A revival of Project5 sounds interesting. At the right price, I would be interested in it AS IS. 

Magic Russ

iRelevant
A revival of Project5 sounds interesting. At the right price, I would be interested in it AS IS. 

Not until they update it to 64 bit and multi-core support.

This ^^^^^

I would love to have clip gain to be able to insert a fader or a knob on clips we decide to turn up or down..this would help in automation greatly..Thanks for letting me voice my concerns.

Hello and thank you.
 
Thank you for rescuing Sonar (or whatever it will come to be called) and thank you for providing this opportunity to report bugs and ask for features.
 
I don't have a lot to add to the feature list - except to say my priority would be improvement to the score editor - if possible including something which allows use the computer keyboard to enter notes - nobody's heard of XGWorks but it allowed users to type notes etc with the keyboard.  Very fast once you get use to it.  I know this won't be important to most users but I hope you will consider it.
 
The main reason I'm commenting is that I have found a bug today. 
 
I had a couple of projects I was working on the and the same error occurred in both. 
 
I had a few tracks and instruments set up and everything was OK.  I added an output to external midi.  Then the assignments to synths from all the other midi tracks (going to vsts) were wrong.  The first midi track was 'pointing to' the external midi even though I had not asked for this.  The next midi track was pointing to the first VST (not the second), etc.
 
The first time this happened I didn't realise Sonar had made the error.  And the next thing I did was delete a synth without deleting the associated tracks.  I do this to avoid losing the midi by mistake.  Then I tried to delete the audio track associated with the synth and Sonar crashed. 
 
This should be easy enough to fix I think. 
 
Anyway, I am very relieved and very grateful to you, Meng, and to Bandlab for all that you are doing.  I wish you all the best.
 
 
 
 

Better stability and you already mentioned about VS700 I'd very much like to see greater functionality between the software and the 700C for sure.
 
And keep the dark theme available, the light bright ones are harder on the eyes in the dark.

Sorry. This sentence is output by google translation.
 
1) Bug
  If you perform many copying and pasting on the MIDI track, the display contents may be broken and it may become inoperable.
2) Bug
  CAL does not execute the data within the target range in the order of the event list. Therefore, it may be unexpected results.
3) Feature
　Please make CAL script correspond to latest. If CAL is excluded from TDFKAS, I will use Cubase.
4) Feature
　I want you to correspond not only to stereo but also multi-channel VST. I especially want you to respond to surround which works with another software.
 (Example) 7.1 channel plug-in like Vienna Ensemblea Pro.
 
This is about to come up quickly. thank you for reading.
　

MOMENTUM : From what I have experienced over the past week , tirelessly slugging away with the I'Phone 'MOMENTUM' app, trying desperately to make some 'sense of my of my multitude of ( Yes.... questionable) song /tune concepts.........I JUST SHAKE MY HEAD ............and wonder..............."Now  that I have been exposed to this nifty  'modus opperandum' ........being MOMENTUM  .............how will I survive without it " ?
Momentum .........OR Its Better should be an essential inclusion in any future BL development.
Please Meng / Noel
Is there something in the Pipeline?
Cheers.........Frank H

1. Chord Track
2. Arranger Track
3. Notation Improvements
4. Better Stability
 

I don't know at what point we are 'cause I stoped reading the posts quickly 'cause I got tired of reading about gui changes, which made me think:

Can't we just stop changing the gui's. for visual stability reasons. If we are adding stuff it's fine by me but don't remove or move stuff around just to make room for new stuff.

The same is true for putting back the good gui stuff removed over the years....

Oh, and god the colors in S3 to S8.5 are "vivid" when compared to the current "palish" one we are now stuck with......even after making changes to the colors parameters int preferences......I just could'nt resist regardless of the above....(-:


Mario

Hi
I'm just in the process of building an AZCcontroller interface for my new MOTOR49
1) I need a command to show the Multidock, not toggle it like "D"
2) need a command to set focus on the Multidock, separate from show
3) need command to hide/show the bus pane in the multidock, make sure it retains the user set size of the bus pane and it does not reset the bus pane size like the hide/show menu item in the multidock
 
Thanks,
Sonar powered for life

Sonar is the best DAW. I want just some issues as following.
 

 
 

1. fix the current bugs
2. finish the current features

Just a quick suggestion here but would be hugely helpful.
 
Within projects with large track counts, lots of AUX tracks and patch points, upon setting up a send you're presented with a huge list to scroll through. This looks like the standard Windows list-box. I'd like an organised list, grouped into types with collapsable sections. In general, I'd like to see the new DAW present information like this in custom controls and not the bog-standard windows controls.
 
Thanks ;-)
 
 
 

Project Sync Groups (PSG's)

This is not a new idea. I've suggested it a couple of years ago.

Scenario
(Example) I recorded a 15 song (15 projects) of a punk band, where the drums, bass, and rhythm guitars are all recorded the same way. I mix one song, and within seconds, can copy the mix of drums, bass, guitars (maybe even vocals) over to the other 14 songs in a simple dialogue/wizard. If I go back and change a kick drum, for example, I can merely update the other mixes without even having to load them in Sonar by the click of a single button.

What can a PSG help with?
After mixing song #1, I put on a movie and manually copy all settings from the one mixed song to all other projects. It takes hours in some cases, because there is currently no suitable method to automate this. After all mixes are submitted to the artist, if the artist later decides she doesn't like the sound of the bass, for example, I will update one mix, get her approval, then have to open all other projects and update the bass there, as well. 

Notes

• In the dialogue/wizard, you can choose what elements on which tracks in a list of projects need to be updated/copied. Think of the wizard as being sort of like the Export dialogue. 
• Only the active project in Sonar is the current master.
• Only changes are applied. If a project's settings are corrupted, the engineer can opt for a full-sync of all PSG elements.
• As the mix progresses, you can add/remove elements or tracks and even remove or add projects from the PSG (Project Sync Group).
• (software) If a new Send is created, ask to create it, or automatically create it and report it.
• (software) If a failure occurs, report it (may be reported before changes are applied)
• Templates are 'a' way to accomplish this, but require the arduous, time-consuming process of importing audio, something not practical until all editing is done. Editing requires commitment, and Templates only give you one shot at synchronization.

Low-hanging fruit
While this idea might seem expensive or time-consuming, here's a start: Simply decrypt all element settings (fader, pan, Gain, FX Bin, PC-Channel, Sends, etc.) and outline them in a way so that external code can be used to edit the project files. This could be a read-writable section of the project, where any syntax errors will not affect loading of the file into Sonar, meanwhile can be reported.

Impliment full midi librarian, easy to use, for all midi devices. Make it auto discover and setup wizard if selected.