Sound Quality of Sonar X1

Page: << < ..1617181920.. > >> Showing page 17 of 31
Author
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 13:08:33 (permalink)
I certainly wouldn't place all the blame on his kid. Other people's kids in general are annoying little oiks. Sure the parents think they are wonderful but there's nothing more irritating than other people's kids, with possibly the exception of a missing metronome.
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 13:12:11 (permalink)
SteveStrummerUK


 
Did I miss the group hug  

...I think you did not miss much....lol!!!

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 13:13:12 (permalink)
mmmmm...I see that I had to post something to get someone else's post to display again...weird ....

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 13:16:41 (permalink)
Yes mine went missing too. I thought Cake had taken it and placed it in their top ten list of great posts. I have the other 9 places.
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 13:25:49 (permalink)

Maybe we've rematerialised in the Twilight Zone Coffee House.

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

brozobob
Max Output Level: -90 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 30
  • Joined: 2006/03/08 02:05:47
  • Location: Detroit, MI
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:01:28 (permalink)
John T


Where did everybody go? Surely we can get this up to 20 pages. I'd like to pick up on brozobob's point: I think a lot of mix problems I have are the fault of his son. I'm wondering how widespread this is.

Be nice John; only I'm allowed to talk about my son.  One day, he'll grow up to be embarrassed by his old man....for that gift, only I have the privilege of mentioning him.  

Tools: Sonar Producer X1c // PC Dual Core Intel/Giga/Windows XP 32 bit // E-MU 1616M // M-Audio BX5a studio monitors // M-Audio Axiom 61 // Korg
PadKontrol // Amplitube 2 // Dimension Pro // Rapture //  V-Station // FM8 // Battery // EZ Drummer // Carvin Bolt // Fender Stratocaster // Tradition Jerry Reid Pro Tele // Alvarez 5056 // Vox AC4TV // Roland BC-60/310 // Blackstar HT-60 Soloist
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:01:49 (permalink)
SteveStrummerUK


 
Did I miss the group hug  


No, but in case you missed the punch-line.

http://forum.cakewalk.com/fb.ashx?m=2514268

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:04:32 (permalink)
Lanceindastudio


Exactly what I was thinking 

Jind


Jonbouy


The inference I get is that when folk here don't like what's being said about their favourite DAW software they'd rather collude to make a bunch of noise to drown out that voice rather than listen to what is actually being said.



I think that's a bit unfair - the end result turned out being that it was not any inherent flaw in the audio engine, that regardless of DAW used, the sound was the same.  This thread went off topic the moment folks started responding with the premise that somehow certain DAW programs were better for certain types of recordings or had inherent "flavor". I suspect if that path was never taken and the original OP had posted audio files with his original post, this would be a much shorter (albeit less entertaining) thread. This was not Sonar fanboys protecting the almighty DAW, it was people saying it must be something other than the "flavor of a given DAW".  Ultimately those that ruled out the DAW being the culprit (aside from a valid complaint about the Interleave button no longer being visible) were correct - human error ruled the day (none of can say they have not made assumptions in the past or are error free 100 percent of the time - human error tends to be the most likely culprit in many cases).


Lessons learned:


If you have a problem with the "sound" of something it's always helpful to post samples of what you are hearing with the original problem report so others can use there ears to see if they hear the same thing. 


We have some very experienced folks with very good ears here. Great catch on the underlying issue.



Jind and Lance before you snowball into a whole defence force I was talking about this forum generally not the thread specifically.  If you check back you'll see it was a response to Karl's light-hearted general post.

I note you bypassed the bit about the new Rewire too.

And there ya go as if to provide a perfect example of what I'm referring to.
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/03/12 14:12:44

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:06:48 (permalink)
Jonbouy


SteveStrummerUK



Did I miss the group hug  


No, but in case you missed the punch-line.

http://forum.cakewalk.com/fb.ashx?m=2514268

 
Yes I saw that mate, I'm one of the sad buggers that have read every post on this fred...
 
 
I've certainly been keeping taabs on it
 
 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

jamesg1213
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 21760
  • Joined: 2006/04/18 14:42:48
  • Location: SW Scotland
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:12:28 (permalink)
SteveStrummerUK


 
 
I've certainly been keeping taabs on it
 
 


GYC Steve.

 
Jyemz
 
 
 



Thrombold's Patented Brisk Weather Pantaloonettes with Inclementometer
BenMMusTech
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2606
  • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
  • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:23:38 (permalink)
17 pages on the sound quality of Sonar, go learn how to mix and then debate the sound quality.

Apples and Oranges, if you know how to mix even audacity will sound great.

Sorry 5 in the morning here and still a little drunk, but come on guys there is little difference in DAW's it all about YOU and how you use your tools, hmm sounds vaguely sexual.

I suppose music makeing is a form of masturbation, so is talking on forums about the sound quality of DAW's.

Smiley Face Smiley Face and then some.

Peace Ben 

Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
http://1331.space/
https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:26:54 (permalink)
BenMMusTech


17 pages on the sound quality of Sonar, go learn how to mix and then debate the sound quality.

Apples and Oranges, if you know how to mix even audacity will sound great.

Sorry 5 in the morning here and still a little drunk, but come on guys there is little difference in DAW's it all about YOU and how you use your tools, hmm sounds vaguely sexual.

I suppose music makeing is a form of masturbation, so is talking on forums about the sound quality of DAW's.

Smiley Face Smiley Face and then some.

Peace Ben 

 
If your tool is 'smart' you'll be good to go
 
 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

BenMMusTech
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2606
  • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
  • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:29:16 (permalink)
No after 8 bottles of spirits in less than two weeks I feel a little droopy!!

Steve Peace Ben

Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
http://1331.space/
https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
BenMMusTech
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2606
  • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
  • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:30:51 (permalink)
Wow 4 more posts, 3 after this and I have hit 800, it would have been more like a thousand had I not been a naughty boy.

Do I get a prize??

Oh yes, thats right the dunces's cap from jonbouy and go to my room!!

Peace Ben

Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
http://1331.space/
https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:33:00 (permalink)
Let's stay on topic. The imagery is disturbing.

I've opened two tabs to read this all in stereo but it keeps defaulting to one.
SteveStrummerUK
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 31112
  • Joined: 2006/10/28 10:53:48
  • Location: Worcester, England.
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:33:23 (permalink)

"Goodnight Jonbouy..."

"Goodnight Ben..."



Seems familiar - now where have I heard that before 

 Music:     The Coffee House BandVeRy MeTaL

trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 14:36:34 (permalink)
Sounds more like....

Party on Garth

Party on Wayne...



The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
frankandfree
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 447
  • Joined: 2008/04/26 11:56:32
  • Location: Norddeutschland
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:02:50 (permalink)
John T


Frankandfree is right, though, Reaper allowed 64 bit recording right from the off. Whether this means the whole signal path was 64 bit, I'm not sure.
The audio engine was/is 64bit float from end to end. 


Nevertheless, I wasn't well enough informed about the history of Sonar's engine. After some searching I found out that a 64bit audio engine was introduced with Sonar 6, not Sonar7 as I thought all this time. Apparently I was reading the advertisements for v7 wrong. In that case, assuming that Sonar 6 came out end of 2006, it was much more of a head-to-head race with a really close finish .
As it might have been a matter of days or weeks i hereby step back from my claim (this is the only reason why I even care to post this) and leave it to those who actually care to find out who may have "won" by a nose's length.



This Gearslutz thread includes a few interesting comments by the main Reaper developer Justin Frankel about the pros and cons of 64bit float calculation: http://www.gearslutz.com/board/q-justin-frankel-designer-reaper/118481-reaper-64-bit-engine.html

FastBikerBoy
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 11326
  • Joined: 2008/01/25 16:15:36
  • Location: Watton, Norfolk, UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:24:23 (permalink)
trimph1


kevo


Did you see this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-lN8vWm3m0

That really shows how our perception can be flawed...

I know my perception is.....


John T


Where did everybody go? Surely we can get this up to 20 pages. I'd like to pick up on brozobob's point: I think a lot of mix problems I have are the fault of his son. I'm wondering how widespread this is.


I should think that video link will be good for another 4 or 5 pages, there's bound to be someone who claims they are immune to it.
bitflipper
01100010 01101001 01110100 01100110 01101100 01101
  • Total Posts : 26036
  • Joined: 2006/09/17 11:23:23
  • Location: Everett, WA USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:26:03 (permalink)

"The world is full of marketing departments trying to convince you that equipment and specifications can substitute for talent & hard work. This is not true, the 'performance' transcends the medium every time. The performance includes musicianship, vocals, orchestration, arrangement and the mixing decisions. These are all under your control and have little to do with the DAW software you use or plugins you have."


Among the sea of virtual ink that's been devoted to this topic, this is probably the best paragraph ever written. It should be lesson #1 to be memorized and taken to heart by every newly-minted home recordist.


All else is in doubt, so this is the truth I cling to. 

My Stuff
Lanceindastudio
Max Output Level: -29 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4604
  • Joined: 2004/01/22 02:28:30
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:27:34 (permalink)
So true Bit!!!

Asus P8Z77-V LE PLUS Motherboard   
i7 3770k CPU
32 gigs RAM
Presonus AudioBox iTwo
Windows 10 64 bit, SONAR PLATINUM 64 bit
Lots of plugins and softsynths and one shot samples, loops
Gauge ECM-87, MCA SP-1, Alesis AM51
Presonus Eureka
Mackie HR824's and matching subwoofer
Noel Borthwick [Cakewalk]
Cakewalk Staff
  • Total Posts : 6475
  • Joined: 2003/11/03 17:22:50
  • Location: Boston, MA, USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:28:22 (permalink)

>> After some searching I found out that a 64bit audio engine was introduced with Sonar 6, not Sonar7 as I thought all this time.


That's still incorrect. The first public release of the 64 bit audio engine and a fully native 64 bit app was way back in SONAR 4 way before anyone else did it. We released a technology preview of the 64 bit app before Jan 2005. You can read about it in this KVR announcement.
http://www.kvraudio.com/news/cakewalk_releases_free_beta_version_of_64_bit_sonar_2901

Here is a white paper that was published around that time
http://www.cakewalk.com/Press/release.aspx/White-Paper-Benifits-of-x64-for-Audio-Workstations


Noel Borthwick
Senior Manager Audio Core, BandLab
My Blog, Twitter, BandLab Profile
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:30:34 (permalink)
I knew I should stuck with Sonar Le, Bit
BenMMusTech
Max Output Level: -49 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2606
  • Joined: 2011/05/23 16:59:57
  • Location: Warragul, Victoria-Australia
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:35:26 (permalink)
Hey Noel sorry about the imagery, I actually thought Sonar was one of the first to introduce 64 bit oversampling.

I don't know why you have bothered to join in on this one Noel, the people comparing apples and oranges should go back to mixing 1.1.

Bitflipper is correct.

Do I get a prize Noel.

Loving X1, what a fool I was to harp on and on and on and on and on about how the world ended when we went from 8.5 to X1.

Sorry about that, still a little drunk.

Do I get a prize smiley face!!, sorry cant be botherd opening the face thingy.

Peace Ben

Benjamin Phillips-Bachelor of Creative Technology (Sound and Audio Production), (Hons) Sonic Arts, MMusTech (Master of Music Technology), M.Phil (Fine Art)
http://1331.space/
https://thedigitalartist.bandcamp.com/
http://soundcloud.com/aaudiomystiks
John T
Max Output Level: -7.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6783
  • Joined: 2006/06/12 10:24:39
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:36:32 (permalink)
The face thingy is where the prizes are.

http://johntatlockaudio.com/
Self-build PC // 16GB RAM // i7 3770k @ 3.5 Ghz // Nofan 0dB cooler // ASUS P8-Z77 V Pro motherboard // Intel x-25m SSD System Drive // Seagate RAID Array Audio Drive // Windows 10 64 bit // Sonar Platinum (64 bit) // Sonar VS-700 // M-Audio Keystation Pro 88 // KRK RP-6 Monitors // and a bunch of other stuff
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:47:12 (permalink)
John T


The face thingy is where the prizes are.




"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
Jind
Max Output Level: -73 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 878
  • Joined: 2007/09/08 16:14:48
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:48:44 (permalink)
Jonbouy


Jind and Lance before you snowball into a whole defence force I was talking about this forum generally not the thread specifically.  If you check back you'll see it was a response to Karl's light-hearted general post. 

I note you bypassed the bit about the new Rewire too.

And there ya go as if to provide a perfect example of what I'm referring to. 

You really think I'm reinforcing your "defense force" claim by simply pointing out the OP's problem could have been resolved earlier by:


1. Instead of venturing into the "This DAW is better for Dance music, this one for Rock" conversation that ensued early on instead of troubleshooting with some sort of logical removal of variables most likely to result in differences in audio quality.


or


2. The lesson learned - include sample files of the audio when trying to determine if/and/why two different items sound different.


You truly think that's an example of Fanboism, a great Sonar Defense Force public relations statement?  
Truth be told, I have always been pretty clear that I could care less what any other person uses as a tool to make music as I too use many tools with the only bottom line being what works for me.  If anything I'm much more in the Craig Anderton school of thought of using the best tool for the task you are attempting to accomplish and that one size definitively does not fit all. 


My golden rule of product usage is the day I'm no longer happy with a product I use will be the day I stop using it, and that I could care less how anyone else creates music.


I'll continue to see happy users as nothing but happy users and people with problems as people with genuine problems they are trying to work through, it does not change whether they are on the Sonar Defense Force or the Moving on to Another Product team - use the tool that gets the work done for you is as simple a statement as there is.

Jind
 
Sonar X2 PE, Cakewalk V Studio 100; Intel i7 w/ 16 GB Ram, MS Windows 8.1
strikinglyhandsome1
Max Output Level: -3 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 7224
  • Joined: 2006/11/15 09:21:12
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:48:50 (permalink)
I can only see this thread ending if someone starts dating Yoko Ono and she comes along and posts in it.
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:50:52 (permalink)
strikinglyhandsome1


I can only see this thread ending if someone starts dating Yoko Ono and she comes along and posts in it.


Not likely IOW?

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
Jonbouy
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 22562
  • Joined: 2008/04/14 13:47:39
  • Location: England's Sunshine South Coast
  • Status: offline
Re:Sound Quality of Sonar X1 2012/03/12 15:59:42 (permalink)
Jind


Jonbouy


Jind and Lance before you snowball into a whole defence force I was talking about this forum generally not the thread specifically.  If you check back you'll see it was a response to Karl's light-hearted general post. 

I note you bypassed the bit about the new Rewire too.

And there ya go as if to provide a perfect example of what I'm referring to. 

You really think I'm reinforcing your "defense force" claim by simply pointing out the OP's problem could have been resolved earlier by:


1. Instead of venturing into the "This DAW is better for Dance music, this one for Rock" conversation that ensued early on instead of troubleshooting with some sort of logical removal of variables most likely to result in differences in audio quality.


or


2. The lesson learned - include sample files of the audio when trying to determine if/and/why two different items sound different.


You truly think that's an example of Fanboism, a great Sonar Defense Force public relations statement?  
Truth be told, I have always been pretty clear that I could care less what any other person uses as a tool to make music as I too use many tools with the only bottom line being what works for me.  If anything I'm much more in the Craig Anderton school of thought of using the best tool for the task you are attempting to accomplish and that one size definitively does not fit all. 


My golden rule of product usage is the day I'm no longer happy with a product I use will be the day I stop using it, and that I could care less how anyone else creates music.


I'll continue to see happy users as nothing but happy users and people with problems as people with genuine problems they are trying to work through, it does not change whether they are on the Sonar Defense Force or the Moving on to Another Product team - use the tool that gets the work done for you is as simple a statement as there is.


That's why I'm a Sonar fan, there's plenty or areas where I ain't though.

I will use my time here to attempt to progress the inherent flaws that crop up for me daily even though I'm well in the 90th percentile of satisfaction with the product generally.

Saying how great the new Rewire implementation is for example will not get it to the stage where it stops it from being able to cause the very same problem as the OP had here, other than it wouldn't have been down to user error.

Again despite my pointing out that you had, and still are, for reasons best known to yourself continuing to partially quote me completely out of context, I'll re-iterate, my comment was on the general conduct on this forum not this specific thread.

It also contained comment that the new 64 bit implementation is simply a port over from the previously existing flawed 32 bit one.  Again you didn't mention that bit.

 
post edited by Jonbouy - 2012/03/12 16:05:49

"We can't do anything to change the world until capitalism crumbles.
In the meantime we should all go shopping to console ourselves" - Banksy
Page: << < ..1617181920.. > >> Showing page 17 of 31
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1