eve_ripper
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 57
- Joined: 2015/10/22 15:33:15
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/17 06:36:31
(permalink)
Maybe a bug
Wanted to export my track to share with other musicians. I wanted quick mp3. Selected export entire mix and after rendering file Ifound file with 2 seconds. Ok, disabled hp and lp filters in export to mp3 window. Now I've got a file with my audio exported but without any of virtual instruments audio. Do I really need to bounce them as audio before export? I think for quick bounces it should be fast and without such problems.
|
MarianoGF
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 63
- Joined: 2016/12/29 23:21:50
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/17 15:22:43
(permalink)
Feature request: SELECTION LENGHT INFOIn Cakewalk we actually have two displays showing the selection info, which are "Select From" and "Select Thru". Would be very useful to have a third display showing the SELECTION LENGHT, as this example in Vegas Pro. Because actually if one need to know how long is lasting a song, must to calculate in mind the "Select From" and "Select Thru" information to guess it approximately. This is a bit annoying, and very easy to solve with this proposed "Selection Lenght Info" display. Also, as in the exaple gif, would be nice that the numbers change as we vary the selection, and not once we release the mouse button, as it happens now in our beloved Cakewalk. Thanks Cakewalk team for asking the users.
post edited by MarianoGF - 2018/04/17 15:59:23
|
MarianoGF
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 63
- Joined: 2016/12/29 23:21:50
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/17 16:23:35
(permalink)
Feature improvement: SAME TIME FORMATSI consider useful that "Selection", "Loop" and "Punch In/Out" displays in the Control Bar should change their time formats as we change the main "Current now time" format. The same would happen with the ruller time format as we change the Track Pane Header time format. Revision April 23, 2018:As I could experience in many other DAWs and video editors, It doesn't seem to be necessary to have dedicated displays for "Loop" and "Punch In". It is enough with the "Select From" and "Select Thru" displays (plus a third for "Selection Lenght") and keeping the two existing buttons to "set loop points to selection" and "set punch points to selection". This way we can save space in the control bar for expanding collapsed tools. Thanks Cakewalk for asking the users.
post edited by MarianoGF - 2018/04/25 15:17:02
|
StevenMikel
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 319
- Joined: 2010/06/04 00:16:35
- Location: Greenfield In.
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/17 20:13:32
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby jeremy@cominginsecond.com 2018/04/20 19:37:49
The ability to feed multiple soft synths from a single midi track,for a layered sound. Cubase does this with "midi sends",there is a video about this on YouTube.
|
CadErik
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 216
- Joined: 2006/05/14 15:19:57
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 02:51:01
(permalink)
meng It would help very much if people could share (with as much or as little detail as they want) the top 5 things they would love to see or to be improved in TDFKAS from SONAR - the more specific the better. Or if there are things that you feel we are sorely lacking versus other options in the market, it's all helpful to know. Everyone's workflow and priorities are not the same, so please stay civil!
Right now, because of the limitations listed here, I won't be starting new projects in Sonar. 1. Improved VST time sync - resync all the VST plugins after pause/start even if you are not resuming on a measure. StudioOne already does that. 2. Improved latency compensation (it can go crazy up to 20 sec). Same thing, this is much better handled in StudioOne 3. More reactive UI 4. Arranger track, like StudioOne.
|
coltpeacemaker
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 46
- Joined: 2015/05/06 02:02:53
- Location: Perth Western Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 06:28:47
(permalink)
☄ Helpfulby backwoods 2018/04/18 07:50:47
Can you make your borders in Sonar smaller! They take up so much real estate there no need for it. The pro channel and media/vst windows on the sides are about 1 cm each, can you thin it out and same for the bottom!! Also implement full track colours when using the dark theme like mercury not just a line off colour! But most off all pls fix the Matrix view, im a huge Ableton user and love the way Ableton handles audio clips. The matrix is too clunky in the way it works and records atm! pls can you look into it because that's where you guys fall down! As much as i love recording and playing guitar, electronic music is HUGE and that's one off the reason Sonar keeps failing you need to make it so we tech heads have a easy to use DAW that's capable off traditional recording for users that use guitars,drums etc but EDM lovers also have a STRONG platform that's just as easy to use. Also the GUI is looking really tired! And the fonts and quite dated and need to be brought into 2018 and beyond And lastly better surface control in Sonar as its quite difficult atm to integrate some into Sonar where in other DAWs such as Ableton,Cubase,Reason,fl studio its a snap... Cheers Meng and the team.....
post edited by coltpeacemaker - 2018/04/18 09:10:06
|
coltpeacemaker
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 46
- Joined: 2015/05/06 02:02:53
- Location: Perth Western Australia
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 08:35:05
(permalink)
Fl studio used to be the biggest electronic DAW but Ableton has easily overtaken it! Just go on youtube and type in electronic tutorials and its all nearly Ableton live and i love it too! Just bought 10 and its brilliant...
|
sonarjeff
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5
- Joined: 2015/06/20 00:15:37
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 17:59:52
(permalink)
Hi Meng, It would he helpful if the "input quantization" mode could be activated by simply right clicking on the track selected for recording and have that display as a selectable option and/or have "Record with Quantize" as a recording mode option. Thanks much and it's terrific to see all the great things BandLab is offering the Cakewalk community. - Jeff -
|
Yurim
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2018/02/26 03:56:32
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 19:30:57
(permalink)
Make sonar8.5 pro version one by using vst3 in sonar8.5 instead of sonar home edition. Please do not get the version now, just release the sonar8.5pro version at a low price and let vst3 use only the existing 8.5. I'm begging you. Or, if you change the theme in the current version, you can return to the 8.5-time interface and use the 8.5 screenshots and features.
|
mickeymonster
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24
- Joined: 2017/03/06 23:50:04
- Location: Hawaii
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 22:11:15
(permalink)
Hi Meng. I have one. Of all my plug ins carried over, addictive drums is the only one lost. Its my favorite. I'm sad.
|
mickeymonster
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24
- Joined: 2017/03/06 23:50:04
- Location: Hawaii
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 22:18:40
(permalink)
ON SECOND THOUGHT, DON'T CHANGE ANYTHING YET. EVERYBODY WANTS SOMETHING DIFFERENT. GIVE US ALL A CHANCE TO PERCOLATE FOR A COUPLE MONTHS. THE SOFTWARE IS FINE THE WAY IT IS. WE NEED CONTROL SURFACES, NOT RADICAL UI CHANGES.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 22:20:06
(permalink)
mickeymonster Hi Meng. I have one. Of all my plug ins carried over, addictive drums is the only one lost. Its my favorite. I'm sad.
Addictive Drums and Addictive Drums 2 bundled with SONAR were the full retail versions. Other than not being installed or missing from the CbB scan path, there is no reason AD and AD2 should be missing from CbB.
|
mickeymonster
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 24
- Joined: 2017/03/06 23:50:04
- Location: Hawaii
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 23:10:06
(permalink)
Cakewalk Sound Center (Synth Rack) and addictive drums are missing from my plug ins. I can still find them in SONAR platinum. My request is please don't dismantle command center and Sonar prematurely. We all need to continue to open both the old and new program to be able to tell what works and what doesn't.
|
scook
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 24146
- Joined: 2005/07/27 13:43:57
- Location: TX
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/18 23:15:31
(permalink)
Any plug-in that shows up in 64bit SONAR but is not in CbB is most likely a problem with the CbB scan path. CSC was effectively replaced when Rapture Session was released. Rapture Session was bundled with every version of SONAR and automatically integrates CSC content into its browser.
|
iRelevant
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
- Total Posts : 430
- Joined: 2017/10/25 21:14:48
- Location: Norway
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/19 11:34:26
(permalink)
I've been thinking some more ... and would like to voice my opinion. Now that CbB has become a x64 only DAW, which I presume is the way of the future ... and ultimately the only alternative ... In my opinion it is critically important to make sure that a well functioning bridge to 32-bit plugs is in place. I would like to see CbB turn its legacy history into a feature. To benefit from it's past achievements, not to throw it in the garbage as old fashioned and un-modern. A DAW that cherishes it's legacy and glorious innovative past. I also think it is important to make the support for a vast range of legacy MIDI equipments more accessible, and a feature ... as I understand it Azlow ? has done a lot of work in this area for controllers, and it might be a good move to get him aboard on this part ... if he's not already. I also think some kind of cooperation with SoundQuest when it comes to MIDI equipment, and integration to the SoundQuest program, could be advantageous for both. Further more I would like to see the support for DX plugins and DXi instruments make a obvious overt comeback. Reaper, another great fairly recent DAW has it out in the open, so why would CbB hide and be seem close to abandon it ? Doesn't make sense to me. To attract and recruit new users, I think special focus should be made in future versions to cater to the Modular Crowd as well as Mobile users (Apple and Android). Myself would like to see easier integration with my myriads of iPad musical apps and CbB, I haven't gone modular yet ... but it's coming. Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback ... all the best. Regards, Sven
|
fresh101
Max Output Level: -75 dBFS
- Total Posts : 772
- Joined: 2004/01/12 15:15:59
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/19 17:58:29
(permalink)
Add/ remove slice marker to groove clips in editor. Ala recycle.
|
steveau58
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3
- Joined: 2015/01/17 16:55:19
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/19 21:03:16
(permalink)
|
Liquid Noise 23
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7
- Joined: 2015/01/13 12:52:50
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 13:05:21
(permalink)
I would like to see better handling of audio interfaces. I have latency issues when playing VST i's through the Focusrite interfaces. I don't have any issues with my ZOOM interfaces and I had this problem even before Band Lab took over so it has to be a problem within the software. It is safe to say it is not my setup because I don't have any latency issues with any other DAW, unless I am doing something wrong.
|
zblip2@gmail.com
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 105
- Joined: 2014/11/21 17:25:06
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 16:02:32
(permalink)
Please make the video engine better... Please please please... Everyone working to picture for Publicity, film etc is suffering with the present video engine. Sonar is 10 years behind. Sonar is loosing users because anybody serious about writing to picture has to migrate to another daw (any other) to have a stable and professional work flow. When a movie is imported in Sonar, it is locked at the beginning of the timeline with no possibility of moving it, also, when you play Sonar past the video in the time line, things freeze up and get sluggish... Sonar has Codex incompatibilities with popular video formats... It is just a mess... please fix this
|
zblip2@gmail.com
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 105
- Joined: 2014/11/21 17:25:06
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 16:29:30
(permalink)
Sonar used to have a nice and usefull destructive pitch shifter which offered the possibility to retain legnth or not... BUT THEY ABANDONED IT FOR NO REASON!!! Why??? Every daw needs this basic audio process Please put one back in the audio process list. Something like this:
|
zblip2@gmail.com
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 105
- Joined: 2014/11/21 17:25:06
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 16:52:04
(permalink)
Please return to simpler times. It makes no sense to have two effects slots for each track: usual fx insert area AND pro Channel... It takes space and is redundant. I Sonar commits to pro channel, then make it simple and universal and optimize it. Automation... There again, I played around with Ableton live's automation and everything is so much more straight forward. Sonar Platinum tried to mimic a Recording Studio as much as possible, with fancy graphics and rackmounted units... But we are past this now. You guys have to decide which side of the fence you want to be. This has been Sonar's problem. Either you are a bad ass composition tool (Ablelton), or a jack of all trades production daw (Pro Tools). If you want to stay on the fence, then you better have an harmonious package.. more harmonious the Sonar Platinum was.
|
zblip2@gmail.com
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 105
- Joined: 2014/11/21 17:25:06
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 17:04:10
(permalink)
I went on Youtube and looked at old Sonar 8.5 videos... Go check it out. So much cleaner UI with lots of realestate. I remember when you could customise all the widgets in the top view.. It looked great and was functionnal. Please go back to this mindset. Blend in better plugin automation and you got a winner! Less Graphics, more logic
|
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 19:46:50
(permalink)
My feature request is to ignore everything zblip2@gmail.com has to say. Cakewalk is near perfect exactly as it is. After using Studio One for a few weeks, there are a few things I would like to incorporate into Cakewalk. In Studio One 3, there are more options for shaping an automation envelope. Tools similar to a bezier tool (I think that's what it's called) in Photoshop and Illustrator. I thought that was great. I also like the idea that someone said of having one MIDI file feed more than one soft synths. The other thing that I like from Studio One was nestable track folders. Only being able to go one layer deep is not ideal. None of these limitations, however, changes in any way the fact that Sonar/Cakewalk is the best DAW on the planet in my book. The brief time I spent with Studio One only reinforces that.
|
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 19:49:58
(permalink)
Also, since Cakewalk by Bandlab doesn't have a pitch correction solution currently, I think it would be a great idea to try to get V-Vocal in Cakewalk again. I'd think you could get the code for a song from Roland. I really like V-Vocal, other than some stability issues. In fact, there are some things about V-Vocal I actually like better than Melodyne (though, if I had to choose only one, I'd have to go with Melodyne).
|
poetnprophet
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 128
- Joined: 2016/07/23 12:56:57
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 20:01:29
(permalink)
I would also like to add, please: - Ability to move multiple tracks at once. Currently to arrange tracks, you have to have incredible foresight, or incredible patience. Please please and thank you! Dave
|
msmcleod
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
- Total Posts : 920
- Joined: 2004/01/27 07:15:30
- Location: Scotland
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 21:42:34
(permalink)
There are a few free pitch correction VST's out there as an alternative e.g. Graillon 2 Free, Melda Production's MAutoPitch, GSnap and KeroVee.
For pitch To MIDI... years ago, Sonar (or maybe it was Cakewalk Pro Audio) used to have a monophonic pitch to MIDI converter... may this could be put back in to CbB as a fallback for those who don't have V-Vocal or Melodyne installed?
Also, I seem to remember on Sonar Platinum, the pitch to midi (dragging from an audio track to a midi track) worked regardless of whether Melodyne was actually registered/activated or not - i.e. it just needed to be installed. In any case Meloydne Essentials doesn't offer pitch to MIDI natively, so there must be something else Sonar was doing. Whether this method works in CbB or not, I don't know.
M.
|
reevant
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 18
- Joined: 2015/04/23 18:12:16
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 22:27:59
(permalink)
I decided I would look about for a new daw when Sonar lost support after looking I chose Reaper. Reaper has a very simple way to adjust the tempo of audio files and leave the pitch as it was (or change it if you want). This comes in very useful for say slowing tempo at the end of a song albeit initially recorded (or generated) at a constant tempo.
I found editing audio such as cutting or copying and pasteing far simpler in Reaper. The way crossovers and or merging the items are done is far simpler.
I would keep Reaper just to perform these tasks even though I prefer Cakewalk.
|
poetnprophet
Max Output Level: -88 dBFS
- Total Posts : 128
- Joined: 2016/07/23 12:56:57
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/20 23:13:11
(permalink)
I have been checking out Bandlab.com quite a bit over the last week. I've got a profile, uploaded some projects and tracks, checked out the community, trying to see what it's all about. I was very skeptical at first, but now think I see where there is some good potential. Here's what I'd like to see in terms of integration between Cakewalk and Bandlab: - Upload to bandlab account directly from CbB by WAV or MP3/etc. Even better to add metatags, images, description etc in this step also. I see this as a way to share private mixes with clients, get their feedback, etc, without a going through email, dropbox, etc. - Inversely, ability to import forkable projects from Bandlab directly into Cakewalk. - Share CbB projects through the Bandlab platform. Upload and/or import entire projects for two reasons: 1) to share with clients and collaborators as the current system allows via forking, and 2) Edit projects and mixes remotely (sometimes I do a mix, and later I realize I want to make a small level adjustment. Doing this remotely on my laptop would be fantastic rather than going all the way back to the studio, perhaps export bounced stems, or maybe just save the state of the plugins?) - Forking mechanism built into Cakewalk that follows the project whether online (bandlab) or offline, perhaps replacing or adding to the Mix Recall feature. I think having project/mix forks could be helpful tracking project progress. cheers, Dave
|
pdarg
Max Output Level: -52.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2265
- Joined: 2004/03/26 17:52:53
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/21 01:17:45
(permalink)
Here's a quick feature that could be added to a future version of Cakewalk: A simple latency meter that displays what the current latency value is (in milliseconds) They do this now in Presonus Studio One (version 3).
|
Daibhidh
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
- Total Posts : 204
- Joined: 2016/11/25 21:51:53
- Status: offline
Re: Feature Requests + Improvements [New 29/3/2018]
2018/04/21 06:08:28
(permalink)
MarianoGF Feature improvement: SAME TIME FORMATS
I consider useful that "Selection", "Loop" and "Punch In/Out" displays in the Control Bar should change their time formats as we change the main "Current now time" format. The same would happen with the ruller time format as we change the Track Pane Header time format. Thanks Cakewalk for asking the users.
I second this. It's a very simple request, but very useful.
|