pbognar
Max Output Level: -76 dBFS
- Total Posts : 720
- Joined: 2005/10/03 16:22:03
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 14:47:40
(permalink)
Elffin SO far I like the expanded... really great ideas... 1 or 2 questions..... Does the browser show the icon pictures? Are Note value 'icons' back in notation window? - integrated step record perhaps??? No Staff View love I fear. If you want Note value 'icons' back in the notation window, pm me.
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 14:48:08
(permalink)
Jonbouy stevec 5/ Replace Synth 6/ Dragging into the Browser 7/ Whatever we're forgetting or haven't been told yet Whoa, yeah forgive me that makes ALL the difference. So to be fair we now have. 1/ The ability to add standard VST's that have been specifically nobbled only to work in Pro Channel. 2/ A Reason 3 (or greater) style combinator device to combine several FX into one. 3/ An extra notation program output format. 4/ Direct uploads to Soundcloud. 5/ Replace Synth 6/ Dragging into the Browser 7/ Whatever we're forgetting or haven't been told yet Those that have stuck with X1's growing pains all the way from December will have to pay a third of the full version upgrade price for this killer added functionality? Man, I was thinking they deserved some kind of award. I like the new features ... but the main reason I'm equally, if not more, inspired to buy the upgrades is, "There are bug fixes included in Expanded, including many in the ProChannel.", per Seth. Pro Channel has been a thorn my hard drive since December and I'm really hoping this fixes it. If there were new features and no fixes, I wouldn't take the plunge. But, couple the fixes, features, plus, they are giving you a package deal if you buy Expanded and the PCK4 together ... it's really a very good deal. You get all that for $79US. Plus if you watch the video, it looks like there are some new VST's that are included that they don't list in the written specs. I'd like to see a nice Limiter in the Pro Channel, something different than Boost 11. I'm sure that's to come.
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 14:55:26
(permalink)
"There are bug fixes included in Expanded, including many in the ProChannel." It seems like those are coming even if you upgrade or don't. Strikes me as funny there are bug fixes for Pro-Channel when it's been stated so many times there weren't actually any specific issues though. The proprietary modules might be worth your while though, personally I wouldn't spring for them because they will be Sonar specific. I can understand that not being an issue for some but it would be for me.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2011/09/15 14:57:10
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 14:56:44
(permalink)
Jonbouy "There are bug fixes included in Expanded, including many in the ProChannel." It seems like those are coming if you upgrade or not. The proprietary modules might be worth your while though, personally I wouldn't spring for them because they will be Sonar specific. I can understand that not being an issue for some but it would be for me. Then you would hate Cubase or Logic.
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 14:57:50
(permalink)
John Jonbouy "There are bug fixes included in Expanded, including many in the ProChannel." It seems like those are coming if you upgrade or not. The proprietary modules might be worth your while though, personally I wouldn't spring for them because they will be Sonar specific. I can understand that not being an issue for some but it would be for me. Then you would hate Cubase or Logic. I do already... One of the things I've always loved about Sonar is the open endedness of it. I sure hope that don't change.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2011/09/15 15:00:32
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
daryl1968
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10984
- Joined: 2010/06/01 22:51:43
- Location: Englishman in deepest, darkest Wales
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:00:21
(permalink)
Jonbouy Do you have X1? The spec on your signature says 8.5.3.
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:02:24
(permalink)
daryl1968 Jonbouy Do you have X1? The spec on your signature says 8.5.3. Nope and this news ain't getting me any closer to migrating neither. Of course I have an interest in X1 because I'm a Sonar user. Why? Do you have a valid objection to that there? Does it diminish my point of view in some way?
post edited by Jonbouy - 2011/09/15 15:03:40
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
daryl1968
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10984
- Joined: 2010/06/01 22:51:43
- Location: Englishman in deepest, darkest Wales
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:03:57
(permalink)
|
djjhart@aol.com
Max Output Level: -53.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2189
- Joined: 2008/10/24 08:45:46
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:18:15
(permalink)
The best thing about Expanded is You can add what you like to your channel strip. A Home run in my book! Plus you dont have to hear others **** about why a delay and not a compressor ect.. It totally lets you build your daw the way you want.. No need for those expensive lunch boxs .. Just hope we get a few great 3rd party developers designing plugs for the Pc..
Computer - Intel Q9550, Intel BX48bt2 MB, W8 64 bit. 8 gb Ram, SSD Hardware - Tascam Fw1884 Control surface only, Ni S49 Komplete Kontroll,Roland Quad Capture, Ni Machine,Kore, Focusrite A/D converter, Blue Mic, Roland Gaia, Akai Mpk49, Yamaha HS80 Monitors.Software - Sonar Platinum , Vengeance VPS bundle,Sugar Bytes Effectrix, Turnado, NI Komplete 10 Ultimate, Dune, Rob Papen Blade , Delay, Punch Evolved. http://soundcloud.com/johnhartson/tracks http://www.youtube.com/user/jhart1313
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:18:56
(permalink)
Well I got a lot of flack when I was posting about it without having it. I did have access to it but that didn't seem to matter at the time. I would wonder what one can say about a version one does not have and never uses. What is the point of such postings? Surely not to inform. Perhaps to counter those with a positive view? One has every right to post anything one wants within the TOS but it is confounding to read opinions that are not based on actual experience.
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:30:07
(permalink)
Jonbouy "There are bug fixes included in Expanded, including many in the ProChannel." Strikes me as funny there are bug fixes for Pro-Channel when it's been stated so many times there weren't actually any specific issues though. I know I know. I'm trying to be positive here. Honestly ... the most important thing I want to know is ... who is the cutie singing in the promo video?
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
backwoods
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2571
- Joined: 2011/03/23 17:24:50
- Location: South Pacific
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:33:16
(permalink)
JonBouy: Reason/Record owners aren't impressed by the fee to upgrade to reason 6 either. But Propellerhead developers, like Cakewalk developers, need some money coming in you see. Some people might prefer "X2" now but I think Cakewalk is doing the right thing here by tightening up X1 and introducing a few new features at a low price.
|
LANEY
Max Output Level: -64 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1350
- Joined: 2010/12/11 20:27:13
- Location: USA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:34:50
(permalink)
Isn't the girl Cori Yarckin? I have reason record and was wondering if I should upgrade since I haven't use it since X1, I will definitely get the expanded ASAA.
post edited by LANEY - 2011/09/15 15:36:14
i7/16GB ram Win 7 x64 SONAR Platinum Producer x64 VS-700 C&R Octa-Capture and VS-100 for live recording
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:35:50
(permalink)
|
Danny Danzi
Moderator
- Total Posts : 5810
- Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
- Location: DanziLand, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:36:58
(permalink)
Jonbouy Those that have stuck with X1's growing pains all the way from December will have to pay a third of the full version upgrade price for this killer added functionality? Those were exactly my thoughts when I read about it, Jonbuoy. I think it's ludicrous to charge for this...and guess what, if you're a yank, it's roughly HALF the upgrade price. Granted, I have been one that hasn't had extreme show stoppers from version 1 of X1...however, I've had to deal with enough quirks and issues that have made me wait until X1 c to where I was able to fully trust and use the program "for business". Surely the time it took for all of us to wait is worth something? Is it standard norm for some people to wait 6 months to be able to use it? It pains me to say it...but this has definitely been my worst Sonar experience to date and hearing stuff like this upsets me even more. I'm going to shut up and stick to 8.5 where I belong. As a matter of fact, I'll probably not consider another upgrade for a very long time if ever. While typing this....the PC bug just showed up. I so wish I could reproduce this...it's happened 3 times this week. I'm twisting dials and hearing no change at all. I just closed it down, reopened the project...it works fine. Oh joy...just what I need...more mods to PC that I have to pay for. No thanks. If it weren't for screen sets and effects chains, I'd not even use X1. -Danny
My Site Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
|
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
- Total Posts : 6348
- Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
- Location: London ON
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:48:34
(permalink)
I'm pretty sure that I would upgrade, myself. Reason being that there are some things in it that I do like... One for me is the pro-channel fixes The other? The fact that one would be able to combine several fx into one device through a combinator ...
The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate. Bushpianos
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:49:35
(permalink)
Danny Danzi Jonbouy Those that have stuck with X1's growing pains all the way from December will have to pay a third of the full version upgrade price for this killer added functionality? While typing this....the PC bug just showed up. I so wish I could reproduce this...it's happened 3 times this week. I'm twisting dials and hearing no change at all. I just closed it down, reopened the project...it works fine. -Danny Danny ... this post means so much to me. And not in an, "In your face Cakewalk!" kind of way, but rather a, "See! I told you this was happening and you didn't believe me!" kind of way. I think we all can agree that I've pretty much had the $hit kicked out of me for quite some time because I've been saying for months, "Hey guys ... there's a real problem here.". When someone like Danny comes along and says the same thing I've been saying all along, they can't deny it anymore. Yet, I'm still going to upgrade to the Expanded pack and new limiter. I'll give them the money because I am a capitalist and I believe in a free market system and I do support Cakewalk. One thing I know is, now is not the time to be taking funds away from them if we want to see Sonar advance. Especially in this economy, every penny counts ... Thanks for the post Danny, I only wish this would have happened to you sooner. It may have gotten resolved months ago if it had. Sincerely, Bub
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
dgrm44
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 282
- Joined: 2007/04/26 16:45:59
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 15:55:24
(permalink)
I am confused. What is so great about the new 'Create Your Own FX Chain'? And what is this new PC Standard I have read about in this thread....is it something comparable to VST?
|
Keni
Max Output Level: -17.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5769
- Joined: 2003/11/04 10:42:15
- Location: Willits, CA USA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 16:10:29
(permalink)
dgrm44 I am confused. What is so great about the new 'Create Your Own FX Chain'? And what is this new PC Standard I have read about in this thread....is it something comparable to VST? Unless I misunderstand, it's our new method of creating fx chains... But with the special ability to insert within the ProChannel's bus. I think this is the solution they came up with for our need/desire to mix our vst's with/within the PC buss (environment)... There is no PC standard (by name) that I know of yet, but Cakewalk created their new PC using it's own bus instead of the vst's... As vst is a trademark of a competitor, I perfectly understand... Keni
|
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 22562
- Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
- Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 16:13:44
(permalink)
backwoods JonBouy: Reason/Record owners aren't impressed by the fee to upgrade to reason 6 either. But Propellerhead developers, like Cakewalk developers, need some money coming in you see. Some people might prefer "X2" now but I think Cakewalk is doing the right thing here by tightening up X1 and introducing a few new features at a low price. Ah but I didn't go to the R5/Record duo either until I saw I'd qualify for the free upgrade to 6. Vendors shouldn't have exclusivity on being shrewd in trying to maximise the benefits of a release schedule... @John WRT to your last post I think your release schedule is more predicable than most. As a potential repeat customer I would imagine my presence here is not as frowned upon by our hosts as it is by some of the self-appointed milk monitors that, like yourself, seem to think they hold some kind of court office here. I simply did a recap of the features included in the advertising I never attempted to speak from experience, but I think I completely got the gist of what is actually being offered in this expansion better than some that already own the product. Feel free to correct me on any actuals within my observations. I'd welcome that. I think the Combinator thing is cool, as it already is in Reason, but I would have expected it to be included within the concept of FX chains introduced in X1 rather than an additional paid for feature. Track templates in 8.5.3 work well enough for me WRT recallable FX combinations but the automatable container is a good addition.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2011/09/15 16:29:15
"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles. In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
|
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 16:57:41
(permalink)
Bub Danny Danzi Jonbouy Those that have stuck with X1's growing pains all the way from December will have to pay a third of the full version upgrade price for this killer added functionality? While typing this....the PC bug just showed up. I so wish I could reproduce this...it's happened 3 times this week. I'm twisting dials and hearing no change at all. I just closed it down, reopened the project...it works fine. -Danny Danny ... this post means so much to me. And not in an, "In your face Cakewalk!" kind of way, but rather a, "See! I told you this was happening and you didn't believe me!" kind of way. I think we all can agree that I've pretty much had the $hit kicked out of me for quite some time because I've been saying for months, "Hey guys ... there's a real problem here.". When someone like Danny comes along and says the same thing I've been saying all along, they can't deny it anymore. Yet, I'm still going to upgrade to the Expanded pack and new limiter. I'll give them the money because I am a capitalist and I believe in a free market system and I do support Cakewalk. One thing I know is, now is not the time to be taking funds away from them if we want to see Sonar advance. Especially in this economy, every penny counts ... Thanks for the post Danny, I only wish this would have happened to you sooner. It may have gotten resolved months ago if it had. Sincerely, Bub Gotta say, I can't believe I haven't swayed you yet on the fact that we never denied this issue existed. All we did was ask people to contact us so we didn't have to dig through thousands of off-topic forum posts to get to the bottom of the issue. Despite my PM invitation, the total amount of times people contacted me directly on this particular issue was zero. The good news though, is that a helpful forum member that was running into this actually contacted Tech Support. We worked together and he provided me with tons of details regarding why ProChannel would intermittently not process audio for him. After about a week of trying to reproduce it myself since then, I actually can reproduce it repeatedly on a few of our test machines. I've spammed QA and Dev's inboxes since then. It's much easier to get to the bottom of this stuff when we're given a fair chance. ;) EDIT: I should add that this is light humor. I'm totally thrilled to have a recipe to reproduce this so that we can take the workload of you folks trying to convince us it's real.
post edited by Ryan Munnis [Cakewalk] - 2011/09/15 17:03:39
|
dappa1
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2949
- Joined: 2007/02/26 04:18:57
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 16:59:00
(permalink)
Aslong as Cake have got the go ahead to wait a little while longer before the release of Sonar (whatever it will be called) not X please. I think this is a good idea and Modules for regular customers is inline with future developments I hope. Which we hope will leave for abit more time to develop and iron out all the crinkles in Sonar. Can we think Of a New Name for the next Sonar Cakewalk skylight
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:01:17
(permalink)
Ryan Munnis [Cakewalk] Despite my PM invitation, the total amount of times people contacted me directly on this particular issue was zero. Your Inbox must be full. I've PM'd you three times and only received a response once. Bub.
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:18:55
(permalink)
Bub Ryan Munnis [Cakewalk] Despite my PM invitation, the total amount of times people contacted me directly on this particular issue was zero. Your Inbox must be full. I've PM'd you three times and only received a response once. Bub. I don't mind apologizing publically for being overwhelmed with things to do. Two of the three PMs were about me locking a thread. You've sent two since my response, one of which didn't really warrant a reply. With the greatest respect, I've had to prioritize phone calls, emails, problem reports, meetings and trainings above a 3rd party plug-in related problem. I'll take another look at your PM and respond within. Sorry for the delay.
|
Bub
Max Output Level: -3.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7196
- Joined: 2010/10/25 10:22:13
- Location: Sneaking up behind you!
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:20:13
(permalink)
Ryan Munnis [Cakewalk] Bub Danny Danzi Jonbouy Those that have stuck with X1's growing pains all the way from December will have to pay a third of the full version upgrade price for this killer added functionality? While typing this....the PC bug just showed up. I so wish I could reproduce this...it's happened 3 times this week. I'm twisting dials and hearing no change at all. I just closed it down, reopened the project...it works fine. -Danny Danny ... this post means so much to me. And not in an, "In your face Cakewalk!" kind of way, but rather a, "See! I told you this was happening and you didn't believe me!" kind of way. I think we all can agree that I've pretty much had the $hit kicked out of me for quite some time because I've been saying for months, "Hey guys ... there's a real problem here.". When someone like Danny comes along and says the same thing I've been saying all along, they can't deny it anymore. Yet, I'm still going to upgrade to the Expanded pack and new limiter. I'll give them the money because I am a capitalist and I believe in a free market system and I do support Cakewalk. One thing I know is, now is not the time to be taking funds away from them if we want to see Sonar advance. Especially in this economy, every penny counts ... Thanks for the post Danny, I only wish this would have happened to you sooner. It may have gotten resolved months ago if it had. Sincerely, Bub Gotta say, I can't believe I haven't swayed you yet on the fact that we never denied this issue existed. All we did was ask people to contact us so we didn't have to dig through thousands of off-topic forum posts to get to the bottom of the issue. Despite my PM invitation, the total amount of times people contacted me directly on this particular issue was zero. The good news though, is that a helpful forum member that was running into this actually contacted Tech Support. We worked together and he provided me with tons of details regarding why ProChannel would intermittently not process audio for him. After about a week of trying to reproduce it myself since then, I actually can reproduce it repeatedly on a few of our test machines. I've spammed QA and Dev's inboxes since then. It's much easier to get to the bottom of this stuff when we're given a fair chance. ;) EDIT: I should add that this is light humor. I'm totally thrilled to have a recipe to reproduce this so that we can take the workload of you folks trying to convince us it's real. My comment wasn't aimed at Cakewalk, it was aimed at the people who have been "kicking the $hit out of me" ... which Cakewalk has never done.
"I pulled the head off Elvis, filled Fred up to his pelvis, yaba daba do, the King is gone, and so are you."
|
dmbaer
Max Output Level: -49.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2585
- Joined: 2008/08/04 20:10:22
- Location: Concord CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:23:12
(permalink)
Keni Unless I misunderstand, it's our new method of creating fx chains... But with the special ability to insert within the ProChannel's bus. I think this is the solution they came up with for our need/desire to mix our vst's with/within the PC buss (environment)... This makes a lot of sense ... but I'm not sure you'll be able to do what you're suggesting. I went back a carefully reread the whole announcement. They talk about the new effects group cabability and they talk about customizing pro channel, but I could not find anywhere where it was stated that you could place an effects group in the pro channel. Hope I'm wrong and perhaps someone will clarify.
|
Danny Danzi
Moderator
- Total Posts : 5810
- Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
- Location: DanziLand, NJ
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:28:26
(permalink)
Bub Danny Danzi Jonbouy Those that have stuck with X1's growing pains all the way from December will have to pay a third of the full version upgrade price for this killer added functionality? While typing this....the PC bug just showed up. I so wish I could reproduce this...it's happened 3 times this week. I'm twisting dials and hearing no change at all. I just closed it down, reopened the project...it works fine. -Danny Danny ... this post means so much to me. And not in an, "In your face Cakewalk!" kind of way, but rather a, "See! I told you this was happening and you didn't believe me!" kind of way. I think we all can agree that I've pretty much had the $hit kicked out of me for quite some time because I've been saying for months, "Hey guys ... there's a real problem here.". When someone like Danny comes along and says the same thing I've been saying all along, they can't deny it anymore. Yet, I'm still going to upgrade to the Expanded pack and new limiter. I'll give them the money because I am a capitalist and I believe in a free market system and I do support Cakewalk. One thing I know is, now is not the time to be taking funds away from them if we want to see Sonar advance. Especially in this economy, every penny counts ... Thanks for the post Danny, I only wish this would have happened to you sooner. It may have gotten resolved months ago if it had. Sincerely, Bub Hahaha actually Bub, I thought I had posted in a few of your posts regarding this but maybe I didn't and I'm mistaken. I know I posted somewhere when someone mentioned the issue. Someone at Sonar even contacted me about the issue I was having privately, but because I couldn't give them any steps to reproduce it....there's nothing anyone can do. What's weird is, they don't seem to ever see this problem on their end. I've posted about it a few times, but I never made my own thread. Maybe not so much in this forum because...well, I try my best not to b!tch too much as I do respect and honor the Bakers we DO get on this forum. Not sure about the ones we don't know...but I think both Seths, Willy, Noel, Brandon and some of the others we see around here are all top notch guys. I'd be willing to bet if they could tell us stuff "off the record" they feel our pain on some of this stuff. But I'll tell ya, it was kind of a slap in our faces to read about this expand thing....knowing what we've been through with this release. Then again, maybe the (insert number here) users of X1 are all completely happy and there are only 30 of us on this forum that are missing the boat, unqualified to run the program, don't know enough about Windows, have crap pc's, junk video cards, Sh!tBlasters, and our lack of comprehending the manual or that 64 DOESN'T make a difference when a program has some issues. You know what's weird for me? When I use X1, I miss what I can do in 8.5. When I use 8.5, I miss some of the new features you can use in X1. It's like I'm so screwed up now, I'm taking turns per project just to satisfy myself only to say later "I should have used 8.5 because this just happened" or "why did I even use PC....I know better" and I'm stuck bringing in my own effects chains....which is really cool and one of the features I totally miss in 8.5. I dunno man...I guess I'm just tired of the whole release "growing pains" thing. It's been more of an "as the Sonar turns" than I could really handle this time. 8.0 was tough to swallow when it was released....but this was really hard for quite a few of us...ok wait, at least 30 of us. :) Honest opinion? I'd much rather pay Panu and Ben for giving me options that really make a difference for the better....but that's just me. -Danny
My Site Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
|
AT
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 10654
- Joined: 2004/01/09 10:42:46
- Location: TeXaS
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:36:30
(permalink)
Man, this is why I'm glad I don't make software. People complained about the yearly updates. Others and some of the same people then complained when it didn't come on time. When Cake took a year and a half for X1 people complained about the legnth of time of the update. When they did several point releases people complained about the timing and that their bug didn't get fixed. Now they've split off development including new features and some fixes, charge for it, and people complain about features, fixes and having to pay for it. I think the only way they could win would be to fix everything, include everything and have it free for customers who've ever bought any version. I mean, I'm kidding, sort of, but it seems like a hard row to hoe. Admittedly there are things that need to be improved and fixed, and some have been around for a while (OK, a long while). But the list of what does work is so long sometimes I feel bad for the bakers. There are a lot of things I'd like, but failing to become a programmer myself I figure I'll just have to wait. Gapless engine would be nice, but I never expected to edit my tape while rolling. I don't use notation, so they can stuff that in the back. I've never had the PC issue (knock on wood), so that is low on my list. I wish they would get beatscape to work - it has a lot of potential but has never been updated. I wish they would cater to me, but it would help if I made more suggestions in the suggestion box and/or the tech support, instead of complaining on the forums. It seems to be a place where everyone blows off some steam with no expectation of recieving company help. @
https://soundcloud.com/a-pleasure-dome http://www.bnoir-film.com/ there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. 24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
|
ampfixer
Max Output Level: -20 dBFS
- Total Posts : 5508
- Joined: 2010/12/12 20:11:50
- Location: Ontario
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:45:30
(permalink)
Ryan Munnis [Cakewalk ] SNIP The good news though, is that a helpful forum member that was running into this actually contacted Tech Support. We worked together and he provided me with tons of details regarding why ProChannel would intermittently not process audio for him. After about a week of trying to reproduce it myself since then, I actually can reproduce it repeatedly on a few of our test machines. I've spammed QA and Dev's inboxes since then. It's much easier to get to the bottom of this stuff when we're given a fair chance. ;) EDIT: I should add that this is light humor. I'm totally thrilled to have a recipe to reproduce this so that we can take the workload of you folks trying to convince us it's real. That's great news. I'd say more important than anything in months. Let's have the Pro Channel patch - TODAY. I'd like to start using it again.
Regards, John I want to make it clear that I am an Eedjit. I have no direct, or indirect, knowledge of business, the music industry, forum threads or the meaning of life. I know about amps. WIN 10 Pro X64, I7-3770k 16 gigs, ASUS Z77 pro, AMD 7950 3 gig, Steinberg UR44, A-Pro 500, Sonar Platinum, KRK Rokit 6
|
skylightron
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
- Total Posts : 277
- Joined: 2011/09/03 18:05:39
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 Expanded
2011/09/15 17:57:52
(permalink)
Well this is all good because X1 now has a longer shelf life and more updates on the way. Nobody has to buy Expanded but it's there with those new features. Should it have been a free release similar to what 8.3 did for 8.1? Only time will tell once it's up and running. But I can understand why Cakewalk would want to cash in since no new version is being released and they need the $ for their fourth quarter sales. I would have preferred Expanded to be even cheaper, $29 but perhaps those new features are worth the $49.
|