sdpate


Silly boy, you can't discount reality with conspiracy theories. Ran X1 for 5 weeks, from the first day and praised it high and low until it wouldn't work. I've been testing beta software for over 20 years. If CW said it was beta code I'd have treated it as such. The old story is under promise and over deliver. X1 over promised and didn't deliver. That's why people are upset.

Well, what does that mean exactly? Until it wouldn't work? .
What you mean is: until it wouldn't work "FOR ME ON MY SYSTEM(s).
Posting it's unusable or doesn't work is ridiculous.  At least post it correctly. What do you think the rest of us are making it up that it works OK for us?
Jeeeezzzz.

You can post form your andriod phone?
What app are you using

VigilantSound


The quoteing on this forum does suck, especially if your onj a mobile like and android phone or an i phone... no spell check no copy paste no quotes.... it used to be better....

There is a spell check. There is also a quote and unquote.The quote is to the right of the full justification icon. Spell check is the first icon.

I don't like this forum software either but it does have the things we use the most. What I miss is the reply to indication. 

I thought most of the negative post were from old users who didn't like the new version?

It's not so much what you say......
it's how you say it.

the more humble you are....
the less likely you will argue or be rude

John

VigilantSound


The quoteing on this forum does suck, especially if your onj a mobile like and android phone or an i phone... no spell check no copy paste no quotes.... it used to be better....

There is a spell check. There is also a quote and unquote.The quote is to the right of the full justification icon. Spell check is the first icon.

I don't like this forum software either but it does have the things we use the most. What I miss is the reply to indication. 

 
 
Fixed
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

stratman70

sdpate


Silly boy, you can't discount reality with conspiracy theories. Ran X1 for 5 weeks, from the first day and praised it high and low until it wouldn't work. I've been testing beta software for over 20 years. If CW said it was beta code I'd have treated it as such. The old story is under promise and over deliver. X1 over promised and didn't deliver. That's why people are upset.

Well, what does that mean exactly? Until it wouldn't work? .
What you mean is: until it wouldn't work "FOR ME ON MY SYSTEM(s).
Posting it's unusable or doesn't work is ridiculous.  At least post it correctly. What do you think the rest of us are making it up that it works OK for us?
Jeeeezzzz.

Um, don't you think when someone posts they DO mean "their system" not yours?

I don't get your thinking.  Unless you're suggesting they have to use the words you want them to?

Middleman


Billy and Scott are buddies so expect them to support each other in all things. Look at the number of Billy posts after Scott comments. It's ingratiating. Scott has whined excessively about his issues. I think everyone got it about post 50 that he is not happy with X1. He finally got the attention he was seeking when Noel responded to him personally. I say enough, I was tired of his negativity about the product and I called out his environment. Not to say he didn't have a problem, just the excessive way he went about making it known.

Man, you make a lot of assumptions Phil.   Scott and I hardly know each other, though we have been communicating about some things lately.   And I only support things I think are right, not who it's coming from.   You can believe that or not, but it's fact for me.

Scott hasn't whined.  He has brought up issues - some of which CW has acknowledged That's whining?  SHeesh.  Yet you call his finding a bug "getting attention"??

So you're whole deal is you'd like to throttle how much people can say?  Or how they say it?

You accused him of things and even called him BS.   I think it is you who should look inside, perhaps.

But I really don't want to get into yet another pissing contest on the Sonar forums.  The facts can speak for themselves.

Hey musicman100,
 
  I with ya on this one.  I felt that way all along.  All the complaining made me not load X1.  Now that I have i'm finding the horrors don't exist on my machine.  I'm still having a hard time finding things and A LOT of the time I think I'm finding a bug when I'm just using the wrong command.

  I have got to quit hitting "E" for erase in the PRV when that turns on and off the effects.  I thought there was a bug doing it ,  but it was me! 

ba_midi

stratman70

sdpate


Silly boy, you can't discount reality with conspiracy theories. Ran X1 for 5 weeks, from the first day and praised it high and low until it wouldn't work. I've been testing beta software for over 20 years. If CW said it was beta code I'd have treated it as such. The old story is under promise and over deliver. X1 over promised and didn't deliver. That's why people are upset.

Well, what does that mean exactly? Until it wouldn't work? .
What you mean is: until it wouldn't work "FOR ME ON MY SYSTEM(s).
Posting it's unusable or doesn't work is ridiculous.  At least post it correctly. What do you think the rest of us are making it up that it works OK for us?
Jeeeezzzz.

Um, don't you think when someone posts they DO mean "their system" not yours?

I don't get your thinking.  Unless you're suggesting they have to use the words you want them to?

Well, Billy, read the posts about folks who it works for -99.9% say something like "works OK for me"-works oK here". or Fine here so far.
What would a "noobie" think of either posts. Hey Joe, bunch of guys say it works OK for them.
Hey Joe, these two guys say it's unusable>
Sorry, Billy-I do not want to argue with you but I believe thier is a difference. Maybe it's just the perceived tone when no further definition is given.
Please, do not insult me-Do I want them to use my words. Come on. Man. Friggin' insane here.

marcos69


Holy mackerel

Is that a Mackerel or a tuna, Sushi anyone?
 
X1 Rocks. 
 
Despite the fact the keyboard shortcuts don't work as I expect, i.e. Q to mute a clip, Shift N, ect  X1 is big step forward.
 
Change is good.  I think we need some civil discourse on X1
 
 

stratman70

ba_midi

stratman70

sdpate


Silly boy, you can't discount reality with conspiracy theories. Ran X1 for 5 weeks, from the first day and praised it high and low until it wouldn't work. I've been testing beta software for over 20 years. If CW said it was beta code I'd have treated it as such. The old story is under promise and over deliver. X1 over promised and didn't deliver. That's why people are upset.

Well, what does that mean exactly? Until it wouldn't work? .
What you mean is: until it wouldn't work "FOR ME ON MY SYSTEM(s).
Posting it's unusable or doesn't work is ridiculous.  At least post it correctly. What do you think the rest of us are making it up that it works OK for us?
Jeeeezzzz.

Um, don't you think when someone posts they DO mean "their system" not yours?

I don't get your thinking.  Unless you're suggesting they have to use the words you want them to?

Well, Billy, read the posts about folks who it works for -99.9% say something like "works OK for me"-works oK here". or Fine here so far.
What would a "noobie" think of either posts. Hey Joe, bunch of guys say it works OK for them.
Hey Joe, these two guys say it's unusable>
Sorry, Billy-I do not want to argue with you but I believe thier is a difference. Maybe it's just the perceived tone when no further definition is given.
Please, do not insult me-Do I want them to use my words. Come on. Man. Friggin' insane here.

I agree some posts go overboard.  Some posts are downright nasty.  But some posts are also understandable because people were disappointed by how it's working for them.

There are posts that get on my nerves too - I think we all have experienced that.

I'm not trying to insult you at all, though;  But if someone says "X1 doesn't work" - don't you think they are, in fact, talking about their system and their experience?

What I don't understand is why people feel so protective and upset by those things.   I agree if someone is going to go public with a harsh statement about the product they should back it up with facts rather than just ranting.

But after all, this is the internet - and it's human beings.  I just wish we'd all be a little more tolerant of the anxiety some people are experiencing.

If it's working for you (you being whoever, that is), then why not be just a tiny bit more compassionate for those it's not doing as well for.   I don't see any harm in that.

And I think you make a good point about "perceived tone."   Some users are not even American and they may express differently.  Some users may not be well educated for all we know, so they didn't learn good manners.   It takes all kinds, as they say.

Like you, I think it's good to call someone out for just ranting without real information.  But I just don't want to let myself become too judgmental too quickly.

I'm actually try to reach a point where I simply don't care about this forum as much.  It really has turned sour lately.  And that's a shame.   I always felt a strong bond with our community here.

Maybe this too shall pass, as they say.  But for now it's a rough road be on.

Scott, let's make this right. For clarity, your video did not appear like a normal startup of X1 i.e. launching from the desktop. It appeared to me as a virtual environment which is why I called it BS, not you by the way as you and Billy have implied, but the so called tested "bugs" in what appeared to be a virtual environment. I felt this was an unfair test to expect normal operations of the software. In the end you clarified it was not virtualized. So here is my apology for that comment. Also, Noel clarified that under the setting you had, the bug would appear, I did not have those settings and could not duplicate it. Was actually trying to help there.

I still do believe you have created an unfair perspective on X1 across numerous threads, snide comments and a high number of the same repeated complaints which did not seek resolutions due to your particular environment not running well. You are running on XP which is no longer supported by Microsoft but you expect Cakewalk to support you on that OS indefinitely. I think you've got all the mileage you are going to get out of that environment.

I can understand your frustration 10Ten and appreciate those kind words. The fact is your dancing with the less efficiency over time by not upgrading. I know it's published but the reality is, and in my experience with DAW software over 10 years, the more you trail, the higher your likelihood of encountering issues. I didn't make the rules but they are what they are when you are dealing with open platform.
 
Service Pack 3 is extended through 2014 but all prior versions are done.

The majority of people having issues right now are running XP from the threads going on here. Not sure they are all on service pack 3 by the way. I know that's what Sonar has published but look at the issues a lot of XP users are having.
 
By the way, what versions are you guys running?

Zuma

Nobody likes to hear their favorite sports team sucks, LOL.
"Hey! What the hell are you saying? You sonofa...."

Boy, does this hit the nail on the head!  Reading the various threads about the multiple problems in X1 -- and the vitriol coming from fanboys -- seemed exactly like this.  "How dare you saying anything negative about MY team!" 

Well, from the number of comments on various threads, by some very respected and long-time members of this forum, it would appear that "your team" (actually, OUR team) has a serious, serious problem. 

Just sayin. . . .