Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1

Page: << < ..678910.. > >> Showing page 8 of 13
Author
joakes
Max Output Level: -72 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 905
  • Joined: 2006/12/05 15:51:24
  • Location: 465 Km South West of Paris
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 15:13:34 (permalink)
This fred is interesting, but why should, if I want to have & trial version of Pro Tools, get an iLok thingy ?

Basically you got to get one, so where is the trial and user's choice aspect if I don't have already an iLok or don't want to get one ?

Bummer, cos after reading this fred its whetted my appetite ........ NOT !
Jerry

Built by yours truely : I7-2600@3.4GHz, Asus P67Z68, W10x64 Creator Edition, 32GB RAM, 3 HD's, nVidia 760 GT, Focusrite 18i20 2,d Gen + Ti FW, Oxygen 61 iv Gen, and Edirol SD-20 (yes it works), CbB, Teles, Strats, LP's, Epi Riviera, etc
miguelito
Max Output Level: -83 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 391
  • Joined: 2009/12/19 09:18:15
  • Location: Bellingham, WA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 15:13:41 (permalink)
Based on the tenor of the last couple pages I'd say we're all losing.

Regards,

Mike

A Roseberry racer w/
Win7 Pro (64) fully loaded
RME UFX Fireface;
Sonar X2;
Guitars and amps. 
Axon 100 MKII,
M-Audio Keystation Pro 88,
Komplete 
All software latest revision
 
aleef
Max Output Level: -82 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 431
  • Joined: 2006/09/14 20:02:26
  • Location: la/ca
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 16:16:35 (permalink)
Is a major blanket statement. It works, if you sort of sequence synths via midi. If you need to produce bands, vocalists, record live concerts, record the London Philharmonic, compose the next great Hollywood score, rip off the backstreet boys from your bedroom and hopefully wind up golfing full time by 40... than you need Cubase, Pro-Tools, Sonar, DP, Logic... or something. Two of these are mac only. 1 of these is 32 bit. Do the math

 
i have never needed a DAW to capture a righteous performance.. there is no math involved..i dont use technology to hide the fact, that i make mistakes... and my equipment is inferior. it is what it is.. i had a 20yr background before the advent of DAWs.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Intel i7 3820 3.6 GHz
ASUS Sabertooth X79 16Gb   
SonarX2PE ProTools 11 
RME HDSP9632
Linear Phase
Max Output Level: -53 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2201
  • Joined: 2012/04/15 02:21:15
  • Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 16:36:56 (permalink)

I wanst being down on your skills.  If you know how to setup BASF on a reel 2 reel, and lock down a banging analog recording of the Eagles going through a Neve Desk..  HA..  You are a way better engineer/producer than I.

too many lasers...






Sonar = audio editing ninja of a music software!

soens
Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5154
  • Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
  • Location: Location: Location
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 18:41:31 (permalink)
Hmmm, It appears he knows something... or at least someone... we don't. His Sig says he's using X1P Expanded.
 

 
...
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 18:48:10 (permalink)
x1p ???
dude i need to update 12 more patches.
be right back.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 19:08:17 (permalink)
That means Sonar X1 Producer Expanded.

Best
John
Jimbo 88
Max Output Level: -57 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 1828
  • Joined: 2007/03/19 12:27:17
  • Location: Elmhurst, Illinois USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 20:33:17 (permalink)
Hey all this talk about Protools...I think Avid is in financial trouble and Sibelius (owned by Ptools and Avid) is about to shut down.   I've been hearing these things on other forums. 

Protools is not so profitable after all...
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 20:58:00 (permalink)
If they sink it's their own bloody fault. You cannot be that rigid and uncompromising in the modern consumer tech world. I'm sure they'll be able to keep contracts with the big studios though which is what they should have stayed focused on in the first place.
djwayne
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2021
  • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
  • Location: USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 22:01:24 (permalink)
Ya it's their own fault alright. I just tried downloading the PT 10 demo again and the first attempt failed at 84 % , the second attempt finally worked (this is three hours later) it wouldn't install over the PT SE I had so I had to un-install that. I finally get it to install then it tells me the iLok isn't working right, so I check the iLok account and my PT demo license expired June 1st 2012, so I try to get another license and I find out the rule is only one trial license allowed per iLok account. So you guessed it, I'm not allowed to demo the PT10, due to their policy, even though the download I attempted two months ago failed.  

Just as well, I checked Guitar Center's prices...Sonar producer is $399, Pro Tools 10 is $ 699.

And you wonder why.
Beepster
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 18001
  • Joined: 2012/05/11 19:11:24
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/08 22:39:41 (permalink)
I don't wonder at all. I'm lovin' Sonar and that $699 from PT would likely get you the PT equivalent of Sonar Essentials (if not less). I also hate being forced into buying specific hardware. Believe me there is no love lost for Avid and PT with me. I just view them all as different tools for a job. I liked Nuendo very much but I have no NEED for it nor the money to drop on it and I have no problems learning some new workflow techniques to make Sonar do what I like. I just hope my creations in X1 can be handled by the big boys on their fancy Macs and what not if I ever get called upon to step up to the plate. Really that is my only major concern. If a studio scoffed at me for sending them something I came up with in X1... well, I'd go to another studio that weren't stifled jagoffs. The point is most of us here love Cakewalk but it is always good to have discussions about other platforms. It keeps everyone on their toes and I'm sure the bakers have watched this thread to see where people's heads are at. It can only serve to create better products. I believe I've said it before... the fact the Cake guys set up this forum is pure genius. Not only does it provide a place for users to do a bulk of the tech support and testing it is also a huge resource in regards to market research. The more we talk the more they learn and the better the product gets. I think it's brilliant and to me it speaks of an extremely intelligent and hands on company. I like that and it shows in the final product. I am indeed becoming a Sonar fan boy but I am also extremely pragmatic about stuff... especially when it comes to me dropping what little money I have into my studio crap. Cakewalk was the way to go and believe me I look at them all in painstaking detail before making my final choice. Love the Cake. Love the forum. Cheers.
chuckebaby
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 13146
  • Joined: 2011/01/04 14:55:28
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 00:17:08 (permalink)
John


That means Sonar X1 Producer Expanded.


yes,it was a funny we were making.

Windows 8.1 X64 Sonar Platinum x64
Custom built: Asrock z97 1150 - Intel I7 4790k - 16GB corsair DDR3 1600 - PNY SSD 220GB
Focusrite Saffire 18I8 - Mackie Control
   
vintagevibe
Max Output Level: -51 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2446
  • Joined: 2003/12/15 21:45:06
  • Location: Atlanta, Ga
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 00:40:52 (permalink)
Jimbo 88


Hey all this talk about Protools...I think Avid is in financial trouble and Sibelius (owned by Ptools and Avid) is about to shut down.   I've been hearing these things on other forums. 

Protools is not so profitable after all...


Sibelius is not shutting down.  They are closing the London office and moving it elsewhere.
soens
Max Output Level: -23.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 5154
  • Joined: 2005/09/16 03:19:55
  • Location: Location: Location
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 00:42:49 (permalink)
(...)
post edited by soens - 2012/07/27 01:06:42
DonM
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4129
  • Joined: 2004/04/26 12:23:12
  • Location: Pittsburgh
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 07:50:36 (permalink)
Anderton


After extensive research, I have come to the following conclusion: Sonar is made by Cakewalk, and Pro Tools by Avid.



You remember well Twelve Tone Systems / 5 1/4" disks / The first MIDI interfaces / 12 voice Polyphony / and "Forward Motion" (Which I by the way own!)


Those were the daze


-D

____________________________________
Check out my new Album  iTunesAmazonCD Baby and recent Filmwork, and Client Release
 
DonM
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4129
  • Joined: 2004/04/26 12:23:12
  • Location: Pittsburgh
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 08:16:37 (permalink)
djwayne


Ya it's their own fault alright. I just tried downloading the PT 10 demo again and the first attempt failed at 84 % , the second attempt finally worked (this is three hours later) it wouldn't install over the PT SE I had so I had to un-install that. I finally get it to install then it tells me the iLok isn't working right, so I check the iLok account and my PT demo license expired June 1st 2012, so I try to get another license and I find out the rule is only one trial license allowed per iLok account. So you guessed it, I'm not allowed to demo the PT10, due to their policy, even though the download I attempted two months ago failed.  

Just as well, I checked Guitar Center's prices...Sonar producer is $399, Pro Tools 10 is $ 699.

And you wonder why.
W:


I have been running PT since V7.  I also run Samplitude, Sonar, the full Adobe Creation Suite, Sound Forge, Vegas, I could go on.  Since I teach Digital Media and produce for NPR I use just about everything.


PT is by far the most difficult DAW to install and keep running, add Waves and it is a real hobby for sure.  Thank goodness that Waves moved away from the iLok in V9.  I run Win7, OSX Snow Leopard and Mountain Lion in the studio.  I can assure you PT runs better on OSX.  I use PT on both OS platforms, but install and running is much better on OSX.  


By the way Sonar runs better under Windows :)


It is an understatement to say that Sonar is a far better value than PT.  Keep in mind you'd have to add the $1000+ CPTK to the $699 to even come close to Sonar.  


I am very conversant in both PT and Sonar.  I see them as two members in my ensemble.  Think McCartney and Lennon.  Very different, very competitive, specialists in certain areas, and also good on their own.  The only perspective I can share with you is that I never seen any tool as an exclusive member in my kit.  I have had tons of trouble keeping PT running on my Win7 system - but I have learned a lot from that.  I love learning since I am a teacher.  


I will certainly not ever try to convince anyone what DAW they should use, especially if they are recording themselves and not engineering client projects for CD, film, or broadcast like me.

Last week I was at one of my clients homes doing a DAC interface install and lessons on how to record his practice sessions.  He has a Grammy for best Classical Artist, and several Gold Records.  This guy is the real deal in my list of clients - he is using Garage Band.  He comes to me for tracking, mix and mastering when not working with his label.  The funny part of this story is ... I had never used Garage Band.  I had no idea what to do with the darn thing ... then it all started to make sense and we were off recording multiple takes.  What a waste of money for him to invest in anything else right now.

Just wait for Windows 8 and the next rev of Sonar - by that time Apple will have bought Avid and it will become Garage Band Pro

-D

____________________________________
Check out my new Album  iTunesAmazonCD Baby and recent Filmwork, and Client Release
 
John
Forum Host
  • Total Posts : 30467
  • Joined: 2003/11/06 11:53:17
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 08:59:20 (permalink)
Good to see you Don. 

Best
John
trimph1
Max Output Level: -12 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 6348
  • Joined: 2010/09/07 19:20:06
  • Location: London ON
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 09:10:45 (permalink)
I dunno. I tried PT10 and found it to be a PITA to load for pete sake. 

Sonar is just quick to load and get running here..love it.

The space you have will always be exceeded in direct proportion to the amount of stuff you have...Thornton's Postulate.

Bushpianos
Freddie H
Max Output Level: -39 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3617
  • Joined: 2007/09/21 06:07:40
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 09:31:14 (permalink)
Cubase works very good on Windows 7x64 too and so do Samplitude x64


-Highly developed spirits often encounter resistance from mediocre minds. -It really matters!
DonM
Max Output Level: -34 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4129
  • Joined: 2004/04/26 12:23:12
  • Location: Pittsburgh
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 12:21:38 (permalink)
John


Good to see you Don. 

John!  My mentor - good to be seen and good to see ya.

Hope all is well.  By far 2012 has been my most successful year regarding products and projects.  Despite the economy woes, I have had more billable hours in 2012 than since I started.  I miss being hear as much as a few years ago - but I realize I miss the folks more than the topics!

Best

-D

____________________________________
Check out my new Album  iTunesAmazonCD Baby and recent Filmwork, and Client Release
 
pwal
Max Output Level: -46 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2909
  • Joined: 2004/08/24 07:15:57
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 12:25:28 (permalink)
blimey

list of stuff
konradh
Max Output Level: -42 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 3325
  • Joined: 2006/01/16 16:07:06
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 13:47:50 (permalink)
With all due respect, why are we discussing this?  1-This is a Sonar users' forum. 2-All the major DAWs work and all have pros and cons.
Middleman
Max Output Level: -31.5 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 4397
  • Joined: 2003/12/04 00:58:50
  • Location: Orange County, CA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 13:49:54 (permalink)
Inquiring minds wanted to know.

Gear: A bunch of stuff.
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 14:05:15 (permalink)
I've read a few humorous posts, some public information about Avid's current state of affairs, and a good amount of back and forth bickering.  But has anyone actually gotten any useful information about PT or "PT vs. SONAR" in.... oh, I don't know, that last 4-5 pages?  Just curious.
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
djwayne
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2021
  • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
  • Location: USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 14:13:40 (permalink)
stevec


I've read a few humorous posts, some public information about Avid's current state of affairs, and a good amount of back and forth bickering.  But has anyone actually gotten any useful information about PT or "PT vs. SONAR" in.... oh, I don't know, that last 4-5 pages?  Just curious.
 


Yes, I found out that to build up Pro Tools to the same level as Sonar, it would cost an additional $1000 over the $699 initial price. So you're looking at around $1,700 ........that may be chicken feed for the gods, but us mere mortals must stay with in our budgets.
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 14:21:27 (permalink)
Yes, I found out that to build up Pro Tools to the same level as Sonar, it would cost an additional $1000 over the $699 initial price. So you're looking at around $1,700 ........that may be chicken feed for the gods, but us mere mortals must stay with in our budgets.

 
Yeah... I think the CPTK has always been needed to bring PTLE up to "normal" DAW standards when it comes to overall features. 
 
But geez...   your two acoustics alone don't run much less $$ than everything I have in my little studio.  
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
lowdown
Max Output Level: -85 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 300
  • Joined: 2004/04/14 16:07:38
  • Location: Essex - UK
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 14:24:56 (permalink)
vintagevibe
Sibelius is not shutting down.  They are closing the London office and moving it elsewhere.



Where are they moving to ? Just curious.


http://www.pro-tools-expert.com/home-page/2012/7/8/top-composers-express-anger-over-avid-sibelius-closure.html




Garry

http://soundcloud.com/garrycribb



Sonar X2B x64, W7 x64  
Cubase 7.5 x64

Intel i7/4790K 24 Gig Ram
Roland Quad Capture
djwayne
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2021
  • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
  • Location: USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 14:33:13 (permalink)
stevec



Yes, I found out that to build up Pro Tools to the same level as Sonar, it would cost an additional $1000 over the $699 initial price. So you're looking at around $1,700 ........that may be chicken feed for the gods, but us mere mortals must stay with in our budgets.

 
Yeah... I think the CPTK has always been needed to bring PTLE up to "normal" DAW standards when it comes to overall features. 
 
But geez...   your two acoustics alone don't run much less $$ than everything I have in my little studio.  
 


deleted
post edited by djwayne - 2012/07/09 23:05:26
stevec
Max Output Level: 0 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 11546
  • Joined: 2003/11/04 15:05:54
  • Location: Parkesburg, PA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 14:59:41 (permalink)
Today, money is much tighter.

 
Gotcha.    Nice selection either way.
 

SteveC
https://soundcloud.com/steve-cocchi
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=39163
 
SONAR Platinum x64, Intel Q9300 (2.5Ghz), Asus P5N-D, Win7 x64 SP1, 8GB RAM, 1TB internal + ESATA + USB Backup HDDs, ATI Radeon HD5450 1GB RAM + dual ViewSonic VA2431wm Monitors;
Focusrite 18i6 (ASIO);
Komplete 9, Melodyne Studio 4, Ozone 7 Advanced, Rapture Pro, GPO5, Valhalla Plate, MJUC comp, MDynamic EQ, lots of other freebie VST plugins, synths and Kontakt libraries
 
djwayne
Max Output Level: -55 dBFS
  • Total Posts : 2021
  • Joined: 2005/08/07 17:27:09
  • Location: USA
  • Status: offline
Re:Sonar X1 vs Pro tools 10 part 1 2012/07/09 15:50:56 (permalink)
Thanks. Work hard and save your money. That's what I was told by a very famous musician when I was about 12-13.  
Page: << < ..678910.. > >> Showing page 8 of 13
Jump to:
© 2024 APG vNext Commercial Version 5.1