Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 17:49:24
(permalink)
UnderTow Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] But this is the biggest issue: They are not the same tools as they used to be. I really feel that they were needlessly dumbed down. (I understand the rationale but don't agree with it). I have to say that I don't' really agree with you here. I'm not sure what the previous tools did that the new ones don't' do (nothing I ever used that's for sure). There are a finite amount of commands and AFAICT these were mostly, if not all, applied to the Smart Tool and then the other tools and their functionality are still present. They are just not customizable. I dont' think they were dumbed down though. in fact I'd say the old tools were pretty dumb in that they only did one thing for the most part, unless "trained to do more....basically creating a Smart Tool of sorts. I suspect you have forgotten how those tools behaved in their default settings. I never reprogrammed them so I am very familiar with their default behaviour: Old Sonar Draw Tool: Left click to add note; Click on Edges to resize notes; Click in the middle to drag notes up or down. Click on top edge to change velocity; ALT-CLick to select just that one note; SHIFT-ALT-Click to select several notes; ALT-Click on background to deselect all notes; CTRL-Click to draw several notes in succession; Right-Click for Note Properties dialogue. X1 Draw Tool: Left Click to add notes; Right click to delete notes. Need I continue? But it was kind of redundant as all the tools could be customized to do that. Yes the individual tools are pretty "dumb" but that's why the Smart Tool is there. So now it's: ALT+Left CLick to add a note; Click on edges to resize notes; Click in middle to drag up and down; click on top edge to change velocity; Click to select just one note; CTRL+Click to select several notes; Left+Click on background to deselect all notes; (no idea); double click for note properties. So it's pretty damn close and it all happens with one tool instead of two or three. I think what you'll see next is some customization of the Smart Tool made available happen and some of the default behavior tweaked based on user feedback - much like what we've got in this very thread. I know some of us didn't underestimate so much as it was a risk we were willing to take to move forward. How is removing existing functionality moving forward? Just adding the Smart Tool would have covered that, no? It depends on your definition of moving forward. We'd rather have one customizable super tool than another tool that works in addition to the three customizable PRV tools that were in addition to the half dozen TV tools. It just adds to teh mess. So we must simplify first in order to move forward. Maybe a bit too savvy after all, heh? No comment. Either way we tried to make it relatively easy for one to revert the behavior by simply reassigning the key commands. But this isn't the case as the new individual tools really have been dumbed down. Even the most basic functionality of the Select Tool has been separated out into two tools! (Select and Move. This could be done with just the Select Tool before).
But why do you need the Select and Move tools? You can do all those things with the Smart Tool. Let's boil it down - what is the Smart Tool not allowing you to do that you feel compelled to use one of the "dumb" tools? If I can understand that then perhaps that can be addressed. We're not going back to three customizable tools that only work in the PRV and are seperate from the other TV specific tools. So let's figure out how to make the smaller tool set better. I'm all ears. If we can identify functianlity that can be addes to teh Smart Tool (or even teh dumb tools) then that's something I can work with and discuss with the devs and Product Management team. Regardless, even if it were 8.5 I'd personally suggest to a user that they stop switching tools and just customize one tool to do 90-100% of everything they need. Actually, see my description above, they already did that in their default settings. (I just wish the lasso selection would work differently when assigned to a key modifier. That was all the change I would have needed to have everything under one tool). UnderTow Perhaps for you personally. But SONAR must make sense for newcomers and IMO should need a lot less figuring out and tweaking to get it to work in a logical and consistent way. I can say I didn't like having to reconfigure my tool set every time I installed SONAR or was using a machine that wasn't mine. Yes you could export your PRV settings but it just seems like cumbersome activity. But I am for some Smart Tool customization options, but not to the extent that we have 3 arbitrarily named endlessly tweakable tools that only work in the PRV.
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 17:50:12
(permalink)
FastBikerBoy Smart tool: Double click or Alt click to add note; Click on Edges to resize notes; Click in the middle to drag notes up or down. Click on top edge to change velocity; Click on Note to select; Left click and drag to select several notes; Left click on background to deselect all notes; Double click on note to open its properties; Right click on note to delete it; Alt+Click to split note; Shift + Right click to mute note; Right click & drag to erase multiple notes; Switch to TV view to work on audio clips - fade in/out slip edit, work on MIDI clips, automation, or audio transients without changing tools. V8 Draw tool: ceases to function outside PRV. Need I continue? I am not arguing that the Draw Tool was better than the current Smart Tool! (Well except for simple clicking to draw notes) If anything, the Smart Tool is closely based on the old Draw Tool. I am just pointing out that the claims that were made previously in this thread that re-assigning the key-bindings could restore previous work-flows is absolutely incorrect. I am also pointing out that the other tools besides the Smart Tool really have been dumbed down. (I am also making a few sides points on the way). As I have said many times, I like the Smart Tool though I do think it needs a little tweaking. UnderTow
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 17:53:49
(permalink)
FastBikerBoy Old Sonar Draw Tool: Left click to add note; Click on Edges to resize notes; Click in the middle to drag notes up or down. Click on top edge to change velocity; ALT-CLick to select just that one note; SHIFT-ALT-Click to select several notes; ALT-Click on background to deselect all notes; CTRL-Click to draw several notes in succession; Right-Click for Note Properties dialogue. X1 Draw Tool: Left Click to add notes; Right click to delete notes. Need I continue? Smart tool: Double click or Alt click to add note; Click on Edges to resize notes; Click in the middle to drag notes up or down. Click on top edge to change velocity; Click on Note to select; Left click and drag to select several notes; Left click on background to deselect all notes; Double click on note to open its properties; Right click on note to delete it; Alt+Click to split note; Shift + Right click to mute note; Right click & drag to erase multiple notes; Switch to TV view to work on audio clips - fade in/out slip edit, work on MIDI clips, automation, or audio transients without changing tools. V8 Draw tool: ceases to function outside PRV. Need I continue? "Shift + Right click to mute note" - Cool - was wondering why I couldn't do that with the Smart Tool - Thanks for the tip FBB. Now we'll await the post from 'other world' stating that when one hits F6 it's slower than using one tool and S, D, and E are faster than some other tool that you don't have to use. It's cool. I'm kinda getting it now. Actually I find the above quote from UT really interesting. I've NEVER used the Draw Tool in X1a. Why would you when the smart tool does everything stated above? And why would you make such a silly point about a (now) virtually useless tool? Just for argument's sake? Just for argument's sake? Just for argument's sake? I think that's where I get confused. I keep thinking these threads are for people helping people out and learning new tools and new ways of doing things. That's the world I live in. But others clearly live in another world where making arcane and argumentative points simply for the sake of same are the reason for these threads. Hmm... have I crossed over? Is my point in this post arcane and argumentative? Simply for its own sake? Long Live 8.53!!! S D E!! S D E!! S D E!! S D E!!
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 17:56:13
(permalink)
UnderTow mike_mccue Yes, I fully agree Jim... I was shocked to recently learn that Cakewalk staffed it's former Director of Product Management position with someone who had a total of 8 years experience after earning a Master's Degree. That sounds impetuous to me but then I learned that the person was actually a former "Vice President" at yet another company. A position held merely 3 years after graduating from college. Being an expert in some technical field does not preclude the fact that it takes many years to amass life experience and, as you suggest, generalized wisdom. Heck, I'm still working on that stuff every day. Having the realization that Cakewalk, the corporation, depends on such experience to guide the development of product explains, to me, why I have observed all the symptoms I have come to complain about for the past 5 years. If that worries you, you might be a little worried about the X1's Product Manager's previous experience: http://www.linkedin.com/in/zylervega It seems that what amounts to a bit of helpdesk experience as a side job while studying is enough to become the Product Manager of Cakewalk's flagship product. It seems a bit of a responsibility jump if you ask me. UnderTow Guys - I would ask that we not make potentially unfortunate assumptions about people we don't know and situations that we have little or no"on the ground" knowledge of. Zyler is one Product Manager (and incidentally is an intelligent person with a keen analytical mind). But regardless, and more importantly...SONAR's development strategy and product management is done by a pretty wide group with a wide array of talents and experience. It's not just one guy. So I would urge you not to let any one person's apparent experience worry you too much when it comes to our beloved flagship DAW.
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 17:56:57
(permalink)
People are misunderstanding my addressing of very specific points being made with something else so I will just state that I think things could have been done a bit more elegantly while keeping more users happy in the process, and leave it at that as far as the old tools are concerned. I also believe mistakes were made when designing the new tools. (Separate select and move tools instead of a single grab tool being an obvious example). UnderTow
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 17:58:34
(permalink)
UnderTow FastBikerBoy Smart tool: Double click or Alt click to add note; Click on Edges to resize notes; Click in the middle to drag notes up or down. Click on top edge to change velocity; Click on Note to select; Left click and drag to select several notes; Left click on background to deselect all notes; Double click on note to open its properties; Right click on note to delete it; Alt+Click to split note; Shift + Right click to mute note; Right click & drag to erase multiple notes; Switch to TV view to work on audio clips - fade in/out slip edit, work on MIDI clips, automation, or audio transients without changing tools. V8 Draw tool: ceases to function outside PRV. Need I continue? I am not arguing that the Draw Tool was better than the current Smart Tool! (Well except for simple clicking to draw notes) If anything, the Smart Tool is closely based on the old Draw Tool. I am just pointing out that the claims that were made previously in this thread that re-assigning the key-bindings could restore previous work-flows is absolutely incorrect. I am also pointing out that the other tools besides the Smart Tool really have been dumbed down. (I am also making a few sides points on the way). As I have said many times, I like the Smart Tool though I do think it needs a little tweaking. UnderTow Posted before reading this UT. IMO the other tools haven't been dumbed down, they've been rendered useless and maybe that's just semantics in which case I agree. I NEVER used the draw tool in X1 as stated above. I NEVER use any of the Tools other than the Smart Tool in X1. Doesn't make that right it's just a personal observation. I also agree that with a couple of tweaks the Smart Tool can indeed become REALLY Smart.
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 17:59:38
(permalink)
Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] Guys - I would ask that we not make potentially unfortunate assumptions about people we don't know and situations that we have little or no"on the ground" knowledge of. Zyler is one Product Manager (and incidentally is an intelligent person with a keen analytical mind). I am not doubting his intelligence. I was just questioning his experience. But regardless, and more importantly...SONAR's development strategy and product management is done by a pretty wide group with a wide array of talents and experience. It's not just one guy. So I would urge you not to let any one person's apparent experience worry you too much when it comes to our beloved flagship DAW. A post in the past had made me believe he was the X1 Product Manager. Thanks for clarifying. UnderTow
|
ShermanSmelville
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 80
- Joined: 2010/12/22 14:44:53
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:02:21
(permalink)
Gosh Undertow, trust you to be homing in on someone's credits...
Music Equipment: Cakewalk, Izotope, Propellerheads, Wavelab, Yamaha guitars, Roland keyboards Sonar X1, Gateway DX4831 (i7 860, NVidia GT320, 64bit, 8gig)
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:06:50
(permalink)
ShermanSmelville Gosh Undertow, trust you to be homing in on someone's credits... Do you have something to say? How's life in the peanut gallery? UnderTow
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:11:18
(permalink)
UnderTow People are misunderstanding my addressing of very specific points being made with something else so I will just state that I think things could have been done a bit more elegantly while keeping more users happy in the process, and leave it at that as far as the old tools are concerned. I also believe mistakes were made when designing the new tools. (Separate select and move tools instead of a single grab tool being an obvious example). UnderTow I actually thought a Grab tool that combined the two would be good. It was actually discussed, but some wanted to keep them separate for now in case further functionality was added to the "dumb" tools. We figured most people would use the Smart Tools nearly all the time anyway. So I think in the future you'll either see more customization added back in to the "dumb" tools or you'll see the Select and Move perhaps merge into a tool of average intelligence.
post edited by Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk] - 2011/03/15 18:16:42
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
bapu
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 86000
- Joined: 2006/11/25 21:23:28
- Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:14:03
(permalink)
Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] a tool of average intelligence. Brandon tries to make Bapu feel good about himself.
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:15:31
(permalink)
UnderTow Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] Guys - I would ask that we not make potentially unfortunate assumptions about people we don't know and situations that we have little or no"on the ground" knowledge of. Zyler is one Product Manager (and incidentally is an intelligent person with a keen analytical mind). I am not doubting his intelligence. I was just questioning his experience. No I know - and I apologize if I inadvertently made an insinuation. I was just saying that sometimes people's aptitude can potentially make up for lack of experience. A "quick study", etc. But regardless, and more importantly...SONAR's development strategy and product management is done by a pretty wide group with a wide array of talents and experience. It's not just one guy. So I would urge you not to let any one person's apparent experience worry you too much when it comes to our beloved flagship DAW. A post in the past had made me believe he was the X1 Product Manager. Thanks for clarifying. UnderTow Sure thing. I thought it needed clarification. As SONAR is our flagship DAW and our main product, we have a number of hands on deck in various capacities.
post edited by Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk] - 2011/03/15 18:17:11
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:16:02
(permalink)
bapu Brandon Ryan [Cakewalk ] a tool of average intelligence. Brandon tries to make Bapu feel good about himself. LMAO!
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7360
- Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
- Location: Seattle
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:25:19
(permalink)
ShermanSmelville Gosh Undertow, trust you to be homing in on someone's credits... A healthy dose of irony for someone (undertow, not you Sherman) who refuses to mention any of his own credits and instead says his knowledge should speak for itself. I'm surprised his post didn't get the thread locked or worse.
=========== The Fog People =========== Intel i7-4790 16GB RAM ASUS Z97 Roland OctaCapture Win10/64 SONAR Platinum 64-bit billions VSTs, some of which work
|
John
Forum Host
- Total Posts : 30467
- Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:41:03
(permalink)
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 18:44:51
(permalink)
...wicked ShermanSmelville Gosh Undertow, trust you to be homing in on someone's credits... A healthy dose of irony for someone (undertow, not you Sherman) who refuses to mention any of his own credits and instead says his knowledge should speak for itself. I'm surprised his post didn't get the thread locked or worse. I don't "refuse to mention" my credits. I think they are irrelevant in a technical discussion. And I never said my knowledge should speak for itself. I said that facts and the logic of arguments should speak for themselves when discussing technical things. At that time we were discussing how a compressor works. Did you ever bother doing the very simple test I proposed? You are eager to jump to conclusions but too lazy to actually check things. Enough said... Anyway, last time I check I do not manage anything at Cakewalk. I don't even have any direct influence on anything that happens at Cakewalk. A Cakewalk Product manager on the other hand is a different story. Brandon clarified things now. You and ShermanSmelville are just taking cheap pot shots. I guess that in itself says enough... UnderTow
|
jm24
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2127
- Joined: 2003/11/12 10:41:12
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 19:01:02
(permalink)
Yo Brandon Is the only underlying assumption for left-click behavior to be consistant with Windows? Or:::: Is it assumed that users will more often be editing rather than inserting new notes? This sorta makes sense. But, the reason we may want to use the draw tool is so we do not have to hold the ALT key. Holding the ALT key for many minutes while adding notes makes my finger unhappy. And it makes my hand have to be in a awkward postitiion to use other keys. Double clicking if fine for a couple of notes, but long term? ==== I like the note value not changing based upon the last note touched. Entering notes in Staff view in 8.5 is annoying at best when needing to constantly delete notes of a different value than what I am wanting to add. Just because I just touched a quarter note does not mean I want to enter a quarter note. Definitely need a toggle for this for those guys that like such. ======================= What was the assumption/argument made for removing 1-click/1-keystroke to change note duration value keys/buttons? Is the only way to have 1-stroke note-duration value change to remap the keyboard? J
post edited by jm24 - 2011/03/15 19:04:07
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 19:15:17
(permalink)
jm24 I like the note value not changing based upon the last note touched. Entering notes in Staff view in 8.5 is annoying at best when needing to constantly delete notes of a different value than what I am wanting to add. Just because I just touched a quarter note does not mean I want to enter a quarter note. Definitely need a toggle for this for those guys that like such. Out of curiosity, would it bother you as much if the default note length only changed when you change an existing note's length (but not when just clicking on or selecting a note)? So somewhere in between X1 and previous versions' behaviour. The reason I ask is that it might be nice to have this as one of the options if this behaviour could be set by users. So then you get these three options: - Default Note Length never changes automatically. Users set it through he HUD or Control Bar setting. - Default Note Length changes when a user changes an existing note's length. - Default Note Length always changes to the last selected note's length or when changing the length of an existing note. UnderTow
|
HumbleNoise
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2946
- Joined: 2004/01/04 12:53:50
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 19:28:37
(permalink)
REALLY like all your suggestions UT. Helpful and hopeful. For me the question is a bit moot as my composing skills are fairly rough - but am curious about others.
Humbly Yours Larry Sonar X2 x64 MAudio 2496 Yamaha MG 12/4 Roland XV-88 Intel MB with Q6600 and 4 GB Ram NVidia 9800 GTX Windows 7 x64 Home Premium
|
Brandon Ryan [Roland]
Max Output Level: -40.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3458
- Joined: 2003/11/06 03:29:12
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 19:32:17
(permalink)
jm24 Yo Brandon Is the only underlying assumption for left-click behavior to be consistant with Windows? Or:::: Is it assumed that users will more often be editing rather than inserting new notes? This sorta makes sense. I think it was mainly for consistency with Windows and expected behavior. But it was s pretty heated debate if I recall. I personally prefer ALT for lasso selection and a simple left click for draw when it comes to the Smart Tool's behavior. But, the reason we may want to use the draw tool is so we do not have to hold the ALT key. I can certainly understand that. Holding the ALT key for many minutes while adding notes makes my finger unhappy. And it makes my hand have to be in a awkward postitiion to use other keys. Double clicking if fine for a couple of notes, but long term?
Right. I prefer to add notes with the simple single click and use ALT for selections. Some people don't agree - which is why my number one wish for the Smart Tool is an option to toggle this behavior. ==== I like the note value not changing based upon the last note touched. Entering notes in Staff view in 8.5 is annoying at best when needing to constantly delete notes of a different value than what I am wanting to add. Just because I just touched a quarter note does not mean I want to enter a quarter note. Definitely need a toggle for this for those guys that like such. ======================= What was the assumption/argument made for removing 1-click/1-keystroke to change note duration value keys/buttons? Is the only way to have 1-stroke note-duration value change to remap the keyboard? J
"The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel." WG SONAR Platinum | VS-700 | A-800 PRO | PCAL i7 with SSD running Windows 8 x64 | Samsung 27" LCD @ 1920x1080 | Blue Sky monitors with BMC | All kinds of other stuff
|
jm24
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2127
- Joined: 2003/11/12 10:41:12
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 20:05:06
(permalink)
Anybody??? What was the assumption/argument made for removing 1-click/1-keystroke to change note duration value keys/buttons? Is the only way to have 1-stroke note-duration value change to remap the keyboard? J
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 20:15:49
(permalink)
jm24 Anybody??? What was the assumption/argument made for removing 1-click/1-keystroke to change note duration value keys/buttons? Is the only way to have 1-stroke note-duration value change to remap the keyboard? J I don't think it is too much trouble to reassign some keys for that. At least if I understand you correctly. Personally, if I wanted this under direct single key access I would probably assign the number keys above the qwerty keyboard and re-assign ScreenSets to keys with modifiers. I am more likely to want to change default note length than to want to change ScreenSets (If I ever do which is questionable...) UnderTow
|
jm24
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2127
- Joined: 2003/11/12 10:41:12
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 20:40:43
(permalink)
I prefer no smartness with respect to note duration value. Why? S8: I am entering dotted eighth notes and I click a half note to change pitch and now i have to change value to dotted eighth to continue. Nicht Gut. With SX, this would require clicking the dropdown. Prolly the reason the duration does not change. J
|
PedalPoint
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 52
- Joined: 2010/12/09 22:56:07
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 21:10:17
(permalink)
In the old Sonar I never switched tool, NEVER, because I could do everything I needed with only one tool. You could perhaps say that the tool was “smart”. In X1a however the most efficient way is to switch between two tools. Because adding notes is the most frequent action for most composers it should be done with a single left click, and the only tool that allows you to do that at the moment is the draw-tool, so that should be one of the two tools you use. In old Sonar you could use Alt as a modifier and get the select-tool. Also you could use the middle mouse-button to delete, and you could also resize and change velocity with the draw-tool, and right click would give you the note properties, so you could pretty much do everything with the draw tool. With X1 you can't do these things with the draw-tool anymore, except delete notes, so you need another tool, and that should of course be the smart-tool. One shouldn't too hastily draw the conclusion however that one tool for everything is always faster than changing between multiple tools. There are many situations where the opposite is true. For example, in the old days I used Alt as a modifier to change the draw-tool into a select-tool and the new smart-tool works much the same way, only the other way around. If it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to assume that the draw-tool and the select-tool are the two tools that are most frequently used amongst most composers, then you'll also have to consider the inefficiency of the left hand being occupied holding down a key all the time that one of those tools are used. Some intelligently placed keyboard shortcuts to switch between the two tools can, in many instances, be a better solution. It doesn't take much more time to press a shortcut key and letting go of it than pressing a modifier-key and holding it, but only with the former approach is your left hand completely free to do other things in the meanwhile. The keyboard shortcuts should preferably be in a place that is near to the modifier-keys so you don't have to move your hands back and forth. The F-keys are perhaps a little bit far away. I'm pretty sure this is the fastest method at the moment, if you're using X1 that is, but when they make the tools more customizable that will probably change. For the moment I have to conclude that the old tools were more efficient than the new ones, because the old tools could do pretty much everything that the new ones can, but the old ones were customizable and the new ones aren't. I think X1 has to be seen as a work in progress, that isn't the perfect DAW, but in many ways is a huge step in the right direction, and in other ways many small steps backwards. I think the best approach for Cakewalk now is to spend the next few years working on all the small details that are wrong with X1 and not spending their time and resources with adding all the sexy content that we have enough of anyway. X1 was marketed as being all about work-flow, but what usually happens when you create a whole new work-flow paradigm is that in many ways the work-flow gets poorer because you don't see the consequences of all those changes you just made, especially since the old work-flow had developed over many years to become pretty streamlined. I think it is during the next two or three incarnations of Sonar that we should expect to see the real work-flow improvements. Hopefully... P.S. Those people, whoever they are, that made the windows-consistency argument for not using single left click to add notes could not have been composers, and their opinions should therefore not be counted. Tell them that next time, Brandon.
post edited by PedalPoint - 2011/03/15 21:51:56
|
jm24
Max Output Level: -54 dBFS
- Total Posts : 2127
- Joined: 2003/11/12 10:41:12
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 21:35:22
(permalink)
|
...wicked
Max Output Level: -1.5 dBFS
- Total Posts : 7360
- Joined: 2003/12/18 01:00:56
- Location: Seattle
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 21:38:53
(permalink)
UnderTow I don't "refuse to mention" my credits. If I may paraphrase you: I beg to differ. Did you ever bother doing the very simple test I proposed? Nope, I did not. And you know what, I don't know if anybody else did either. Just like I don't always click on the links you send out. Ain't freedom grand? You and ShermanSmelville are just taking cheap pot shots. You mean "cheap" like searching a Cake employee's linked in profile and assuming that's the grand total of his CV, then coming on the Cake forums and making an accusation he's not qualified for his job? That kind of cheap? Because that's pretty good, I wouldn't give myself that much credit. EDIT: oh forget it, it's not worth any of our time I'll delete the rest.
post edited by ...wicked - 2011/03/15 22:00:01
=========== The Fog People =========== Intel i7-4790 16GB RAM ASUS Z97 Roland OctaCapture Win10/64 SONAR Platinum 64-bit billions VSTs, some of which work
|
UnderTow
Max Output Level: -37 dBFS
- Total Posts : 3848
- Joined: 2004/01/06 12:13:49
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 22:46:46
(permalink)
...wicked Did you ever bother doing the very simple test I proposed? Nope, I did not. And you know what, I don't know if anybody else did either. Just like I don't always click on the links you send out. Ain't freedom grand? Yes freedom is grand and it is your right not to perform the test or write entire paragraphs about links you haven't even bothered clicking on (and then come up with some lame excuse of being too tired for a simple click... but clearly not too tired to spout your opinion on something you didn't even check) but it does give the impression that your opinions are rather empty and meaningless. like searching a Cake employee's linked in profile and assuming that's the grand total of his CV, It seems like a reasonable assumption as it is stated that that is his work experience but facts don't get in the way of your arguments do they? Actually I searched Zyler Vega's name when I first saw it here on the forum for the simple reason that I found it unusual and surreal sounding. (I don't mean that in a bad way at all). I was just curious whether it was common or not. (I tend to be curious about things. Some people, like you, seem much less curious and less interested in searching stuff and rather more interested in spouting their opinion about those things that they didn't even bother checking). I saw his resume and was surprised because I had gotten the impression he was the Product Manager for X1. It turns out I was mistaken about that. then coming on the Cake forums and making an accusation he's not qualified for his job? Someone straight out of university with that kind of limited work experience would most certainly not be qualified to be the single and only Product Manager of Cakewalk's flagship product, no. It doesn't matter how smart he is, that kind of job needs real experience. You probably have never been in a position to make such decisions or you would already know that yourself. There is nothing wrong or cheap about being interested in the people behind Cakewalk and I think that my concern that someone fresh out of uny might be sole Product Manager for X1 is understandable. Thankfully Brandon has clarified the situation. Now can we get back to the topic at hand and can you keep your cheap pot shots to yourself? Thanks. UnderTow
post edited by UnderTow - 2011/03/15 22:54:37
|
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
- Total Posts : 11546
- Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
- Location: Parkesburg, PA
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 22:49:24
(permalink)
Those people, whoever they are, that made the windows-consistency argument for not using single left click to add notes could not have been composers, and their opinions should therefore not be counted. Really? I can't be the only person that primarily uses a controller to record MIDI parts and the PRV to edit them... The current left-click selection behavior is ideal for me for exactly that reason - I spend much more time selecting notes than drawing. But if the scenario was reversed then yeah, I would certainly select a different tool rather than hold down a modifier key all the time. So I'm all for the option that Brandon mentioned. But to imply that composers always manually enter notes in the PRV doesn't seem fair, or entirely accurate.
SteveC https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163 SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors; Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO); Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
|
PedalPoint
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
- Total Posts : 52
- Joined: 2010/12/09 22:56:07
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 23:32:53
(permalink)
stevec Those people, whoever they are, that made the windows-consistency argument for not using single left click to add notes could not have been composers, and their opinions should therefore not be counted. Really? I can't be the only person that primarily uses a controller to record MIDI parts and the PRV to edit them... The current left-click selection behavior is ideal for me for exactly that reason - I spend much more time selecting notes than drawing. But if the scenario was reversed then yeah, I would certainly select a different tool rather than hold down a modifier key all the time. So I'm all for the option that Brandon mentioned. But to imply that composers always manually enter notes in the PRV doesn't seem fair, or entirely accurate. I do sometimes have to be read as a little tongue-in-cheek, you see. I didn't mean to imply that the current left-click selection behavior wouldn't be ideal in many situation. I use the same left-click selection behavior too, remember, I just switch between tools. So I think your argument is valid and I can see why the current left-click selection behavior works for you. I guess my main point was that to argue from Windows-consistency is an especially bad, and shall I say unmusical, argument either way. Especially when it comes to such an important issue as which behavior to assign to the left click in the piano-roll. It doesn't strike me as a kind of argument someone who actually use the software on a daily basis would make.
|
A1MixMan
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
- Total Posts : 1706
- Joined: 2003/11/19 16:15:11
- Location: SunriseStudios
- Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1/a's Destruction Of The Piano Roll Interface And The Resulting End Of The Unive
2011/03/15 23:41:08
(permalink)
You should be able to configure it anyway you want. Similar to the way you can have either the left side or right side be highlighted when split. I prefer to have it on the right as most likely I want to delete it. But there may be times when I only want to work with the left side, so having that option is great. The same thing for the left delete / right delete discussion. Wouldn't it be cool to open up the tool HUD and be able to customize it anyway we wanted?
post edited by A1MixMan - 2011/03/15 23:44:50
|