely going to buy a flat when I'm there. Most of the people I meet from the UK are "tell it like it is" people. A bit blunt until you get to know them, then they soften up a bit....but you can always count on them and you have a friend for life....the way it should be. :) Took me a bit to handle "blunt" though. Gotta tread softly with me....I'm fragile! LOL! :)
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 07:01:02 (permalink)
All good towns for rock acts those. Especially Birmingham. Do let me know when you're next over, we can meet up for a few jars and chat to some birds.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 07:28:19 (permalink)
For sure I will John...with plenty of notice. That's a promise. :)

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 07:36:07 (permalink)
Good stuff.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
Scott Lee
Max Output Level: -68 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1120
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:13:38
  • Location: Hollywood, California
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 08:39:08 (permalink)
Danny Danzi


Scott Lee


Very interesting thread. 

Once you filter out or block the basement spin team looking just to argue, we have established two results. One group states Sonar sounds superior to protools for example, then the other camp will call anyone crazy for thinking daws sound different.  Can we have it both ways? So if I'm a guitar player and x1 colors my mix better then protools, then indeed the engines have something going on under the hood. Or does that only work when it favors my beliefs?

Here we go again? It was established early in this thread that a null test on a single track would most likely be comparable in results. In fact, it was also mentioned user errors can be a culprit. When we compose with Sonar, we all use different means to produce music. Some are heavily dependent on midi, some elastic audio. Do we all share the paths getting from point a to b? How many times have you asked yourself "oh I didn't know you could do that this way!"


Now, knowing the endless possiblies we approach our music, we can also link the possibly that bugs will be found according to how the end users produce, what methods are used. I still suspect that how the audio is piped, routed, or mixed can influence that null perfect signal we all want. This can by why some see it some don't.


The forums I believe should be for intelligent debates. We might not all agree on the topic at hand, but strive to improve what we are all passioniate about - X1. I'd like to see Sonar used more in the industry, but we also need to address problems that folks have not insult or downplay the customers. We are all keeping Cakewalk afloat by being long term users of the software.


Best regards,

Well Scott, I admit to being in the camp where I do not believe they color the sound. That said, I am NOT in the camp that would call you or anyone else experiencing this, "crazy". I can only speak for myself and produced a pretty credible test that complied with what the OP mentioned. I don't know if you heard my test samples, but in my opinion and that of others, there were no blatantly obvious differences other than human performance issues because I literally played the same piece individually into each DAW I tested as well as exported from each one.
 
I would think if there was a problem, it would be pretty obvious. It's not like a DAW would just color one instrument and not another, right? I didn't even use a good soundcard to further prove things. I have done this same test with various soundcards of great quality and converters such as Lynx, Apogee, RME, and Echo. I get the same results no matter what DAW I use as long as the same interface is used as well.
 
My front end is always the same. Either a direct box or mic's going through a console. One other thing I wanted to bring to your attention that others here as well as myself are sort of bugged about is, you made a few serious claims here which we questioned. We questioned them because you didn't provide any proof other than your text. I'm not calling you out or attempting to make you have to justify anything, but when you make the claims you have made in this thread without showing any audio examples at all, how can you expect people to really buy into it?
 
As soon as I read this thread and what people were saying, I took 10 minutes to record a little piece in each DAW using a clean sound with Guitar Rig 4 and a basic preset we all have. I ran out of a guitar pre-amp that I use that was on bypass. When in bypass mode, it sounds and works exactly like a direct box. Two low Z in's to my Mackie 32x8 console on two channels, no pre-amp from the console used, channel faders at unity/center, board eq disabled, out of the board into 1/8 inch line in to a Realtek card recording at 16/44 with an input of -3dB peak vias master fader on my console. I did this test purposely from my house using my crap system in order to show what a regular, ordinary customer may get.
 
Studio One 2, Sonar X1 Expanded and Reaper were used. I have the latest updates on all three. I recorded each part inside of a different DAW giving me 3 different performances exported out of each DAW it was created in. The results? They sounded identical. Forget nulls and all that stuff for a second...do a test like I did and let your ears be the judge. If we have to do a null test to show us something that we can't hear on our own, how much of a difference could there be? Even if the null test shows a difference, the way you described your problem on here...it should be blatantly obvious there is a color change. We should also be able to hear this colorization if it truly exists. Is there any way you can give us some steps to recreate so we can try to hear what you hear?
 
Make it basic like I did. If you are using an analog front end that we can't duplicate, what if you got rid of it and tried the same tests just to see if we can get what you get? It should be easy enough to do. You should be able to take a DI right into your DAWs of choice and get these anomalies you hear. If you can get them, so can we unless something in your set-up is different somewhere. But I'm willing to try whatever you say to attempt to duplicate your findings. But you gotta work with me/us. :)
 
I'm really interested in getting to what may be causing the stuff you hear. I never once thought you or anyone else was crazy....I just wish I could duplicate what you hear so I could jump on the train and help to fix what you think may be broken if indeed it IS broken. But if I can't hear it and I don't see any proof with some merit behind it, it makes it tougher to swallow man, know what I mean?
 
-Danny 


Danny,


I wasnt referring to one single individual regarding this thread. I am in the process of putting demo clips for Cakewalk to examine as well as the standard .ini and data sheets.

I was not also doubting any of your work also, so don't take it to heart. You are a guitarist, I am too.. Admittely though the electronic dance world has taken a great deal more of my time. This is where we differ. My approach though is different due to the type of music I create. The plugins, the way we eq, the dynamic ranges we have to tweak. Acoustic instruments have a very predictable range set while edm does not. 

Have you noticed that sonar has a very guitar heavy crowd? Sure we see a few dance music and rap artists among us, but honestly why is that?  Is it marketing angle to permote "sonar the guitar friendly daw 2.0!". Cakewalk wants to tap into all the markets of course, hints the reason why we see beatscape, matrix, step sequencers, 64 bit rewire, etc. 

I do also understand the wide range of hardware, and how speakers, cards, settings can all effect sound. It's taken me honestly 29 years to get to where I am with music and mastering, so I feel quite confident on the technical aspects. You are correct in saying that it is always important to test on other rigs. I have tested on many rigs Danny, including home systems pcs, macs, and multi million dollar setups.

I will not be posting the files publically though rest assured cakewalk will have the files. I don't have all day to argue or play forum tug-a-war. I write music for quite a few clients and also run a music club in Hollywood so time is precious.

This goes right back to why I posted again on this thread. If I were a newcomer and saw a thread bashathon such as this, why would I ask any questions or report a problem? Just want folks to realize we need a fun, inviting experience. You never know, if you keep an open mind, you might just find those mysterious bugs people complain about.

Best,

Scott Lee (ASCAP)
SFX Media 
Song Composer / Engineer / Audio Director

http://www.youtube.com/user/Dezacrator?feature=mhee

John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 08:42:28 (permalink)
I think it's been fun.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 08:53:44 (permalink)
I never meant to bash on you or sound like I was doubting you, Scott. Honest I wasn't. I totally respect what you're saying I just wish I could duplicate it. I too have been at this over 30 years myself, so I can relate to the time spent....and I know you're fully aware of how everything works etc. I didn't mean to make what I said sound like a sermon....I know you are more than qualified and don't need to hear anything from me. :) But my point was, even when I record other instruments or even full projects, I don't hear a difference.

Where others are "science types" in this field, I'm a guy that will do other tests that I feel are equally as important but cater more towards "black or white". For example, if it helped the cause here, I could create a 1 minute project in each DAW if need be just to see if we get anything weird with all the instruments in place instead of just a clean guitar track. I could then re-create the exact same project in the next DAW and then the next. Wouldn't that be a perfect final test for something like this?

I understand the files you are talking about are for a client and that you can't disclose them. I fully respect that...but there's no way for you to take a few minutes and do a little test of sorts with some steps so we can try to see if we get it? I know what it's like to be busy brother...I do 12-18 hour days here 7 day per week and have been doing it this way since 2007. LOL! 6 hours sleep, eat, shower, feed my dad, give him his meds and I'm gone. I've been here at the studio since 6 pm last night. Hahaha! I may get out of here by 10:30 this morning. But all that aside, I always seem to find the time to do a little something. So if you too can get around to something small, know that I don't think you're crazy, am not trying to challenge you in any way or discredit you, and am really curious about this whole thing a little more than maybe I should be. Again, my apologies if you took my post the wrong way. I never intended to upset you or make you feel challenged....I'm just really interested in this. :)

Respectfully,

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4397
  • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
  • Location: Orange County, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 11:39:10 (permalink)
T h e  t  h  r  e  a   d     i    s      s       l      o       w       l         y          d               y                       i                       n                                 g.

Gear: A bunch of stuff.
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 17:42:56 (permalink)
Did anyone notice this had slipped off the front page?
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 17:55:44 (permalink)
Everyone's down the pub chatting to some birds...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I'll leave it now
 
 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 17:59:18 (permalink)
It only left the front page in the way that The Cure pretend they're not coming back for a six song encore given only the mildest encouragement. 

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 18:09:09 (permalink)
This thread was voted thread of the year on Gearslutz. True story. Voting has now closed but you may still be charged if you attempt to do so.
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/15 18:11:54 (permalink)
I'm going to throw something out here...

Is it possible that the Visual appearance of a DAW might influence the way people PERCEIVE its sound? Think the McGurk Effect here....

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
Page: << < ..2627282930.. > >> Showing page 26 of 31
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1