Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye

Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 4 of 6
Author
DumbKidFromHell
Max Output Level: -79 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 598
  • Joined: 2005/06/09 22:22:51
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/24 22:36:30 (permalink)
Nah - I still prefer to think of you as an utter twat so no apology !


I have no problem with twat!
#91
David_C
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 63
  • Joined: 2007/08/29 08:38:39
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/24 22:46:59 (permalink)
Holy smokes guys, give Steve Austin a break. Yes, it is odd that he announce on a Sonar forum that he finds it bad and all but why are there so many Mac haters out there? I own a Mac Mini 2.0 ghz (mostly for video editing) but I also got the Logic Express 8 upgrade and find it not too bad. Mind you my main system is PC with Sonar 7 which works equally nice and I really prefer the Cakewalk VIs like Dimension Pro (awesome), Rapture and z3ta to the Jam Packs that I once found unbeatable. Personally, Session Drummer 2 has awesome kits with some great subtelties. I also like Sonar's interface a bit better. THE ONLY thing I still really dislike about Sonar is the notation editing window. Logic's I find to be the best of any DAW. I studied orchestral composition in university for a few years so notation is the area I'm most comfortable in, and I dislike how you cannot simply click on the note head and hear the tone or else drag it up and down on the staff chromatically with note audition. I do fell the boys at Cakewalk need to address this. Other than that, Sonar 7 is frankly quite astonishing. I enjoy making music on it.

However, Mac's do not suck. I hope Steve is still perusing this thread however since I want to tell him to check out the Apple Help forums under Logic and see how many users have the same issues/problems/questions as onces voiced on this forum. There is no getting around the fact that sometimes technology gets in the way. I personally had tons of issues building my last PC and Vista 64. Neither of my vid cards worked (ATI RAdeon X1550 and Gforce 6200) nor my wireless D-link adpater (kinda important when authorizing my NI plug-ins). But then again, my Intel Mac won't even load my EWQL Symphonic Choirs so that Kontakt 2 can recognize the samples.

As for the price- well, yeah a Mac Mini will run you under $1000, but you have to add 2 gigs of RAM (which is the max on it), buy Logic Express ($299) or Pro ($499), a soundcard (Firewire is optimal) which could cost anywhere between $250 to $1000. If you want to regress to a G5 Power PC tower, than you are looking at $1500 and up. And most of them need more RAM. And storage. It will be a costly thing. If you already have a PC, than you're okay to go with Sonar because you can download Asio4All to run off your built-in soundcard (I find the WDM drivers wonky personally).

Anyhow, best of luck Steve. If Logic/Apple gets to make good music and easier than Sonar, go for it. Me, well I honestly boot up my Mac 25% of the time while Sonar on my PC gets most of the attention.

-Dave

Mac G5 2.0ghz, Logic 8, Dimension Pro, Z3TA, Rapture, EWQLSO Platinum Pro XP, EWQLSC, Vienna SE, HALion Symphonic Orchestra, etc
#92
Jose7822
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 10031
  • Joined: 2005/11/07 18:59:54
  • Location: United States
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/24 22:57:44 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: vomit2

But I don't know if she's telling me the truth or not, she doesn't have a lot of exsprance!



That's funny as hell .
#93
RockinRoll
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 183
  • Joined: 2007/09/16 23:18:22
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 00:16:26 (permalink)
Wow, some serious angst against the Mac ... what is up with that? I can understand a lack of interest, given you are working fine with what you have but ... wow ... wow

Unfortunately Vista is pretty much a dud, its driver support is non-existent and its performance lacking. Unfortunately, it appears to be the horse that Cakewalk has decided to ride and this means that Windows problems are Cakewalk's problems.

I personally like the Sonar interface better than Logic's but I have clearly had less trouble on the Mac than Windows ... by a long and I mean long shot. You have insurmountable problems with Vista64 and mixing 32 with 64 is a really bad idea. Nothing is perfect but your odds of success are much higher on the Mac. If you have no tolerance for dicking around with the technology, then Windows is not the place to be and you will like the Mac. I would normally add that you can build your Frankenstein in the PC world but ... Apple's Mac Pro has been coming out with the fastest processor technology available before anyone else. Dare we say FrankenMac!!!! :)

I tried out Bootcamp the other day and have come to the realization that with my Mac I have can my Cake, Logic and Final Cut too! Can't see a downside in that.

RnR
#94
David_C
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 63
  • Joined: 2007/08/29 08:38:39
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 00:48:18 (permalink)
RnR, I do agree with you. When I first went back to PC land before Sonar 7 came out, I had nothing but problems tweaking this, adjusting that, not actually writing any music! Now my PC runs very smoothly but now so does my Mac Mini. like I said before, I like the interface of Sonar better than Logic but I agree that there is much too much negativity towards Macs here. Which I suppose is natural. In any case, Cakewalk rules!

Mac G5 2.0ghz, Logic 8, Dimension Pro, Z3TA, Rapture, EWQLSO Platinum Pro XP, EWQLSC, Vienna SE, HALion Symphonic Orchestra, etc
#95
rjt
Max Output Level: -70 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1017
  • Joined: 2003/11/08 10:12:44
  • Location: Portland, Oregon
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 00:51:23 (permalink)
While I thought most of the answers here were hilarious, what ever happened to "Don't feed the trolls??"

Talk is cheap; supply outweighs the demand.

Light travels faster than sound, that's why some people look bright before you hear them speak.

Jerry Jones bought the Dallas Cowboys, Andy Reid owns them!!

#96
steve austin
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 93
  • Joined: 2004/03/17 23:34:41
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 01:18:54 (permalink)
Thanks David_C and RockinRoll for your levelheaded comments and realistic insights gained from experience, half of these guys in here seem to have their head up their backside, as if the PC is the be all and end all when we know for a fact it is not, and they seem very defensive(even worse than Mac users) despite the fact that they know very well that the PC DAW world has very real and ongoing problems running Sonar under Vista64
.
LogicPro8 can expect to be practically "bug free" within one or two updates because currently intel users are nothing but praising Logic8 for its stability and new streamlined interface as well as being optimised for quad core processors etc.
the amount of problems PC users have to deal with when starting out with a new PC are not what i want to run into, because some users in here have taken months and even years to get things running properly and then they lock their setup out of any more updates to avoid the inevitable problems an update brings.

But as i understand it, the LogicPro8 has been largely if not totally rewritten for the new Leopard 64bit OS because they needed to get rid of some of the old bugbears and code that was causing some problems in the past, but i have come to the conclusion that anyone starting out in the DAW world would be much better off with a brand new intel Mac and simply wait for the LogicPro8.1 update and Leopard 10.5.1 and then there will be minimal problems if at all.
Logic is also about to be upgraded to 64 bit and i anticipate it to be running smoothly on Leopard with very real performance and efficiency gains, unlike the hyperbole stated by cakewalk regarding Sonars use inside vista64.
The advantage of LogicPro is that it is owned by the people who develop the OS so the programmers of the OS pass on inside knowledge and secrets to the LogicPro8 developers for maximum stability programming with minimal performance hiccups.And the OS is also developed with the LogicPro8 application in mind so that can only be a real plus for stability and efficiency.
My opening post did state that i wanted to buy Sonar7 and jump on board but i anticipate nothing but problems, going by most of the posts in here. It is a pity because i would have loved to use the Z3TA+,PSYNII,Pentagon, and V-vocal but i just ain't prepared to deal with the issues Sonar is having with windows.
post edited by steve austin - 2007/10/25 01:33:14
#97
keith
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3882
  • Joined: 2003/12/10 09:49:35
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 01:20:37 (permalink)
ORIGINAL: David_C
Holy smokes guys, give Steve Austin a break.


Stone Col' Steve is getting what is coming to him. Not that he cares. If he actually intended to carry on a debate as to the suitability and stability of SONAR7 then he could have done so. There are many people on this board that use many products, many hardware platforms, and can carry on meaningful discussions on the benefits of one over the other -- from features to price to just about anything meaningful one would want to discuss.

Instead, "steve" was interested in lobbing a forum hand grenade and ducking for cover. "steve" wants to get cute with his little Mac/Logic religious crusade, so "steve" gets what's coming to him. I hope he got paid for his little free advertisement/disinformation post, 'cuz otherwise that's just pathetic. No, "steve" doesn't get a break... "steve" wants to get cute... and "steve" can go fnck himself. Oops, typo! I meant: "steve" can go f*ck himself.

Yes, it is odd that he announce on a Sonar forum that he finds it bad and all


Actually, no, I don't agree. This forum is a perfectly fine place to post educated opinions on and criticisms of SONAR. There's lots of that floating around. There's a good balance of fanboyism/fangirlism and relatively unbiased and practical knowledge and experience. There have been and continue to be many posts about disappointments with bugs, feature sets, upgrade prices, GUI button outline pixel widths, and on and on.

In fact, this is the perfect forum to voice criticisms of the products and of the company itself. Constructive criticism usually ends up in fruitful discussions on features and other things. When SONAR3 came out, one lengthy and heated bug discussion concluded with Ron Kuper admitting that Cake had limited time/resources to devote to bug fixing a product beyond a certain point after release. The whole discussion, all 10 or so pages of it, ended with Ron committing to changing Cake's dev process (to the extent possible) to devote more resources to patch release well into product lifecycles. And we all are getting the benefits of that, getting dot releases loaded with enhancements and patch releases well into the dev cycle of the next version.


Let me reiterate the content of "steve's" post. First, the title "Sonar7 just not good enough [...]". Really? How would he know? He doesn't own SONAR. I can tell you with no uncertainty that he has not demoed SONAR7, because no such demo is available. And even if his friend gave him a copy of SONAR7 to try on his own PC, he would have a hard time doing so because apparently he doesn't own a PC either. Or a Mac for that matter. After all, he's a "hardware musician", right? Or did he lie about that, too? He's so sneaky, that "steve"... he's like Jason Bourne... except different.

Then we have this in the first couple of sentences:

all i see in this forum is nothing but problems problems problems with Sonar7 not to mention Vista.
how dare cakewalk advertise S7 as the ducks nuts and 64bit and all that crap when it is far from being stable and efficient


Dave, considering that according to the content of his own post "steve" owns none of the following items -- a PC, a Mac, a copy of windows XP, a copy of windows Vista, a copy of OSX, a copy of SONAR7, a copy of Logic Pro8 -- do you think what I quoted above represents a legitimate criticism of SONAR7 on a PC, or is it flame bait from a two-bit troll?

If "steve" wants to post a damning critique of SONAR features/workflow/stability based on hands-on experience, and make a valid argument for using some other app and/or platform based on more than just a.) "somebody told me ...", b.) "I've read advertising copy in the latest Macworld that says ...", or c.) "Steve Jobs paid me to say ...", then I say let's have it! Unfortunately, "steve" isn't up to the task, nor is that his objective.


but why are there so many Mac haters out there?


I think there are more Mac fans around here than one would think. I'm always seeing posts from people running SONAR on MBPs and such. The caustic responses are less anti-Mac and more about "steve" making laughable, a S s c L o w n posts about Macs and Logic Pro. Seriously, I wonder if there is a clandestine group within Apple that conducts these sad commando raids on competitors' forums? I wonder if people like "steve austin" and "AXE" get a paycheck from Steve Jobs, like some sort of Blackwater soldier of fortune... And if so, I wonder if the money comes from some untraceable offshore account...

Here ya go, you do the math:

http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=634966&mpage=1
http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=633489&mpage=1#633522
http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=120110&mpage=1

Then there's this little time capsule from our own SteveJL: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=164528&mpage=20#184308

He tried to warn us... we didn't listen. All our base are belong to SteveJL.
post edited by keith - 2007/10/25 01:35:20
#98
RockinRoll
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 183
  • Joined: 2007/09/16 23:18:22
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 01:37:25 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: steve austin

LogicPro8 can expect to be practically "bug free" within one or two updates because currently intel users are nothing but praising Logic8 for its stability and new streamlined interface as well as being optimised for quad core processors etc.


Nothing is bug free, not even a Mac. ;)


the amount of problems PC users have to deal with when starting out with a new PC are not what i want to run into, because some users in here have taken months and even years to get things running properly and then they lock their setup out of any more updates to avoid the inevitable problems an update brings.


Locking out updates is wise on any platform, even the Mac if you depend on your machine.

There are clearly advantages to providing the hardware, operating system and software and one major benefit is the ability to quickly diagnose and resolve problems.

We are seeing change and Apple is clearly "out innovating" Windows. This was not always true and the Mac has just recently taken the performance edge and added than to its stability and ease of use edge. One thing that I find amazing is that with Leopard you will see increased performance from Tiger. This is in stark contrast to a performace decrease that you will see moving your PC to Vista.

Where Apple's success is going to have little impact on Windows sales, I believe it will have a much greater impact on Cakewalk's sales. Of course there are plenty that are buying Macs to run Windows on them, especially the Macbook and Macbook Pro.

With the Mac you cannot lose as it provides every possible OS support and hence all applications along with top end hardware performance that cannot even be found in competitors.

This Christmas is going to be interesting.
#99
Rev. Jem
Max Output Level: -58 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1723
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 22:40:10
  • Location: Llareggub, Oz
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 01:50:17 (permalink)
steve austin = David_C = RockinRoll

Too easy.

Mac haters ? No. Dork haters ? I think so.
keith
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3882
  • Joined: 2003/12/10 09:49:35
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 01:58:12 (permalink)
On May 5, 2004 "steve austin" said:

ORIGINAL: steve austin
the current Emagic(ohh dirty word in here i know!)Logicpro6 and soon to be replaced pro7 with ALL emagics plugins bundled as standard is just going to be to good to resist,esspecially with the recent price slash,and the price of macs plummiting and the hassle free,highly refined,ease of use, streamlined OSX.


On May 6, 2004 "steve austin" decided to elaborate on the benefits of Logic on the Mac ("steve's", uh, comments are highlighted):

ORIGINAL: steve austin
Akshara says;
Dreamstation is no slouch. Neither is the Edirol. And then Project 5 can be had for a song these days, which integrates well with Sonar.

-the dreamstation may be adequate(which is hardly good enough these days!) in A FEW ways,but i assure you it does not match the logic ES2,or ES1 for that matter(you want analog!?check this one out) and project5 costs $795 in australia which would be on top of sonars $1195 making that combo the same price as logicpro6 $1995:
Akshsra says;
Um... yeah it does. There's Cyclone, which is a very capable Groovesampler clone; and Vsampler is as serious as any hardware sampler I've ever come across. And there's a manual now, btw.

-the upcoming ultrabeat(which will be bundled with the next update of logic)is a high end DEDICATED drum/percussion/synth/ sampler allowing twenty five different sound TYPES with dedicated sound shaping SPECIFIC PARAMETERS FOR EACH TYPE,utilising synthesis,component modelling and samples or any combination in between,as well as project5 type grid sequencing being intergrated,i would say that makes ultrabeat godzilla,leaving cyclone as a simplistic apprentice,plus Logics about to implement acid style looping AND the NEW apple loops format into it's app,gosh this just keeps getting better,as well as the new Sculpture(is it's name) component modelling synth(lethal specialised pads and the like, or bowed string emulations,whatever takes your fancy) and a ducks nuts high end amp modeler... WHOOOA all included! and the V sampler is not as streamlined as or as quick to use as EXS24II: now if well just move on to the next cheap comeback the sooner i can get outta here...

Akshara says;
Sure I could... depending on their skill, one can do all the mastering that they need with the included Sonitus Multiband and EQ.

-oh really now! well to quote paul white(chief and editor of sound-on-sound magazine) "although the virtual mastering proccessor iv'e described use's only logics own plug ins, i've found it is capable of delivering EXTREMELY GOOD RESULTS! strong words coming from a man whose heard it all and whose position can't afford him to exagerate too often OR over generalise just because other apps might sound capable or in the ballpark, and where the hell is your specialised Adaptive limiter,pro performing exciter, subass sculpturing and world class(as stated by the best masterers in the business) POW dithering??? go with that sonitus couple obi wan and hope like heck you don't have to SPEND more money!?

Akshara says;
hehe... haven't spent much time actually working over in OSX DAW land recently, have you?

-yes and it's friggen unbelievable how streamlined,HASSLE FREE and a joy to use this apple OS is(it's called PANTHER10.3.3 by the way) esspecially with so much classy software included as standard.1ms latency with built in audio card. such are the privilages of a hardware company owning the software provided.the proccesor efficiency of Logic is so good that a reasonably cheap(what with the recent price drops and all)mac will kick along nicely, OSX was designed for PRO music applications in mind,not just for office applications or extranuous paraphanallia:
Akshsra says;
And the Fantom would blow the Emacs doors off as a creative tool. Paired with a Roland VS-2480, the Emac would cower in terror. You've never actually owned an Emac, have you?

-i think you just like to try and make people cower in terror but the real grim reaper would have a few things to say about that. In australia a fantomX6 and VS2480 retail for a combined price of $15000, in contrast to an appropriate speed Emac and Logicpro6 which would cost a measly $3299(which i'm on my way down after this to place my dollars on the counter after an extensive demo from the dude at the local muso store) and after playing around quite exstensively with the roland fantomx (having been a hardware head for years!) i soon realised it's just another workstation with no equivalent for a ES2, ES1,or ultrabeat percussion synth, and that it's samples plus synthesis engine sounds no better nor is it more capable than the mighty EXS24II,thats before mentioning the tonne of other fully usable high end synths that come bundled with Logic pro6,bit of a price difference, opps i mean great divide there, especially for the old archaic way of the roland combination, extra AD/DA issues,wordclock issues,level matching issues,balanced/unbalanced issues, truncation and rounding error issues(all technically speaking of course)because the Fantom only has four outputs so things have to be recorded and rerecorded,and portability issues and a host of other things which all add up:

QUALITY-PERFORMANCE PLUS-STABILITY-RELIABILTY-EXCELLENT thats EXCELLENT PRICE

Akshara says;
All of this is a currently possible reality, regardless of whether you choose PC, Mac, or a dedicated hardware solution... for between $5k to $10K.

-yeah but it's messier and more exspensive on a PC (i'd dare to say twice as expensive and twice as messy actually,quite a bit more to deal with huh!seeing as computers are not the most ideal way to make music in the first place despite it's huge advantages.when faced with a PC scenario and the aforementioned issues about cakewalks current state of user informing and bug/functionality,and lack of high end inclusions. Yes, points to the sonitus pack but that doesn't make up for it in my mind: no offence cakewalk,hey but this is just how it is.(the last eight words of this sentence have been left for akshars quote response!) hehehe as some would put it!



On October 24, 2007 "steve austin" wasn't done with his sales pitch:

ORIGINAL: steve austin
Over on the Mac side of things, LogicPro8 has just been released and it is 99% stable and bug free "ON RELEASE" and the new Leopard OS will be released this friday and it will give no such problems as Vista does, plus it will actually give a 35% increase in performance because Leopard has been totally optimised for intel multicore processors and it runs 32bit and 64bit applications simultaneously without any need for a so called bit bridge that cakewalk uses.
I would have loved to jump on board with Sonar7 because it looked like a very good DAW with all its new plugs etc but Logic Pro8 has just lowered its price from $999 to $499 which makes it irresistable esspecially when i know the Mac platform and OS is so elegant and stable and i don't have to make adjustments to the OS to get it working efficiently because it automatically optimises itself when you open Logic Pro, and also i don't have to worry about other issues like drivers, bios, and certain obscure settings, but rather just load up and go.by the time LogicPro has its first update it will be100% bug free or as close as you could expect from any DAW.
[etc. etc. etc.]


I can't wait to hear about how Logic Pro 8.1 is an impossible "101% bug-free" when it's released...

Seriously, what are you? Salesperson? Apple marketing wonk? Hired gun? Or just a fanboy who landed, inexplicably, in the wrong forum?
Vim
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 24
  • Joined: 2007/10/23 03:12:27
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 03:08:31 (permalink)
hi All,

I'm still on a PC with an 865 chipset and using logic platinum 5.5.1 (XPPro SP2) with an upgrade to logic pro 6 and had the thought that if it ain't broke don't fix it. It is stable for me and has earned an honest and good return on investment.

At the time of my purchase in 2001, Logic on the PC was the best available bang for the buck. I looked at Sonar but it did not have many of the features that i wanted (especially VST support) and my UAD1 cards would have 'issues' with it.

i had thought of switching to Sonar a number of times over the years since (as it matured) but until now the primary reason for not switching was the lack of the afore mentioned feature. It really was a deal killer.

I can no longer not upgrade. Within a year or two, quad core will be relatively cheaper and so will ddr3 with hdd space much cheaper. Then i'll just upgrade my PC and relegate the current machine to games and video work ... which it can still do admirably. Besides, paying $200 for a Logic upgrade and then paying $5 000 for a top flight machine to take me through 5 years is abit too steep. $5 200 versus $350 for a cross grade. no brainer decision really

Over on the yahoo logic user forum, there is not a mailing that goes by without someone venting over some broken feature in Logic for example Logic Control or Mackie Control universal does not work well and so forth. But just like here, others help them fix the issue and lodge the problem with Haydn et al who wrote logic. Mind you for every user that has a problem, there are 100 others that have a perfectly working set-up simply because they know what they are doing regarding computer upgrades, OS upgrades and Application upgrades. So i can understand the OPs rants if all he has to go by are the perfectly working logic 8 system in some studio that he frequents versus the incessant complaints he reads about here.

Also note that most users that are novices as far as DAWS are concerned are the ones reporting the most 'compatability' and use related issues ... experienced users are not so concerned about 'bugs' because they've developed workarounds and are more concerned about being able to do things quickly ... features. Power users of Logic (such as myself ) just know what needs to be done to make the music and keep their machines in top shape. No doubt the same is true of power users of Sonar.

hopefully as i learn S7, i will not get too frustrated with it and hope that i can rely on the power users expertise as and when needed.

Thanks and have a nice day.
koolbass
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 853
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:27:43
  • Location: Nashville, TN
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 04:11:50 (permalink)
Dear OP,

I'm not quite sure what your problem might be. You may not be cut out for DAW work. I spent the evening editing/comping some vocals I recorded two days ago, primarily using multiple lanes and the mute tool.

Everything has gone totally smooth, very quick, and flawless, and I'm using Sonar 7.01. I also tuned a couple words, using V-Vocal. I'm personally ecstatic with the results.

I don't think the problem is with your hardware/software, but with your attitude. It sounds to me like you haven't actually worked with S7.

Cheers,
Lance "koolbass" Martin
 
Sonar Platinum, Sound Forge Pro 12, ADK built audio computer: Intel 8 core i7 Haswell-E overclocked 4.2GHz; 32 Gig DDR4/2666 ram; Corsair 850W power; Windows Pro 10 x64; Geforce GTX 980 video w/4 monitors (Acer 27" touch screen/primary); 3 Seagate drives - OS, audio, samples, 2 TB external USB3 bkup drive; RME MADIface XT; Ferrofish A16 MKII ADDA; Lucid GenX 6-96 clock

www.BoogieHouseMusic.com
koolbass
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 853
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:27:43
  • Location: Nashville, TN
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 04:18:25 (permalink)
Vim,

Welcome to the world of Sonar, and I wish for you the best. It's refreshing reading an intelligent and mature post from a person who actually "gets it".

I'm sorry you have to leave the comfort zone for the Logic/PC world you've come to know, but you'll find many helpful people here as you begin to find you way around Sonar.

Good luck, and I hope you make some great music!!

Cheers,
Lance "koolbass" Martin
 
Sonar Platinum, Sound Forge Pro 12, ADK built audio computer: Intel 8 core i7 Haswell-E overclocked 4.2GHz; 32 Gig DDR4/2666 ram; Corsair 850W power; Windows Pro 10 x64; Geforce GTX 980 video w/4 monitors (Acer 27" touch screen/primary); 3 Seagate drives - OS, audio, samples, 2 TB external USB3 bkup drive; RME MADIface XT; Ferrofish A16 MKII ADDA; Lucid GenX 6-96 clock

www.BoogieHouseMusic.com
Steve_B_Jobs
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2007/10/25 04:37:10
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 04:42:21 (permalink)
I just want to say good job boys (steve, rocknrollin, etc) MAC is the best. Screw you PCs. To all my fan boys, yes Logic is the best. The hell with all of you. I have to answer an important phone call on my IPhone. DAMN! Another dropped call! At&t, SUCKS!!!!!!
gordonrussell76
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1879
  • Joined: 2006/12/15 05:28:08
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 05:12:34 (permalink)
steve austin = David_C = RockinRoll = Steve B Jobs = AXE

Give it up, its boring.

Oh and Vm great mature post, welcome to the forum

G
Steve_B_Jobs
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2007/10/25 04:37:10
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 05:22:13 (permalink)
Well, I just transported myself into the future with my new IMachine, and Logic 32, is better than Sonar 33!!!!
gordonrussell76
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1879
  • Joined: 2006/12/15 05:28:08
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 06:04:52 (permalink)
Er

What the hell are you talking about.

Your welcome to the future mate, take your hyperbole and shove it where the Steve Jobs don't shine.

G
dappa1
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2949
  • Joined: 2007/02/26 04:18:57
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 06:12:26 (permalink)
A friend of mine who runs Logic7 claims its the best. Although his last DAW was Cubase sx2.

I wonder if the same thing happens in the logic forum. where some one who represents Sonar goes over to another forum to tell them how good there DAW is. I find it strange that this is the case here. Why would anyone feel the need to do that unless they thought there was a threat to there Daw of choice.

I know alot of people have been making mass exodus' to Sonar and v7. V7 seems to be the one people are interested in. (many new members have been joining or asking about v7 and weighing up the alternatives) those who run MACs are still looking at sonar 7 and Bootcamp. There is lots of talk in the MAC camp about Dimension pro and alot of hip hoppers are looking towards this to make there music with. Therefore it would be only feasible that many will turn from Cubase and Logic to Sonar as I know alot of people are fed up with their DAW of choice.

Vista will not always suck. Developers will start to make drivers as the new quadcores invade and saturate the market. The dust will settle and the OS though not perfect for some will become more stable.

I for one had problems albeit, minute problems with Vista. That was only because I could not download the updates for Vista and the patches for Sonar. Now that I am able to download the updates and patches the drop outs have gone and the updates have brought stability to my OS.

Dramtic improvements have been made with these updates and I am sure that, by the time the SP1's are available stability will not be so much of an issue neither will latency.

There are some in this forum who have not been hindered by Vista because they have done their homework. It would be different if you have just bought a machine that has Vista on it but the system was never ready for Vista in the first place. I think that is bad marketing by M$ but then again they have to offload Vista because of poor support.

As I mentioned earlier. I had problems but they have been downloaded away.

For what it is worth. I have recorded music with Sonar and XP and I have recorded music with Vista and Sonar. But then again. I always choose my PC's for my specific needs.

I like MACs and I like Logic. I like some of the things that Cubase can do and I also like some of the thngs that Sonar can do. Would I buy a MAC? Yes. Probably. would it make a difference to my music? Nope. But I can make a difference to my music!

You support the bears, I support the knicks!

You Support Arsenal, I support Manchester United (who are the best by the way)

SteveJL
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4644
  • Joined: 2004/01/23 05:26:38
  • Location: CANADA
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 06:23:52 (permalink)
Then there's this little time capsule from our own SteveJL: http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.asp?m=164528&mpage=20#184308

OMG! I had completely forgotten that thread. Even though there was so much flaming, it was a GREAT discussion. Ahhhhhhh, good times We don't get so many of those here any more Wonder whatever happened to Shea? (he hasn't posted since 4/06)

Thanks for referencing it, and my detective-work on Steve Austin

 
David_C
Max Output Level: -89 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 63
  • Joined: 2007/08/29 08:38:39
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 10:25:29 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: Rev. Jem

steve austin = David_C = RockinRoll

Too easy.

Mac haters ? No. Dork haters ? I think so.


Uh, what did I ever say to you to provoke this smart-ass equation? I'm a Sonar 7 user, and aside for about 6 months where I tried a few Mac DAWS, I have been a Sonar user since 2.2. I'm not sure why you would equate me with a fellow who porports to not having used any DAW. I'm certainly not biased about which is better and if that's what led you to this response I would suggest that you take a couple deep breaths and get some objective perspective on the matter at hand. Any DAW is a tool that allows us to get our musical ideas out into the world. Whichever one does it better for that person is the best one to use. There is no absolute best sequencer (although I can think of a few that I find terribly archaic..cough..Digital Performer...cough).

I didn't mean to insinuate that every here was wrong for their comments, I just thought we're above petty "don't let the door hit your a$$ on the way out" responses. It seems obvious form his posts that he's a Mac fan although my only question is why not hang around the Logic forum and find more about that or the Steinbergh forum and investigate that DAW as opposed to a Cakewalk forum where you know there's no direct Mac support (aside from Parallels/Boot Camp running Windows XP).

Anyhow, if you see me as a dork, I guess I cannot do anything about that. I think you're wrong but whatever. I'm sure you wouldn't conduct yourself this way if this was a live forum where everyone was in a big room face-to-face. Gotta love the internet huh? It allows people to grow balls they thought they never had and hide under the tough shell of anonymity.

Mac G5 2.0ghz, Logic 8, Dimension Pro, Z3TA, Rapture, EWQLSO Platinum Pro XP, EWQLSC, Vienna SE, HALion Symphonic Orchestra, etc
gordonrussell76
Max Output Level: -56.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1879
  • Joined: 2006/12/15 05:28:08
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 10:33:47 (permalink)
Fair enough, probably you were just similar enough to the others, sorry for tarring you with the same brush.

I agree, I am not anti MAC nor anti any other DAW, but its just frustrating when people feel the need to come into the forum and spout crap. I don't go into the Logic forum and tell them how wonderful Sonar is !

I think the other frustration is that a lot of MAC disciples are so fervent that they generally suggest that you must be ****ed or somehow a lesser human being if you foolishly continue to use a PC, which also gets peoples backs up.

I guess you got caught in the crossfire, which is a shame.

G
keith
Max Output Level: -36.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3882
  • Joined: 2003/12/10 09:49:35
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 10:40:23 (permalink)

ORIGINAL: David_C
I didn't mean to insinuate that every here was wrong for their comments, I just thought we're above petty "don't let the door hit your a$$ on the way out" responses. It seems obvious form his posts that he's a Mac fan although my only question is why not hang around the Logic forum and find more about that or the Steinbergh forum and investigate that DAW as opposed to a Cakewalk forum where you know there's no direct Mac support (aside from Parallels/Boot Camp running Windows XP).


Dave, I understand what you're saying, but in "steve austin's" case your insightful suggestions are fruitless... just look at his post history. Constantly selling Logic on the Mac. Why? If they were meaningful, objective comparisons of features and stability that'd be one thing, but all I see is "the Mac is so stable and streamlined and HASSLE FREE"... What the hell does that even mean? He's talkin' out his @ss for some reason, but I can guarantee you it's not for the purpose of constructive debate or problem solving. Hell, even another pointless "I'd really like to see SONAR ported to Mac" thread would be more constructive than the junk he throws out there... Ever see somebody fertilize a garden with animal feces? That's what "steve's" first and second post was like. Just sprinklin' on the crap.

Anyhow, if you see me as a dork, I guess I cannot do anything about that.


I think you just jumped to the defense of the wrong person, unwittingly, and you're guilty by association in the eyes of some. That's my gut feeling anyway. I also think Rev. Jim was being a little toungue-in-cheek with his comment, hence the smileys...
Peter Morrison
Max Output Level: -81 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 471
  • Joined: 2003/12/29 06:52:37
  • Location: Farnham England UK
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 10:44:07 (permalink)
He's had more "Last Posts" than the British Army

Gear;-4 copper kettles-a large dustbin-a piece of string and a cotter pin. I keep a spring on standby 
Monkey Mash
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 163
  • Joined: 2006/09/24 03:13:50
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 10:47:15 (permalink)
Good Boy

dappa1
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2949
  • Joined: 2007/02/26 04:18:57
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 10:57:44 (permalink)
My inspiration does not come from any particular DAW. It is just good that I happen to like the Canvass that I draw on. I have written some good songs in Cubase, some in Sonar and I am sure if I did not like a particular DAW then I am sure that would not stop my creativity.

Infact, to be quite honest. put any DAW infront of me and I am sure, in time I would get used to it.

I am quite happy with what I have now, and If I see Cubase going anywhere for a discounted price or Bundled I would use it. If Logic made a resurgence on the pc, then I would investigate it.

Because, it is all about the music at the end of the day!

If Steve wants to go, I will open the door for him and pat him on the back and wish him the best with his new DAW; whether or not his DAW of choice is invisible or not!

although I am a bronze, silver or gold member. I only come here to have a laugh and learn more about what I have; although I do not use PE. I still learn alot from coming into these forums. I have been using Sonar products for ten months. I am developing quite well with it. No one in the forum can stop me from using a product that I chose to buy with my money.

I find it funn that some would even try!
johnsjam
Max Output Level: -86 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 232
  • Joined: 2006/03/29 17:35:55
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 11:37:31 (permalink)
What everyone else said: Bye!

My music: http://www.johnmansfieldmusic.com/

2009 Winner in Unisong's International Songwriting Contest with "Crazy"!

Sonar 8.5.2 PE
Les Paul Studio
Fender Stratocaster
Fender Telecaster American Deluxe Ash
Takamine Acoustic
Fender Jazz Bass
Guitar Rig 3
Superior Drummer
koolbass
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 853
  • Joined: 2003/11/13 23:27:43
  • Location: Nashville, TN
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 12:10:04 (permalink)
Judging by this post and many of your former posts, you've got an obvious personal incentive with mac. But, unless you're just totally blind and ignorant, your platform attacks seem to have an opposite than intended effect.

But you'll always catch more ants with honey than with vinegar, and vinegar can definitely be a good wine gone bad.

Cheers,
Lance "koolbass" Martin
 
Sonar Platinum, Sound Forge Pro 12, ADK built audio computer: Intel 8 core i7 Haswell-E overclocked 4.2GHz; 32 Gig DDR4/2666 ram; Corsair 850W power; Windows Pro 10 x64; Geforce GTX 980 video w/4 monitors (Acer 27" touch screen/primary); 3 Seagate drives - OS, audio, samples, 2 TB external USB3 bkup drive; RME MADIface XT; Ferrofish A16 MKII ADDA; Lucid GenX 6-96 clock

www.BoogieHouseMusic.com
Steve_B_Jobs
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3
  • Joined: 2007/10/25 04:37:10
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 12:48:32 (permalink)
their head up their backside


Speaking of which. I have my INeeds to be taking care of. Lets meet in the usual place.
RockinRoll
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 183
  • Joined: 2007/09/16 23:18:22
  • Status: offline
RE: Sonar7 just not good enough, sorry guys bye bye 2007/10/25 23:26:27 (permalink)
What a joke, you guys have too much time on your hands.

I use them all and tell it like it is ... sorry if its not what you wanted to hear.

RnR
Page: < 12345.. > >> Showing page 4 of 6
Jump to:
© 2026 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1