Sound Quality of Sonar X1

Page: << < ..2122232425.. > >> Showing page 21 of 31
Author
bobguitkillerleft
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 944
  • Joined: 2011/05/17 17:28:58
  • Location: Adelaide Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:17:00 (permalink)

OK RTL Latency is the TOPIC!

Is it still the PCIe[not PCI.....Sandy Bridge...oh sure I got 2 PCI slots,but THE BRIDGE!-even if it worked,No better than Firewire,they tell me] yes I said PCIe,is it still the quickest trip?
Then besides EMU who makes PCIe for at least 1/2 of what RME cost's[here-$1000,just for the card,no pre's,no Multiface]???

Also EMU's 1212,1616m come with Sonar 6!!!.......too old,.PCIe for Sandy B is lookin grim.

ESI make something but,I know 0 about it.

Should I stop typing right now,and just get a Babyface? You use one of those Mr. Roseberry,don't you?

https://soundcloud.com/rks26https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hitmen Lenovo W540 Factoryrefurb SONAR PLATINUM,Ozone 7 N.I. KA6 Komplete 9 SSD4 Platinum Epi L/H LP Custom Headstock broken twice and fixed.Gibson L/H Les Paul 2010 Wine Red Studio stupid Right Hand Vol.Tone for Left Hand?LH84Ibanez RS135 gen.FloydRose JB Marshall 100w 2203 4x25w Celestion Green backs
"You are what you is"-Frank Zappa "But I'm gonna wave my freak flag high"-Jimi Hendrix    
Garry Stubbs
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2619
  • Joined: 2008/02/18 17:34:48
  • Location: Castlethorpe, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:18:07 (permalink)
As someone who spends a fair bit of time on stage performing with wireless systems (wandering into the audience), you get more than about 20' off the stage... and the latency starts to get pretty uncomfortable.
Jim Roseberry



Thats a very interesting fact Jim. I am currently putting together a new band as lead guitarist and have been looking at some wireless rigs for my guitars. I had never considered this. Are you saying that the latency is less if you stay stagebound? (I am talking small club / bar stages here) Is that to do with the processing of any interference in the weakened single as I cant see that the distances involved could possibly be effected by the speed of transmission...


I know this should be for the equipment or coffee house but I couldn't help but respond to the comment...


Garry


https://soundcloud.com/garry-kiosk
Sonar Platinum 64-bit: Q6600 8Gb Win7 64-bit: KRK Monitors: ART MPA PRO VLA ii preamp: 3 x 500Gb internal SATA disks: Superior Drummer2: GPO4: Realstrat: Saxlab: Rapture: Dimension Pro: Ozone 4: Edirol SPS-660: PCR-500 MIDI controller: Korg PadKontrol: Fender / Gibson / Yamaha / Ibanez guitars:Guitar Rig 5: Dual 22" Monitors: Mapex Drums, Sabian AAX cymbals: Alesis DM5 Pro Kit: SE Electronics and Shure Mics: Mathmos Lava Lamp (40W)
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:20:34 (permalink)
> metadebates over metapoints in metadiscussions...or summat.

It's interesting, though, isn't it? After the preceding 20 pages, in which "I can hear it" arguments were shown conclusively to be useless arguments, just shift the topic slightly, and everyone falls back on "I can hear it" immediately.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:24:26 (permalink)



I'm thinking of googling some literature on acoustic latency tests and see what shows up...either that or email some of my audiologist friends and see what they have...

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:26:25 (permalink)
To be fair, I would expect the tolerable threshold to be a bit lower for lots of highly percussive sounds.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9871
  • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
  • Location: Ohio
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:26:52 (permalink)
Well, perception and reality aren't the same thing.

 
In the studio... and on the stage, for all intents/purposes, they are the same.
It's the reality of the "moment".
If you're comfortable in either scenario, you're more apt to deliver a better performance.

Best Regards,

Jim Roseberry
jim@studiocat.com
www.studiocat.com
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:31:11 (permalink)
Jim Roseberry



Lots of people will swear they can hear the difference between 5ms and 15 ms of latency, but they totally can't.

 
FWIW, If you have absolutely any sense of solid/tight musical time (especially those with a drumming background), you can most definitely hear/feel the difference between playing thru 5ms and 15ms total round-trip latency.  Don't think so???  Setup your favorite virtual piano and play it with 5-6ms of latency.  Now add a 100% wet delay plugin (as an insert)... and set it to add 10ms of delay.
Play the virtual piano both with and without the delay.  Which one feels tighter and more responsive?
It's easy to hear the difference (unless you're playing super slow attack sounds). 

Hi Jim, unfortunately I'm in this same camp with you brother. Something in the "feel" changes for me. I don't really hear a latency, but I definitely feel it with my V Drums as well as my keyboard. For example, at 256 buffers (5.3 ms for me) I seriously tell a major difference and can't play there correctly.
 
At 128 buffers (2.7 ms for me) I can play perfectly and do not notice an actual timing thing...but the feel gets funny. I can't even describe it other than I can have someone set this up without me seeing it and I can tell them what buffers they used.
 
At 64 buffers (1.3 ms for me) that feel thing (or lack there of) at 128 buffers is no longer there. I notice all this stuff moreso on my drum kit though than the piano. But I can't do 256 (5.3 ms) at all. I can't believe there was a time when I DID use that setting and just got used to it. It could be because maybe the new stuff of today is a bit more demanding, I was using WDM drivers and never had a pc like the one you built me. I know all that stuff really comes into play performance wise...especially having a pc with the right horse power and good asio drivers. But honest when I tell you man, I can pick these buffer sizes and latency out without even seeing them.
 
As a matter of fact, I just did this about 4 months ago. I have a new studio and when we put the new V Drums kit in and were testing everthing out, I yelled in to my engineer that was at the console "dude, take it off 128 and set it to 64 buffers" and he says "you gotta be kidding me...how did you know that's where it was set?!" Honest, that's a true story. It may have something to do with me originally being a drummer or the fact that I have pretty decent timing...but you're not alone in this. :)
 
-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:33:57 (permalink)
Jim Roseberry



Well, perception and reality aren't the same thing.

 
In the studio... and on the stage, for all intents/purposes, they are the same.
It's the reality of the "moment".
If you're comfortable in either scenario, you're more apt to deliver a better performance.

Indeed. Which would mean the belief that you can hear a difference just as much of a problem as an actual difference, wouldn't it? This is confirmation bias.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:34:03 (permalink)
John T


Aaaaaaannnnndd.... 20 pages.

 
Aaaaaaannnnndd.... 97 times you've posted in those 20 pages.
 
 
That's 16% of all the posts on this massive thread.
 
 
Or just shy of 3⅓ pages all to yourself.
 
 
Somebody sure likes the sound of their own voice.
 
 
Unless of course you meant "Aaaaaaannnnndd.... 20 pages" was a good thing.
 
 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:35:34 (permalink)
I do think it's a good thing, yeah. As you've noticed, it's a conversation I'm actively participating in. If you're not into it, you can always **** off.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:45:38 (permalink)
John T


I do think it's a good thing, yeah. As you've noticed, it's a conversation I'm actively participating in. If you're not into it, you can always **** off.

 
Ahh thanks Johnty baby, I love it when you talk dirty.

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:45:44 (permalink)
http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-122756.html....particularly eeka chu's comment...

THE INFLUENCE OF PRESENTATION TIME 
ASYNCHRONY ON MUSIC INTERVAL PERCEPTION

http://ojs.vre.upei.ca/index.php/psychomusicology/article/viewFile/806/938

Music and The Human Ear
http://www.silcom.com/~aludwig/EARS.htm

Just a quick spelunking on google showed this up...

Now mind, a lot of this is more involved with how we perceive sounds in certain spaces..and as well, brain function plays a certain role in it. 

To me, it really does not make that much of a difference whether some have 'magic ears' or not. If you enjoy playing live, or in the studio, it should be the enjoyment factor that matters more....




The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
Garry Stubbs
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2619
  • Joined: 2008/02/18 17:34:48
  • Location: Castlethorpe, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:51:03 (permalink)
SteveStrummerUK


John T


I do think it's a good thing, yeah. As you've noticed, it's a conversation I'm actively participating in. If you're not into it, you can always **** off.

 
Ahh thanks Johnty baby, I love it when you talk dirty.

Can I talk dirty to ya too Strummy, I'm not very good at it and I need the praccy !


You fop, you .. you... bounder you....




There, I said it..


https://soundcloud.com/garry-kiosk
Sonar Platinum 64-bit: Q6600 8Gb Win7 64-bit: KRK Monitors: ART MPA PRO VLA ii preamp: 3 x 500Gb internal SATA disks: Superior Drummer2: GPO4: Realstrat: Saxlab: Rapture: Dimension Pro: Ozone 4: Edirol SPS-660: PCR-500 MIDI controller: Korg PadKontrol: Fender / Gibson / Yamaha / Ibanez guitars:Guitar Rig 5: Dual 22" Monitors: Mapex Drums, Sabian AAX cymbals: Alesis DM5 Pro Kit: SE Electronics and Shure Mics: Mathmos Lava Lamp (40W)
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:51:16 (permalink)
Karl: on the 24/44 vs. 24/48 thing...I think it's a great question. In my situation as well as the stuff I work on over here, to me anything 44.1 that I record seems to be a bit smaller in sound size. Nothing major, but when I listen back to projects I've done there, there is always a little something missing or thinner sounding to my ears as opposed to 48.

It very well could be I'm hearing something because I want to. But I've tested this on projects before and I always pick the 48 out. It could be my sound cards or whatever, but for me, 16/44 sounds sort of like 1 inch tape and 24/48 sounds more like 2 inch tape as far as the size of the sound goes. I don't use 24/44 and have only messed with it a little bit. The times I did mess with it, I really didn't hear a difference between it and 24/48. But I've stuck with 24/48 because the majority of the big places and people I work with still use it. I've been using 24/48 since 1996 or so. I created a project...sort of like the little guitar files I did for our DAW test in this thread. But I did it with full instrumentation for about 30 seconds at 16/44. Then the same project at 24/48 and then again at 24/96. Each time, I re-recorded the instruments from the ground up.

I noticed no difference between 24/48 and 24/96. I did get that "1 inch tape" type thing out of 16/44 though but there was nothing wrong with the quality. The size of the sounds just appeared to be smaller or something. I picked out the 16/44 mix every time. What I did was, I made 4 test files. 16/44 mix, 24/48 mix and 2 of the same 24/96 mixes so I could try to fool myself with a wild-card.

I then created a random playlist, grabbed a pen and paper, put my mouse on the play button, turned my head and pressed it. As I listened, I wrote down which mix I thought it was. I got the 16/44 right every time and got lucky on the 24/48 and 96's a few times, failed a few times because they sounded so alike. But I picked up on that 16/44 every time for the gear I used at the time. Could I tell today? I really can't say for sure. I'll have to try it and get back to you. Everything has come so far these days...just about everything sounds acceptable. But, that said, I still use 24/48 by habit around here.

Now, I mentioned I couldn't tell a difference between 24/48 and 24/96. To me, if you are doing rock or not mic'ing acoustic instruments, the higher sample rates are not going to shine through. I was recording a school orchestra one day using my mobile unit. I recorded them at 24/48. They decided to try this little piece of a song they were working on just to have a capture of it for their heads. They knew they weren't done with it yet and would mess up in the middle. So, I decided to change gears and do that particular song at 24/96.

Sure enough, they screwed up in the middle and wanted another shot at it. This time, I went back to 24/48. They played the whole thing near perfect...and I'm glad I switched back! When I got the stuff home, man, this is the stuff where 24/96 can make a really nice difference. The less sonic a mix production is, the more you really hear where the higher sample rate kicks in. The more you use plugins, amp sims, distorted guitars etc (even if you mic cabs) the more the higher sample rate in MY opinion doesn't make one bit of difference. But for an orchestra, jazz ensemble, something where you are literally mic'ing lots of acoustic instruments...man, it sure did make a nice difference on my end. Cleaner, a bit more crispness, more clear like stuff was jumping out at me that wasn't as apparent in the other version.

Not drastic mind you, but enough to where you can definitely tell a difference without struggling to hear the difference like we sometimes do when we listen to a test or whatever. It jumps right out to you as different, but it's not something that makes a huge difference like you might think considering most would think that the jump from 48 to 96 would be a huge leap in quality. It didn't hit me like that, but it definitely was different. Hope some of this helps....I'm no expert on this stuff bro, but this has been my experience whether it's scientifically right or completely wrong and I was just hearing things. :)

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:58:23 (permalink)
The Kiosk Project


SteveStrummerUK


John T


I do think it's a good thing, yeah. As you've noticed, it's a conversation I'm actively participating in. If you're not into it, you can always **** off.


Ahh thanks Johnty baby, I love it when you talk dirty.

Can I talk dirty to ya too Strummy, I'm not very good at it and I need the praccy !


You fop, you .. you... bounder you....




There, I said it..

 
Sorry Garry, I can't be having with any of that mate.
 
 
In point of fact, I'm sulking at the moment after such a crushing put-down from me ol' bezzie mate John T....
 
 
I'm only just managing to hold back the tears.
 
 
I think I'll just skulk off with my metaphorical tail between my non-metaphorical legs and self-harm for a couple of days in a darkened room.
 
 
 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

Jim Roseberry
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 9871
  • Joined: 2004/03/23 11:34:51
  • Location: Ohio
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 09:58:49 (permalink)
Hi Jim, unfortunately I'm in this same camp with you brother. Something in the "feel" changes for me. I don't really hear a latency, but I definitely feel it with my V Drums as well as my keyboard. For example, at 256 buffers (5.3 ms for me) I seriously tell a major difference and can't play there correctly.

 
Hi Danny,
 
I don't doubt what you say at all...
With my live keyboard rig, I built a machine that could sustain substantial loads at a 48-sample ASIO buffer size.  Super tight/responsive timing. Why?  Because I much prefered the feel to using larger ASIO buffer sizes.
 
I do think that some folks are more sensitive to timing than others.
Witness that some folks have tight solid timing (as players)... and others not so much.
Great drummers can play ahead/on/behind a click track.  That changes "feel" in a significant way. 
That's being aware (and in control) of timing on a much smaller scale than 15ms. 

Best Regards,

Jim Roseberry
jim@studiocat.com
www.studiocat.com
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 10:06:39 (permalink)
Man a 48 buffer?! LOL!! What's the ms on that, like 0.8 ms? Funny story...when I first got the machine you built for me, it actually worked at 32 buffers one time. It never worked again without a drop-out...as a matter of fact, I couldn't even get the audio engine to start up. But one time, it actually worked and was a pretty cool experience! But I'm totally fine with 64 for the stuff I do. :)

Hey, just to let you know...my buddy Matt is stoked with his pc. He called me one day and was like "yeah, I'm going to Best Buy to get a computer for my studio" and I'm like..."no you don't, you call this guy and let him build it for you...it's non-negotiable". Hahaha! I was at his place a few weeks back. The system is smokin' and he's really blown away with it. He said "wow, everything works and it's fast, I'm so not used to this". LOL! :)

-Danny

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 10:27:13 (permalink)
Thanks for the reply Danny. That was my only serious post, I think, in this whole monster thread. I've always recorded at 48/24, probably because I once read somewhere that I should. Might even have been one of your posts from many moons ago when I first got into this crazy world of digital recording.

I don't think I could tell the difference but my ears are late developing, I'm definitely getting better though. I can hear subtle differences in sounds now that a couple of years ago I would never have noticed.

My second serious post has just reminded me I'm only 12 posts away from the dead horse smiley. Was that really 5 1/2 pages ago that I said that? LOL.....
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 10:43:02 (permalink)
Maybe we should hurry this along to the glue factory?

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
panup
Max Output Level: -50 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2538
  • Joined: 2006/05/23 09:34:35
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 10:47:05 (permalink)
Danny, nice talk about latency and sample rates! 

Like you, I can definitely feel the difference between 64 and 128 with soft synths and playing guitar with GuitarRig. 64 feels more responsive and natural while 128 responds too slow.  I don't play el drums much but even then I feel 64 is natural while 128 delayed. 

What about latency when playing guitar with a real amp then... sound travels 33 cm / 1 ms. If you stand 1 meter away from the cabinet you'll hear sound 3 ms after it's picked.   "At 128 buffers (2.7 ms for me)"  -So is 128 buffers like standing 1 meter away from the cabinet? Maybe if you use headphones but when listening with monitors there is more latency because sound has to travel from speaker to ears (2.5 ms in my nearfields).


I'm used to play with high latencies if I need to: instead of listening the delayed sound I try to imagine it's coming without delay  or I listen another instrument's timing and imagine I'm playing bass when I'm actually overdubbing bass with distorted organ. In that case organ must be set lower than bass, though.


I made 96k test recordings with live drums. My immediate though was cymbals sounded more like they sound when listening them straight from mixing desk. 48 and 44.1 kill the last 0.02% of the authentic live feel ... but I could hear the difference only with a fresh pair of ears if listening very carefully.  44.1 is good enough for me and the missing  0.02% is easy to compensate by doing better mixes and arrs. :)


John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 10:59:12 (permalink)
I'm willing to believe that people have different tolerances for latency, but I'm *really* skeptical about the sampling rate thing. The uncontroversial fact of the matter is the *nobody* can hear at higher frequencies than 22khz, so 44.1 recording (according to the Nyquist theorem) covers the entire audible range for everybody.

So, by necessity, we are claiming that there is some kind of ultrasonic interaction that affects clarity in the audible range. I know this claim has been made, but as far as I am aware, not convincingly, and not backed up by testing.

Interestingly, higher sampling rates do seem to affect distortion in the audible range, but the kicker is, they make it worse, not better.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:00:17 (permalink)
This might add up to subjectively "better" sound for some tastes, though, can't rule that out.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:01:23 (permalink)
Oh goody...let's talk about aliasing now...

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:10:47 (permalink)
I'm also known as BeautifulHunk2
Danny Danzi
Moderator
  • Total Posts : 5810
  • Joined: 2006/10/05 13:42:39
  • Location: DanziLand, NJ
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:12:37 (permalink)
The Kiosk Project



As someone who spends a fair bit of time on stage performing with wireless systems (wandering into the audience), you get more than about 20' off the stage... and the latency starts to get pretty uncomfortable.
Jim Roseberry



Thats a very interesting fact Jim. I am currently putting together a new band as lead guitarist and have been looking at some wireless rigs for my guitars. I had never considered this. Are you saying that the latency is less if you stay stagebound? (I am talking small club / bar stages here) Is that to do with the processing of any interference in the weakened single as I cant see that the distances involved could possibly be effected by the speed of transmission...


I know this should be for the equipment or coffee house but I couldn't help but respond to the comment...


Garry

Hi Gary,
 
I just wanted to share this with you as I'm a total stickler for wireless units. I've tried every single one I could get my hands on. The best is the Sony which is of course about 5k non-negotiable. But to be honest, I didn't want to be wireless THAT bad. LOL!
 
I've tried Beyerdynamic, Nady, Samson, AKG, Shure, Sennheiser, and all the new/old models of the aforementioned companies. None of them were to my liking...so I've stuck with a chord all these years. Until now. I happened to read some really good reviews about the Line 6 Relay G90. Well, I decided to order one to try it. I have an arrangement with the company I buy from that I can just send something back if it's not for me no matter what it is. They usually let me use it for a month or so and then I either return it or send them the cash.
 
But anyway, I get this thing...set it up for the most part (you'll understand what I mean by "for the most part" in a second lol) and start walking around my house. Up stair, around corners, half way up my attic steps, out side in my front yard, out side in my back yard...this thing just wouldn't quit or drop out. I come to find out, I didn't even have the antenna's hooked up and it still kicked my butt!!!!!!!!!
 
Some of the cool features about it:
 
I cannot tell a difference between it and my cable. I recorded with both...0 difference. They have a cable selector/simulator that works fantastic built into this thing.
 
Rechargeable batteries work like a charm. You literally get 7 hours out of them to the numbers using Eveready's. The battery meter on both the transmitter and receiver are spot on and at a glance, you know how much juice you got.
 
You can change the color of the LED readout to various cool colors to match your other readout lights.
 
You can put the antenna's on the front or the back. This way (in the back) you never have to take them off like you would in the front as most rack lids in the front won't let you keep your antenna's on. It works just as great on the back as it does the front.
 
I've gotten 0 drop-outs and no interference at all.
 
No loss of gain, no compressed tone, nothing synthetic.
 
Durable belt pack made of metal...detachable cable.
 
Custom channel saving with name label ability. I have a few transmitters...each one with the name of the guitar on the transmitter.
 
Way more channels than you'll ever need.
 
Drawbacks:
 
Only two. The first is, with the rechargeable batteries, (though they work and perform flalessly) there's a bit of an error with the battery timer when you first fire the unit up with a battery that's been used a bit. This is one of the drawbacks of using rechargeables.....the meter needs a few minutes to read the battery correctly. For example, if you put a fully charged one in, it will read the right amount of time. If you use it all night at a gig and then fire it up the next night or whatever, it will read a number that may be a half hour to an hour off at first. After 3-5 minutes of being on, the correct battery life will show. If you do this with a REAL battery, it will give you the proper time without the 3-5 minute thing. They mention this flaw in the manual...so I knew about it. It's not messed me up or anything.
 
The next is, I got a little hum out of it that I could not get out no matter what I tried. Even with the unit powered off it had this little tiny 60 cycle hum in it. I know this was not my rack or anything in my rack. I took it out of the rack and set it up the same way...it just wasn't "Racked in". It still gave me this little hum. I use all new cables and stuff, so I figured it may be the unit. I grabbed one of those 3 prong to 2 prong adaptors and dropped the ground on it and it was completely gone. I don't like to use those things, but it solved the problem and I have a totally clean sound with 0 noise, hiss, it's perfect. I don't know if maybe the hum is a flaw with my unit or this is something they all have, but the little ground lift worked...so I never looked into it any further.
 
That's the only issues I had though. It's definitely the best wireless I've ever used for guitar. I play some pretty nice size rooms and outdoor gigs...it's been flawless for every one. Definitely check one of these out when you get a chance. I promise you won't be sorry. Hope this helps.
 
http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/RelayG90/ If you scroll through the reviews, I put one up there because I was so blown away by this. It's pretty much along the lines of what you've read here though. :)
 
Sheesh...I'm way off topic...sorry about that guys...just trying to help a few brothers out. :)
 
-Danny
post edited by Danny Danzi - 2012/03/13 11:18:39

My Site
Fractal Audio Endorsed Artist & Beta Tester
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:13:53 (permalink)
Do you reckon Danny has a typist on speed dial?
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:15:44 (permalink)
Or just some speed? :)

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:17:36 (permalink)
Sheesh...I'm way off topic...sorry about that guys...just trying to help a few brothers out. :)

LOL Danny. Has this thread ever been on topic?
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:17:48 (permalink)
Danny once described War & Peace as an interesting paragraph.
SEVerstraten
Max Output Level: -87 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 167
  • Joined: 2011/11/22 03:16:49
  • Location: Vechta, Germany
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/13 11:19:01 (permalink)
Wonder what came first: The flashy typing of the flashy axe wielding?
Page: << < ..2122232425.. > >> Showing page 21 of 31
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1