rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/06 23:34:41
(permalink)
chckn8r1 Randy and all, Sigh, yes, the tempo was indeed the default 120bpm in the file. Apologies as I honestly didn't realize it. I adjusted the tempo to 112 and bounced out the result to post here for your own edification. Apologies to all. D It's really not that big of a deal, Dave, but thanks for checking. This is still confusing though - You opened the file directly, or did you import it? We're trying to understand better how things work in Logic. Is there actually a way to open a MIDI file in Logic without the program ignoring the file's programmed tempo? And - um--I think the new version you posted is still the fast tempo - I don't think that's 112 bpm.-- Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Michael135
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 20
- Joined: 2010/09/02 18:30:08
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/06 23:39:59
(permalink)
Dave, I'm glad you liked my track. I spent a lot of time on it, and I'm glad that others are actually able to hear all the love and care I put into it. I was very worried that people wouldn't even notice. lol The soundcloud page is working, so I suggest just trying again and seeing if it works now. I've found sometimes the server doesn't work, and you just have to try at a later time. I used a mix of stacato trumpets, various sustained trumpets, layered in with some stacato on the attacks to give it an extra little punch when needed. I'm actually quite happy with the end result, as they sound just how I wanted them, but it did take a lot of work. I didn't really worry about having more trumpet players than was in the original. It's not overly noticeable that it's technically too many players, as long as you're careful with your levels. As for the solo trumpet, I did boost the levels slightly on it. The objective was to actually be able to distinguish it as a solo trumpet and hear it above the rest, but just to the point that you could begin to distinguish it as a solo instrument, so that it still blended into the mix. Randy, I listened again to his entry after listening to what the muted trumpets sounded like, and it definitely doesn't sound muted. The marcato trumpet samples in SO have a very "fuzzy" sound to them, and I mistook them for muted trumpets at first.
post edited by Michael135 - 2010/09/06 23:42:10
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/06 23:44:06
(permalink)
Dave - I appreciate you wanting to post the 112 bpm version, but as I posted a little while ago, what you have on your link is still at 120 bpm. Here's a screen capture I just did - An actual 112 bpm version is in the top track, your new MP3 is in the second track, ending early just as your original entry did. - Maybe you grabbed the wrong file earlier when you posted that link: Oh well! Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/06 23:48:15
(permalink)
Michael135 I listened again to his entry after listening to what the muted trumpets sounded like, and it definitely doesn't sound muted. The marcato trumpet samples in SO have a very "fuzzy" sound to them, and I mistook them for muted trumpets at first. Ah, thanks for the follow up, Michael. I was getting concerned that a music major didn't know what muted trumpets sound like. Thanks for the reassurance. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Michael135
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 20
- Joined: 2010/09/02 18:30:08
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/06 23:53:38
(permalink)
I'm a woodwind player, what did you expect? :p I'm the guy that no one ever seems to hear, but is always super busy hanging on for dear life through all those HORRIBLE runs composers (including my self) always think sound so nice. In other words, I don't really pay much attention to what ever the heck the trumpets are doing. I usually have other things on my mind, such as trying to get my poor fingers to move faster. ;) I don't get to really hear muted trumpets all that often, and when I do, they're usually mixed in with non muted ones, so it's not all that obvious.
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 00:25:20
(permalink)
Michael135 I'm a woodwind player, what did you expect? :p I'm the guy that no one ever seems to hear, but is always super busy hanging on for dear life through all those HORRIBLE runs composers (including my self) always think sound so nice. In other words, I don't really pay much attention to what ever the heck the trumpets are doing. I usually have other things on my mind, such as trying to get my poor fingers to move faster. ;) I don't get to really hear muted trumpets all that often, and when I do, they're usually mixed in with non muted ones, so it's not all that obvious. Seek out "Aura" - concept jazz album featuring Miles Davis. Muted trumpet supreme. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 07:35:29
(permalink)
Michael135 I'm glad you liked my track. I spent a lot of time on it, and I'm glad that others are actually able to hear all the love and care I put into it. I was very worried that people wouldn't even notice. lol I was worried too - and I was right!!!!!
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 08:14:50
(permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey Michael135 I'm glad you liked my track. I spent a lot of time on it, and I'm glad that others are actually able to hear all the love and care I put into it. I was very worried that people wouldn't even notice. lol I was worried too - and I was right!!!!! I voted for you, so you were right to worry
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 08:40:19
(permalink)
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
cliffr
Max Output Level: -80 dBFS
- Total Posts : 539
- Joined: 2010/02/19 21:44:43
- Location: Wellington, New Zealand
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 08:45:25
(permalink)
rbowser Michael135 I'm a woodwind player, what did you expect? :p I'm the guy that no one ever seems to hear, but is always super busy hanging on for dear life through all those HORRIBLE runs composers (including my self) always think sound so nice. In other words, I don't really pay much attention to what ever the heck the trumpets are doing. I usually have other things on my mind, such as trying to get my poor fingers to move faster. ;) I don't get to really hear muted trumpets all that often, and when I do, they're usually mixed in with non muted ones, so it's not all that obvious. Seek out "Aura" - concept jazz album featuring Miles Davis. Muted trumpet supreme. Randy B. Yes Randy, awesome example and one of my favorites. I don't play horns, but listent to them quite a lot. I got to see Miles Davis the one time he came to New Zealand. In fact it was the first 'date concert' with my wife to be, back ... Umm 21 years there abouts. That was my wife's introduction to jazz, it was one hell of a concert, literally blew us away!. I think off the top of my head I'd say I particularly like Aura, Tutu, and Decoy, and some of the stuff out on DVD now too. It's been really interesting to check this competition, and now this 'results are in' discussion. I haven't listened to all the entries - just over 50, enough to learn some things of value. Thanks for that guys, you did something really good, that most people just wouldn't do. Now after all this earlier talk about sax and JABB, I have to go check it out. I have the GPO and I'm finding that great, I also have Miroslav but I can get some rather strange results with that at times. Maybe it's just me doing something strange - wouldn't be the first time :-) Awesome job guys Cheers - Cliff
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 10:07:00
(permalink)
T.S. Thanks a lot Randy, heh heh back in those days it took a lot of Sys-X and bank changes to get the limited synths I had to do this. I'm enjoying this thread very much, lot's of interesting posts. Tod OH yes, the fun to be had working with Sysex in hardware synths. They could be such versatile beasts. I'm enjoying this thread a lot too - I agree, Tod, that there's a lot of interesting, good discussion going on. The majority of the posts here show-off the Forum at its best. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 10:10:22
(permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey Michael135 I'm glad you liked my track. I spent a lot of time on it, and I'm glad that others are actually able to hear all the love and care I put into it. I was very worried that people wouldn't even notice. lol I was worried too - and I was right!!!!! Colin "Bristol Jonesey" - I certainly noticed your entry #53, and I'm sure other people did too. It's a very good version. You should feel good about the work you did. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 10:15:00
(permalink)
cliffr I got to see Miles Davis the one time he came to New Zealand. In fact it was the first 'date concert' with my wife to be, back ... Umm 21 years there abouts. That was my wife's introduction to jazz, it was one hell of a concert, literally blew us away!. Nice! You're really fortunate to have seen Miles Davis in concert - I can believe it was a concert that blew you away. The albums he made in that era, including "Aura" are such mesmerizing, incredibly crafted sound excursions. Brilliant stuff. Wouldn't it be amazing to pull something like that off with MIDI?! Thanks for posting about your concert memory. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 10:46:50
(permalink)
rbowser Bristol_Jonesey Michael135 I'm glad you liked my track. I spent a lot of time on it, and I'm glad that others are actually able to hear all the love and care I put into it. I was very worried that people wouldn't even notice. lol I was worried too - and I was right!!!!! Colin "Bristol Jonesey" - I certainly noticed your entry #53, and I'm sure other people did too. It's a very good version. You should feel good about the work you did. Randy B. Hey - cheers Randy! I appreciate your kind words.
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Matt
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 346
- Joined: 2003/11/06 22:23:40
- Location: La Canada Flintridge, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 10:55:20
(permalink)
About the 64GB: I honestly have no idea if I can or could use all of this. 95% of my samples are loaded onto external computers, the only things I run within SONAR are Stylus, Omnisphere, and Kontakt (just for LASS and stuff like Morphestra, Synergy, Evolve, etc). When I had this computer built last September they told me I'd only be able to access 48GB max, but I really really hate upgrading computer stuff so I told them to put the absolute max, state-of-the-art, fastest everything they could, under the theory that eventually the software would catch up and it would save me upgrading for years. RB, to clarify a few things in my post you had questioned: When I said I wanted to hear an interpretation of the MIDI file using any and all means necessary, I meant combining and doubling different sample libraries to achieve the best possible sound, as opposed to being limited to using one library for the entire demo or at least one library for each orchestral section. What I meant by using other techinques to make the MP3 sound better is that, once it became a contest, you may or may not have people that just want to win, and don't care about being true to the sample library. For example, maybe the strings sound a bit weak, so they pull in a sample from another library and softly layer it underneath to sweeten the patch, which would be against the guidelines of the contest but would possibly make their overall MP3 sound better and giving them a better chance to win. I'm not saying anyone did this or accusing anyone of doing this, just mentioning that it's a possibility. The only reason I bring that up is just because there's a lot of grey area... the EQ-ing of the samples being one of them. And the point I was (poorly) trying to make is that perhaps once it became a contest, it became more about production and less about featuring the sample library. I guess what I don't get is, even if there's a ton of bass parts in the MIDI file, aren't they there for a reason? And wouldn't you want to hear those frequencies in the samples so you know what the samples sound like? As far as my preference for the Miroslav solo winds... this is an old sample library that I've used for what, maybe 10 years now? I think part of the problem is that I'm so accustomed to hearing them and so used to working with them that they've sort of become the 'sound' of sampled instruments for me. I know that I use certain sounds in my projects that bother other people and I know other people use certain sounds that bother me, so it might just be a case of one's ears becoming familiar with certain libraries. I should also mention that I don't deem them 'solo' worthy... if I had a flute solo I'd bring in a flute player and record it live. But they are good for doubling strings and otherwise sit well in a mix. To me, anyway. I am not a fan of GPO, from what I've heard it really sounds like what you get is what you pay for. That said, I've heard some really great things in this project that came from GPO. But I am lazy and don't want anything that takes extra manipulation and it seems like GPO takes a little extra effort to sound good. This goes back to one of the original posts I made on this subject about 'writing to the sample' instead of trying to mainpulate the sample to your composition. (Oops edited for typos.)
post edited by Matt - 2010/09/07 10:58:17
|
Bristol_Jonesey
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 16775
- Joined: 2007/10/08 15:41:17
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 11:04:54
(permalink)
Matt I guess what I don't get is, even if there's a ton of bass parts in the MIDI file, aren't they there for a reason? And wouldn't you want to hear those frequencies in the samples so you know what the samples sound like? Matt, I have to say, I don't agree with this. We record drums & bass guitar allt he time, yet when it comes to mixing them down, if you don't carve out a suitable space for the kick & bass, you'll end up with nothing but mud at the lower end. The same applies to orchestral instruments - moreso due to the number of instruments competing down there: Basses, Bass trombones, Contra-Bassoons, Tubas, Tympani - if you left all that lot in there untreated it wouldn't sound very pleasing, don't you think? Just my 2pence
CbB, Platinum, 64 bit throughoutCustom built i7 3930, 32Gb RAM, 2 x 1Tb Internal HDD, 1 x 1TB system SSD (Win 7), 1 x 500Gb system SSD (Win 10), 2 x 1Tb External HDD's, Dual boot Win 7 & Win 10 64 Bit, Saffire Pro 26, ISA One, Adam P11A,
|
Matt
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 346
- Joined: 2003/11/06 22:23:40
- Location: La Canada Flintridge, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 11:20:57
(permalink)
That's why I used question marks in what you quoted... because I don't know what the answer is. For example I don't know if this is even possible, but... I know that I would like to have a sample library where everything is already EQ-d properly to sit in a mix so that I don't have to tweak it myself. I use a lot of live drums loops, and a lot of them take a lot of work to tweak and compress and EQ-- they are basically just raw recordings-- whereas others are already tweaked and produced and don't need any adjustments. I like the those ones better than the ones I have to tweak myself. Yes, I'm lazy, but it also comes down to time = money and I have to work at a pretty intense speed.
|
Michael135
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 20
- Joined: 2010/09/02 18:30:08
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 11:34:01
(permalink)
EWQLSO stuff sounds pretty darn good straight out of the box. I do next to nothing when it comes to EQ. Usually, I just slap a generic EQ to the entire track and that's about it.
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 12:03:46
(permalink)
Now, I just need to hear from Steve Cocchi. - SteveC - where aaaaaaaaaaaaare you? And which prize do you want?--GPO, JABB, COMB, Steinway, or World? Reply to my email address which you have. Hi Randy, sorry... I've been away from the PC since Friday. I know, I know... it practically borders on insane. Anyhow, I do have your email and I certainly will respond. I'm just having a difficult time making the decision! Having nothing to start with, GPO certainly seems like a shoo-in, particularly since the results here were good (yours was the one I noticed from the start). Then again, there's an upgrade path from DimPro's GPO Pocket Orchestra which none of the others offer... JAAB also seems interesting, but I understand from previous threads that it takes a little "massaging" for the right effect. But with time usually at a premium... I'm also interested in the upcoming World library, though obviously there's nothing to compare at this stage. It's a conundrum.  But I am open to any and all suggestions.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
- Total Posts : 26036
- Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
- Location: Everett, WA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 12:06:10
(permalink)
What I meant by using other techinques to make the MP3 sound better is that, once it became a contest, you may or may not have people that just want to win, and don't care about being true to the sample library. For example, maybe the strings sound a bit weak, so they pull in a sample from another library and softly layer it underneath to sweeten the patch, which would be against the guidelines of the contest but would possibly make their overall MP3 sound better and giving them a better chance to win. I'm not saying anyone did this or accusing anyone of doing this, just mentioning that it's a possibility. The only reason I bring that up is just because there's a lot of grey area... the EQ-ing of the samples being one of them. And the point I was (poorly) trying to make is that perhaps once it became a contest, it became more about production and less about featuring the sample library. I guess what I don't get is, even if there's a ton of bass parts in the MIDI file, aren't they there for a reason? And wouldn't you want to hear those frequencies in the samples so you know what the samples sound like? Matt, we had to allow multiple libraries because some submitters were using libraries that do not represent the full orchestra, such as LASS, which has no percussion. And we really did want to hear some of those high-priced libraries, in order to try to answer the big question: do the big-money solutions really justify their expense? We suggested that people at least stick to one library for each section, because otherwise it would be impossible to glean any information about the libraries. Most submitters honored that request. As for using EQ on samples, it's pretty hard not to. I found that the Miroslav violins were unbearably screetchy without EQ, for example. Of course, if we'd been miking a live orchestra in a great-sounding hall, the amount of EQ needed would be minimal if any. But samples are recorded in isolation, without benefit of the interaction with other instruments, and with microphones placed much closer than they would be in a live recording. Sampled instruments will never sound like the real thing for that reason, and EQ will always be required to fit them into whatever imaginary setting we're trying to fabricate. You're right about the bass. Orchestral music uses bass frequencies differently than pop and rock, using them less as rhythmic components and more for tonal fullness. But they certainly are crucial to that classic sound and anyone who uses EQ to artificially suppress or boost them is taking a big risk. I agree that once it became a contest it was suddenly more about production than the libraries under investigation. Randy and I did have some misgivings about that and worried that we'd lose sight of the purpose of the whole exercise, which was to learn more about orchestral libraries. But at the same time, we realized that we might also learn more about how to use those libraries, and we did. One of the higher vote-getters that didn't win a prize was Jonas' (jsaras) #21, made with the lowly TTS-1. That, to me, conveys useful information: that you can get respectable results with any library if you take care and know what you're doing.
post edited by bitflipper - 2010/09/07 12:09:00
 All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. My Stuff
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 12:10:38
(permalink)
Matt About the 64GB: I honestly have no idea if I can or could use all of this. etc. Hi, Matt - Thanks for the detailed reply/post. Great stuff. This 64 gigs of RAM thing--makes my head spin like a top. I was so thrilled when I finally moved up to 4 gigs not all that long ago! hehe. Yes, I see what you mean now. You'd like to hear some Treks done with no restrictions, more like some of the later entries which used the more standard pick-and-choose approach. I'm sure some slicker versions of this file could be produced, but there are definitely issues in that file which would call for a lot of editing in order to produce a more top-notch recording. The piano shouldn't be there, for instance. And some of the harmonic lines are missing, some of rhythms are wrong, the whole thing was quantized - lots of problems. And that dove-tails into your next point/question: " ... I guess what I don't get is, even if there's a ton of bass parts in the MIDI file, aren't they there for a reason? And wouldn't you want to hear those frequencies in the samples?..." No, they really aren't there for a reason, and no I don't want to hear all that in the mix - it was a problem with a number of entries in this contest in fact, the bottom-heavy dull sound some had- Because this isn't an authentic scoring of the music. It was put together by an amateur by ear. He has a bass drum rumbling along with the tympani for instance - that shouldn't be there, and it introduced a pile up in the bass frequencies. You're assuming too much about the level of expertise to be found in this source MIDI file. It was good enough for our purposes, and its flaws made for interesting challenges actually - but the main point was that at least everyone was using the same imperfect source data. I think because sampled instruments have become as sophisticated as they have, a higher expectation grows among users to do less and less work when using them. I think that's not a good trend, and has some users living in a fantasy land where they think all they have to do is run their notation file through a library and instantly have a great recording. Getting back to EQ again - What kind of EQ work is needed can only be determined on a project-by-project basis. When auditioned separately, the instruments in most libraries sound great by themselves. And you can put a number of instruments together without needing to do any EQ massaging - but the higher the instrument count, the more likely some EQ tweaking will be needed, depending on how the cumulative sound of the ensemble is coming out. That's why I believe the technicians who explain that the best that can be done is for samples to come pre-programmed for the best generic sound possible, but when used, there will always be some production work needed in mixing a project using a lot of samples. That's the case in recordings of any kind--without EQ, you get a dull, thudding product. The cake needs a lot of mixing and careful baking to come out right. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Karyn
Ma-Ma
- Total Posts : 9200
- Joined: 2009/01/30 08:03:10
- Location: Lincoln, England.
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 12:25:23
(permalink)
Hi Randy and Dave, I know you don't want to publish actual vote counts and such like, but considering the orriginal intention of the "contest", ie, compairing the relative sounds/abilities of competing orchestra libraries, then could you maybe publish a league table of the results by Library? This would at least tell us which libs we prefered in general, which to my mind was the whole point. I can see from the list of winners that EW was popular, but how popular? did it get a handfull of first place votes or did it have a solid second/third place from every voter that pushed it up the rankings? We don't realy even need to know approx voting figures for each lib, just their relative popularity.
Mekashi Futo. Get 10% off all Waves plugins.Current DAW. i7-950, Gigabyte EX58-UD5, 12Gb RAM, 1Tb SSD, 2x2Tb HDD, nVidia GTX 260, Antec 1000W psu, Win7 64bit, Studio 192, Digimax FS, KRK RP8G2, Sonar Platinum
|
chckn8r1
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 19
- Joined: 2010/07/16 23:16:56
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 12:28:36
(permalink)
Bristol_Jonesey Matt I guess what I don't get is, even if there's a ton of bass parts in the MIDI file, aren't they there for a reason? And wouldn't you want to hear those frequencies in the samples so you know what the samples sound like? Matt, I have to say, I don't agree with this. We record drums & bass guitar allt he time, yet when it comes to mixing them down, if you don't carve out a suitable space for the kick & bass, you'll end up with nothing but mud at the lower end. The same applies to orchestral instruments - moreso due to the number of instruments competing down there: Basses, Bass trombones, Contra-Bassoons, Tubas, Tympani - if you left all that lot in there untreated it wouldn't sound very pleasing, don't you think? Just my 2pence I'm of the same school of thought as Michael on this one. The orchestra as a "band" has evolved over the last few centuries to fit together and blend. EQ'ing individual instruments is kind of irrelevant ... if you're going for the "real" orchestra sound. Each of the sections essentially replicates a high/mid-high/mid-low/low or traditional four-voice S-A-T-B unit. If you follow the Rimsky-Korsakov school of orchestration and all that, you treat the sections as you would an additive synthesizer or an organ - you layer the different "flavours" of sound to create different timbres. For instance, in the bass parts, you'll typically see the double bass holding down the extreme bottom end, while the cello and other bass instruments from other sections (bassoon, tuba, baritone, etc.) are doubling (tripling, quadrupling, etc.) the line to either reinforce it in the same octave or highlight the line in a different, higher octave. If you're looking to highlight a specific instrument in an orchestral setting, it's more a matter of setting dynamics and arranging rather than "fixing it in the mix". For example, if you need the bassoon (an instrument that typically doesn't have a lot of "oomph") to shine through, then you make that part louder and the others quieter ... possibly thinning out the frequency spectrum around the bassoon through arrangement rather than EQ.
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 12:56:37
(permalink)
Karyn Hi Randy and Dave, I know you don't want to publish actual vote counts and such like, but considering the orriginal intention of the "contest", ie, compairing the relative sounds/abilities of competing orchestra libraries, then could you maybe publish a league table of the results by Library? This would at least tell us which libs we prefered in general, which to my mind was the whole point. I can see from the list of winners that EW was popular, but how popular? did it get a handfull of first place votes or did it have a solid second/third place from every voter that pushed it up the rankings? We don't realy even need to know approx voting figures for each lib, just their relative popularity. Hi, Karyn - That seems like a reasonable request, but I feel there's a fundamental flaw in the logic. I don't know how Bitflipper feels about this, I'm speaking for myself. By now it's clear that all the entries sounded very different from one another, even when the same libraries were used. And we all understand that's because each person brought his own unique method of recording to their projects. We know that when we voted, we were choosing the recordings we thought sounded the best, for whatever reason we thought that, whatever criteria we used. But because of those factors just mentioned, the ranking of libraries by how many votes they got doesn't indicate anything concrete. I don't think we were looking to discover what everyone's favorite library/synth was - We were looking to have a collection of demos that show off at least to some degree what can be done with those instruments. - There's nothing definitively solved by anything that happened here - The recordings stand on their own, and each person should draw whatever conclusions they want. The tally you're asking for I don't think would be helpful at all. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 13:42:04
(permalink)
stevec Now, I just need to hear from Steve Cocchi. - SteveC - where aaaaaaaaaaaaare you? And which prize do you want?--GPO, JABB, COMB, Steinway, or World? Reply to my email address which you have. Hi Randy, sorry... I've been away from the PC since Friday. I know, I know... it practically borders on insane. Anyhow, I do have your email and I certainly will respond. I'm just having a difficult time making the decision! Having nothing to start with, GPO certainly seems like a shoo-in, particularly since the results here were good (yours was the one I noticed from the start). Then again, there's an upgrade path from DimPro's GPO Pocket Orchestra which none of the others offer... JAAB also seems interesting, but I understand from previous threads that it takes a little "massaging" for the right effect. But with time usually at a premium... I'm also interested in the upcoming World library, though obviously there's nothing to compare at this stage. It's a conundrum. But I am open to any and all suggestions. There he is - Good to hear from you, Steve. Since you're saying you don't really have any orchestral kind of library at present, my suggestion is that you go for GPO. In one fell swoop you'll have all the instruments in the orchestra, plus piano, harp, harpsichord and some others that aren't part of the traditional, classic orchestra. That package could keep you happily busy for a long time to come. And congratulations on having your excellent entry #54 selected by your peers! Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Matt
Max Output Level: -84 dBFS
- Total Posts : 346
- Joined: 2003/11/06 22:23:40
- Location: La Canada Flintridge, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 14:11:42
(permalink)
No, they really aren't there for a reason, and no I don't want to hear all that in the mix - it was a problem with a number of entries in this contest in fact, the bottom-heavy dull sound some had- Because this isn't an authentic scoring of the music. It was put together by an amateur by ear. He has a bass drum rumbling along with the tympani for instance - that shouldn't be there, and it introduced a pile up in the bass frequencies. You're assuming too much about the level of expertise to be found in this source MIDI file. It was good enough for our purposes, and its flaws made for interesting challenges actually - but the main point was that at least everyone was using the same imperfect source data. I see. This is a big piece of information that I was missing. Actually I knew it but wasn't making the connection. So hypothetically, if you had access to the original Goldsmith score for this piece, do you think you would you be less likely to roll off bass frequencies? Also, for what it's worth, I agree with Karyn about the vote tallies. I have little faith in my own ears so I'd be curious to know how the forum voted-- I put more faith into the forum's ears as a whole.
|
Susan G
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 12016
- Joined: 2003/11/05 22:49:26
- Location: Putnam County, NY
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 14:50:24
(permalink)
I think it would be really cool and educational to see the project files -- at the discretion of the submitters, of course. Obviously we wouldn't all have access to everything used on all of the them, but I for one would love to see some of the MIDI CC work involved, for example, and some were in fact done with just the tools available in SONAR. -Susan
2.30 gigahertz Intel Core i7-3610QM; 16 GB RAMWindows 10 x64; NI Komplete Audio 6.SONAR Platinum (Lexington) x64
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 15:32:54
(permalink)
SOME FOLLOW UPS: Karyn and Matt, let's see what Bitflipper has to say about this idea of rating the libraries according to votes. Maybe he has a different slant on it. As I said, I don't think those tallies would be of any actual importance, since the votes were for what the pool voters thought were the best recordings - and that's a separate thing from what various libraries sound like. - Bitflipper, whaddya say? Matt, "...So hypothetically, if you had access to the original Goldsmith score for this piece, do you think you would you be less likely to roll off bass frequencies?..." It's really too hypothetical for me to know for sure, Matt. The use of EQ, to me, is based on what one hears when all the tracks in a piece are playing. If the original score still sounded bottom heavy and/or muddy to me, of course I would roll off some bass, but that's only part of EQing. I'm remembering back a number of years when I was very afraid of what I could or should be doing with orchestral tracks that were very important to me - the demos for my stage musical. I received a lot of excellent help from people here at the Sonar Forum with more experience than me. I kept trying out their suggestions, re-posting clips from what I was working - and I could hear the sonic improvement that was happening as I sat in their EQ classroom, re-doing the tests over and over. The lesson to me was that no matter what kind of material it is, we are making recordings which Always need help to sound as good as possible, regardless of how well done the arrangement is. I learned that lesson, and can't imagine throwing away what I learned from all the sweat and hard work I went through. Susan, I think that's a very interesting idea - if we could take a peek at the inner workings of some of these entries' project files. It would be totally up to the individuals. If they're here on the thread, they hopefully will see your request, and maybe some of them will provide what you're asking for. It'll be fun to see if some take you up on that. ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE WINNERS: --I've gotten word from the Garritan company today. You're all being contacted very soon, possibly today, and you'll be given instructions on how to claim your prizes at the Garritan business site! Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|
Michael135
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
- Total Posts : 20
- Joined: 2010/09/02 18:30:08
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 17:04:01
(permalink)
Something tells me that I may have to wait a while to claim mine.
|
rbowser
Max Output Level: -10 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6518
- Joined: 2005/07/31 14:32:34
- Status: offline
Re:Orchestral Shootout, Part 4: The Winners and Discussion
2010/09/07 17:17:52
(permalink)
Michael135 Something tells me that I may have to wait a while to claim mine. You chose the up-coming Garritan World library - There isn't a release date yet, but I'm a Beta tester and we're looking at the "release candidate" now. If no major notes come up, it really shouldn't be terribly long. Tony Monaghan, the Garritan contact person will keep you apprised, I'm sure. Randy B.
Sonar X3e Studio Roland A-800 MIDI keyboard controller Alesis i|O2 interface Gigabyte Technology-AMD Phenom II @ 3 GHz 8 Gb RAM 6 Core Windows 7 Home Premium x64 with dual monitors
|